testsigma
Topics
left-mobile-bg

14 Top Test Automation Frameworks in this Year

right-mobile-bg
14 Top Test Automation Frameworks in 2023
image

Start automating your tests 5X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma

Try for free

According to recent reports, the demand for automated software testing is continuously increasing. As a result, organizations are constantly seeking reliable and efficient test automation frameworks to save time and money. When many choices are available in the market, choosing the right one according to the testing needs would be the real challenge.

To assist you in making an informed decision, we have compiled a comprehensive guide of the 14 top test automation frameworks. These frameworks offer various features and are compatible with various programming languages, making them ideal for applications. By using these frameworks, software development teams can improve their testing efficiency, reduce the risk of errors, and enhance overall software quality.

What is a Test Automation Framework?

Test Automation Frameworks are like blueprints for making automated tests. They help you create efficient and repeatable tests that can be used on different platforms and applications. It also helps you use data-driven Testing and object-oriented programming and connect with other tools like version control systems.

Test frameworks provide structure to tests by setting up standard rules and procedures. This helps ensure that tests are efficient, effective, easy to maintain and debug. We’ve compiled a list of top test automation frameworks to help you find the best one for your needs.

When should You Use Test Automation Frameworks?

Test Automation Frameworks help streamline the process of creating automated tests. They provide a structure and set of tools that can be used to create an efficient and consistent approach to automated Testing. Test automation frameworks can be used in a variety of different situations, such as when:

1. The application being tested is complex or requires many tests.

2. There is a need for multiple test environments or platforms.

3. Tests must be run frequently and consistently across different application versions.

4. Tests must be integrated with other development processes, such as continuous integration or DevOps pipelines.

5. Tests require data-driven capabilities, such as parameterization or data-driven Testing.

6. Multiple teams work on the same project and must share test assets and results consistently.

Standard Types of Test Automation Frameworks

Here are the standard types of test automation frameworks which are generally used:

Depending on the need and requirement of the tester, there are specific widely used test automation frameworks with different functionalities which are preferred by the QAs, including:

Linear Scripting Framework:

This framework involves recording and linearly replaying test scripts with no or minor modifications. This is the first-generation testing method for automated software testing and has the most straightforward framework approach. Linear scripting framework is mainly used to test a web application‘s user interface wherein the testers record their step-by-step actions and playback the record tests.

Advantages

  • You don’t need to know how to write code, so you don’t need any special skills for test automation.
  • This is one of the quickest ways to create test scripts because you can record them in a short amount of time.
  • It’s easy for everyone involved in Testing since the scripts are set out in order.
  • It’s also a great way to start using automated Testing, especially with a new tool.
  • Most automated testing tools will have record-and-playback features, so you won’t need to plan too much.

Disadvantages

  • This framework makes it so your scripts can’t be used again. The information is stuck in the test script, which means you can’t run the same tests with different data sets and will have to change it if any of the information changes.
  • It’s also tough to keep up with since any changes to the application will take a lot of extra work. And when you’re trying to test more things, this model won’t handle it very well.

Data-Driven Framework:

This framework allows the tester to segregate the test script logic and data by storing it in an external database such as XML, CSV, Excel spreadsheet, text, etc. The best feature of this type of framework is that it reduces the number of scripts required to cover all the test cases, and it can modify test scenarios with code based on the data used. The data-driven framework has a drawback: a combination of external data sources may crash software tools and complicate manual Testing.

Advantages

  • Tests can be done with lots of different sets of info.
  • You don’t have to use the same data every time, so you can quickly check how things work in different scenarios.
  • This means you don’t have to write as many scripts, and you won’t need to keep changing the data each time you change the script.
  • Doing more tests faster will save you loads of time!

Disadvantages

  • You’ll need an experienced tester who knows a lot of programming languages to use this design the right way.
  • They have to find and organize the sources of data from outside and write code (make functions) that link the tests easily with those sources. It takes a lot of time to get a data-driven framework ready.

