testsigma
left-mobile-bg

Actionable Feedback in Test Automation for Continuous Delivery

November 10, 2024
KR
right-mobile-bg
Importance of Actionable Feedback in Test Automation for Continuous Delivery
image

Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma

Try for free

Continuous Delivery envisages the release of reliable software in fast-paced short cycles automatically and frequently.

These short continuous release cycles ensure a faster time to market and reduced business risk associated with every release.

Continuous feedback is important in a DevOps environment for continuous improvement, to identify and fix defects early in the development cycle. Continuous actionable feedback through Continuous Testing helps to release software products faster into production with lesser defects.

Continuous feedback in the delivery pipeline from Functional Experts, stakeholders, QA Analysts, Testers ensures a speedy release of quality software with less or no errors.

A good deployment pipeline has feedback loops at all stages of the development lifecycle. Feedback is required not only on the quality of your code, but on the quality of your requirements, and the quality of your processes for delivering software. At each stage of the pipeline, verifications need to be run, not just acceptance tests.

Development teams need adequate information regarding a failure. Feedback should automatically include all the necessary information and actions to fix the issues and proceed in the pipeline quickly, for instance, specify which test failed, how it failed, and provide adequate steps for action with the supporting information.

From Passed or Failed results to Actionable feedback

While delivery speed is the key, ensuring the right user experience is critical. Hence, businesses need to continuously test in real user scenarios to seamlessly release software.

Along with the speed of delivery, the reliability and immediate feedback from cross-functional teams play an important role in continuous testing to help improve the quality of software.

In the Continuous Delivery process, every software change is a release candidate that continuously undergoes Testing before deployment.

In such short cycles, there wouldn’t be much time to scrutinize the test automation results, instead, it would be time saving and easier to quickly identify if the continuous testing platform could give a Yes or No automatically to decide if the release candidate is safe to proceed further in the delivery pipeline.

Additionally, if instead of simple Passed/Failed results of test automation, a platform that can analyze the business risk associated with test failures and be able to say Yes or No to allow your “release candidate” to move forward in the delivery pipeline automatically with actionable results will help analyze, debug and fix the cryptic failures.

The actionable feedback will not just help you to understand the build status, but also provide suggestions to take release decisions automatically. This feedback should include all the necessary information to fix the issues and proceed further in the pipeline instantly.

This approach will save both time and effort required to debug and analyze the test results to proceed.

With short release cycles, it is very difficult to analyze the cryptic results of all the failed tests and the affected areas.

Along with the feedback from the failed tests it is also required to identify potential failures upfront but automatically fix them and suggest those areas that might as well be affected.

Before we flag ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to a release candidate, the platform should perform all necessary checks automatically to ensure the quality of the release(Exploratory testing would be a plus).

Along with validating the functional requirements, we need to asses the system requirements, achieve maximum coverage and assess the performance automatically to ensure an uninterrupted existing user experience while adding new features.

An Agile organization that follows Continuous Delivery and a continuous feedback approach Continuous Delivery and continuous feedback with the help of an end to end automation process can ensure the release of quality software faster with less or no business risks.

As the roles are redefined in Agile and DevOps, cross-functional teams and just anyone can take part in Continuous testing. Hence, the results/feedback must be understandable for everyone including non-developers.

Feedback from the team through Team Collaboration

In addition to actionable results, team collaboration is also important in DevOps.

Cross-functional teams across different geographical locations need a common platform to communicate the ambiguities in the automated testing process.

Team communication is important for teams to function effectively and produce quality products. Feedback is fundamental not only to CI/CD but throughout the application development lifecycle.  Feedback should be fast, and actionable and delivered in a way that lets teams respond rapidly.

If the feedback is actionable and understandable to everyone, anybody can take the necessary steps to proceed further in the delivery pipeline.

Traceability throughout the lifecycle is required for rapid response. Tailor your feedback process to fit your team. If an existing solution doesn’t fit or becomes outdated, You may need to create a new one that works.

The main goal of continuous delivery is to make feedback loops shorter to ensure the reliability of software and analyze the business risk associated with it before the software reaches the competitive market.

The continuous actionable feedback along the Continuous Delivery pipeline ensures the reliability of the software being released. A well-designed delivery pipeline that integrates the team, process and tools offer no scope for failure.

Testsigma’ Approach

Testsigma’s non-cryptic easy to understand feedback of all test runs help teams take effective actions immediately.

Testsigma’s inbuilt automatic feedback mechanisms in the form of instant notifications and automatic suggestions from AI on executions help make effective decisions on the go. The AI indicates areas of failure and those that might as well be affected due to change.

Shift Left is imperative to Agile development and delivery needs. You need to identify if your test automation tool is shift-left ready.

Testsigma is a strong advocate of Shift Left testing. Testsigma allows testing at an early stage even before the application is fully available also as a part of every stage in the development lifecycle checking modifications as soon as they are introduced.

Integrations with collaboration tools like Slack lets you monitor execution updates, track and share the progress of tests automatically.

It is also easy to make changes to the automated tests since the test scripts are written in simple natural language statements. Even complex test scenarios can be automated easily with the help of detailed feedback from within Testsigma and the collaborating team.

Testsigma gathers continuous actionable feedback and helps development teams prioritize these actions. Clear documentation and points on improvement are important in the application development cycle to achieve Continuous Testing.

Chat with our test experts and learn more about Testsigma!

Testsigma Author - KR

KR

Founded Testsigma in 2019 and is the current CEO, prior to that I worked as a Software engineer and Technical Lead. I specialize in Saas, Cloud Applications, Product Management, Product Development, Test Automation, Network Monitoring Systems, Software Development, Distributed Systems. Being a part of various tech platforms and communities keeps me on feat to gain more insights and stay updated.

image

Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma

Try for free
imageimage
Subscribe to get all our latest blogs, updates delivered directly to your inbox.

By submitting the form, you would be accepting the Privacy Policy.

RELATED BLOGS


How to Test Mobile Application Manually?
AAYUSH SAXENA
MANUAL TESTING
Top Manual Testing Interview Questions and Answers
KIRUTHIKA DEVARAJ
MANUAL TESTING
Acceptance Criteria Vs Acceptance Tests – 5 Key Differences
DHIVYA KRISHNA
MANUAL TESTING