Cloud-based automation testing is a simple concept. We leverage cloud resources to accomplish our automation testing goals in the project. This article will focus on tools that make this happen in real time on the cloud. 



Below, I have summarised the most popular tools for cloud automation testing assuming that you all are familiar with cloud-based <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automation testing</a>. 



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_are_Cloud_Testing_Tools">1 What are Cloud Testing Tools?</a></li><li><a href="#Top_5_Popular_Cloud_Testing_Tools">2 Top 5 Popular Cloud Testing Tools</a><ul><li><a href="#Testsigma">2.1 Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#AppPerfect">2.2 AppPerfect</a></li><li><a href="#CloudQA">2.3 CloudQA</a></li><li><a href="#Blazemeter">2.4 Blazemeter</a></li><li><a href="#AWS_Device_Farm">2.5 AWS Device Farm</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#How_do_you_select_the_best_cloud_automation_testing_tools">3 How do you select the best cloud automation testing tools?</a></li><li><a href="#Benefits_of_using_Cloud_Automation_Testing_Tools">4 Benefits of using Cloud Automation Testing Tools</a></li><li><a href="#End_Note">5 End Note</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="what-are-cloud-testing-tools">What are Cloud Testing Tools?</h2>



Cloud testing tools are software applications that test applications&#8217; performance, functionality, and security while being hosted on cloud environments.&nbsp;



These tools leverage the scalability and elasticity of cloud computing to simulate real-world user traffic and various operational conditions, helping developers and testers ensure their apps function flawlessly.



Think of them as virtual testing labs accessible online, eliminating the need for physical devices and infrastructure.



<h2 id="top-5-popular-cloud-testing-tools">Top 5 Popular Cloud Testing Tools</h2>



<h3 id="testsigma">Testsigma</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/static-docs.testsigma.com/new_images/projects/applications/dashboard.png" alt="Testsigma Dashboard showing all the sections"/></figure>


<a href="https://testsigma.com/">Testsigma</a> is a cloud-based test automation tool that allows users to create and execute automated tests for web and mobile applications. It offers a codeless test automation framework that uses natural language processing and <a href="https://testsigma.com/ai-driven-test-automation">AI-driven capabilities</a> to create, manage, and execute automated tests. Testsigma also provides integrations with popular tools such as Jira, Jenkins, and Git, making it easy for teams to incorporate automated testing into their existing workflows. With its easy-to-use interface and powerful capabilities, Testsigma has become a popular choice for organizations looking to improve their software testing processes.


Key Features



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Role management system: Testsigma provides multiple role management systems whereby different people can be assigned various roles and permissions to influence the test scripts.</li><li>Varied automation processes: Testsigma’s main USP is that it can automate almost anything on the cloud &#8211; web app testing, cross-browser testing, native Android &amp; iOS app testing, and web services testing.</li><li>Dynamic locator strategy: Cloud automation testing in Testsigma comes with a dynamic locator strategy that helps in creating stable and reliable test cases.</li><li>Parallel Execution: Testsigma comes with parallel execution capabilities to help test faster. You can also run these parallel tests in the local devices or integrate them with other cloud solutions such as Browserstack and SauceLabs.&nbsp;</li><li>Real devices: When testing, testing on real devices is always recommended when compared to testing on emulators and simulators. And thus, Testsigma offers integration with real device cloud labs.</li><li>In-depth reporting: Testsigma’s reports are of extremely high quality and have been appreciated for the analytical information displayed in them. It helps in getting a comprehensive study of the quality of tests.</li><li>CI support: Testsigma also comes with continuous integration support with integrations with CI tools to facilitate your automation testing.</li></ul>




<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Test your APIs 10X Faster with Low-code using Testsigma for Free. No setup required.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>




<h3 id="appperfect">AppPerfect</h3>



<a href="http://www.appperfect.com/index.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">AppPerfect</a> is one among the tools list that is a versatile tool &#8211; it is of great use for not only testers but developers and big data operations. Integrating <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.salesforce.com/in/?ir=1" target="_blank">salesforce</a> capabilities, AppPerfect sells web testing, load testing, and security testing on its cloud menu. 



Apart from cloud testing, you can also download various other testing modules on the system. AppPerfect provides free 1-hour assistance to install and familiarize with the product.



Key Features



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>GUI enabled: AppPerfect cloud automation testing has a smooth GUI rather than being controlled through a console. GUI gives an added advantage of ease-of-use and does not need you to remember complex console commands.</li><li>Ready-made scripts: In case you don’t want to write scripts yourselves, AppPerfect provides a solution for you. AppPerfect gives the facility of defining the test requirement and bring scripts to you.</li><li>Distributed Testing: AppPerfect <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cloud automation testing solution</a> provides distributed testing where the testers can run their test scripts on multiple systems connected through the cloud. The report is then gathered at a single place with a detailed analysis for the team.</li><li>Schedule and Run: AppPerfect provides the testers with the functionality to schedule their test scripts to run at a specified time. This is very helpful in cases where you either need to verify the performance at some time or need to schedule a nightly test run.</li></ul>



Apart from these, AppPerfect brings a few more advantages such as record and replay feature, remote test management, and in-depth report generation. You can visit their website to know more. 



<h3 id="cloudqa">CloudQA</h3>



CloudQA is one among the cloud-based automation testing tools that is growing in popularity. It can perform tests on web applications and mobile applications. CloudQA is made exclusively for performing QA tests with features such as <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/codeless-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">codeless testing</a> and extension recording.



Key Features



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Intelligent maintenance: CloudQA provides intelligent test script management with facilities to simplify complex tasks easily with Javascript.</li><li>Extremely versatile: CloudQA cloud automation testing solution requires no setup, no infrastructure, and no lock-in. You just need to integrate your tech stack quickly and get started.</li><li>Parallel and scalable: CloudQA provides features to scale your automation tests easily and run parallel executions connected to the cloud infra.</li><li>Collaborative in nature: The tool provides collaborative features where multiple people from the team can collaborate from the ease of their location and contribute to the test creation.</li><li>High-quality resource: CloudQA offers real devices, popular integrations, and data-driven testing support for automation testers.</li><li>Testing methods: CloudQA provides functional testing and load testing capabilities on the cloud along with other features.</li></ul>



<h3 id="blazemeter">Blazemeter</h3>



<a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.blazemeter.com/" target="_blank">Blazemeter</a> brands itself as a “complete automation solution” and according to its reviews, it has lived up to its reputation. Blazemeter is a versatile tool with continuous testing, end-to-end testing, functional testing, and API testing. 



