Testsigma Agentic Test Automation Tool

Products

Solutions

Resources

AI agentsDocsPricing
Get a Demo

Stop spending weeks
on Salesforce tests that
break every release

Automate Salesforce UI, API, and integrations in one platform - without brittle Selenium/Playwright code or tool sprawl.

Write tests in plain English (admins + QA can contribute without heavy code)

Ship through Salesforce Spring/Summer/Winter releases with auto-healing
+ metadata sync

Run at scale across scratch orgs, sandboxes, and production with parallel
execution and unified reporting

G2 Cloud
Testsigma - Samsung
Testsigma - Zeiss
Testsigma - DHL
Testsigma - Kfc
Testsigma - Carrier
Amway
Testsigma - Sanofi
Testsigma - Nagra
Testsigma - Space42
Testsigma - Puma
Testsigma - VF Corporation
Arizona
Testsigma - Finance House
Testsigma - Iifl
Testsigma - Cisco
Testsigma - State Form
Testsigma - Kendra Scott
Testsigma - Samsung
Testsigma - Zeiss
Testsigma - DHL
Testsigma - Kfc
Testsigma - Carrier
Amway
Testsigma - Sanofi
Testsigma - Nagra
Testsigma - Space42
Testsigma - Puma
Testsigma - VF Corporation
Arizona
Testsigma - Finance House
Testsigma - Iifl
Testsigma - Cisco
Testsigma - State Form
Testsigma - Kendra Scott

Switching to automated testing for Salesforce?
Pick your starting point

Most teams come from manual testing, code-heavy frameworks, Salesforce-only tools, or a stitched-together stack. The fastest path for each is here.
Why testsigma

Coming from manual Salesforce testing?

Turn repeatable regression checks into automation quickly - without building a framework. Standardize reusable steps for Lightning and run them every release.

Why testsigma

Replacing Selenium, Playwright, or Cypress?

Never spend another sprint cycle fixing brittle scripts. Move to plain-English tests with self-healing and built-in reporting, so maintenance doesn’t block coverage.

Why testsigma

Moving from Provar/Copado or consolidating tools?

Keep Salesforce depth, then go beyond Salesforce. Test end-to-end workflows across apps, APIs, and data without stitching together execution grids and reporting.

Why Choose Testsigma for Salesforce
Test Automation?

Plain-English
automation that scales beyond the QA team

  • Create tests in plain English with reusable steps and parameters

  • Admins, analysts, and QA can collaborate on coverage

  • Reduce dependency on engineering for every change

Release resilience
for Spring, Summer, and Winter updates

  • Auto-healing to minimize breakage from UI and locator changes

  • Metadata sync to keep tests aligned as org configuration evolves

  • Validate release readiness across sandboxes before go-live

One platform
for Salesforce UI, API, and integration testing

  • UI tests for Lightning + Classic, CPQ, Flows, Experience Cloud

  • API + UI validation for real end-to-end confidence

  • Unified execution and reporting (no toolchain sprawl)

“Frequent Salesforce updates used to break our tests. Now they don’t.”

Testsigma's intuitive UI and automation capabilities have significantly improved our testing efficiency. The ability to track element locator changes and auto-healing has been a game-changer in handling frequent Salesforce updates.

Amrutha Sireesh

Lead QAT Analyst | Crown Commercial Service, UK

Testsigma Feature

The Complete Salesforce Quality Platform
- without the tool sprawl

End-to-End Coverage

Automate Salesforce workflows the way users actually work - from login to outcomes, across environments.

Execution at scale

Run suites in parallel across scratch orgs, sandboxes, and production - without managing infrastructure.

Unified reporting

Get one single source of truth for results, trends, and failures - without stitching together add-ons.

Built-in governance

Organize suites, standardize reusable steps, and keep release readiness visible to stakeholders.

Real outcomes from Salesforce teams – including tools replaced

Salesforce buyers want proof from teams switching off the same things you’re using.

30-40% time savings vs Selenium

Verndale

Reduced effort compared to Selenium: And when tests fail, fixes often take “half an hour or less.”

Selenium

Selenium

Outcome

Less maintenance,
faster throughput

Replaced Playwright upkeep with plain-English tests

SBG Funding

Moved away from high code maintenance so more of the team could contribute to automation.

Replaced

Playwright

Outcome

Easier authoring,
lower maintenance

Technical capabilities that actually matter for Salesforce testing

Not just “can it click buttons” - but can it survive releases, scale execution, and validate real workflows.

Full Salesforce coverage for
real workflows

Intelligent Test Architecture

Automate the journeys your teams run every release - not just isolated clicks.

Lightning + Classic coverage for regression suites

Validate CPQ, Flows, and Experience Cloud workflows

Reusable steps to scale coverage without duplicating effort

CI/CD + environment readiness for Salesforce releases

Advanced Salesforce-specific Integrations

Run the right suites in the right orgs automatically before every release goes live.

Execute across scratch orgs and sandboxes with consistent configuration

Trigger tests from your pipeline and gate releases on results

Centralized results and traceability for fast triage and auditability

Execution performance that keeps feedback loops short

Enterprise-Scale Performance

Scale coverage without slowing releases or drowning in reruns.

