Accelq vs Selenium – Which One You Should Choose?

Selenium is the most popular test automation tool in the market. Even today, with many different test automation tools it has secured its position. Selenium solves almost all use cases for automation testing.

 Many tools use Selenium as a foundation and provide customization for additional features. Accelq is one such tool that empowers Selenium by abstracting the complexity. Accelq uses natural language processing and provides a no-code automation feature. It helps to overcome the complexities and challenges that are there in Selenium such as Salesforce automation testing. 

The dedicated Salesforce automation feature in AccelQ can help reduce the major complexity involved in configuration and setup. Let’s understand them all in detail by comparing Accelq vs Selenium.

Accelq vs Selenium – Overview

Accelq and Selenium are both test automation tools targeting the same segment in the market. However, the test automation approach differs. AccelQ has specific features for Salesforce automation, SAP test automation, etc. Selenium is a general-purpose automation tool that requires more technical expertise.

What is Accelq?

Accelq is an AI-driven, no-code-based commercial tool for test automation. 

• It is a SaaS-based tool, that supports local and cloud execution natively. 
• It can support both desktop web and mobile applications in a single platform. 
• It also supports Salesforce workflow testing without burdening end users with configuration and setup complexity. 
• Accelq can help to test the end-to-end, functional, and API features of any supported application. 

Additionally, it comes with a rich user interface which helps to accelerate the automation. 

What is Selenium?

Selenium is an open-source test automation tool, backed by a community of developers. 

• Selenium is popular because of its extensibility and customization in nature. 
• Selenium is a platform-independent tool. 
• It supports all major operating systems and browsers. 
• Selenium framework can be designed the way you want, there are many community-driven plugins to support visual regression, accessibility, mobile testing, reporting, etc. 
• With the integration of Cucumber, test cases can be directly mapped to requirements and solve the readability issues. 

Due to its open source, active development, and rich features, Selenium stands at the top of the list of test automation tools. However, Selenium, which is a more general-purpose test automation doesn’t provide any specific feature to automate the Salesforce testing

Best Alternative to Accelq and Selenium:- Testsigma

Accelq and Selenium are used for the same purpose however their approach towards automation is different. 

Selenium requires good technical skills to set up the framework and write the automation scripts. Accelq helps testers eliminate the complexities involved in Selenium. 

Accelq empowers selenium by enhancing the core test automation feature. It aims to provide all configurations, and integration in one platform and readymade. T

They have also introduced Salesforce test automation, the main goal here is users should not be bothered about configuration, setup, and integration.

Testsigma is also built with the same mindset. Testsigma team has analyzed the trend and scope of test automation and the challenges that testers are facing and then it has built the platform to automate the application. 

Recently, Testsigma has introduced a Salesforce automation feature that makes Salesforce testing very easy. Unbelievably, Salesforce testing with Testsigma can be done without any coding knowledge.

Today, Testsigma supports all required features for desktop web and mobile automation.

 – You can test native and hybrid mobile applications without writing a single code. 

 – It provides all the required integrations readymade. For example, if you need to integrate your framework with CI/CD pipelines you do not need to worry about coding and complexities. 

 – Testsigma even supports Salesforce testing integration, Salesforce testing in Testsigma can be configured with few clicks. 

Testigma also plays a major role in cost saving, though it is a commercial tool where you need to pay for the tool to use, it can save a lot of cost during the test design and execution phase. Organizations don’t need to spend on costly and skilled resources, it provides the no-code automation feature which helps even manual testers and product teams contribute to the automation.

 As skill requirement is considerably reduced, the resources can be shared across the project and team which can further reduce the human resource requirement. 

Interestingly, Testsigma is a more budget-friendly tool, it can provide custom pricing based on the feature and requirement. Testsigma can also automate Salesforce-based automation scenarios. 

Considering Accelq vs Selenium, Testsigma can be a good alternative to these tools, and organizations can get better benefits from Testsigma.