As per Blazemeter, it has been named “Gartner’s customer choice for software test automation”. It boasts the following key features.



Key Features



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Access configurational control: Blazemeter comes with an access control facility where automation tests can be modified only by the authorized people.</li><li>Record tests: Blazemeter can record the tests performed by the tester.</li><li>Ease of integration: The tool can be integrated very easily into the existing pipeline.</li><li>Continuous integration abilities: Blazemeter can be integrated with continuous integration applications to run automation tests at build phases.</li></ul>



Apart from the above points, Blazemeter can also be used for cross-browser support and fetching detailed reports. 



<h3 id="aws-device-farm">AWS Device Farm</h3>



In our list of most popular cloud automation testing tools &#8211; the last one is AWS Device Farm (for mobile sites and mobile apps). It was developed in Portland and acquired by cloud service provider AWS in 2015. 



AWS Device Farm’s (previously called AppThwack) selling point has always been its array of real Android and iOS devices which can run automated tests and provide accurate real-time analysis. Since the devices are real, you can get a hint of your application’s performance in the market beforehand.



Key Features



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Real devices: As mentioned above, AWS Device Farm comes with real devices running your application. With real devices in testing, you get the best idea about the behaviour of a mobile application on target devices.</li><li>Deep-reports: <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/device-farms-test-ios-android-applications/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Device farm</a> has always focussed on letting its user know the power of the final generated reports. These reports are high-level with detailed logs, screenshots, and performance data.</li><li>Built-in testing frameworks: AWS device farm comes with built-in framework support for your help in cloud automation testing. These include Appium and Espresso.</li><li>CI support: The tool also comes with continuous integration support with integrations with CI tools to facilitate your automation testing.</li></ul>



AWS Device Farm is a great platform that comes with physical devices that numbers up to 2500. As a tester, you can always keep this on your list for cloud automation testing on mobile applications.



<h2 id="how-do-you-select-the-best-cloud-automation-testing-tools">How do you select the best cloud automation testing tools?</h2>



As a software engineer, my days are filled with challenges!



I needed a solution to test across different browsers, devices efficiently, and operating systems – seamlessly and without breaking the bank.



So, I embarked on a quest to find the best cloud testing tool, and let me tell you, it was an eye-opening experience! I discovered a treasure trove of options, each boasting unique features and capabilities.&nbsp;



However, my specific testing needs involved the following:



<ul><li>Testing across multiple browsers and devices: Testing on desktops, mobiles, and tablets, regardless of the user&#8217;s device or browser preference.</li><li>Ensuring responsiveness and performance: Fast loading times and seamless responsiveness are critical for engaging readers. The laggy process is a surefire way to lose attention.</li><li>Easy integration with my workflow: As a busy developer, I needed a tool that seamlessly integrates with my existing processes, not adding another layer of complexity.</li><li>Budget-friendly: Let&#8217;s be honest; I needed a solution(a testing tool) that wouldn&#8217;t break the bank.</li></ul>



After diving into cloud automation testing tools, I discovered a treasure trove of options, each with strengths and weaknesses. Here are some of the top platforms that caught my eye:



<ul><li>BrowserStack: A powerful platform offering access to a vast array of real devices and browsers for comprehensive testing. Their visual testing capabilities were particularly appealing. </li><li>Sauce Labs: Another strong prospect with extensive device and browser coverage. Their integration with popular CI/CD tools was a plus. </li><li>LoadStorm: If performance testing is your primary concern, LoadStorm is a force to be reckoned with. Its ability to simulate real-world user loads was impressive. </li><li>Testsigma: Now, this is where things got interesting! Testsigma offered everything I needed and more at a price point that fit my budget perfectly. Excellent user-friendly interface, comprehensive testing capabilities (including API and mobile testing), and effortless integration with project management tools such as Jira are absolute game-changers.</li></ul>



Ultimately, Testsigma emerged as the champion for my testing needs. It ticked all the boxes: affordability, diverse testing options, user-friendly interface, and smooth integration.&nbsp;



Remember, the &#8220;best&#8221; cloud automation testing tool depends on your unique needs and budget!



<h2 id="benefits-of-using-cloud-automation-testing-tools">Benefits of using Cloud Automation Testing Tools</h2>



Here are some of the benefits of using cloud testing tools:



1. Accessibility and Scalability:



Cloud testing tools are accessible from anywhere worldwide with an internet connection, eliminating the need for on-premise hardware and software.&nbsp;



This makes it ideal for geographically distributed teams and allows for easy scaling up or down of testing resources based on project needs.&nbsp;



Imagine a team of testers from different countries all working together on the same testing platform, like a global orchestra seamlessly playing in harmony.



2. Faster Time to Market:



Cloud testing tools can significantly reduce testing time by providing access to a vast array of real devices and browsers on demand.&nbsp;



This eliminates the need to wait for physical devices or set up complex testing environments, allowing teams to test and release software faster.&nbsp;



Think of it like a high-speed testing highway compared to traditional testing methods&#8217; slow, winding road.



3. Cost-Effectiveness:



Cloud testing eliminates the need for expensive hardware investments and maintenance costs associated with traditional testing labs.&nbsp;



You only pay for the resources you use, making it a cost-effective solution for projects of all sizes. Picture a piggy bank overflowing with savings thanks to cloud testing.



4. Improved Collaboration and Visibility:



Cloud testing platforms offer built-in collaboration features enabling teams to share real-time test results, reports, and insights.&nbsp;



This improves communication and visibility into the testing process, leading to better decision-making and faster resolution of issues. Think of it as a transparent testing kitchen where everyone can see what&#8217;s cooking.



5. Wider Test Coverage:



Cloud testing tools provide access to a wider range of devices, browsers, and operating systems than traditional testing methods.&nbsp;



This allows for more vast testing and helps identify bugs that might be missed.&nbsp;



6. Enhanced Security:



Cloud testing platforms offer robust security features that protect your data and applications. This is especially important for testing sensitive applications or those with strict compliance requirements.&nbsp;



Picture a shield protecting your software from security threats. 



