Top 12 UI Testing Tools Used In 2025

Comparison of the 5 Best UI Testing Tools

Tool	Description	Key UI Testing Features
	Cloud-based, Agentic AI-powered platform for web, mobile, desktop, API, SAP, and Salesforce test automation.	No-code interface, AI-based test creation, cross-platform automation, parallel testing, Self-healing maintenance, advanced reporting, and CI/CD support.
Selenium	Widely-used open-source web UI automation library.	Cross-browser testing, multi-language support, extensive plugin ecosystem, and parallel execution via Grid.
Accelq	AI-based codeless automation for web, mobile, and desktop UIs.	Intelligent element recognition, composite UI controls, model-based test building, CI/CD integrations, and self-healing scripts.
Cypress	JavaScript-centric, developer-focused UI testing framework.	Live execution, auto-waiting, real-time debugging, API stubbing, cross-browser support, time-travel debugging.
Playwright	Modern automation framework for multi-browser UI testing.	Cross-browser testing, multiple language bindings, headless mode, live debugging, and network interception.

12 Best UI Testing Tools in 2025

Testsigma

Testsigma is a cloud-based, Agentic AI-powered test automation platform for web, desktop, mobile, API, SAP, and Salesforce applications. With Testsigma’s intuitive no-code interface, NLP Engine, and advanced AI, both tech and non-tech team members can have control over complex UI test flows.

Features

• Testsigma Copilot and Atto for Agentic test automation
• No-code UI test cases creation in simple English.
• Cross-platform automation (web, mobile, API, desktop, Salesforce, SAP)
• AI-powered self-healing tests to reduce test maintenance
• Dynamic, customizable reports
• Built-in bug reporting, screenshot/video logging
• CI/CD pipeline integration for continuous testing
• Supports visual testing

Pros Testsigma

• Requires no coding
• Advanced reporting and analytics
• Accessible for both tech and non-tech members
• Integrates easily with common CI/CD tools

Cons Testsigma

• Primarily cloud-first, local testing is limited

BugBug

BugBug offers codeless, end-to-end UI testing for web apps, emphasizing simplicity and efficiency. Its Chrome-based recording, browser-based playback, and team-friendly features make it popular with SaaS and e-commerce businesses.

Features

• No-code browser-based test recording and playback
• Smart selectors, automatic waiting, parallel cloud runs
• Scheduled monitoring with notifications (email, Slack)
• Unlimited free users, PDF reporting
• CI/CD API and Zapier integration

Pros BugBug

• Highly accessible for non-technical users
• Unlimited tests/local runs on the free plan
• Easy collaboration for teams

Cons BugBug

• Best suited for web apps, not mobile/desktop
• Limited flexibility for highly complex test logic

TestDriver.ai

TestDriver.ai uses AI agents to create and maintain UI tests without selectors, delivering autonomous end-to-end UI testing for web and desktop. The tool adapts to UI changes in real time and integrates with GitHub workflows.

Features

• Autonomous, selectorless test generation and maintenance
• Natural language prompts for custom scenarios
• Exploratory and regression testing with screen replays
• Pull request-based test integration, dashboard reporting
• CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions, Vercel, and Netlify

Pros TestDriver.ai

• Adapts rapidly to changing UIs
• Easy onboarding, fast coverage

Cons TestDriver.ai

• Less transparent for manual test customization
• Primarily focused on web/desktop, mobile testing is limited

AskUI

AskUI automates UI testing using visual AI rather than code selectors, making it platform-agnostic. It interacts like a human, identifying elements visually and simulating clicks, swipes, or drags.

Features

• AI-based interaction for desktop, web, or mobile UIs
• Compatible with any OS or tech stack
• Customizable testing with JavaScript and Typescript SDKs
• Screenshot capture, detailed debugging
• Integrations with test runners (e.g., Jest, vitest)

Pros AskUI

• No reliance on DOM selectors, works across platforms
• Flexible, readable API
• Handles complex UI tasks like drag-and-drop

Cons AskUI

• Early-access phase
• Initial setup requires code permissions

Hercules

Hercules by TestZeus is an open-source, AI-driven agent for autonomous UI, API, and visual testing. It uses Gherkin-format scripts and AI for self-healing and end-to-end automation, optimized for Salesforce and browser-based interfaces.

Features

• Autonomous agent-based UI testing; zero code/maintenance
• Gherkin input, auto-execution, standard reporting
• Visual validation, accessibility, and security checks
• Parallel cloud/browser farm runs, mobile emulation
• CI/CD (Docker-native), network log/video recording

Pros Hercules

• Open-source, flexible for advanced custom workflows
• Strong visual validation and reporting
• Self-healing and agentic test flows

Cons Hercules

• Focused chiefly on web and Salesforce environments
• Complex custom scenarios may require adjustments

LELANTE

LELANTE is an LLM-powered framework for fully automated Android UI testing, translating natural language cases directly into UI actions. It emphasizes scalability and adaptability for evolving apps.