Keyword-Driven Framework:

In this type of framework, tables on a spreadsheet determine the action of a test script based on the assigned keywords. This framework offers the same benefits as a Data-driven framework with the added advantage that the user doesn’t need extensive coding knowledge. The framework is also application independent, i.e., not dependent on the application, programming languages, or automation tools. The main disadvantage of a Keyword-driven framework is that the initial investment of time and money is high.

Advantages

  • It is necessary to possess a limited amount of scripting knowledge.
  • A single keyword can be utilized in numerous test scripts, thus making the code reusable.
  • Test scripts can be created without relying on the application being tested.

Disadvantages:

  • Setting up the framework can be expensive and complicated. You need to figure out what keywords you want to use and create object libraries.
  • You also need someone who knows how to do test automation well. It can take a lot of work to keep track of all the keywords when trying to make your tests bigger.
  • You have to keep building out the object libraries and keyword tables.

Modular Testing Framework:

This framework divides the application under test into isolated modules that can be combined to make larger test scripts. The modular testing framework breaks down a user’s interaction with the application into smaller tests and recombines them to achieve specific goals. It is scalable and comes with a high level of modularization, resulting in more accessible and cheaper maintenance.

Advantages:

  • If you make any changes to the application, you won’t have to worry about the rest of the application.
  • You need to fix the module and its related test script. This makes creating test cases easier since you can use the same test scripts for different modules.

Disadvantages:

  • The test script has all the data already typed in, so you can’t use different data sets.
  • You need to know how to code to get the framework ready.

Hybrid Testing Framework:

This framework combines more than one of the above-mentioned frameworks to leverage the strengths of each. Hence it combines benefits from all its associated frameworks and avoids weaknesses. Most of the test automation frameworks that are developed for modern software development cycles are hybrid.

Advantages:

  1. Flexibility to choose between Data-driven and Keyword-driven frameworks, depending on what you need for your test.
  2. You can use the exact keywords, functions, and test data for multiple tests.
  3. It’s easier to make changes since you only have to update one place instead of all the individual test cases.
  4. Tests written with a hybrid framework are usually more understandable than those written with just one type of framework.

Disadvantages:

  1. Setting up and maintaining a hybrid framework can be more complicated than using just one framework.
  2. Team members might need extra training to use the hybrid framework properly.
  3. It could also cost more money to develop and maintain it, and debugging problems with it may be more challenging than with just one.

To be effective, these types of test automation frameworks should possess some key elements such as:

  • It should be easy to maintain and reusable
  • Should be scalable to future needs
  • Have reliability and consistency
  • Have high efficiency
  • Should have maximum test coverage

Read here about XCUI Test Framework

Benefits of Test Automation Framework Architecture

There is no question that test automation provides numerous advantages. A test automation framework is a set of guidelines and protocols that aid automated testing. This framework provides an organized testing structure, allowing faster, easier, and more efficient testing. There are many advantages to implementing a test automation framework, including the following:

  1. Increased productivity: Test automation frameworks help automate test cases, saving time and improving productivity.
  2. Improved accuracy: Automation frameworks help eliminate human errors, increasing overall accuracy.
  3. Reusability: Reusing test cases with automation frameworks saves time and money.
  4. Reduced cost: Automation frameworks can reduce the cost of testing by eliminating the need for manual testing.
  5. Improved test coverage: We can ensure that all aspects of the software are tested with automation frameworks.
  6. Better test organization: Automation frameworks help keep tests organized, making finding and debugging problems easier.
  7. Easier maintenance: Maintenance is simplified by automation frameworks since they allow to use same test cases for multiple software versions.

How to Determine Which Framework is Right for Your Organization?

Every team and every project has requirements for test data management, test behavior specification, error handling, reporting, etc. Before finalizing the ideal framework for your organization, you should ask these questions to yourself:

  1. Does the application have a complex flow? Have a look at the testing requirements.
  2. What is the user experience like, and consider the technology used in the application?
  3. Determine the costs associated with each framework.
  4. Can your team easily plug into one of the frameworks? Evaluate the skill set of your team within the organization.
  5. What guidelines will give the desired results of the automated tests?
  6. Which tools would be ideal for your organization before designing an approach that fulfills all the requirements?
  7. What is the technical proficiency of the people who will maintain test automation?
  8. What types of reporting are expected from the automation?