7. Continuous Testing and Integration:



Cloud testing tools can be easily integrated with continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines.&nbsp;



This allows for automated testing at every stage of the development process, leading to faster identification and resolution of bugs.&nbsp;



<h2 id="h-end-note">End Note</h2>



This ends our carefully curated list of the most popular cloud automation testing tools. But, obviously, these are not the only ones floating in the market. With experience and keeping our broad audience in mind, we have shortlisted these tools. 



However, we would love to learn more from our readers and understand what other leaves exist in this tree. Share your thoughts and experiences with other tools that were not included in the list. 



This will help the community and gain a better understanding of this beautiful cloud automation testing arena.



Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/signs-you-need-to-invest-in-a-cloud-based-test-automation-tool/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">6 Signs You Need to Invest in a Cloud Test Automation Tool</a>

Most Popular Tools For Cloud Automation Testing

Top 5 Popular Cloud Testing Tools

<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">Automated web testing</a> is not a new concept today. With advancements in web development technologies and how complex web codes are written today, web testing was bound to walk this way sooner or later. The problem with adopting automation is that it is not like a Netflix subscription that we can pay and enjoy cloud services. 



Climbing the automated web testing ladder requires planning, careful execution, and a workforce that is familiar with all the intricacies. In addition, all these things require capital that cannot be ignored or marked “miscellaneous”. 



The cost is huge and all these things come to a simple yet head-scratching question &#8211; will we be able to get a return on this investment?(ROI) Or are we better off without it?



This post will help you answer these questions if you are in such a situation or think you will face such questions in the future. Let’s dissect the reasons affecting the return on investment (ROI) and draw a rough timeline by which the difference between them would become positive.&nbsp;



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Factors_affecting_ROI_in_automated_web_testing">1 Factors affecting ROI in automated web testing</a><ul><li><a href="#Expansion_in_space_dimension_for_ROI">1.1 Expansion in space dimension for ROI</a></li><li><a href="#Resource_Investments">1.2 Resource Investments</a></li><li><a href="#Resource_Setup">1.3 Resource Setup</a></li><li><a href="#Configuring_tools_and_frameworks">1.4 Configuring tools and frameworks</a></li><li><a href="#Expansion_in_time_extension">1.5 Expansion in time extension</a></li><li><a href="#Test_script_creation">1.6 Test script creation</a></li><li><a href="#Maintenance">1.7 Maintenance</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#How_much_time_do_we_have_to_wait">2 How much time do we have to wait?</a></li><li><a href="#ROI_is_subjective_8211_Do_not_copy-paste">3 ROI is subjective &#8211; Do not copy-paste</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="factors-affecting-roi-in-automated-web-testing">Factors affecting ROI in automated web testing</h2>



While calculating the ROI in automated web testing, we may come through the following factors-



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>expansion in the space dimension</li><li>expansion in the time extension</li><li>additional costs in these dimensions and others.</li></ul>



&nbsp;Let’s see them one by one and how they are related to each other.



<h3 id="expansion-in-space-dimension-for-roi">Expansion in space dimension for ROI</h3>



The first thing to understand is how much space will we be increasing when we start thinking about automated web testing. First of all, we need people that can perform <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/signs-you-need-to-implement-automated-web-testing/">automated web testing</a>. It will cost money to hire them and keep them around as well. The more people you hire, the more it will cost you.



So, taking an average salary of $80,000 for one automation tester for one year, hiring three of them would cost you $240,000. Although $240,000 cannot be considered the purest form of investment as manual testers will draw salaries too if given this work. You can subtract the current offering from this amount.



Salary Investments = (Automation tester salary &#8211; Manual tester salary) * number of testers



Also, the people doing the hiring for the organization will be paid for their time. The number of people can range from 3 to 8 depending on the lot size.



Hiring Costs = (One day salary of the interviewer) * (number of interviewers) * (number of days interviews take place)



<h3 id="resource-investments">Resource Investments</h3>



Next comes resource allocation. Each of your testers will require resources to work on. For example, if you have opted for any cloud-based tool for say <a href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-integration" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">CI/CD pipelines</a> then you need to extend the current plan. 



Since these testers will access the tool simultaneously, a better plan would be desirable which will cost more money. This can be completely slashed out with manual testers as they will not require cloud-based automation testing frameworks.



Resource investments =&nbsp; Additional tool plan costs



<h3 id="resource-setup">Resource Setup</h3>



The last factor in space dimension is the device lab setup required for automation testing. Automation testing is preferred in cases where repetitive tasks are being performed which simply wastes precious time. 



For example, a manual tester can also work on a device lab but repeatedly doing the same things on each device is an error-prone mechanism. Hence, this is one of the factors to introduce automation in the system.



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/CeTRjPBDLrz8PQG5Orh_j7OSYXZFrIVB-_1gIdJq_xUzT55fXDCl21fG5C_YBcaxmN_1248I5ClGT_3b8GP9b7wFZoJsb8AP-YSEp2FfaSQ28UJ6IsWVmvsCKlDriaFx49j0pRKR=s0" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" width="400"/><figcaption><a href="https://in.pinterest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Source</a></figcaption></figure></div>



If your device labs were already set up and manual testers were working on them (which is never recommended), these costs are saved as they were previous investments. If not, this will be included.&nbsp;



Device lab setup cost &#8211;&nbsp; Device 1 cost + Device 2 cost + Device 3 cost…………. Device n cost



You will also require to invest in a central connection to these devices to manage them through a virtual machine etc. This cost would be negligible though in front of actual device costs.



If you are not looking forward to making heavy investments in device setups and are more inclined <a href="https://mietly.io/en/renting-hardware/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">towards renting one</a>, your costs will come down significantly. 



I recommend going through a cloud-based setup that has real devices to operate on. This way you can get all the advantages of real devices and do not have to dig so deep in your pockets.



Cloud-based <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank">automation web testing</a> platform is purely a matter of requirements. If your requirements are satisfied by a tool X and a tool Y, you can choose the one asking for less money. 



For example, a fantastic cloud-based automation testing tool is Testsigma that hosts real devices that give accurate results and performance metrics of your web application.



 You can also perform <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/automated-cross-browser-testing-tool" target="_blank">cross-browser testing</a> and AI-based test script generation with NLP (English-based language) in no time. With so many features and so many devices, this tool just costs $249 per month. Compare this with device setup cost and you will understand the difference.



