Hoppscotch and Postman – they are both popular tools for API testing and development and offer a diverse set of features, including ease of use, collaboration, and real-time response monitoring. If you are at the intersection of choosing any one of these tools, this Hoppscotch vs Postman debate might help you arrive at your destination. The comparison of test automation tools helps take the right decision.
Table Of Contents
Hoppscotch vs Postman – Overview
What is Hoppscotch?
Hoppscotch is an open-source API development ecosystem that simplifies sending requests, designing APIs, and monitoring responses. It provides a user-friendly interface for interacting with APIs, offering features such as real-time response monitoring, request history, and environment variables.
What is Postman?
Postman is a popular collaboration platform for API development, used by developers to design, test, and document APIs. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for building and managing APIs, including features like API testing, automated testing, API monitoring, and API documentation.
Check here – Postman Alternatives
Hoppscotch vs Postman – Detailed Comparison
Pros of Hoppscotch
- User-Friendly Interface: Hoppscotch offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.
- Real-Time Response Monitoring: Users can monitor API responses in real time, which facilitates quick debugging and troubleshooting.
- Open-Source: Being open-source, Hoppscotch encourages community contributions and allows for customization according to specific needs.
- Request History: It maintains a history of requests that allows users to revisit and reuse previous requests effortlessly.
- Environment Variables: It supports environment variables for users to manage and switch between different environments seamlessly.
- API Collections: Hoppscotch makes it easy to navigate collection management, thanks to its minimalist approach. It offers the essentials of API request management without expecting complicated configurations.
- Variables: Hoppscotch offers straightforward support for managing variables in simple use cases. As long as the setup is not too complex, it provides better variable support.
- Pricing: Completely free to use.
- GraphQL Support: Along with REST API capabilities, the tool also supports GraphQL APIs that allow devs to query and manipulate data with the GraphQL query language. This simplifies composing GraphQL queries, running mutations, and analyzing responses.
Support for multiple authentication methods: The tool supports multiple authentication methods so that devs can interact with authenticated APIs. It offers configurable options for specifying credentials and parameters for basic authentication, OAuth 2.0, API keys, or custom authentication schemes.
Cons of Hoppscotch
- Limited Collaboration Features: Unlike some other API development tools, Hoppscotch may lack certain features, such as team collaboration and version control.
- Less Comprehensive Documentation: The documentation for Hoppscotch may not be as extensive or detailed compared to some other tools.
- Dependency on Browser: It operates as a browser extension or web application, which may limit its capabilities compared to standalone desktop applications.
What Companies Use Hoppscotch?
Hoppscotch came in 2019 and has since become a popular API development suite. It is lightweight, web-based, and comes with security features. Some of the big companies using Hoppscotch are Microsoft, Google, Verizon, RedHat, IBM, Salesforce, Cisco, SMARTTechStack, and OLX.
Testsigma vs Hoppscotch
Testsigma and Hoppscotch serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle.
Testsigma is an automated testing platform that focuses on test automation, whereas Hoppscotch is primarily used for API development and testing.
Create and write low-code test cases using pre-defined NLP commands
While both tools are valuable in their respective domains, Testsigma specializes in automated testing for web and mobile applications, offering features such as parallel test execution, cross-browser testing, and self-healing. The tool consists of distinct aspects that also include API testing, which validates responses in real time. You can also integrate API tests with functional testing in Testsigma.
On the other hand, Hoppscotch excels in simplifying API interaction and monitoring, providing developers with a user-friendly interface for designing and testing APIs.
Pros of Postman
- User-Friendly Interface: Postman provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers to create and execute API requests.
- Comprehensive Testing Features: It offers a wide range of testing capabilities, including manual testing, automated testing, and performance testing.
- Automation: Postman allows for the automation of repetitive tasks, such as API testing and monitoring, through scripts and collections.
- Collaboration: Postman facilitates collaboration among team members through features like shared workspaces, team libraries, and version control.
- Extensive Documentation: It offers robust documentation features, including the generation of API documentation from requests and responses.
- Customization: Postman allows for customization of requests in order to add complex workflows with pre and post-request scripts.
- Integrations: Postman integrates with a larger variety of tools and platforms for version control, automation, API documentation, and other advanced abilities.
- Community Support: Postman’s community is larger and more established, as compared to Hoppscotch.
Variable support: The tool enables global and local variables that can be used to customize requests dynamically and modify parameters as required by tests.
Check here – REST Assured vs Postman
Cons of Postman
- Limited Free Tier: While Postman offers a free tier, some advanced features and capabilities are only available in paid plans.
- Steep Learning Curve: Postman has a learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its wide range of features and capabilities.
- Performance: In some cases, users may experience performance issues, especially when working with large collections or performing complex operations.
Check here – Karate vs Postman
What Companies Use Postman?
Similar to Hoppscotch, Postman also boasts of having a client base of big enterprises, including Google, Microsoft, Twitter, Salesforce, Shopify, and Adobe.
Check here – JMeter vs Postman
Testsigma vs Postman
Testsigma and Postman serve different purposes in the software development lifecycle.
