Cypress vs Cucumber – Which One to Choose?

Live Testing What it is and How to Conduct

Live Testing | What it is and How to Conduct?

Playwright vs Cypress Which should you Choose in 2023

Playwright vs Cypress: Which One should you Choose?

Top 10 TestRigor Alternatives and Competitors

WPF Automation Testing What, Why, Best Practices & Tools

WPF Automation Testing: What, Why, Best Practices & Tools

CRM Testing What it is, Why, How to Do &amp; Best Practices

CRM Testing | What it is, Why, How to Do & Best Practices

Progressive Web Apps (PWA) Testing What , How to do & Tools

Progressive Web Apps (PWA) Testing | What , How to do & Tools

10 Top Model-based Testing Tools to Work With


<p>Imagine releasing a software product you&#8217;re confident about, only to find out later that users are encountering issues you thought were resolved. This scenario is more common than one might think and is often a result of &#8216;Defect Escapes&#8217;.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In the world of software testing, Defect Escape is a critical metric that points to bugs or issues slipping through the testing phase and making their way into the final release. It&#8217;s a subtle reminder of the challenges in achieving perfect software quality.</p>



<p>The importance of understanding and managing Defect Escapes cannot be overstated. It&#8217;s not just about identifying what went wrong; it&#8217;s about refining the testing processes and preventing future lapses.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In this blog post, we delve into what constitutes a Defect Escape, why it&#8217;s a crucial aspect of software quality assurance, and most importantly, how you can effectively measure and minimize these escapes.&nbsp;</p>



<p>For teams aiming to enhance their software&#8217;s reliability and user satisfaction, grasping the concept of Defect Escape is essential. It&#8217;s a journey towards not only detecting bugs but also fortifying the overall quality of software development and testing practices.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_a_Defect_Escape"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is a Defect Escape?</a></li><li><a href="#Defect_Escape_Rate_Why_Is_It_Important"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Defect Escape Rate: Why Is It Important?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Track_Your_Defect_Escape_Rate"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> How to Track Your Defect Escape Rate?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Improve_Your_Defect_Escape_Rate"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> How to Improve Your Defect Escape Rate?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_an_Acceptable_Defect_Escape_Rate"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.1</span> What is an Acceptable Defect Escape Rate?</a></li><li><a href="#How_Do_You_Calculate_Escaped_Defects"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.2</span> How Do You Calculate Escaped Defects?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-a-defect-escape"><span id="What_is_a_Defect_Escape"><strong>What is a Defect Escape?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Defect Escape is a critical concept in software testing, referring to bugs that go undetected during testing and end up in the released software. This phenomenon is more than just an oversight; it highlights weaknesses in the testing process, potentially leading to increased costs, customer dissatisfaction, and harm to the brand&#8217;s reputation.</p>



<br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Learn more about software testing</a></button></p><br>



<p>Understanding and addressing Defect Escape is essential for enhancing testing strategies and overall software quality. By analyzing these incidents, teams can pinpoint and rectify gaps in their testing methodologies, leading to more robust and reliable software products. For deeper insights into optimizing testing processes, take a look at our article on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-efficiency/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Efficiency.</a></p>



<h2 id="defect-escape-rate-why-is-it-important"><span id="Defect_Escape_Rate_Why_Is_It_Important"><strong>Defect Escape Rate: Why Is It Important?</strong></span></h2>



<p>The Defect Escape Rate is a vital metric in software testing, offering a clear quantification of how many bugs slip through the testing net into the final product. This rate is crucial for several reasons:</p>



<p>Firstly, it serves as a direct indicator of the testing process&#8217;s effectiveness. A lower defect escape rate implies a more rigorous and successful testing phase, whereas a higher rate may signal the need for process improvements. This metric helps organizations identify specific areas in their testing cycle that require attention, enabling targeted improvements.</p>



<p>Moreover, understanding the Defect Escape Rate is essential for maintaining customer satisfaction and trust. Bugs in a live environment can lead to user frustration, negative feedback, and in severe cases, loss of clientele. By striving to minimize the Defect Escape Rate, companies not only enhance the quality of their product but also safeguard their reputation and customer loyalty.</p>



