Puppeteer vs Selenium | A Reviewed Comparison Between Two Automated Testing Libraries
Automated user interface testing is an essential but frequently overlooked component of the software delivery cycle. Users access the software by interacting with the User Interface (UI) for the application’s basic functionalities, which makes the User Interface (UI) the most integral component of any web or mobile application, also known as the Graphical User Interface. GUI requires a mechanism to test the UI to maximize a smooth user experience continuously.
This method of testing the UI of an application to ascertain its functionality is known as UI testing. Covering everything right from corroborating the slightest bit of logic, navigation, calculations, UI workflows, validating all the buttons to transitions, UI testing is a mandatory aspect of executing applications.
The Quality Assurance (QA) teams are accustomed to performing manual UI testing of applications. With the advent of Agile methodology, the QA teams replaced their conventional testing practices with Agile development models and automation frameworks. The teams were motivated to adopt automation to run the test cycles for quicker release of products. Thus, automated UI testing became a norm in software testing pipelines globally.
When it comes to automated UI testing, Selenium and Puppeteer are two formidable names.
There is an ongoing debate on which one is better regarding automated UI testing. We hope to give you a comprehensive understanding of both tools, how they function, and their considerable differences in functionality in this article. Then you can judge which one wins the battle – Puppeteer vs. Selenium.
Table Of Contents
The Selenium tests are limited to web applications and not for desktop or mobile apps. Due to its broad flexibility, developers use this tool continually for web app testing. It is supported by all three operating systems – Linux, Macintosh (macOS), and Windows as well as by all popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
The Selenium software is a suite of tools devised to cater to distinct Selenium QA testing needs.
Here’s a list of selenium tools
Selenium Integrated Development Environment (IDE):
Available as a Chrome plugin and for Mozilla Firefox, the Selenium Integrated Development Environment (IDE) records all the browser interactions to generate codes for each. These generated codes re-test scripts written in various scripting languages. However, the Selenium IDE writes too clumsy codes for an automation test script. Regardless, the native plugins can aid you in reviewing multiple test cases.
The test automation scripts are written in popular programming languages such as C#, Java, .Net, Python, Perl, and Ruby. The Selenium WebDriver has all the components, such as Library, Application Programming Interface (API), and Driver, to construct a functional test automation framework. All of them converged will help you carry out diverse types of automated web application testing.
Selenium Remote Control (RC):
RC and WebDriver are test automation technologies that support several programming languages but have some key differences. Selenium RC is a testing framework that allows a QA or developer to build test cases in any programming language to automate UI tests for web apps against any HTTP domain. Selenium RC works as two components, one of which handles “client libraries for the desired computer language” and the other as “a server that launches and terminates browsers automatically.”
Assume you have six test cases. You wish to complete your test cases on a remote machine because your local device runs numerous applications. You need to configure the remote server so that the remaining can execute the test cases there, and that’s where Selenium Grid comes in handy.
Selenium Grid’s hub-and-node architecture allows you to run concurrent tests across several browsers. The client-server architecture of the Selenium grid works with the client as ‘Hub’ and the server as a ‘Node.’ When coupled, they comprise the Selenium Grid, The local machine is in charge of activating the test cases, and when they are triggered, the remote device executes them automatically.
Combining tools like TestNG and JUnit with Selenium is the best way to handle test cases and create reports. Integrating Selenium with tools like Jenkins, Mavis, and Docker will help you Execute continuous testing flawlessly. Another pro of using Selenium is to create automation test suites for specific test objects that can be reused and run on different browsers and operating systems.
The Google Puppeteer, had its initial V1 release on 11th January 2018. by a Google team with unparalleled access to the internals of the Chrome browser. being a young kid, It had skyrocketed to become one of the most ubiquitous and popular automation frameworks with 89 releases till now.
Puppeteer 13.6.0 is the latest version of the automation framework, released on 20th April 2022. With a community of over 200,000 users and 414 contributors, Puppeteer is the second only most favored automation framework among QA teams (to Selenium).
At its core, Puppeteer is a Node.js library and browser testing framework. It was written by a Google team, explicitly designing it to deliver a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol.