Cloud-based tool investment &nbsp; =&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Annual Charges or (Monthly charges) * months



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/OnwLv52XCAw1gln-9ERZJ-ucCmfShmRg48Olaxx0ReKLRAT8mo6A_F9VFWC289YbI7HALenZjUPXCN9D-ZAh4925LGtw6lEvNpWbAdP30dmhYTufWoh2x1sdG7tYuqkchig685JS=s0" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" width="400"/></figure></div>



<h3 id="configuring-tools-and-frameworks">Configuring tools and frameworks</h3>



A bitter truth in the testing industry is that test automation takes a lot of time to get started. The configuration time is especially high when you are opting for the online tools and teams make the mistake of not considering it for ROI in automated web testing. 



The problem with configurations is that you will never work on a single tool or library etc. The processes are too complex today and even if you take Eclipse in your local system, you know how troublesome it becomes to eradicate all the errors.



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/XCkXox8icEM8-ng1mCAWd28MvAJelVUqH6ChtEn9y4nYjL9F-uTd7--jT0f6VtkmdUK9Br_XBFADNvvN07aorbHe44Khk9VihJWzhH8KKXgO3CCXE1EAjp6M6FI6OMTWnEDYSBGe=s0" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" width="400"/></figure></div>



Therefore, always take configurational setup time into consideration while calculating the ROI. This cost will just be initial but will impact your total investment number.



Configurational costs = &nbsp; (Salary of automation tester for one day * days taken for configuring the tool) * number of testers working in the configurational setup



While calculating the ROI here, we are not taking into account the training costs for the automated web testing languages and frameworks. This is in assumption to the fact that you will hire people who are already familiar with the language and other requirements (as we considered the hiring costs). 



If you already have automation testers but they need to be trained, you can replace them with hiring costs. The net investment should remain the same though.



<h3 id="expansion-in-time-extension">Expansion in time extension</h3>



The above section was all about setting up the resources and investing in them when we start automated web testing. But as the saying goes “time is money”, we spend money every second a tester or a resource is at work.



<h3 id="test-script-creation">Test script creation</h3>



The first thing starts by creating the test scripts. If this is the first time your team is boarding the automation flight, a lot of the time will be spent on this. This can even extend to a couple of months. The more testers are working on this, the more cost you are going to bear.



Test script creation investment =&nbsp; (Salary of one automation tester for one day * days taken) * number of testers working on test scripts.



How can you tackle this and bring the costs down? The best way is to go for tools that actually do not require any programming languages. For example, Testsigma uses plain English language (such as “Navigate to <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank">www.testsigma.com</a>”) instead. These can be created extremely faster.



The second method is to choose a tool that is GUI based and uses drag-and-drop to create tests. This may bring down costs too.



<h3 id="maintenance">Maintenance</h3>



Next comes the maintenance. If the tests have been created and you are working on subsequent iterations (for example), then test scripts will need maintenance. 



This maintenance work is equivalent to writing new test cases, debugging some older ones, deleting some test cases, shuffling the code a bit according to the new version etc. The bottom line is maintenance takes considerable time and hence investments.



Maintenance investment =&nbsp; (Salary of one automation tester for one day * days taken for maintenance) * number of testers maintaining the test cases



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/6vTVIZjHJqRxzrTt3bEd5feh7oT9cE1uoMWCiGeFYCyWSbk2SbC-rn91VjnKDB8O8TkFC7s6_ONkQU6oyWUzvAgE87HD83x4YEYR1x8GpV_gN3hySiyXvJee3x7udWlPH9oXcEJl=s0" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" width="400"/><figcaption><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://giphy.com/" target="_blank">Source</a></figcaption></figure></div>



Maintenance is a direct result of the tool you are using. If you have opted for tools that have the capability of automatically healing the broken test cases then maintenance time can be drastically reduced.



Testsigma comes built with a self-heal feature that looks to detect and rectify any structure-related changes as soon as they occur.



<div class="bg-primary cta">

Testsigma is giving 21 days free trial
<div class="d-flex mb-1" style="justify-content:space-evenly">
 <button class="btn cta-btn bg-white"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Signup now</a></button></div>
</div>



Both of these processes can easily top the charts for the things that would take most of your time and cost you in automated web testing. There will definitely be other things in between though. 



For example, sometimes you might get a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/10-reasons-why-test-automation-fails/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">failed test</a> case error because of things that were just out of your control. A slow page load, a failed UI element locator, failed loop execution just to name a few.&nbsp;



We can surely take them in this post but the cost is just negligible when we talk about hundreds of thousands of dollars.&nbsp;



<h2 id="how-much-time-do-we-have-to-wait">How much time do we have to wait?</h2>



Up until this post we talked about the investments required in starting the automated web testing and not about the return time on them. If you are opting for automated web testing and use that efficiently for a longer period of time, the return will eventually come. 



The point of inflection in the time-cost graph is bound to be achieved. The time, however, depends on you.



The following graph shows the time-cost relationship between the time and the investment returns relationship:



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/wVzov_f9_g6amnY7yQhgi2PBWTvgIbHS9HH62fKRePbqi6u9vvDckD89BkClCoxJ-oIr1AiRn3uGQxHWqdCeLV8VstGO3xNZUzjNux5JRETgPeH4AYsgxeBPnERC83Grzj6pvk7K=s0" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" width="400"/><figcaption><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://blog.qatestlab.com/2018/06/12/when-automate-testing/" target="_blank">Source</a></figcaption></figure></div>



The definitive values are extremely hard to predict due to the number of variables involved. How many testers are working? What kind of project is this? What are your testing methods? Are your testers trained? And so on.



Although, we can roughly calculate the time saved in each test and multiply it with the tests we are executing.



For example, let say a manual tester takes 20 minutes to execute 100 tests. In automation, we need 30 minutes to write the tests and 5 minutes to execute them. The comparison is 20 to 35 which is the initial investment we have talked about in this post.



But in another iteration, a manual tester will again take 20 minutes to execute the same 100 tests. This time though, we have our automated web tests already created and therefore it just takes 5 minutes this time. So, for two iterations, my time becomes 40 to 40 which is equal. 



This is the point of inflection shown in the graph above. In the third iteration, automation surpasses with the time being 60 to 45 (manual to automation). Automation will never look back again.



To make things interesting in the above calculation, we can also add the salaries of each of the testers. The manual tester will charge for 60 minutes in three iterations whereas the automation tester for only 30 minutes of test creation. The next 15 minutes are resource costs that are negligible in comparison.