<p>For a comprehensive understanding of defect management in software testing, consider exploring our in-depth article on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-tracking/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Defect Tracking</a>, which provides valuable insights into tracking and managing defects efficiently.</p>



<h2 id="how-to-track-your-defect-escape-rate"><span id="How_to_Track_Your_Defect_Escape_Rate"><strong>How to Track Your Defect Escape Rate?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Tracking the defect escape rate is a fundamental aspect of ensuring software quality. This metric is typically calculated by dividing the number of defects found post-release by the total number of defects (including those found during and after testing) and then multiplying by 100 to get a percentage. This formula gives a clear picture of how effective your testing phase has been in catching bugs.</p>



<p>To effectively track this rate, it&#8217;s important to have a robust defect-tracking system in place. This system should be capable of categorizing and documenting defects throughout the software development lifecycle. Regular analysis of this data allows teams to monitor trends over time, identify recurring issues, and take proactive measures to strengthen their testing strategies.</p>



<p>Furthermore, integrating defect tracking with your development and testing tools can streamline the process, ensuring that all team members have visibility into the defect status and can respond promptly. This integrated approach can significantly enhance team collaboration and efficiency in addressing software quality issues.</p>



<p>For more insights into the tools and strategies that can help in effectively tracking and managing defects, you might find our article on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/devops-metrics/">DevOps Metrics</a> particularly useful.</p>



<h2 id="how-to-improve-your-defect-escape-rate"><span id="How_to_Improve_Your_Defect_Escape_Rate"><strong>How to Improve Your Defect Escape Rate?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Improving the Defect Escape Rate is crucial for delivering high-quality software. This involves adopting strategies that not only detect bugs early but also prevent them from reaching the end-users. Here are key approaches to enhance your Defect Escape Rate:</p>



<p><strong>1. Find Bugs While Writing Your Code</strong></p>



<p>One of the most effective ways to reduce defect escape is to identify bugs during the coding phase itself. Implementing practices like peer code reviews and using static code analysis tools can catch errors early. This proactive approach ensures that many potential defects are addressed before they even enter the testing phase.</p>



<p><strong>2. Document Your Testing Strategy for Every Work Item</strong></p>



<p>A well-documented testing strategy for each work item ensures thoroughness and consistency in the testing process. This documentation should include test cases, expected outcomes, and special testing conditions. It serves as a roadmap for testers, helping them cover all scenarios and reducing the chances of oversight.</p>



<p><strong>3. Test Everything, Automatically!</strong></p>



<p>Automation is key in modern software testing. Automating your testing processes, especially for repetitive and routine tests, increases efficiency and accuracy. Tools that enable continuous testing and integration can help catch defects early and often, significantly lowering the Defect Escape Rate.</p>



<br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Learn more about automated testing</a></button></p><br>



<p><strong>4. Find Defects in QA Before They Make It to Production</strong></p>



<p>Quality Assurance (QA) is your last line of defence before production. Implementing rigorous QA processes, including multiple testing stages and varied testing methodologies (like regression, performance, and user acceptance testing), can catch defects that might have slipped through earlier stages.</p>



<p><strong>5. Find Defects During and After Production Deployments</strong></p>



<p>Finally, monitoring your application post-deployment is crucial. Implementing real-time monitoring tools and conducting post-release testing can help identify and rectify defects that escaped initial testing phases. This continuous vigilance ensures ongoing quality maintenance even after the product has been released.</p>



<p>Improving the Defect Escape Rate is a multifaceted approach that involves vigilance at every stage of software development. For an in-depth understanding of how to tackle missed bugs in testing, consider reading our guide<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/a-testers-guide-to-deal-with-missed-bugs/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> A Tester’s Guide to Deal with Missed Bugs.</a></p>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>In summary, the Defect Escape Rate is a pivotal metric in assessing and enhancing the quality of software development. By implementing strategies such as early bug detection, thorough testing documentation, embracing automation, rigorous QA, and vigilant post-production monitoring, organizations can significantly lower their Defect Escape Rate. These practices are not just about identifying errors; they are about fostering a culture of quality and continuous improvement.</p>