Accelq vs Selenium vs Testsigma – Key Differences

Feature	Accelq	Selenium	Testsigma
Cost and License	Commercial License/ Not Free	Apache 2.0 open source license/ Free	Commercial License/ Not Free
Testing Platform support	Supports Windows/Mac for desktop web. iOS and Android for Mobile	It supports Windows/Mac/Linux for desktop web.Mobile automation requires Appium integration	Supports Windows/Mac/Linux for desktop webAndroid and iOS for Mobile
Dedicated Salesforce use case feature support	Yes	No	Yes, Supports the entire Salesforce suite test automation
Native mobile application automation support	Yes, Available	No, Requires third-party tool integration	Yes, Available
Browser Support	Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari	Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari	Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari
In-built integration to CI/CD tool	Supports many popular CI/CD integrations inbuilt and configurable without much technical knowledge	Integration is supported for all major CI/CD tools. However, integration requires coding knowledge and good technical skills.	Supports many popular CI/CD integrations inbuilt and configurable without much technical knowledge
Record and playback support	Record and Playback is natively supported and it produces a stable script even with the dynamic web application	Record and Playback are supported via Selenium IDE. However, tests are not reliable for dynamic websites. Hence it is not recommended to use this feature for enterprise applications	Record and Playback are supported with the Chrome plugin. Testsigma has the most efficient record and playback feature which produces stable and reliable automation scripts.
AI/ML feature	Built with AI/ML features helps to automate faster.	No AI/ML feature	Testsigma is powered by AI, helps to reduce flakiness and produces more stable results
Customization and Extensibility	Extensible to some extent	Highly extensible and highly customizable	Provides option for customization of certain features with limited extensibility
Cloud base test execution	Supports cloud-based test execution and local execution natively. Can also be integrated into third-party cloud execution tools.	No native cloud execution support	Supports cloud-based execution and local execution natively and also supports integration with third-party cloud-based tools.
Set up complexity	No need to set up the tool locally as it is a Cloud-based tool.	Highly complex to set up and requires good technical knowledge. Also requires time and effort to set up a complete framework	No local setup is required, as it is a cloud-based test automation tool
Reporting and logging	Provides inbuilt sharable reports. Logging is automatic, no setup is required	No in-built reporting and logging features. One needs to implement using his technical skills and third-party plugin	Provides detailed logs for debugging. Reports are customizable and comprehensive. It also provides a customizable dashboard
Features	In-built API testingIn-built Accessibility testingNative cloud-based execution supportNo scripting knowledge is required to automateAll required setup is available ready-madeCross-browser/Cross-platform supportSupports integration with CI/CD tools without complex configurationDedicated technical support	Free and open-sourceHighly customizable and extensibleSupports edge case scenariosCross-platform/ Cross browser supportLarge community supportMany tutorials and videos are available to learn online for free	Supports almost all testing types such as API, Visual Regression, UI Testing, End-to-end Testing, Functional Testing, etc.Supports cloud-based test execution nativelyAll required set up is available readymadeSupports multiple browsers and platformsSupports for data-driven testingReporting and debugging features are inbuilt no configuration or integration is requiredSupports Integration with CI/CD tools nativelyDedicated technical supportGood documentation
Cons	License cost is not transparentNot free to useLarge-scale automation support is unknownLess customization and extensibility compared to SeleniumLimited documentation	No native mobile automation supportNo in-built reportingNo in-built API testing supportDoesn’t support cloud execution nativelyHighly complex to set up and automateRequires highly skilled resources to set up a frameworkIntegration with third-party tools is not easy	The license cost has not been disclosed; we need to contact the support team.

Accelq and Selenium Similarities

Selenium and Accelq are both built to fulfill test automation needs. There are many similarities between these tools. 

• They both support multiple browsers such as Firefox, Chrome, Edge, and Safari hence they can be used for compatibility testing. 
• You can also perform the accessibility test automation with Accelq. You can achieve this in Selenium just by integrating the accessibility plugin. 
• You can perform end-to-end testing, UI testing, and functionality using both of these frameworks. 
• Selenium and Accelq are extensible; these can be integrated with CI/CD tools, Though selenium requires a good amount of technical knowledge due to the tool’s nature, however integration can be performed. 
• Selenium and Accelq both provide features to integrate third-party tools which help to extend our framework to support development and management tools like Jira, qTest, Testlink, etc. 
• The record and Playback feature is provided by both of these tools, however, Selenium record and playback tools (Selenium IDE) lack stability tests and are often seen as flaky. Accelqs Record and playback are more stable and reliable. 
• Both the tool supports Salesforce test automation, however, AccelQ has the exclusive feature for Salesforce test automation

Considering the similarity of features, Testsigma also provides features similar to Accelq and Selenium. As mentioned earlier while evaluating the best-fit tools for your project or organization don’t forget to evaluate Testsigma. 

Testsigma is a proven player in the market and it has gained a good number of customers that belong to different segments such as large-scale, mid-scale, and start-up (small-scale) organizations. 

With the Salesforce test automation support, Testsigma has become a more powerful automation tool than ever. Additionally, Testsigma is budget-friendly, in most cases, it fits into your tight budget.

Conclusion

Selenium is an open-source test automation tool that is known for good customization and extensible features. Many organizations have created custom organization-specific frameworks to support their project/organization-specific edge case scenarios. 

Selenium is a building block for many commercial tools. In recent days many commercial tools have utilized the Selenium core features, and by abstracting the complexity they are providing the option to write test automation scripts without any programming language. Accelq is one such example. 

Accelq and Testigma have similar features, however, Testsigma additionally provides many unique features such as one-click visual regression testing support, customization features, and easy integration with many well-known third-party tools. 

Testsigma can be considered a good alternative to Selenium and Accelq. One of the interesting and most appreciated features of Testsigma is that it supports all different testing types in one platform that also includes Salesforce test automation. This eliminates investment in multiple tools and lowers the skill upgrade time and cost. 

As you are aware, all the tools will have pros and cons due to their architecture or by how it has been built. While choosing the best automation tool for your project you need to understand the requirements and roadmap carefully and evaluate the tools against that. Remember, it’s always costlier and a huge risk if you decide to switch the automation tool later. So, Make the right choice before you begin.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Can I migrate test data from Accelq and Selenium to Testsigma?

Testsigma is an AI-based no-code test automation tool. It is a SaaS tool and requires no setup. Since it is a no-code-based tool, you do not have to write the script. Testsigma comes with a record and playback option, All you have to do is just execute the flow manually, Testsigma records all of these test cases in the background and takes care of all the locators and other automation framework complexities in the background.

Is ACCELQ based on Selenium?

Accelq is a modern no-code automation tool that empowers Selenium by enhancing the test automation features of Selenium and overcoming the challenges that are involved in Selenium. You don’t feel the Selenium flavour while you work with the Accelq as all the Selenium complexities are abstracted.

Does Testsigma support Salesforce test automation?

Yes, Testsigma is a powerful tool, it supports salesforce automation. It has released features specifically to support Salesforce testing.