<h2 id="roi-is-subjective-do-not-copy-paste">ROI is subjective &#8211; Do not copy-paste</h2>



ROI is always with reference to the investments. Investments are always with respect to the project and situations. Therefore, if you think company X had to invest $300,000 a year and therefore you will do the same, you are probably wrong. 



ROI is purely subjective in nature. As I have repeatedly mentioned, the variables involved changes everything for every organization, and careful planning is the only rescue part.



This post tried to highlight the major investments, their costs of implementation and the return approximations. I hope this post made a fair judgment between the practical and theoretical aspects of ROI in automated web testing. For compliments and complaints, please reach out to us in the comment section!



Blog image credit: <a href="https://www.freepik.com/vectors/business" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">Business vector created by stories &#8211; www.freepik.com </a>

Automated web testing - some strategies to achieve ROI?

Automated web testing – some strategies to achieve ROI?

A few years back, “codeless testing” was interchangeably used with the “record-and-replay” functionality of the automation software. Today, the advancements in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/codeless-testing" target="_blank">codeless testing</a> have <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/selenium-vs-scriptless-test-automation/#:~:text=Scriptless%20test%20automation%20tools%20can,users%20know%20scripting%20and%20programming." target="_blank">widened the gap</a> between the terms and gave them<a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/scriptless-automated-testing-is-not-the-same-as-record-and-playback/" target="_blank"> separate and clear meanings</a> in the IT industry. Therefore, it becomes a confusing question when we talk about these two terms today. 



The thought of when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing and when to go for other methods still remains a complex question and more cluttered than ever. This post will point out several methods that can help you decide which way to go while starting a project or setting up a whole enterprise. 



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Codeless_Testing">1 What is Codeless Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_Codeless_Testing">2 Advantages of Codeless Testing</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Choose_Codeless_Automation">3 When Should You Choose Codeless Automation?</a><ul><li><a href="#1_Development_and_testing_are_not_synchronized">3.1 1. Development and testing are not synchronized</a></li><li><a href="#2_Rising_Issues_with_code-based_test_automation">3.2 2. Rising Issues with code-based test automation</a></li><li><a href="#3_Short_on_time">3.3 3. Short on time</a></li><li><a href="#4_Low_on_monetary_resources">3.4 4. Low on monetary resources</a></li><li><a href="#5_UI_tests_are_the_priority">3.5 5. UI tests are the priority</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">4 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Suggested_Readings">5 Suggested Readings</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-codeless-testing">What is Codeless Testing?</h2>



Codeless testing is a type of software testing that requires no code writings from the testers. Instead, it relies on <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/natural-language-processing-nlp-based-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">natural language processing</a>, <a href="https://www.zaptest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">drag-and-drop UI elements</a>, <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/best-scriptless-testing-tools-for-angular-based-applications/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">artificial intelligence, self-healing capabilities etc</a>. It depends on the <a href="https://testsigma.com/codeless-automation-testing-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">codeless testing tool</a> you are using. 



For example, instead of writing a selenium script with browser instances, we can directly write navigate to URL to just access the intended web address. 



<h2 id="advantages-of-codeless-testing">Advantages of Codeless Testing</h2>



Codeless testing brings a lot of advantages along with it, some of them are mentioned below:



<ul><li>Saves Time: Codeless testing eliminates the requirement of learning and implementing the code in complex automation testing frameworks. Hence, a lot of time is saved in learning and constructing the test cases with codeless testing.</li><li>Involves People from Diverse Teams: Since there is no coding involved, the test cases are easily understood by non-technical people. They can then contribute in their own way for better quality tests such as suggesting changes or sometimes constructing a few scenarios themselves.</li><li>Extremely low maintenance: Codeless test automation requires very little maintenance work from the test automation engineers. On the contrary, with scripted test automation, they often struggle with the frequent changes done in the software.</li></ul>



And there are a lot more of this. But scripted testing has its own advantages too and therefore deciding when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing becomes a topic for discussion.



<h2 id="when-should-you-choose-codeless-automation">When Should You Choose Codeless Automation?</h2>



Whether you are a startup, a small enterprise, or a big organization, every project you work on brings its own challenges and careful planning. Therefore, to deal with it, you need to be sure of the top points that will help you decide when to choose codeless automation and when to stay away from it. The following points will help you understand.



<h3 id="1-development-and-testing-are-not-synchronized">1. Development and testing are not synchronized</h3>



Development and testing are two pillars of SDLC and should go hand in hand. With methods allowing faster software development, testing might get a bit unsynchronised with it. 



For example, sometimes testing lags behind one release cycle and sometimes two. This gap might increase in the future if remedial steps are not taken. One such step is to use codeless test automation. With codeless automation for testing, things move faster and the gap is narrowed with faster testing cycles.



<h3 id="2-rising-issues-with-code-based-test-automation">2. Rising Issues with code-based test automation</h3>



Code-based test automation comes with its own challenges. The most popular one being the team’s skills you would require to commit the tasks. Code-based test automation needs a team that knows specific programming languages and framework knowledge on which testing will be done. 



Sometimes, more than one technology is finalized based on the team’s knowledge and experience that are not compatible with each other. Such a situation may take additional time to resolve. When such issues start to arise commonly, codeless testing is the way to go for enterprises.



<h3 id="3-short-on-time">3. Short on time</h3>



Sometimes, you don’t need to go deep into the technicalities while deciding when should you choose codeless automation for testing. Just weighing both the methods on the amount of time they take from the start to end is enough if time is the only factor holding your judgment. 



Codeless testing is faster to write tests and is easier to learn by the engineers. If you are having trouble matching the project deadlines frequently, codeless testing is the best option to choose.&nbsp;



<h3 id="4-low-on-monetary-resources">4. Low on monetary resources</h3>



When time is not the deciding factor, money is. Startups and small enterprises have to spend their money meticulously on each resource. Automation testing is one of the prime factors that can consume a lot of money or time. 



Since automation testers are few (considering the knowledge of programming) and the demand is high, they sometimes aim for higher salaries which costs the company extra money. Sometimes, you need to train the automation testers on a new programming language or framework which can cost extra money to the company too. 



On the contrary, codeless test automation neither requires highly skilled automation testers nor do they require a lot of training. Codeless test automation tools just require monthly or annual subscriptions fees for the maintenance of their infrastructure.&nbsp;



The difference in costs involved in both the situation is also very large. For example, the national average salary for an automation engineer in the United States is 83000 USD. 