Testsigma is primarily focused on automated testing, offering features such as low-code test automation, parallel test execution, and cross-browser testing for web and mobile applications.
Enter the endpoint, select the method, add headers, set the status code, and run the test
Postman specializes in API development and testing, providing a comprehensive suite of tools for designing, testing, and documenting APIs.
While both tools are valuable in their respective domains, Testsigma excels in end-to-end automated testing for applications, whereas Postman is ideal for API-related tasks such as testing, monitoring, and documentation.
Hoppscotch vs Postman – 10 Key Differences
| Feature | Hoppscotch | Postman | Testsigma |
| Purpose | Simplifies sending requests, designing APIs, and monitoring responses | Collaboration platform for API development, testing, and documentation | Simplifies and accelerates the process of automating web, mobile, and API testing without coding |
| Interface | Intuitive and user-friendly | Intuitive and user-friendly | user-friendly, intuitive interface |
| Open-Source | Yes | No (Proprietary software with a free tier) | No |
| Real-Time Monitoring | Yes | Yes | Supports real-time monitoring and reporting |
| Request History | Yes | Yes | Maintains a detailed history of test executions, including logs, results, and any changes made |
| Environment Variables | Yes | Yes | Supports the use of environment variables |
| Collaboration | Limited | Extensive | Promotes collaboration with features like role-based access control, shared test cases, and project-level management |
| Automation | Basic | Advanced (scripting, automated testing, etc.) | Excels in automation, offering codeless automation capabilities for web, mobile, and API testing |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium (Free tier with paid plans available) | Subscription-based pricing model with multiple tiers, including free tier |
| Extensive Features | No | Yes | Yes |
Also read Insomnia vs Postman
Testsigma vs Hoppscotch vs Postman – Which is Better?
When considering which tool—Testsigma, Hoppscotch, or Postman—is better suited for a company’s needs, it’s essential to evaluate their respective strengths and how they align with the company’s requirements and goals.
For companies focused on automated testing and looking to optimize their testing processes, Testsigma may be the preferred choice due to its AI-driven automation capabilities and focus on test efficiency. It supports web application automated testing, mobile app testing, and API testing. Testsigma takes the lead in end-to-end testing opportunities.
However, for companies primarily engaged in API development and testing, particularly those seeking simplicity and ease of use, Hoppscotch could be the better fit. On the other hand, for organizations with complex API ecosystems and a strong emphasis on collaboration and documentation, Postman may offer the most comprehensive solution.
Conclusion
API testing is crucial, and manually checking them is not ideal. Clearly, the right approach includes API development and testing tools that offer a diverse array of options. Among a sea of options, we bring you the two most prominent candidates in the API testing landscape— Hoppscotch and Postman. They have been around for a while and carry features to perform easy and complex API testing scenarios. The differences between Hoppscotch and Postman will help you decide which tool is the right fit for your business.
Alternatively, the low-code test automation tool, Testsigma, is a worthy contender if you are looking to adopt something that is not just limited to testing APIs but also includes web and mobile testing features.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is the best API client, Postman or Hoppscotch?
When choosing between Postman and Hoppscotch, consider the following checklist.
Choose Postman if:
- You need advanced API testing capabilities like automation, scripting, and API monitoring.
- You prefer advanced team collaboration and workspace-sharing features.
- Your testing infrastructure needs gRPC, SOAP, or CI/CD integration.
- Your team handles enterprise-level API development.
Choose Hoppscotch if:
- You need to run quick tests with a lightweight API client.
- You’d prefer an open-source tool.
- Your work revolves around REST, GraphQL, or WebSockets.
- You can work without automation or CI/CD integrations.
Postman vs Hoppscotch vs Thunder Client – what are the main differences?
Let’s compare Postman, Hoppscotch, and Thunder Client across multiple parameters.
API Testing Capabilities:
- Postman: Ideal for all APIs — REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, gRPC, and SOAP.
- Hoppscotch: Best for REST, GraphQL and WebSockets.
- Thunder Client: Ideal for REST and GraphQL.
Ease of Use:
- Postman: Carries advanced capabilities but is complex for usage. Requires prolonged installation.
- Hoppscotch: Lightweight, browser-based, and requires installation. Not as many advanced features.
- Thunder Client: Best for usage by VS Code users. It directly integrates into the editor.
Automation & Collection Running:
- Postman: Best option for test automation as it supports multiple integrations, including Newman CLI for CI/CD integration.
- Hoppscotch: No automation or collection runner available.
- Thunder Client: Offers a collection runner but no CI/CD integration.
Collaboration & Team Features
- Postman: Ideal for collaboration within workspaces, cloud syncs, and API documentation.
- Hoppscotch: No team collaboration features that stand out.
- Thunder Client: Advanced team features require the Pro version.
Performance & System Resource Usage
- Postman: Can slow down large API projects.
- Hoppscotch: Fastest and most lightweight.
Thunder Client: Lightweight for VS Code users (who are the only ones who can use the tool).
Soap UI Alternatives10 Best SoapUI Alternatives | Which is Better?Nightwatch Alternatives
Nightwatch AlternativesLambdatest vs Browserstack
LambdaTest vs BrowserStack
