When should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing?
A few years back, “codeless testing” was interchangeably used with the “record-and-replay” functionality of the automation software. Today, the advancements in codeless testing have widened the gap between the terms and gave them separate and clear meanings in the IT industry. Therefore, it becomes a confusing question when we talk about these two terms today.
The thought of when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing and when to go for other methods still remains a complex question and more cluttered than ever. This post will point out several methods that can help you decide which way to go while starting a project or setting up a whole enterprise.
Table Of Contents
Codeless testing and its advantage – a brief introduction
Codeless testing is a type of software testing that requires no code writings from the testers. Instead, it relies on natural language processing, drag-and-drop UI elements, artificial intelligence, self-healing capabilities etc. It depends on the codeless testing tool you are using.
For example, instead of writing a selenium script with browser instances, we can directly write navigate to URL to just access the intended web address. Codeless testing brings a lot of advantages along with it, some of them are mentioned below:
- Saves Time: Codeless testing eliminates the requirement of learning and implementing the code in complex automation testing frameworks. Hence, a lot of time is saved in learning and constructing the test cases with codeless testing.
- Involves People from Diverse Teams: Since there is no coding involved, the test cases are easily understood by non-technical people. They can then contribute in their own way for better quality tests such as suggesting changes or sometimes constructing a few scenarios themselves.
- Extremely low maintenance: Codeless test automation requires very little maintenance work from the test automation engineers. On the contrary, with scripted test automation, they often struggle with the frequent changes done in the software.
And there are a lot more of this. But scripted testing has its own advantages too and therefore deciding when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing becomes a topic for discussion.
When should you choose codeless automation?
Whether you are a startup, a small enterprise, or a big organization, every project you work on brings its own challenges and careful planning. Therefore, to deal with it, you need to be sure of the top points that will help you decide when to choose codeless automation and when to stay away from it. The following points will help you understand.
1. Development and testing are not synchronized
Development and testing are two pillars of SDLC and should go hand in hand. With methods allowing faster software development, testing might get a bit unsynchronised with it.
For example, sometimes testing lags behind one release cycle and sometimes two. This gap might increase in the future if remedial steps are not taken. One such step is to use codeless test automation. With codeless automation for testing, things move faster and the gap is narrowed with faster testing cycles.
2. Rising Issues with code-based test automation
Code-based test automation comes with its own challenges. The most popular one being the team’s skills you would require to commit the tasks. Code-based test automation needs a team that knows specific programming languages and framework knowledge on which testing will be done.
Sometimes, more than one technology is finalized based on the team’s knowledge and experience that are not compatible with each other. Such a situation may take additional time to resolve. When such issues start to arise commonly, codeless testing is the way to go for enterprises.
3. Short on time
Sometimes, you don’t need to go deep into the technicalities while deciding when should you choose codeless automation for testing. Just weighing both the methods on the amount of time they take from the start to end is enough if time is the only factor holding your judgment.
Codeless testing is faster to write tests and is easier to learn by the engineers. If you are having trouble matching the project deadlines frequently, codeless testing is the best option to choose.
4. Low on monetary resources
When time is not the deciding factor, money is. Startups and small enterprises have to spend their money meticulously on each resource. Automation testing is one of the prime factors that can consume a lot of money or time.
Since automation testers are few (considering the knowledge of programming) and the demand is high, they sometimes aim for higher salaries which costs the company extra money. Sometimes, you need to train the automation testers on a new programming language or framework which can cost extra money to the company too.
On the contrary, codeless test automation neither requires highly skilled automation testers nor do they require a lot of training. Codeless test automation tools just require monthly or annual subscriptions fees for the maintenance of their infrastructure.
The difference in costs involved in both the situation is also very large. For example, the national average salary for an automation engineer in the United States is 83000 USD.
Codeless test automation tools such as Testsigma can satisfy all your testing requirements with advanced analytics and reporting features and run 10 parallel tests for half that price (around 41000 USD).
Bottom line: when you are short on monetary funds and the project requires testing, codeless test automation should be the call for rescue – of course, other project requirements for test automation should be met too.
Save your testing time and costs with codeless test automation with Testsigma
5. UI tests are the priority
The goal of UI testing is to guarantee the correct working of the visual components of the software. Sometimes, that is the utmost priority as you may be releasing software with just the UI changes.
Codeless test automation therefore would be the best option when such scenarios arise. Although if code-based regression tests are fulfilling the purpose, you can choose to avoid codeless automation. But for a fresh test suite, codeless works best when it comes to the user interface.
Codeless test automation is the new kid in the automation world that is more effective and simplified than its parents. But it still is in the learning phase. Definitely, it comes with certain limitations and is not 100% perfect. This may be one of the reasons that organizations think about when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing.
There may be some limitations to the codeless test automation which can make you wonder, if, you as an enterprise, should choose codeless automation for testing.
For instance, Selenium has an issue with the scalability of the application. Selenium allows the objects to be defined on a single locator only that demands a lot of time when we are maintaining the tests.
In this post, I tried to clear the air that can help you resolve the confusion. As far as tools are concerned, there are a few codeless test automation tools available that are different in one thing or another (as most of the tools are). Choosing a tool is not a textbook process.
As this post highlighted the points that can help you in determining the choice of automation method, the tool that solves that problem is the best choice.
I hope that by the end of this post, you will have certain parameters in your hand through which it would become a simplified process. For any comments and suggestions, we welcome your comments below.