It is best to create a scorecard to assess several parameters, including scripting, integration, reports generated, usage, etc. while evaluating multiple tools. Test automation frameworks will establish the guidelines to achieve the desired goals of automated tests. But a qualified and proficient test automation professional should be involved in considering the design and implementation of automation frameworks or the selection of software tools.

Top 14 Test Automation Frameworks List

Software development teams have embraced test automation in the past decade to increase their tests’ speed, accuracy, and repeatability. Automation testing frameworks provide the foundation for building automated tests, making it easier to maintain, execute, and report results. Various automation testing frameworks are available, each offering unique features and capabilities.

This blog post discusses the 14 top test automation frameworks, features, and pricing. Finally, we will review best practices for getting the most out of automated testing. Read on to learn more about the 14 top test automation frameworks.

Testsigma

Testsigma utilizes AI-based test automation to generate robust and dependable test automation scripts. It helps to reduce manual effort. Also, ensuring that tests are reliable, accurate, and comprehensive enough to detect bugs. Besides, it ensures that all tests are wide enough to cover all possible scenarios of an application under test.

Testsigma Dashboard showing all the sections

More Features

1. Zero Setup Required.

The “Cloud-based” version will be available for use on the cloud and is a premium version. All test automation workflows, such as authoring, execution, and reporting, are all performed on the cloud – how cool is that?

2. Ease of Test: Testsigma supports test creation in plain English. Thus, test creation is as easy as writing test cases in English. Similarly, test case maintenance is easy too.

3. Multiple Platforms: Testsigma lets you automate tests for web, mobile, APIs, and desktop from the same place using the same approach.

4. Headless browser automation: With the support of headless browser automation, you can further speed up the execution of your test cases with Testsigma.

5. Support for loops: Testsigma has been designed to accommodate complex looping workflows like if-else, for, and while.

6. Networking Control: Testsigma simulates the manipulation of network connection state and latency during test execution.

7. Data-driven testing: Testsigma can check large data sets to identify patterns and trends that can be used to inform the testing process.

8. Parallel testing: Testsigma allows parallel testing at both the case and suite levels, allowing for greater efficiency and time savings in the testing process.

9. Cross-browser testing: In the Testsigma platform, users can execute a single test case on multiple browsers. The test execution can be done on your local devices or the device cloud of your choice. Thus ensuring the consistency and reliability of the test case across all browsers.

10. Visual testing: Via this feature, you can easily catch any visual errors in your application.

Advantages

  • AI-driven testing streamlines test creation and maintenance.
  • Codeless test automation reduces reliance on programming expertise.
  • Cross-browser testing ensures consistent performance across different browsers and platforms.
  • Offers data-driven testing and parallel testing execution support.
  • Provides the option to automate headless testing to speed up the test execution process.

Disadvantages

  • Pricing might be a concern for small teams or individual testers, especially for advanced features.

Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma’s unified platform.

Try for free

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium is the perfect solution if you’re looking for an open-source tool for web browser testing. With Selenium, you can create automated tests that interact with your web application and ensure it functions correctly. This platform limits its support to web browser automation and does not provide support for mobile devices.

More Features

  1. Cross-Browser Testing: Selenium enables cross-browser testing, allowing users to verify their applications on multiple web browsers. It supports many browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer.
  2. Support for different languages: Selenium is a powerful tool for automating tests for web applications. Testers can write tests in popular languages like Java, Python, C#, etc., and execute them across different browsers.
  3. Multiple Platform Support: Tests built using Selenium can be executed on multiple platforms, such as Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.
  4. Parallel Test Execution: Via Selenium Grid, Selenium enables users to execute tests in parallel, thereby providing the capability to run multiple tests concurrently.

Advantages

  • Open-source nature fosters community collaboration and continuous improvement.
  • Supports multiple programming languages, providing flexibility to developers and testers.
  • Extensive browser compatibility ensures broad coverage across popular web browsers.

Disadvantages

  • Requires programming skills, making it less accessible for non-technical testers.
  • Complex setup and configuration may intimidate beginners and slow down testing initiation.
  • Lacks built-in reporting and test management features, necessitating integration with additional tools.