Codeless test automation tools such as <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank">Testsigma</a> can satisfy all your testing requirements with advanced analytics and reporting features and run 10 parallel tests for half that price (around 41000 USD). 



Bottom line: when you are short on monetary funds and the project requires testing, codeless test automation should be the call for rescue &#8211; of course, other project requirements for test automation should be met too.



<div class="bg-primary cta">

Save your testing time and costs with codeless test automation with Testsigma
<div class="d-flex mb-1" style="justify-content:space-evenly">
 <button class="btn cta-btn bg-white"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Signup Now</a></button></div>
</div>



<h3 id="5-ui-tests-are-the-priority">5. UI tests are the priority</h3>



The goal of UI testing is to guarantee the correct working of the visual components of the software. Sometimes, that is the utmost priority as you may be releasing software with just the UI changes. 



Codeless test automation therefore would be the best option when such scenarios arise. Although if code-based <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank">regression tests</a> are fulfilling the purpose, you can choose to avoid codeless automation. But for a fresh test suite, codeless works best when it comes to the user interface.



<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Codeless test automation is the new kid in the automation world that is more effective and simplified than its parents. But it still is in the learning phase. Definitely, it comes with certain limitations and is not 100% perfect. This may be one of the reasons that organizations think about when should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing. 



There may be some limitations to the codeless test automation which can make you wonder, if, you as an enterprise,&nbsp; should choose codeless automation for testing. 



For instance, Selenium has an issue with the scalability of the application. Selenium allows the objects to be defined on a single locator only that demands a lot of time when we are maintaining the tests.&nbsp; 



In this post, I tried to clear the air that can help you resolve the confusion. As far as tools are concerned, there are a few <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/best-codeless-automation-testing-tools-in-2021/" target="_blank">codeless test automation tools</a> available that are different in one thing or another (as most of the tools are). Choosing a tool is not a textbook process. 



As this post highlighted the points that can help you in determining the choice of automation method, the tool that solves that problem is the best choice. 



I hope that by the end of this post, you will have certain parameters in your hand through which it would become a simplified process. For any comments and suggestions, we welcome your comments below.



<h2 id="suggested-readings">Suggested Readings</h2>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/codeless-testing-when-is-testsigma-recommended-tool-for-you/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Codeless Testing: When is Testsigma recommended tool for you</a> 



<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/best-codeless-automation-testing-tools-in-2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Best Codeless Automation Testing Tools in 2023</a> 



<a href="https://testsigma.com/codeless-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Modern Codeless Test Automation: Myths And Facts</a> 



<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/advantages-of-using-codeless-test-automation-tools-an-exhaustive-list/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benefits of Codeless Test Automation Tools</a>

Codeless testing When should enterprises choose codeless automation for testing

When Should Enterprises Choose Codeless Automation for Testing?

Geolocation Testing: Test Website from Different Locations

Devops and the need for cloud based solutions

Cloud Solutions for Devops | What ,Why , Types & Advantages

Top 5 Angular Testing Tools List to Look For

We, engineers, love automation! We love it so much that we devise new ways all the time to incorporate automation in each and every field of software development. Today, automation is like the fuel that keeps the project going and helps us finish within deadlines and allotted budget. 



But automation is most needed to manage the responsibility of something that is <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.statista.com/statistics/245501/multiple-mobile-device-ownership-worldwide/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">14.9 billion in number</a> and has become the part and parcel of our lives; the mobile phone. Mobile applications are taking the world by storm. 2021 alone is seeing <a href="https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1262892/mobile-app-revenue-worldwide-by-segment">693 billion USD</a> in revenue from mobile apps. 



Web developers are moving their focus from desktop-first to mobile-first web design which further solidifies our understanding of how important this pocket device has become.



 When something steals the show by this nature and everyone begins to notice, it results in fierce competition and a race to be the most popular, on top, and the best! The frequent mobile app updates are living evidence of this claim. What could be the best choice to cut down the costs and gain speed to move the pipeline faster than test automation? 



Mobile devices are the most fragmented thing you will ever work with while developing software. From operating systems to versions to hardware specs, mobile devices stand unique even after being billions in number. 



Such a fragmented world is impossible to <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/how-to-convert-manual-test-cases-into-automated-test-cases-and-why/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">test through manual work and hence the call for test automation</a> in mobile becomes a necessity while developing an application. But this is not as easy as it may sound. 



Automation does bring out some fruitful benefits that reap throughout the season but implementing mobile test automation also puts up some roadblocks that are best to be considered before initiating the process. 



In this post, we shall go through the same challenges that <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/automated-mobile-app-testing" target="_blank">mobile test automation</a> brings with itself and analyze the methods by which we can tackle them.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Variety_of_Device_Settings">1 Variety of Device Settings</a></li><li><a href="#Moulding_Automation_Approach_with_Application">2 Moulding Automation Approach with Application</a></li><li><a href="#Training_and_Selecting_Right_Tool_Stack">3 Training and Selecting Right Tool Stack</a></li><li><a href="#Collaboration_with_Multiple_Teams">4 Collaboration with Multiple Teams</a></li><li><a href="#Too_Frequent_Versions">5 Too Frequent Versions</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="variety-of-device-settings">Variety of Device Settings</h2>



Test automation in conventional software is straightforward. With fixed targets and no external factor to depend on, writing automation test scripts becomes easy. A mobile device is a different story though. 



The functionality and usability of applications on mobile devices can be influenced by multiple other factors. For example, checking the impact on functionalities because of the change in network bandwidth is an important scenario to judge the mobile application’s performance, and including it in the automation script could be a tough job. 



But testing this is essential too because data communication over the network cannot be eliminated by putting all the files into the device storage. That way the application becomes a heavy download (and update) for the user and also occupies a big space on one of the most precious things on a mobile device: the storage space. Some such similar challenges are: 



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Network Related Settings</li><li>Orientation Settings.</li><li>Side-By-Side View for multi-tasking.</li><li>Accessibility settings for challenged users.</li></ul>



Also, along with it, some mobile devices offer specific settings such as adjustable windows, etc.



