Top 5 Best BrowserStack Alternatives 2023
BrowserStack is a cloud testing vendor offering mobile devices, tablets, and browsers for testing. It’s pretty good, but if you’re interested in switching to something else, this list will go over some of the best BrowserStack alternatives that will help you test your websites or apps quickly and effortlessly.
Table Of Contents
- 1 What is BrowserStack?
- 2 Why Do People Choose BrowserStack?
- 3 Features of BrowserStack
- 4 BrowserStack Pros and Cons
- 5 5 Best BrowserStack Alternatives
- 5.1 1. Testsigma
- 5.2 Testsigma vs BrowserStack – Which One Is Better for Automated Testing?
- 5.3 2. LambdaTest
- 5.4 LambdaTest vs BrowserStack – How Do They Differ?
- 5.5 3. Cross Browser Testing
- 5.6 Cross Browser Testing vs BrowserStack – Which Is Better for Web and Mobile Apps?
- 5.7 4. Browserling
- 5.8 Browserling vs BrowserStack – How Is It Different?
- 5.9 5. DataDog
- 5.10 DataDog vs BrowserStack – How Do They Differ?
- 6 Comparison BrowserStack Competitors
- 7 Final Words
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- 9 Suggested Readings
What is BrowserStack?
Why Do People Choose BrowserStack?
People have loved BrowserStack for a long time because they’re one of the earliest cloud testing vendors in the market. They’re also known for:
Cross Browser Testing
One of the main reasons many people choose this leading software testing platform is because it excels at cross-browser testing. It allows users to test for experience close to the original device counterpart.
Option to Choose Different Devices
BrowserStack also has different devices to choose from over the cloud. This is another reason why users are still drawn to this tool. It is also relatively easy to troubleshoot with the help of competent support and documentation.
Downsides of the BrowserStack tool
Despite having so many advantages, BrowserStack lacks many features that users desperately need. For instance, installing the app files takes a very long time, and it could be a problem for users who want something fast.
Another issue with this tool is that it is pretty expensive for small-scale companies and budding testers who want to start with something affordable.
Now that you know all the downsides of this tool, it’s time to explore some alternatives for testing your apps.
Features of BrowserStack
BrowserStack carries several features that make it a fan-favorite of many testers. Here are some of them:
- The tool offers support for mobile and web testing on more than 3000+ real OS and devices.
- BrowserStack is helpful in executing performance and API testing.
- You can easily run parallel tests using BrowserStack.
- The tool has the option to run parameterized testing and requirement-based testing.
- You can integrate BrowserStack with other third-party tools, such as CI/CD, bug tracking, and more.
- It provides testers with the option to gather test summary reports and visual analytics to easily understand and debug the output.
BrowserStack Pros and Cons
We list the Pros and Cons of BrowserStack
|Offers access to more than 3000 real devices||Uses a high degree of system resources and might overload the system|
|Is secure, stable, and scalable to support multiple concurrent automated and manual tests||It can be slow at times|
|Provides actionable insights into the performance of the application under test||The cost of the tool might be more than its alternatives at times|
|Allows integration with third-party plugins to scale the testing efforts|
|Saves cost by eliminating the need to use simulators/emulators or buying various devices for testing|
5 Best BrowserStack Alternatives
If you’re looking for fast, cheap, and less complicated substitutes to BrowserStack, give these five tools a try –
If you’re thinking of replacing your BrowserStack with something that can cover all test automation platforms like Web apps, Android apps, iOS apps & APIs, Testsigma should be your ultimate choice.
One of the most exciting features of this automated testing tool is its compatibility with both static and complex tests. Most testing tools only focus on single test scenarios, but with Testsigma, you can cover many different options.
Besides, the codeless automated testing feature makes it easy for developers to work with a wide range of test scripts.
Testsigma vs BrowserStack – Which One Is Better for Automated Testing?
Testsigma is the best BrowserStack alternative for automated testing because of its ability to do quick automation end to end.
Testsigma has a suggestion engine that is designed to tackle errors and bugs. An exciting feature is its integration with a wide range of CI/CD and bug tracking tools that ensure maximum accuracy.
With Testsigma, you don’t need to try out multiple tools for testing different details of your web apps as it can cover all web, mobile, iOS, android devices, and API testing. Although identifying the HTML element can be tricky with this tool, you can easily overcome it with the help of their support team.
Testsigma is an excellent test automation tool that can work as a perfect BrowserStack alternative. Starting from test script development, execution, planning, and designing — everything is conducted efficiently through Testsigma.
A completely reliable cross-browser testing cloud that serves as an excellent alternative to BrowserStack is the LambdaTest. The best thing about this tool is that it allows developers to conduct cross-browser testing on more than 2000 real browsers in a wide range of screen resolutions. In addition, the UX is far superior to the BrowserStack.
LambdaTest offers the following platforms for live testing –
- Android & iOS mobile browsers
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
- Windows 8.1
- Windows XP
- Mac OS (10 versions available)
LambdaTest vs BrowserStack – How Do They Differ?
LambdaTest differs on many levels from BrowserStack, but the most important differentiating point is that it offers tons of benefits in its free plan, which is not available in BrowserStack.
Yes, LambdaTest offers a free version that will last you forever. However, the free plan only accommodates five users, 30 minutes of live browsing every day, six sessions in a month, and 10 minutes for each session.
This free service can be an excellent solution for small companies or developers who don’t need to use a browsing tool frequently. You can also get a free trial with Browserstack, but it covers 30 minutes of live testing and 100 minutes of automated testing.
Even if you move to the premium plans in LambdaTest, you’ll still find them better than BrowserStack. Starting from $19/month, you can enjoy automated browser tests and manual and visual test automation across different locations.