Karate

Testsigma - Karate

Let’s talk about Karate. Is it the martial art initially developed in Japan? What do you guess, the legendary Bruce Lee may have practiced this art during his free time?

Karate is a testing framework that follows the Cucumber style of programming and the Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) approach, making it easy to understand for non-programmers. Karate offers UI testing capabilities that enable developers to interact with web pages and test user interfaces. This includes clicking buttons, entering text, and validating elements on the page. It is the only API testing tool to offer a combination of API automation, UI test automation, and performance testing in a single standalone tool. You can quickly define test scenarios, run them in any order, and gain insights from the results. It’s the perfect way to ensure your product work as expected – without extra effort!

More Features

  1. Powerful Assertions: Karate facilitates the validation of web service responses through powerful assertions.
  2. Parallel Execution: Karate enables parallel execution of tests, making it an ideal solution for teams working on complex web applications.
  3. Flexible Reporting: Karate offers versatile reporting capabilities, enabling developers to generate report outputs in HTML, XML, and JSON formats.
  4. Plain English Test Steps: Karate enables developers to create readable and maintainable tests using Gherkin.
  5. Easy to Integrate: Karate is compatible with existing tools and frameworks, such as Jenkins, Maven, and Eclipse.
  6. Framework: Karate is a Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) testing framework, as opposed to Test-Driven Development (TDD). It is relatively concise to create a framework.
  7. In-house support: This system offers internal support for transitioning configurations between various testing environments (QA, Stage, Production, and Pre-Production).
  8. Built-In: This software is equipped with native rest reports and can be integrated with Cucumber to facilitate UI reports and provide greater clarity.

Advantages

  • Combines API testing and behavior-driven development (BDD) for comprehensive test coverage.
  • Supports testing of both REST API and GraphQL services.
  • Easy-to-read test scenarios enhance collaboration between technical and non-technical team members.

Disadvantages

  • Limited support for non-HTTP protocols may constrain testing possibilities for certain applications.
  • The learning curve for newcomers to BDD concepts and syntax may slow down initial adoption.
  • Dependency on the Groovy language may limit integration with projects using other programming languages.

Katalon

katalon

Katalon Studio provides an easy-to-use, comprehensive set of capabilities for the creation and execution of automated tests. It supports automated testing with the ability to record actions as they are executed. This allows users to quickly create automated tests that can be used again in future testing cycles.

More Features

  1. Cross-platform compatibility: Katalon Studio offers cross-platform compatibility with Windows, macOS, and Linux. This enables developers to create and execute tests across various operating systems quickly.
  2. Smart recording and playback: Katalon Studio boasts a smart recording and playback feature that enables users to expedite the automation test creation process.
  3. Comprehensive reporting: Katalon Studio offers comprehensive reporting of test execution. This affords users the ability to assess and debug their tests conveniently.
  4. Flexible scripting: Katalon Studio facilitates the creation of tests in multiple scripting languages: Gherkin and Groovy, granting users the freedom to utilize the language of their preference.

Advantages

  • An all-in-one test automation solution simplifies testing setup and management.
  • User-friendly interface reduces the learning curve for new users and promotes productivity.
  • Built-in test reporting features provide visibility into test results and facilitate collaboration among team members.

Disadvantages

  • Limited customization options may hinder advanced testing requirements or specific use cases.
  • Scalability challenges for large test suites may impact performance and maintenance efficiency.
  • Additional plugins or integrations may be necessary to access advanced features, potentially increasing complexity.

Appium

appium
appium

Appium is a test automation tool for Android and iOS apps.

Features:

  1. Supports Multiple Languages: Appium is compatible with various programming languages, including Java, Objective-C, C#, PHP, Python, and Ruby, as long as that language has a Selenium client library.
  2. Supports Multiple Platforms: Appium supports automation of tests for mobile apps on iOS, Android, and Windows.

Advantages

  • The cross-platform mobile testing capability allows testing of both iOS and Android applications.
  • Supports multiple programming languages, offering flexibility to developers and testers.
  • Robust support for native, hybrid, and web apps ensures comprehensive mobile testing coverage.