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/zlElgfgNSIp63V48hLIcAe5e0JYi2i9HUkDHVrfncT00QNPyZLAjF0oKsT_1r9meVZKjQCWaxSr_wHj8uYaNm4VSY0AfNe6DnGD0QoZXf9JM9Bp2Ygu0WL_mkrmtraNsiLo0NSsE" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform"/></figure>



Source: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.norebbo.com/google-android-illustrations/" target="_blank">https://www.norebbo.com/google-android-illustrations/</a>



Can we tackle this challenge in mobile test automation? Actually, only partially. Mobile devices are very diverse and so is their settings list. Practically, these settings are one of the top reasons that have kept manual testing alive in this area. 



But, on the other hand, things are progressing too. Online mobile test automation tools have started to develop setting-based software through which we can write scripts of network bandwidth being “4G” and for orientation of the mobile device. One such tool that can help you achieve the above tasks is <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/automated-mobile-app-testing" target="_blank">Testsigma</a>. 



<div class="bg-primary cta">

With its latest release, Testsigma is set to change mobile test automation forever. Witness the change live on 11th August 
<div class="d-flex mb-1" style="justify-content:space-evenly">
 <button class="btn cta-btn bg-white"><a href="https://testsigma.com/webinars/reimagined-mobile-test-automation?utm_source=ts&amp;utm_medium=tscta&amp;utm_campaign=wp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Register for the webinar here</a></button></div>
</div>



To read more about mobile testing, check out the <a href="https://testsigma.com/mobile-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">mobile testing guide here</a>. 



<h2 id="moulding-automation-approach-with-application">Moulding Automation Approach with Application</h2>



An important part of working in an organization based on a mobile application is that feedbacks are prompt and the team cannot ignore them. With such high competition in every field, the one who works on feedbacks leads the race in the market. 



To gather more and more feedback from the user, developers often use multiple ways for the same. For example, prompting the user regularly with a pop-up, emailing them regularly for feedbacks or picking the feedbacks from app hosting platforms such as the play store.&nbsp; 



An important part of working in a team that works on developing a mobile application is that the mobile application goes through multiple changes quickly. These changes are driven by user needs and feedback and are essential to keep up with the competition.



So, how does test automation relate here? When we work regularly on adding updates/feedbacks for a long time, the application might take a new form. There will be a lot of arrangements, new additions, deletions etc.



 With such a reformed application, the older automation scripts will not work properly. As a result, we can relate the test automation to a machine that needs servicing regularly with regular checks and regular updates into the system. 



If the feedbacks are too much, the <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/factors-that-slow-down-automation-testing-test-automation-challenges/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">automation changes regularly and thus become a challenge for the organisation slowing</a> down every other process in the pipeline.&nbsp; 



This challenge is the easiest to tackle among all the others. The basic thing to remember is to write minimum cases and scripts that can easily be changed later to change to accommodate new changes. 



Practically, we can’t write cases that will never be changed even if the application has reformed with time. But keeping them to a minimum is the best way to go. 



Also, list down all those cases that have the potential to be changed later and the cases that have dependencies on them. Too many dependencies can lead to the same disastrous consequences that we are trying to avoid from the beginning.



<h2 id="training-and-selecting-right-tool-stack">Training and Selecting Right Tool Stack</h2>



Automation in mobile testing is a bit tough, as already portrayed in this post. It takes a bit of cost in the beginning too and the device settings make it more troublesome. Therefore, it is extremely important to <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-right-open-source-test-automation-tool/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">choose the tool stack that can fulfil all your mobile application test automation</a> needs. 



But there is a dilemma here. We cannot go ahead and choose the first tool we see as best. What if no one in our team is trained to operate on the tool? That’s an extra cost of training and delayed project deadlines right there!&nbsp; 



So the dilemma comes down to should we go ahead and choose the best tool and put a cost on training? Or should we choose the most known tool and put a cost on manual testing? 



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/Rj9xKfh7Rv60-HvV3SR10nRnB6GFowmWyuxqb8Fz8wZOqhkV0EJlMhW_8FpwFvOHeYyu1xI45yDd9SBzpSfs1MOPqHqn-xZvarSe5yK5-k81krFJZunalhTG7PecSzeYnfGCgnfW" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform"/></figure>



Source: <a href="https://www.greymatterrecruitment.co.uk/blog/only-half-of-marketers-have-training-in-key-skills/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">https://www.greymatterrecruitment.co.uk/blog/only-half-of-marketers-have-training-in-key-skills/</a>



Being in a good position in your testing team, such a question will definitely cross your path. The best method to tackle this challenge is to choose the best tool (because that’s the best bet in the long run) and the tool should have strong documentation that can help teammates learn on their own. 



Documentations are extremely important to pull you up whenever you get stuck in between or want to know what wonders the tool can perform. One such tool that can help you in mobile test automation and has solid documentation with step-wise processes is Testsigma. 



With Testsigma support, you can contact its support executives for any problems within seconds through the chat feature. Testsigma also gives you detailed documentation and examples to perform certain tasks such as creating a local tunnel etc.&nbsp;



<h2 id="collaboration-with-multiple-teams">Collaboration with Multiple Teams</h2>



As time passes, the mobile applications become complex and modules become diverse. As a result, the company hires more people and expands its wings in the market. These teams do not always know each other in person but a simple ticket is their only source of connection. 



In mobile test automation, while teams work on different modules, collaboration becomes a little difficult. There are a lot of people involved in writing the test cases, a different set of people setting them up in your CI/CD pipeline and then other people reading the error reports and working on them. All of them have to be in sync and hence it becomes a challenge for everyone.



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/sRiCY21RJ25VJ-2TcDzdBb-tmJmx08DpD5XjAB0h94bkoP9T0fxsV8_dSTtmmS7X2tOHfsbtqV8wmB5T-zD-b20uzbI-dU_VdDRCSaoEGo1s1ttDdNE6irn4SdU0H1PtafNS3i45" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform"/></figure>



Source: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">www.twitter.com</a>



The best method to tackle this challenge is the tool you choose for mobile test automation. Tools have evolved over the years to not only support the capabilities of a mobile device but also the teams working behind it to make it better. Collaborative tools are one such solution. 



Collaborative tools perform mobile automation with multiple people together on a single problem such as improving or writing automation test cases. Collaborative tools also help in sharing the final test reports with other team members or having a single central repo where all of them can look into (if they have rights).&nbsp; 



A mobile test automation tool with collaborative properties is the best way to go, this tool should allow you to share the reports and help write tests together as well. TestSigma helps you in such regards by allowing you to give different rights to different people in a project.