<p>Ultimately, reducing the Defect Escape Rate is a collaborative and ongoing effort. It involves every member of the software development team and is integral to building reliable, user-friendly software. Embracing these principles is key to not only minimizing defects but also ensuring customer satisfaction and maintaining a competitive edge in the software industry.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions<br></strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="what-is-an-acceptable-defect-escape-rate"><span id="What_is_an_Acceptable_Defect_Escape_Rate"><strong>What is an Acceptable Defect Escape Rate?</strong></span></h3>



<p>An acceptable Defect Escape Rate varies depending on the industry, project complexity, and the specific standards of a company. Generally, a lower rate is always preferable. For high-stakes industries like healthcare or aviation, the acceptable rate is typically very low due to the critical nature of the software. In less critical applications, a slightly higher rate might be tolerable. The key is to set a benchmark based on historical data, industry standards, and the specific tolerance level of your stakeholders and customers.</p>



<h3 id="how-do-you-calculate-escaped-defects"><span id="How_Do_You_Calculate_Escaped_Defects"><strong>How Do You Calculate Escaped Defects?</strong></span></h3>



<p>Escaped defects are calculated by identifying the number of defects found in the production environment that were not caught during the testing phases. The formula for calculating the Defect Escape Rate is:&nbsp;</p>



<p>Defect Escape Rate = (Number of Defects Escaped to Production/Total Number of Defects (Pre-production + Production)) × 100</p>



<p><br><br>This calculation gives a percentage that reflects the effectiveness of your testing process in identifying and resolving defects before <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software release</a>.</p>



<customlinks>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Defect Management</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-management/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Defect Tracking</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-tracking/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Defect Density</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-density/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Defect Analysis</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-analysis/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Bug vs Defect </ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/bug-vs-defect/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Latent Defect In Software Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/latent-defect-in-software-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Defect Prevention</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/defect-prevention/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
</customlinks>


What is Defect Escape | Importance & How to Measure?

What is Conventional Testing? | Types, How to Do & Challenges


<p>Anyone in the test automation industry for quite a few years now would know how Cypress and Puppeteer have changed the game. The initial tough days of installing, creating, and debugging tests using Selenium are a thing of the past, thanks to Cypress and Puppeteer. Now, among these two tools, which one is better? The Cypress vs Puppeteer conversation will help you understand the topic in detail.</p>



<p>In case, you have an extensive list of points to consider, <a href="https://testsigma.com/compare-test-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">compare test automation tools</a> in a way to check which one among the many available in the market works for you.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Cypress"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is Cypress?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is Puppeteer?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_Core_Differences"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</a><ul><li><a href="#Installing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Installing</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> When Should You Use</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Not_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> When Should You Not Use</a></li><li><a href="#What_Companies_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.4</span> What Companies Use</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Execution"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.5</span> Test Execution</a></li><li><a href="#Features"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.6</span> Features</a></li><li><a href="#Benefits"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.7</span> Benefits</a></li><li><a href="#Limitations"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.8</span> Limitations</a></li><li><a href="#Pricing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.9</span> Pricing</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Which_is_Better_8211_Cypress_vs_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#Alternative_Tool_for_Cypress_and_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_Cypress_better_than_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.1</span> Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Puppeteer_and_Cypress"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.2</span> What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="cypress-vs-puppeteer-overview"><span id="Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_8211_Overview">Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-cypress"><span id="What_is_Cypress">What is Cypress?</span></h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="798" height="134" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/17165452/Cypress-2.png" alt="Cypress" class="wp-image-53897" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/17165452/Cypress-2.png 798w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/17165452/Cypress-2-768x129.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 798px) 100vw, 798px" /></figure></div>