Disadvantages

  • Complex setup processes and configuration may require additional time and expertise to overcome.
  • Slower execution speed compared to native testing frameworks may affect testing efficiency, especially for large test suites.

Eggplant

Eggplant is an automated testing framework to create and run tests for mobile, web, and desktop applications. It enables users to build tests quickly and easily, run them on multiple platforms, and get results quickly. It automates the application and user interaction process, records user actions, and compares results against expected behavior. Eggplant tests can be executed on physical devices and simulators, allowing for testing in various environments. Eggplant also allows integration with other tools, such as Jenkins, for continuous integration and delivery.

More Features

  1. Image Recognition: Eggplant employs a strong image recognition algorithm to determine UI elements on a device or application.
  2. Cross-Platform: Eggplant is an effective tool for testing applications across multiple operating systems and platforms.
  3. Data-Driven Testing: Eggplant creates data-driven test scripts and enables users to leverage external data to test their applications.
  4. Pricing: Eggplant is a commercial test automation software that enables users to create automated tests for mobile, web, and desktop applications.

Advantages

  • Image-based testing allows for intuitive test creation and validation of complex UI elements.
  • Cross-platform support for desktop, mobile, and web applications offers versatility in testing environments.
  • Powerful AI-driven automation enhances test coverage and identifies UI changes or anomalies effectively.

Disadvantages

  • The high cost of ownership may be prohibitive for small teams or organizations with budget constraints.
  • Training and proficiency in using Eggplant’s features may be required to maximize its capabilities.
  • It may not be suitable for all testing scenarios, particularly those involving non-visual aspects or backend functionality.

Ranorex

Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio

This is quick and easy to configure, enabling you to commence automated testing quickly. Ranorex Studio offers integrated reporting capabilities, enabling users to monitor test results efficiently.

More Features

  1. Cross-Platform & Cross-Device Support: Ranorex Studio boasts compatibility with a wide range of platforms and devices, allowing for the easy creation of tests for various operating systems. It supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and web applications across desktops, laptops, tablets, and smartphones.
  2. Easy Data-Driven Testing: Ranorex Studio enables data-driven testing with the ability to execute multiple tests with variant data sets.

Advantages

  • User-friendly IDE facilitates test creation and management, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • Supports desktop, web, and mobile testing, offering versatility in testing different types of applications.
  • Robust object recognition capabilities enhance test stability and maintainability, even in dynamic UI environments.

Disadvantages

  • Proprietary licenses may increase the cost of ownership, especially for larger teams or enterprises.
  • Additional plugins or integrations may be required for certain features or integrations, potentially increasing complexity.

TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete offers automated testing solutions for desktop, web, and mobile applications. It is a robust and straightforward tool that accelerates software testing procedures. TestComplete provides a complete test report feature for users. With this, users can create detailed documentation about the results of automated tests.

More Features

  1. Test Visualizer: TestComplete’s feature offers a graphical view of test steps and results. This allows for the efficient identification of errors and bugs within the software.
  2. Cross-Platform Support: TestComplete provides comprehensive support for Windows, Linux, Mac, iOS, and Android platforms.
  3. Object Identification: TestComplete is provided with object identification capabilities. This lets it identify objects in an application regardless of their on-screen representation. This improves the efficacy and accuracy of automated testing.

Advantages

  • Scriptless test creation streamlines test development and maintenance, empowering non-technical users to participate in testing.
  • Built-in test management features provide visibility into test execution and results, facilitating collaboration among team members.

Disadvantages

  • The proprietary license may result in higher upfront costs.
  • Limited support for certain technologies or platforms may necessitate additional tools or workarounds to address specific testing requirements.

Test Studio

Test Studio facilitates the development of automated tests with its user-friendly UI and point-and-click approach. Its visual debugger enables users to effectively navigate their tests and observe the condition of their application at every step. Test Studio facilitates automated testing at regularly scheduled intervals and integration with continuous integration systems to boost test automation.