You can also enjoy an on-demand pass feature, which allows you to purchase testing time for occasional purposes without signing up for a premium plan. This is a very flexible option for web developers and budget companies.
If you’re looking for a flexible option for live browser and operating system testing for a good deal, LambdaTest can be a decent alternative. It has good features and works fast enough to ensure your requirements are adequately met.
3. Cross Browser Testing
Cross-Browser testing is an excellent option if your target is running Selenium test scripts in the cloud. Apart from Selenium test scripts, you can also operate Appium test scripts through this tool. You can perform cross-browser testing on multiple browsers, including all the major browsers, via this tool.
An interesting feature of this testing tool is that it allows you to take turns between regular and portrait modes for mobile testing.
Other features include capturing network traffic, running automated screenshot tests as well as tracking web pages or web applications. QA engineers can benefit the most from this BrowserStack substitute.
Cross Browser Testing vs BrowserStack – Which Is Better for Web and Mobile Apps?
The Cross Browser Testing and BrowserStack have plans to start at 29$ a month.
However, you cannot run tests on real mobile devices using the starting plan of BrowserStack. With the starting plans of BrowserStack, you can only run tests on desktops.
However, with Cross Browser Testing, you can conduct multiple tests on mobile devices. In the same plan, you can run unlimited manual tests, which is pretty amazing. Since you’re paying the same price, it’s better to go for the Cross Browser Testing, which allows better facilities than BrowserStack.
However, the starter plans do not include automated tests, and you need to select a premium plan depending on the number of parallel testing.
We loved the web application testing feature on real devices and browsers. Starting from its Headless Browser Testing feature, integration with GitHub, Jira, and Jenkins, and performing visual regression testing across different browser versions — everything about this tool was excellent.
However, we did face an issue with end-to-end testing. It was slightly difficult to edit the end-to-end testing compared to other tools. Other than that, this one works perfectly well for different operating systems.
Cross Browser Testing from SmartBear is an excellent tool for web designers and QA engineers because of its impeccable performance in mobile testing.
One of the easiest and most effortless tools for testing websites in virtual machines is Browserling. Equipped with online browser sandbox technology, you no longer need to panic about viruses.
You can also deploy tests with the help of some extensions like Firefox, Chrome, Safari, etc. Besides, this tool allows you to change the screen resolution and browser size to meet all your testing requirements.
Browserling vs BrowserStack – How Is It Different?
With BrowserStack, you can’t expect a free trial or plan. However, with Browserling, you can enjoy an excellent free plan that does not even need account creation.
The free plan allows you to test on Windows 7 and accurately depict how any website will appear on live browsers. It is also limited to browser versions like Internet Explorer 11, Firefox 3-88, and minimum live test numbers.
Despite the limitations in the free plan, it is still a better alternative to BrowserStack as it allows you to test applications to figure out how certain websites will look on multiple versions of browsers.
Although we did not like some of the limitations in the free plan of Browserling, we were still quite impressed with the responsive testing and safe encryption features. We liked that you can share the URL for viewing the browser, take screenshots, annotate them and leave any feedback.
Overall, this is a decent tool that can benefit many small budget companies who want something for occasional use and are looking for a reliable substitute to BrowserStack.
DataDog is an outstanding device for test automation compared to other tools. You don’t have to do any coding to carry out test automation with Datadog.
The best thing about this tool is that the tests can regularly update themselves, which is excellent. It allows you to record the tests and view the full page screenshots based on your tests.
DataDog vs BrowserStack – How Do They Differ?
Although both Datadog and BrowserStack have similar work modes, Datadog is a cheaper option compared to BrowserStack.
BrowserStack starts at 29$ a month, whereas DataDog begins at $12 a month, which is even less than half the price of BrowserStack. With the starting plan, you can comprehensively test at least a thousand browsers per month — which is far better than paying for the expensive BrowserStack starting plan.
Although we were impressed with the automated screenshots and cheap price points, we faced some issues with the graph report. The graph report felt technical and included several metric types that need further reading. Other than that, we liked the great insight and were impressed by the self-maintaining test feature.
DataDog is an eminent private cloud monitoring tool designed for testing different browsers. With a smart user interface and easy integrations, this is a great replacement for BrowserStack.
Comparison BrowserStack Competitors
|Third-party integrations available||Third-party integrations available||Third-party integrations available||Third-party integrations available||Third-party integrations available||Third-party integrations available|
|Free trial available||Free trial available||Free trial available||Free trial available||Free trial available||Free trial available|
|Supports various testing frameworks||Supports various testing frameworks||Supports various testing frameworks||Supports various testing frameworks||Supports various testing frameworks||Supports various testing frameworks|
Wrapping it up, it can be said that all of the testing tools in our list are excellent alternatives to BrowserStack. However, our top BrowserStack Alternatives has to be Testsigma because of their flexibility and smart features.
Both of these tools can provide rapid automation and have facilities to suit the needs of companies of different scales. So, if you want the best alternatives to BrowserStack, we recommend going for Testsigma.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the best alternative to BrowserStack?
There are many alternatives to BrowserStack, and the best one can be any tool that suits your needs. If you are a skilled coder, then going for a testing tool that supports programming is good for you. There are other options, such as Testsigma, that you can choose if you prefer a no-code test automation tool alternative to BrowserStack.
Which is better, Sauce Labs or BrowserStack?
Sauce Labs offers access to real and virtual devices, but it is limited to a handful of popular browsers. On the other hand, BrowserStack provides access to more than 3000 real devices and OS for cross-browser testing. You can choose the option that fulfills your requirements.