Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma
Try for freeThe modern application relies on many advanced technologies, frameworks, and third-party tools. Rather than targeting a single use case, the application focuses on multiple features. This increases the complexity of the application and leads to defect leakages. As the applications are complex, there will be more scope for testing. Managing all different scenarios, their execution, and designing using a legacy approach may create chaos during the testing phase. Test management tools come in handy to overcome such challenges. There are many test management tools in the market, Kualitee is one such popular tool. However, this tool lacks many features that the organization requires, and because of that many organizations are looking for the best suitable alternatives, this blog explains the overview of the Kualitee tool and its alternatives.
Table Of Contents
What is Kualitee?
Kualitee is a test management platform that aims to streamline the testing process by providing end-to-end tracking and collaboration features. Kualitee was founded in the year of 2015 it is shipped under a commercial license. It provides many features including AI-based test case creation, in-built defect management, personalized dashboards, role-based access, etc. Kualitee tool is improving its features every day to provide a smooth user experience.
Why Consider Kualitee Alternatives
Though Kualitee provides many features, it may not fulfill all of the organization’s requirements. As Kualitee is still trying to improve its tool and add more features, some of the features are still not supported. However, organizations may need them to fulfill their standards and to bring better-quality software. Below are key pointers to consider Kualitee alternatives
Usability Issues
Kualitee lacks the many usability and user experience features, many users opined that test cases and test runs are confusing in the Kualitee platform.
Lacks Integration support
Though Kualitee offers integration with many tools, it lacks fewer known tools. Additionally, many users opined that integration features for the popular tool are also limited and require technical expertise.
No In-built support for Test automation
While it supports manual test cases, when it comes to automated testing it lacks the inbuilt capability of automation testing. The integration support for automation tools is also limited. Currently, only Selenium is supported for integration.
Limited analytics and dashboard features
Kualitee supports reports and dashboard features, however, there are limitations to these. These are not highly customizable; some organizations may find customization features are not enough especially when they want to share it with higher management and stakeholders
Limitations with Test plans
Test plans are limited to specific projects, they cannot be used across the project, additionally, some customers have opined that many features in Kualitee are having bugs and performance issues, and it doesn’t scale well with larger projects. Kualitee could have also increased its focus on defect tracking for better management.
Customer support
In some cases, Kualitee has taken more time to provide the solution to specific problems, which blocked customers from moving forward.
Top 10 Kualitee Alternatives
There are many test management tools in the market, however selecting and evaluating such tools may be difficult, as each tool has many advances and disadvantages. Looking at each tool listing down the pros and cons, and matching them against your requirements may be complex tasks. To make your job easier we have provided a curated list of Kualitee alternatives below. Note that these tools are not ordered by ranking and list may not be exhaustive.
Testsigma
Testsigma has recently released a test management platform for manual testing. Testsigma is a pioneer in the no-code automation space, after gaining popularity in the automation space and serving customer demand it has introduced a Test Management System (aka Testsigma TMS). Currently, it supports both automation and manual testing natively without any third-party tool integrations. This not only helps in the easy maintenance of test cases but also increases the speed and efficiency of testers.
Features of Testsigma
- It offers budget-friendly and flexible pricing plans that can meet any type of organization such as small-scale, mid-scale, and large-scale
- Testsigma’s test management system is easy to setup and configure which requires only basic technical knowledge
- Supports all of your testing activities management in place such as test planning, creation, and execution of test cases.
- Testsigma’s automation platform supports the automated execution of test cases using cloud testing concepts. That can be used to cover advanced use cases such as cross-browser, cross-platform, and visual testing
- It offers the most advanced AI-driven test case creation based on text or image file
- Testsigma encourages reusability by allowing users to group multiple test steps and use them in other test cases/test suites
- It can be easily integrated with Jira and other popular tools to report the bug instantly without navigating the actual application
- Testsigma’s reporting and dashboards are rich and comprehensive it can be used for real-time monitoring of testing activities
- One can easily assign the state of test cases and later that can be filtered out easily with visual UI based on the requirement
- It also supports creating multiple test runs, and test executions by allowing users to attach the evidence
- It provides dedicated technical support to answer all your queries and assist you in integration and configuration.
- Testsigma aggressively builds the feature based on customer feedback
TestCollab
TestCollab is a test management tool founded in 2010. It allows the testing and development team to efficiently carry out the testing by increasing cross-team collaboration and managing all testing activities in one place. It supports the integration of popular project management tools and test automation frameworks.