Parallel execution to cut suite runtime

Failure insights that reduce time-to-fix

Trends and reporting to spot repeat breakpoints early

Built for the three Salesforce testing
teams we see most

Salesforce admins + manual testers who need no-code

Move from checklists to automated testing in Salesforce without becoming a framework owner.

You'll see

Fast regressions, less dependency on engineering.

QA teams drowning in Selenium or Playwright maintenance

Replace brittle scripts with plain-English automation and self-healing so coverage grows without churn.

You'll see

More coverage, fewer "fix the suite" sprints.

QA leaders struggling to consolidate fragmented toolchains

Unify authoring, execution, reporting, and governance - so Salesforce quality doesn't require five tools.

You'll see

Lower total cost, cleaner ops, one source of truth.

Testsigma vs Top Players

Automated Acceptance Testing

If your goal is automated acceptance testing, it helps to separate tools that only manage UAT from those that can actually build, run, and maintain automated user acceptance testing end-to-end.

What you’re
evaluating

Time to value + adoption

Maintenance + release resilience (Spring/Summer/Winter)

Salesforce coverage depth (Lightning/Classic + key areas)

End-to-end beyond Salesforce (apps, APIs, data)

Unified platform vs tool sprawl (UI + API + reporting)

Best fit

Testsigma

Fast to stable regressions. Plain-English tests. Admins + QA can contribute

Auto-healing + metadata sync. Fewer breaks after releases

Lightning + Classic. CPQ, Flows, Experience Cloud. Real workflows

Test Salesforce + rest of stack in one platform

UI + API in one place. Central results + trends

Switching from manual, frameworks, Provar, or stacks. Want stable automation + E2E confidence

Manual testing

Slow to scale. People-hours grow with scope

Every release = long retest cycles

Inconsistent coverage. Complex areas skipped

Mostly manual. Slow to validate integrations

Spreadsheets + tribal knowledge

Small suites. Low change frequency

Selenium / Playwright / Cypress

Setup + scripting time. Mostly engineers can maintain

High churn • Flaky runs • Frequent rewrites

Possible, but brittle at scale

Needs extra tools + glue code

Add-ons for grid/reporting. Split visibility

Teams that want full control + can fund maintenance

Salesforce-only tools (e.g., Provar)

Fast for Salesforce UI. Less flexible beyond Salesforce

Better for Salesforce UI • Still breaks across end-to-end flows

Strong Salesforce UI focus

Common gap beyond Salesforce

UI-first. Extra tools for APIs/reporting

Salesforce-only needs. Limited E2E

Fragmented stacks (framework + grid + reporting)

Slowest start. Glue work + multiple tools

Highest churn • Breaks ripple across tools

Depends on setup. Environment + flake issues

Broad coverage, heavy coordination

Always fragmented. Hard to correlate results

Teams willing to run a complex stack

Testsigma

See the Difference in 10 Days

Bring one real Salesforce regression flow. We’ll show you how it looks in Testsigma vs your current approach.

bg-pattern
Enterprise-grade security,
compliance, and recognition
4.5
G2 Cloud
4.4
Capterra
4.4
Get App
Users love us
Testsigma - G2 Badge
Enterprise-grade security
Testsigma - Enterprise-grade security
Test Salesforce alongside your
entire stack - in one platform

Salesforce quality doesn’t end at the login screen. Validate workflows that touch ERP,
finance, portals, and data tools - without stitching multiple testing tools together.

  • Extensive support for Salesforce APIs to perform actions on Salesforce objects and validate data including SOQL support
  • 30+ integrations with CI/CD, test management, and bug-tracking tools like Gearset, Flosum, AzureDevOps, and so on
  • Support for custom REST API to integrate with any third-party system
bg-pattern

Access your Salesforce testing playbook

Guides and templates for faster automated testing in Salesforce—especially when you’re switching tools.
Salesforce UI Testing: How to Automate With Testsigma

Salesforce UI Testing: How to Automate With Testsigma

Yamini Priya

20 MAY 2023

AUTOMATION TESTINGSALESFORCE TESTING
Salesforce Regression Testing: Benefits and Best Practices

Salesforce Regression Testing: Benefits and Best Practices

Yamini Priya

26 JUN 2023

AUTOMATION TESTINGREGRESSION TESTING
Salesforce Test Cases Template with Best Practices

Salesforce Test Cases Template with Best Practices

Yamini Priya

10 AUG 2023

AUTOMATION TESTINGTEST AUTOMATION

Frequently Asked Questions

Testsigma’s Salesforce automated testing solution is built for release resilience with auto-healing and metadata sync, so common UI and configuration changes don’t force full test rebuilds. Teams validate changes in sandboxes first and ship with higher confidence.
Yes, Testsigma supports Salesforce UI automation across Lightning and Classic and is designed to handle real workflows, not just isolated clicks.
No. You can create and maintain tests in plain English. This makes it easier for admins, QA, and analysts to contribute without becoming framework maintainers.
Yes. Testsigma supports UI + API testing and helps you validate end-to-end flows that cross Salesforce and other connected systems.
Most teams switch to reduce maintenance and consolidate tools for Salesforce automation testing. With Testsigma, you get a unified platform for authoring, execution, reporting, and release resilience - without stitching together a stack.