Puppeteer vs. Selenium: Key Differences
While both Selenium and Puppeteer are open-source browser automation solutions, they have some fundamental differences:
|Parameter of Comparison||Selenium||Puppeteer|
|Type of tool||It is a web framework for testing web applications||It is a Node.js library|
|Browser Compatibility||Selenium supports multiple browsers.||It only works with Chrome or Chromium.It does not support other browsers|
|Speed||Selenium is slower than Puppeteer||Puppeteer Is faster than Selenium|
|Cross-Platform Support||Available in Selenium||No cross-platform support is available in Puppeteer.|
|Automation Compatibility||It supports only web automation||Supports web automation and mobile automation both|
|Screenshot||PDFs screenshot support is not available||Screenshots can be taken of both PDFs and Images|
Selenium mandates a more complicated installation process than Google’s Puppeteer to account for all the specific browsers, languages, and modules the user is using. Compared to that, Puppeteer uses Yarn or npm since it is a Node library that users can easily install. Check out Puppeteer on Github.
Selenium Grid supervises the enactment of Selenium tests on various browsers and operating systems, allowing the execution of one test on all platforms. This simultaneous execution of test suites reduces the elapsed time needed to finish application testing.
On the other hand, Puppeteer offers numerous advantages. The primary use is its ability to control the Chrome browser and its accessibility to DevTools Protocol. Since Selenium needs Webdriver to send script commands to the browsers, it is comparatively slower than Puppeteer. In simple words, a complete solution for automating Chrome.
Regarding performance management capabilities, Puppeteer takes the cake over Selenium’s offered features. The Google Puppeteer has powerful performance management features such as tracking runtime and load performance, collecting screenshots, and even throttling CPU performance to emulate mobile device performance. Selenium fails to provide any such performance management capabilities. Selenium lacks such performance management capabilities.
Selenium is an automation framework that tests applications that run on different operating systems (Linux, macOS, and Windows) and in multiple browsers (Safari, Firefox, Chrome, etc.). Since most web applications do not dictate the user to use specific browsers, developers can use Selenium to test their apps for multiple operating systems and browsers. That said, it is also critical to note that Google Chrome manages about two-thirds of the global web traffic. And when it comes to automating Chrome, Puppeteer offers the best solution.
Productivity and Learning
Puppeteer vs. Selenium: Ease of Use
Puppeteer is a complete solution for automating Chrome browsers and focuses on Chrome only. It does not serve as a dedicated testing solution like Selenium, but Puppeteer focuses on a single API, so it is considerably easier to automate the generation of Puppeteer code. Chrome being in its palm Puppeteer is not a standalone testing solution.
It does not have an IDE like Selenium, nor does it include a tool for managing parallel and distributed testing. The recording capabilities of Puppeteer are geared keenly for performance management. While the IDE of Selenium focuses on recording test suites and scripts, the recording capabilities of Google’s Puppeteer concentrate more on performance management.
Due to its support for multiple operating systems, platforms, browsers, and programming languages, Selenium is relatively more complex and customized than Puppeteer. The installation and configuration of Selenium Grid and Selenium WebDriver are non-trivial compared to Puppeteer with npm or Yarn.
So, Which One Should You Choose?
One of the most crucial aspects of web application development is its testing, which is time-consuming, taking up 30%-40% of the time in a standard release cycle. However, using these QA automation tools can drastically boost the productivity and effectiveness of development tools.
Selenium is a full suite of tools designed to support the development and execution of automated tests for multiple operating systems, programming languages, and browsers.
On the other hand, Puppeteer is a Node.js package designed by a Google team to deliver a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol.
Puppeteer and Selenium can provide added capabilities and supports, such as supporting data scraping. Combining a proxy provider with Selenium can help developers overcome restrictions websites implement, such as geographic locations, to thwart data scraping. Numerous GitHub projects propose solutions to prohibit browser fingerprinting.
My Two Cents,
The crux of the entire debate (Selenium vs. Puppeteer) ultimately boils down to your specific requirements and needs. Your choice of the testing library depends on what you wish to accomplish. There are no winners, losers, or scorecards here.
Thus whatever your project might be, there is a testing library to suit all your automated testing needs. Take help from any of the tested automation testing tools to write and execute safer, better, and more secure codes. That’s a journey worth taking, regardless of which tool assists you along the route.
With Testsigma, teams can save ample setup time for automated browser tests, and it works with Selenium, where you get the flexibility of raw code or No code. That’s how Testsigma is with fully automated workflow, and there’s nothing more you could ask.