Features

• Natural language test input for Android apps
• Automatic prompt engineering and GUI refinement
• Live action and test execution via LLMs
• 73% real-world test execution success (2025 benchmark)

Pros LELANTE

• Removes manual scripting requirements for Android testing
• Scales easily with app complexity

Cons LELANTE

• Early-stage framework, limited multi-platform support

BotGauge

BotGauge is a Gen AI-powered tool for rapid, low-code UI, functional, API, and visual test automation. It supports English language test creation, intelligent scenario suggestions, and smart analytics for QA optimization.

Features

• Low-code, English-natural test scripting
• Gen AI authoring for scenarios, self-healing test management
• Parallel testing, DB/API visual testing
• Smart release analytics and CI/CD integrations
• Unlimited team seats per license

Pros BotGauge

• Scales across web, API, and database testing
• Substantial cost and manual intervention reductions
• Early bug detection and self-healing

Cons BotGauge

• Mobile support in development, not yet available
• Some advanced cases require custom APIs

UIValidate

UIValidate focuses on robust, no-code validation of web and desktop UIs, merging test management and analytics to simplify coverage and reporting.

Features

• No or low-code GUI test creation
• Comprehensive reporting, analytics, and debugging
• Cross-platform compatibility
• Third-party integrations (CI/CD, DevOps tools)

Pros UIValidate

• Easy for beginners and business testers
• Automates tedious coverage tasks

Cons UIValidate

• May be feature-limited for complex, multi-layered apps

ACCELQ

ACCELQ delivers AI-powered codeless UI testing for web, mobile, desktop, and APIs, enabling teams of varying skill levels to build, maintain, and execute end-to-end test flows.

Features

• No-code automation for modern UI stacks (React, Angular, Flutter)
• Composite control support (Kendo, Bootstrap)
• Model-based testing, auto-generated test assets
• Self-healing object recognition
• Deep CI/CD tool integrations (JIRA, Jenkins, Bamboo, TFS)

Pros ACCELQ

• Unified platform for all test types
• Self-maintaining scripts minimize maintenance
• Supports modern web stacks

Cons ACCELQ

• Slight learning curve for non-technical users
• Performance may vary with very large suites

Selenium

Selenium is the classic open-source library for browser-based UI automation; it’s favored for its flexibility and language support.

Features

• Cross-browser and OS support
• Multi-language bindings: Java, Python, C#, Ruby
• Selenium Grid for distributed parallel testing
• Integration with frameworks like Appium for mobile testing

Pros Selenium

• Mature, widely documented, massive community
• Highly customizable with plugins

Cons Selenium

• No-code support is limited
• Lacks built-in reporting and analytics

Playwright

Playwright is a fast-growing automation UI testing framework built for reliable cross-browser web testing. Its robust debugging, headless execution, and multi-language support make it a top pick for modern teams.

Features

• Out-of-process test execution for performance
• Supports Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, mobile emulation
• Network interception, advanced debugging
• UI mode, Inspector, trace viewer

Pros Selenium

• Fast, reliable, cross-browser
• Developer-friendly tools

Cons Selenium

• Visual test automation relies on third-party tools
• Native mobile support requires integration

Cypress

Cypress provides JavaScript-based automation for web UI testing, focused on developer ergonomics and debugging.

Features

• Auto-waiting, live reloads, time-travel debugging
• Stubs/API control for complete test scenarios
• Fast execution, paid coverage reporting

Pros Cypress

• Excellent live debugging and API testing
• Easy to set up and extend

Cons Cypress

• No support for native mobile apps
• Only major Chromium browsers natively supported

Factors to Consider While Choosing the
Best UI Testing Tool

• Application Type: Choose a tool that matches your specific platform, whether it’s web, mobile, or desktop, to ensure full coverage and smooth integration with your app’s environment.
• Programming Language and Tech Stack Support: Select a tool that supports your team’s languages and frameworks so you can use existing skills and avoid compatibility issues.
• Ease of Use: Pick no-code or codeless solutions for easier test creation, especially if business users or manual testers contribute to automation.
• Cross-browser and Cross-platform Compatibility: Make sure tests run consistently on all major browsers and operating systems, so users have a reliable experience everywhere.
• Reporting, Analytics, and Debugging Capabilities: Look for tools offering clear reports and debugging aids, such as video logs, screenshots, and traceability, to help identify and resolve issues quickly.
• Integration with CI/CD Pipelines and DevOps Tools: Use tools that connect with your CI/CD workflows for automated, fast feedback on every software update or release.
• Community Support and Documentation: A tool with strong community and documentation means help is easy to find and onboarding is simpler, reducing learning time.
• Budget, Licensing, and Scalability Considerations: Check costs, free and paid options, and scalability to ensure the tool can grow with your team or project.
• Test Maintenance and Self-healing Capabilities: Prefer tools with self-healing or easy updates so you spend less time fixing broken scripts as your UI changes.
• Support for Advanced Test Scenarios: Choose a solution with visual, accessibility, and security test options if your app needs to meet strict standards or reach diverse

Conclusion

UI testing tools play a pivotal role in enabling teams to deliver reliable and user-friendly web applications. With evolving technologies, tools that offer codeless interfaces, AI-powered self-healing, comprehensive reporting, and seamless CI/CD integrations are becoming essential. As UI complexity grows, investing in a flexible and scalable automation platform can significantly reduce manual effort and speed up release cycles. To explore a powerful solution that combines these capabilities, try Testsigma for automated UI testing.