More Features

  1. Cross-Browser Testing: Test Studio enables users to perform tests across multiple web browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, with ease.
  2. Data-Driven Testing: Test Studio eases users to construct data-driven tests conveniently by drawing data from external sources like databases, Excel sheets, and additional external sources.
  3. Cross-Platform Testing: Test Studio allows cross-platform testing, enabling users to execute their tests on Windows and Mac operating systems.
  4. Robust Security: Test Studio implements thorough security measures to safeguard confidential test data and secure data accuracy.

Advantages

  • Visual test automation streamlines test creation and maintenance.
  • Supports both web and mobile testing.
  • Built-in test reporting and analytics provide insights into test execution and results.

Disadvantages

  • Limited support for non-Telerik products may require additional tools or workarounds for certain integrations.
  • It may require additional plugins or extensions for advanced features.

Cucumber

cucumber

Cucumber enables developers to create automated tests efficiently through user stories. These are written in plain language that can be mapped to computerized tests. Cucumber’s easy syntax is expressed using plain language text called Gherkin, which is written in a way that makes it easy for non-programmers to understand the behavior of an application. An example of Gherkin syntax is: Given I am on the homepage When I click the “Sign Up” buttonThen I should be taken to the signup page

More Features

  1. Cross-platform: Cucumber is open for multiple platforms, including Windows, Mac, and Linux.
  2. Support for multiple languages: Cucumber supports various programming languages, such as Java, Ruby, and Python.
  3. Reporting: Cucumber offers vast reporting of test results, enabling the identification of areas requiring improvement.

Advantages

  • BDD framework promotes collaboration between technical and non-technical team members.
  • Easy-to-read test scenarios enhance communication and understanding of test requirements among stakeholders.

Disadvantages

  • Requires additional setup and configuration for integration with test automation tools.
  • Dependency on Gherkin syntax may limit expressiveness and flexibility in test scenario design for certain use cases.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO facilitates automated testing of web applications, leveraging the WebDriver protocol to control and execute tests in a browser.

More Features

  1. Cross-Platform Compatibility: WebdriverIO supports multiple browsers and environments, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and IE. It also supports running tests on mobile devices.
  2. Flexible configuration: WebdriverIO has an extensible configuration, letting users customize their setup to fit their specific needs.
  3. Command-line interface: WebdriverIO features a command-line interface (CLI) that provides an easy way to interact with the tool.
  4. Time-saving features: WebdriverIO features such as automatic screenshotting, automatic waiting, and automatic retries help reduce the time spent writing tests.

Advantages

  • JavaScript-based test automation allows for seamless integration with modern web development frameworks.
  • Supports synchronous and asynchronous testing.

Disadvantages

  • Limited support for non-JavaScript projects may restrict usage in environments with diverse technology stacks.
  • Documentation could be improved to address common use cases and provide clearer guidance for users.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a modern front-end testing tool built using JavaScript and focuses on making testing easier for developers and QA engineers. It uses a unique DOM manipulation technique and runs directly in the browser, providing a more developer-friendly approach to testing applications.

More Features

  1. Easy Setup: Cypress can be quickly installed and configured.
  2. Visible Test Runner: Cypress features an interactive test runner that can provide quick feedback regarding test output.
  3. Automatic Waiting: Cypress allows for the synchronization of commands and assertions, eliminating the need for additional waits and sleeps in tests.
  4. Multi-Browser Support: Cypress enables tests to be executed across multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
  5. Continuous Integration: Cypress combines seamlessly with ongoing integration services such as Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI.

Advantages

  • Fast and reliable test execution improves testing efficiency and turnaround time for feedback.
  • Built-in test runner and assertion library streamline test development and execution.

Disadvantages

  • Limited support for cross-browser testing may restrict usage in environments requiring broader browser coverage.
  • Requires understanding of asynchronous JavaScript and event-driven architecture.

Robot Framework

Testsigma - Robot Framework

Robot Framework is an open-source framework for automated testing and acceptance testing. It is written in Python and leverages the Selenium 2 library for browser automation. Robot Framework features an integrated development environment (IDE), RIDE, providing users with an accessible platform to create, edit, and debug tests.It has been used in various contexts, including web applications, embedded systems, desktop applications, and mobile applications. It also automates web crawling, data extraction, and scraping tasks.