Features of TestCollab
- Provides a centralized repository for all of your testing activities
- Allows to creation of collaborative test plans and checklists
- Supports customized workflow
- Provides the burn-down charts to monitor QA tasks and work
- Provides integration with many popular tools such as Jira, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Cypress, etc.
- Supports API-based integration
- Provides collaboration features to speed up the activities
Limitations of TestCollab
- Limited integration with automation framework
- Complex procedure to integrate the third-party tool
- Lacks documentation, many information and features are not documented
- As it lacks documentation learning curve is high and difficult to use
- Many users have observed scalability issues
- No in-built support for automation testing
- Supports only basic defect management features
Testpad
Testpad is a test plan tool. It is different than the traditional test arrangement platform. As Testpad claims it is built for simplicity and test faster. It allows structured thinking and a mindmap feature which can help more in exploratory testing. It also offers integration with a few tools like Jira, Github, Jenkins, etc.
Check here – Testpad vs Testrail
Features of Testpad
- Offers a simple way to create test plans
- Provides a different approach compared to traditional test management
- Provides a keyboard-driven editor for faster designing for test cases
- Supports instant sharable reports no need to kick off the process
- Offers structured thinking, and mindmap style test cases which can help to uncover many defects faster
- Provides guest testing features without logging into the system
- Supports tags and filtering options
- Provides integration into tools like Jira, Jenkins, etc
Limitations of Testpad
- Testpad offers different ways of managing tests, those who are familiar with traditional test management tools, may face challenges
- It offers limited integration into third-party tools
- Neither does it support automation test cases nor does it support automated execution
- May not fit very well into large-scale projects
- It lacks the comprehensive analytics and dashboards
- Less customization options
- No support for advanced capabilities
- Not a formal test case management system, such as test plan, test suite, test execution, etc.
Testiny
Testiny is a modern test management tool that allows the management of both automation and manual test cases in a single place. It also offers integration with many tools such as Jira, GitLab, GitHub, etc. Additionally, it provides many robust features such as importing test cases and custom fields.
Features of Testiny
- Provides an intuitive and easy interface
- Manage, and organize all of your testing requirements such as test plans, test cases, and reports in one place
- Supports real-time collaboration feature
- Automatic versioning of the test cases
- Integration with many project management tools including Jira
- Provides role-based access control for better management of teams
- Supports importing of test cases, custom fields, and templates
- Supports CLI and allows to integrate with any CI/CD tools
Limitations of Testiny
- It provides integration with tools using CLI, which is complex and requires more time and effort
- No direct support automation tools integration
- It lacks a customization option, only basic customization is supported
- Integration is limited to only some tools
- Lacks support for complex workflows
- Lacks the documentation and community support
- Cost may be higher for smaller teams, especially start-ups
- Lacks many advanced capabilities including AI/ML
IBM Rational Quality Manager (RQM)
IBM Rational Quality Manager popularly known as RQM is a test management tool and it is part of IBM’s Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management (CLM) solution. It supports managing the entire quality assurance process such as planning, designing, execution, and reporting. RQM can be integrated into many tools including DevOps tools and defect tracking tools.
Features of IBM RQM
- RQM provides end-to-end solutions for test management from the requirement phase to the execution phase
- RQM allows collaboration by storing the data at a central location and providing authorized access to members
- It can be integrated with many tools including Jira, RFT, UFT, and other ALM tools
- Provides the requirement traceability helps to ensure that development aligns with objectives
- It allows for to reuse of the steps and helps in faster designing of test cases
- It has features like work item tracking, artifact locking, global variables, and data sets.
Limitations of IBM RQM
- IBM RQM is more difficult to setup and configure
- It has a complex interface, documentation is unclear, searching for specific features in documentation is difficult
- It has limited third-party integration
- It has many features combined into a single platform, some of the features may not be required for smaller teams and start-ups
- It has a dependency on other IBM rational tools to work smoothly
- Pricing is not transparent
- Doesn’t have a modern UI, and many users opined that the user experience is not smooth.
Xray
Xray is a test management tool designed for Jira, that supports end-to-end management of testing activities. It supports native integration with Jira which allows many features can be accessed and manipulated in a native Jira environment. Additionally, Xray and Jira serve as one-stop tools to track and manage all project management features including test management.