<p>Cypress is an open-source, end-to-end testing framework that allows third-party add-ons per your testing needs. It runs directly within the browser and comes equipped with distinctive features like real-time interactive testing, automatic waiting, and seamless debugging. Cypress simplifies the testing process by enabling developers and testers to observe test execution in real-time, leading to quick issue identification.</p>



<p>In terms of the brand history, Cypress was released in 2015 with the aim of empowering open-source testing communities.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-puppeteer"><span id="What_is_Puppeteer">What is Puppeteer?</span></h3>



<p>Puppeteer is a powerful Node.js library developed by Google. It was originally designed for web scraping and generating screenshots but has now evolved into a robust tool for browser automation. Testers benefit from <a href="https://medium.com/gdplabs/how-to-use-puppeteer-faad9acafeab" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer’s headless mode</a>, which allows for script execution without a visible browser interface. Its versatility extends to performance monitoring, accessibility testing, and generating detailed reports.</p>



<h2 id="h-cypress-vs-puppeteer-core-differences"><span id="Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_Core_Differences">Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</span></h2>



<p>Although both of these <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-frameworks/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automation testing frameworks</a> bring distinctive advantages for the testers, there are a few differences that you should consider when choosing one tool that suits your needs the best.</p>



<h3 id="h-installing"><span id="Installing">Installing</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Installing Cypress is straightforward. Use npm to install Cypress globally, and then initialize the project with a simple command. Use the below command:</p>



<p><em>npm install cypress &#8211;save-dev</em></p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Puppeteer is installed via npm as well. After installing Puppeteer, it automatically downloads a compatible version of Chromium. Use the below command:</p>



<p><em>npm install puppeteer &#8211;save-dev</em></p>



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-use"><span id="When_Should_You_Use">When Should You Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Choose Cypress when focusing on <a href="https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">end-to-end testing </a>for modern web applications. Cypress is ideal for projects where real-time interactive testing and quick issue identification are priorities.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Opt for Puppeteer when browser automation, especially headless browsing, is the primary requirement. Puppeteer is suitable for scenarios involving web scraping, generating screenshots, or performing tasks without a visible browser interface.</p>



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-not-use"><span id="When_Should_You_Not_Use">When Should You Not Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Avoid Cypress if your project involves extensive <a href="https://testsigma.com/cross-browser-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cross-browser testing</a>, as Cypress primarily supports Chromium-based browsers.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Do not use Puppeteer if your focus is on interactive testing or if you require a testing tool that operates directly within the browser.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-companies-use"><span id="What_Companies_Use">What Companies Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Companies like GitLab, Shopify, and Trivago leverage Cypress for their testing needs.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Google, Netflix, and Alibaba are among the companies utilizing Puppeteer for web automation.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-execution"><span id="Test_Execution">Test Execution</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Cypress runs directly in the browser, enabling real-time interactive testing. It provides an easy-to-understand interface and quick feedback on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-execution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test execution</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Puppeteer excels in headless mode, allowing for script execution without a visible browser interface. It&#8217;s suitable for automated tasks and scenarios where a visible browser is not required.</p>



<h3 id="h-features"><span id="Features">Features</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> It offers features like automatic waiting, real-time reloading, and seamless debugging. It supports JavaScript-based testing and has an extensive set of commands for robust test scripts.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> It provides capabilities for web scraping, taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and interacting with pages in headless mode.</p>



<h3 id="h-benefits"><span id="Benefits">Benefits</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Fast test execution, real-time observation, user-friendly interface, and interactive testing capabilities to promote collaboration between developers and testers.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Beneficial for headless browser automation, supporting web scrapping and performance reporting.</p>



<h3 id="h-limitations"><span id="Limitations">Limitations</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Limited cross-browser support and challenges in handling multiple tabs or windows. It may experience slower execution times in large test suites.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Not suitable for interactive testing scenarios, and the focus on headless browsing limit its applicability for certain use cases.</p>



<h3 id="h-pricing"><span id="Pricing">Pricing</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Both free and paid versions are available.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Free of cost.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup required.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-which-is-better-cypress-vs-puppeteer"><span id="Which_is_Better_8211_Cypress_vs_Puppeteer">Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</span></h2>