More Features

  1. Easy to use: Robot Framework employs a direct tabular test data syntax for enhanced understanding. It facilitates the separation of test data from test cases for simpler maintenance.
  2. Extensibility: Robot Framework enables users to extend its capabilities by creating their test libraries and custom keywords. This allows users to develop tests customized to their requirements and environment.
  3. Cross-platform: Robot Framework is a cross-platform, open-source automation framework written in Python, with support for Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems.

Advantages

  • Keyword-driven testing framework simplifies test creation and maintenance.
  • Supports a wide range of libraries and plugins.
  • Platform-independent nature allows for cross-platform testing.

Disadvantages

  • Requires proficiency in Python or other supported languages, potentially limiting adoption for teams with different skill sets.

Read here – Robot framework vs Cypress

EarlGrey

The test creation in EarlGrey grabs user interactions while the test is active and generates a video of the test’s execution.

Features

  1. Synchronous execution: EarlGrey offers a synchronous API for test execution, where tests are executed sequentially in the same thread, thus facilitating debugging.
  2. Element Interaction: EarlGrey offers an API enabling users to interact with UI elements, such as tap, swipe, and enter text.
  3. Networking Control: EarlGrey stimulates the manipulation of network connection state and latency during test execution.

Advantages

  • Native iOS UI testing framework ensures accurate and reliable testing of iOS applications.
  • Integrates seamlessly with Xcode and XCTest.
  • Supports advanced interactions and assertions.

Disadvantages

  • Limited to iOS app testing, restricting usage for organizations with cross-platform testing requirements.
  • Requires proficiency in Swift or Objective-C, potentially limiting adoption for teams with different programming language preferences.
  • It may not be suitable for all testing scenarios, particularly those involving non-iOS platforms or technologies.

Read here about – Test Automation Framework Design.

Conclusion

Automation frameworks help create a uniform, sustainable automated tests that can be reused. They can also help reduce the time and effort required to complete the testing process. Automation frameworks provide a range of benefits – from reducing costs and improving quality to reducing manual testing time.

When choosing the right test automation framework for your project, the key is to evaluate each tool’s features, capabilities, and cost. You should consider the size and complexity of your project, the language you are using, and the time and money you are willing to spend. Additionally, you should consider the long-term sustainability of the framework and the community’s support. Finally, you should consider the potential for integration with other tools and technologies. Considering these factors, you can decide which tool best suits your project.

Write automated tests in simple plain English for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs with Testsigma.

Try for free

Frequently Asked Questions

There is a quote by Lillian Smith:” When you stop learning, stop listening, stop looking and asking questions, always new questions; then it is time to die.” Ask and seek knowledge every time you learn anything new. Here are a few questions that many people search for quickly. Let us have a look at those.

Selenium is widely regarded as the most popular automated testing framework. It offers a robust set of tools and libraries for automating web browsers across various platforms and supports multiple programming languages, making it highly versatile. Additionally, Testsigma stands out with its AI-driven testing capabilities, streamlining test creation and maintenance. Both frameworks are widely adopted, catering to diverse testing needs and preferences within the software development community.

Which automation framework is easy?

The most popular and easy-to-use automation frameworks include Testsigma, Selenium, Appium, Cucumber, and Robot Framework. Each framework has its strengths and weaknesses, and which one you choose depends on your specific needs and requirements. Testsigma allows you to create automated test cases in simple English scripts, enabling everyone to create and run testcases.

What makes a good test automation framework?

Oh, Yes! We should know what a good test automation framework is. A good test automation framework should be customized to meet your project’s needs. It should be easy to use and maintain for your team and provide a return on investment. By customizing the framework to fit the project’s requirements, you can ensure that it will help you achieve the desired results.

Suggested Reading

imageimage
Subscribe to get all our latest blogs, updates delivered directly to your inbox.

RELATED BLOGS


Top 6 Game Testing Tools You Need to Know
RAUNAK JAIN
TEST AUTOMATION
Power of POC in Testing: Your Exclusive Guide to Success
VIJAYARAGHAVAN VASUDEVAN
AUTOMATION TESTINGTEST AUTOMATION
Test objects in software testing | Types & How to Create it?
RANJANA KODLEKERE
TEST AUTOMATION