Features of Xray
- Provides native integration with Jira
- Supports test case management, test plan management, execution cycles
- Provides integration with CI/CD tools
- Supports automation testing tools integration
- Allows requirements traceability
- Supports step-based and BDD-style test steps
Check here – Xray vs Testrail
Limitations of Xray
- Xray license is not budget-friendly, one needs to purchase the license maximum number of Jira users
- Xray requires integration with Jira and it has a dependency on Jira
- Limited reporting features
- Limited customization options
- The learning curve may be high for some users
Check here – Testomat vs Xray
qTest
qTest is a test management platform by Tricentis, it aims to streamline the testing activities across the business by governance and traceability for all your testing in one place. Additionally, it allows template-based test case import, export, real-time monitoring, and tracking, etc.
Check here – Qtest Alternatives
Features of qTest
- Supports test case management, test execution, and other test management features
- Provides API to integrate with automation tools
- Supports integration of Jira and other project management tools
- Supports Agile development methodology
- Allows collaboration between multiple team members
- Role-based access control
- Can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise
Limitations of qTest
- API has a lot of latency when integrated with an automation tool, it can increase the test duration
- Legacy UI is difficult to understand and it has performance issues
- No native support for automation test execution
- Integration with CI/CD tools requires a lot of technical knowledge
- Cost may not be budget-friendly for smaller organizations
- Lacks advanced capabilities
TestLink
TestLink is an open-source test management tool that offers end-to-end management of testing activities. It provides many functionalities such as creating and managing test cases, test plans, and execution. TestLink can be integrated with many defect tracking tools and automation tools. As it is an open-source tool it is more cost-effective.
Features of TestLink
- It is an open-source tool and cost-effective
- Supports integration with many project management tools
- Provides role-based access
- Customizable reports and traceability throughout the testing life cycle
- Supports automation integration
Limitations of TestLink
- Legacy and outdated user interface
- Limited reporting capabilities
- Requires good technical knowledge to integrate
- No in-built cloud deployment options
- No active development in recent years
- Less community support and lack of documentation
TestCaseLab
TestCaseLab is a modern test management platform, that comes with a rich dashboard, unlimited users, activity stream, custom fields, and many other features. Additionally, it supports integration with Jira, Trello, GitHub, etc. to streamline the testing activities.
Features of TestCaseLab
- Provides rich UI to manage the testing activities such as test case design, creation, and execution.
- Integration with bug-tracking tools
- Allows cross-team/member collaboration
- Grouping by categories and subcategories
- No user limit on pricing plans
- Supports good dashboards and reporting for every project
- Supports analytics and real-time tracking of testing activities
Limitations of TestCaseLab
- Confusing license model based on test cases rather than users. It may be difficult to predict the test cases before in-hand
- Supports only basic reporting compared to many other competitors
- Limited customization option
- Less community support
- Supports only limited integration, no support for automation tools
PractiTest
PractiTest is one of the popular test management platforms that allows orchestration of automated and manual Testing. It supports API to integrate many different tools into its platform. It supports many features in its platform such as requirements management, defect management, agile and DevOps support, collaborative environment, role-based access control, etc. It is used by many popular organizations.
Check here – Practitest Alternatives
Features of PractiTest
- Supports both automation and manual test case management
- Provides API based integration which helps to integrate many tools
- Supports advanced AI capabilities
- Supports integration with many automation tools such as Selenium, xBot, etc.
- Supports both agile and waterfall methodology
- Supports cloud-based integration no need to set up locally
Limitations of PractiTest
- Limited support for integration tools like bug tracking systems and automation tools
- Cost may not be budget-friendly for smaller organizations
- Limited option to customize
- The user interface could be improved
- Steep learning curve
- The reporting feature is limited
Conclusion
Test management tool helps to streamline the testing process. As the modern application scope has increased a lot and modern applications are built with various technologies. It makes application testing more challenging. Test cases need to be documented and managed efficiently to deliver a quality product. There are many test management tools in the market, however many of them have major limitations. Rather than supporting test management it can create chaos. While choosing a test management tool, one needs to evaluate against the organization’s requirements and the scope of the project. Many modern test managements are built with support to cater to most organization requirements. Testsigma is one such tool that provides many advanced capabilities including AI/ML-based test case creation. Testsigma also has a rich UI with less learning curve that can help to speed up the testing. Organizations can consider Testsigma as the closest alternative to Kualitee and get benefits from them.