<p>The answer truly depends upon the requirements your testing team carries. Cypress brings a few advantages to the shore, whereas Puppeteer provides other benefits. If you are looking for faster test execution, interactive test capabilities, and a tool that runs directly within the browser, Cypress should be your ideal choice. Alternatively, Puppeteer is the right choice if your test focus lies in web scrapping, headlines test automation, and capturing test screenshots.</p>



<p>Ultimately, the decision depends on your specific testing goals, team expertise, and the features that align best with your project requirements. Consider evaluating both tools in a small-scale test scenario to see which one better meets your needs.</p>



<p>The comparison of these two tools in the form of a table below can help you clarify doubts regarding, which tool is right for you.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cypress</strong></td><td><strong>Puppeteer</strong></td></tr><tr><td>End-to-end testing of web apps</td><td>Headless browser automation</td></tr><tr><td>Chromiun-based browsers</td><td>Chromium (can be extended to Chrome)</td></tr><tr><td>Real-time extensive testing</td><td>Limited real-time testing; primarily, headless operation</td></tr><tr><td>Visible browser interaction</td><td>Optional: Headless Mode Available&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Uses JavaScript</td><td>Uses JavaScript (Node.js)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>It is User-Friendly, but steeper for Beginners</td><td>Moderate learning curve, requires JavaScript Skills</td></tr><tr><td>Limited support for cross-browser testing</td><td>Requires additional configuration for cross-browser testing</td></tr><tr><td>Supports real-time debugging</td><td>Offers comprehensive debugging with screenshots</td></tr><tr><td>Open-source and paid options present</td><td>Open-source</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-alternative-tool-for-cypress-and-puppeteer"><span id="Alternative_Tool_for_Cypress_and_Puppeteer">Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</span></h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1600" height="804" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png" alt="Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer" class="wp-image-46715" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png 1600w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-768x386.png 768w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-1536x772.png 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" /></figure>



<p>In case you wish not to limit the testing benefits by choosing either Cypress or the Puppeteer, an alternative that brings features of both the tools together should be on your list. Testsigma comes equipped with a myriad of attributes that overcome the challenges faced due to Cypress and Puppeteer. Unlike Cypress, Testsigma offers creation of browser-agnostic tests in simple english and provides access to over 3000+ devices and browsers for testing.&nbsp;</p>



<p>As a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/puppeteer-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer alternative</a> , Testsigma brings headless testing that supports a wide range of testing types, including web, mobile, and API testing. Not to mention that Testsigma aims to reduce the learning curve by providing a scriptless, no-code interface for test creation.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>Determining which tool works best for you in the long run is more than just checking the price of those test automation tools. Rather it takes into account various factors, such as ease of use, integration capabilities, benefits and limitations, and use cases. Cypress vs Puppeteer comparison takes all these differences into consideration to guide you through the selection process. And if nothing else works, Testsigma is available to fill the gap of test automation tools in the present market.</p>



<p>Consider this blog a detailed guide to making the right decision when it comes to selecting either Cypress or Puppeteer.</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions">Frequently Asked Questions</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-is-cypress-better-than-puppeteer"><span id="Is_Cypress_better_than_Puppeteer">Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</span></h3>



<p>Cypress is only better than Puppeteer if it meets your testing project needs better than latter. The choice between Cypress and Puppeteer depends on the testing requirements. Cypress excels in end-to-end testing with real-time interactive capabilities, making it ideal for modern web applications. Puppeteer, developed by Google, focuses on headless browser automation, making it versatile for tasks like web scraping and generating screenshots.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-puppeteer-and-cypress"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_Puppeteer_and_Cypress">What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</span></h3>



<p>Again, the difference lies in the use case. Cypress is designed for end-to-end testing of modern web applications with real-time interactivity. Puppeteer, on the other hand, is more focused on headless browser automation, suitable for web scraping and tasks without a visible browser interface.</p>


Testsigma Blog