 With Testsigma, mobile <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/5-types-of-tests-that-can-be-automated-for-your-ios/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">test automation for iOS</a> as well as Android can be done from the same place. People<a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/3-steps-automate-mobile-applications-using-testsigma/" target="_blank"> can easily automate</a> and collaborate to work together as a team on different assigned projects, generate reports and share them automatically. Also, this is completely cloud-based and the test automation can be started within minutes of signing up. 



<div class="bg-primary cta">

Kick-start your mobile test automation within minutes
<div class="d-flex mb-1" style="justify-content:space-evenly">
 <button class="btn cta-btn bg-white"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Signup for Testsigma </a></button></div>
</div>



<h2 id="too-frequent-versions">Too Frequent Versions</h2>



Automation is costly in nature. From implementing to licensing, automation can take up a huge cost in the beginning but it eventually evens out with time. The only thing that mobile test automation takes up more than automation is maintenance. 



Different mobile devices keep coming into the market. With each new device, a new screen size, new hardware, and other new specifications arrive that need testing.&nbsp; 



Even if we leave aside the multiple devices, each year Android gets its new update, then iOS and other open-source operating systems too. With each new version, loads of new features arrive for which newer tests need to be written. 



Also, as these operating systems arrive in the market, we need to delete the older operating systems and their tests too. All this becomes a heavy challenge in automation as maintenance becomes very high. 



Unfortunately, this is one such challenge we will face in automation that is not easy to tackle. There will always be an influx of operating systems and versions and they will always ask for optimizations. There will always be code that will be old enough to delete and there will always be newer features that will ask for new code. 



All we can do is to visit this issue regularly in the organization and do not let the work pile up. Hence, there is no shortcut to bypass this challenge and hence if we are dealing with mobile applications, we will have to deal with this too.



This brings us to the end of this post that took us through some of the challenges in mobile <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/top-automated-testing-practices-to-follow/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">test automation and how they can be tackled using practical</a> examples. I hope with this post, you will be prepared better for your automation journey. 



Automation is a bit tricky but the results cut down our time and costs(which every organization loves). If you have any suggestions and comments, don’t forget to put them down below in the comment section. We will be happy to address them. Till then, happy mobile automation testing!!

Challenges of mobile test automation and how to tackle them?

Robotic Process Automation and Test Automation are two confusing terms in testing processes. Similar to TDD and BDD processes, RPA and test automation seem like a single branch of the test segment which is common to be exchanged in communication during planning. The word “automation” seems to be a culprit in this case. 



When both the terms end with automation and someone knows any one of them, it is not hard to presume another one based on primitive knowledge. While it is definitely true that both of these processes automate the process, “what” and “how” of their automation is entirely different. 



This post is constructed to narrow the gap of understanding and to validate that RPA and Test automation are not only different in their working and mechanism, their base foundation works on different scenarios. Before we jump to discuss the details of RPA vs Test Automation, it is better to understand what they individually are.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Robotic_Process_Automation_RPA">1 What is Robotic Process Automation (RPA)?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Test_Automation">2 What is Test Automation?</a></li><li><a href="#RPA_vs_Test_Automation">3 RPA vs Test Automation</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="what-is-robotic-process-automation-rpa">What is Robotic Process Automation (RPA)?</h2>



According to Google, the meaning of a “robot” is: “a machine resembling a human being and able to replicate certain human movements and functions automatically.” Surprisingly, this definition fits perfectly with RPA by making slight adjustments.&nbsp; 



Robotic Process Automation is the process of mimicking a user’s actions on the system and performing them automatically. This is achieved through artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms by learning the patterns from the user’s actions. 



RPA is achieved through software bots with varying capabilities and made available by various developers on the internet. When a user performs the actions with the RPA bot, these user actions are then converted to tasks or actions and performed without a user. 



RPA needs AI algorithms because it does not blindly run the tests again and again but performs the same actions considering the various scenarios. For example, data entry requires us to enter data by performing the same actions but with different data. This can be achieved through RPA. 



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/Lj54HcI5AwDiGMi5IzNSfrnl2chgxH26PIBQLpYTE0fIG_vv6AhN_ufCWklhXJd7j3emFaJWfF1FtUeBlZ37MHVmxeKsOdZKA-n0FLaTaLoeXNaZmBDHohSnFqfKUQQu1lwlZWVA" alt="Robotic Process Automation Applications" /><figcaption>Robotic Process Automation Applications in various fields.</figcaption></figure>



Robotic Process Automation does not require extensive codes to understand the problem. Rather, they are run when a user is performing actions on the graphical user interface. This can be attributed to the name of RPA which has “process” instead of Robotic “Test” Automation. 



A codeless process makes them an important part in performing business-related activities such as data entries, fetching queries or manipulating certain data on situations. RPA removes redundancy in the process and performs repetitive business tasks in order to achieve efficient and time-saving performance.&nbsp;



Benefits of RPA



The RPA boasts the following benefits:



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Efficient Results: RPA bots and processes are highly efficient in performing their tasks. They take less time and wrap things up quickly.</li><li>Accurate Performance: RPA is a machine-led process. Similar to other machine-specific tasks, RPA too has high accuracy and can work for longer hours than a human tester.</li><li>Perfect Resource Usage: RPA consumes resources at a steadier rate and occupies a resource only when it is needed. This method provides a way for other processes.</li><li>Cost-Effective Solution: RPA is a cost-effective solution since manual tester’s work hours are not counted. Moreover, the work done with RPA is faster which is an added advantage in cost-cutting.</li><li>Highly Secure: RPA is a highly secure process and the tasks performed are single tasks. The chances of data leakage are next to zero and information is exchanged through secure paths.</li><li>Helps in Future Planning: RPA performs an error-free job. This makes the overall analytics highly accurate and the analytics data can then be referred for planning for future business goals and investments.</li></ul>



<h2 id="what-is-test-automation">What is Test Automation?</h2>



Test automation is the automation of repetitive “test cases” rather than business rules. Test automation is not a new term for testers working professionally for some time. While building up a big project with a lot of modules, test cases become repetitive. <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank">Regression tests</a> are one such example. 



These repetitive test cases not only waste the time and effort of testers but makes the process boring, error-prone and make them overlook specific bugs. Automating these test cases cuts the cost of the project and helps testers focus their energy somewhere else.&nbsp; 



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/4K9eRqXzzJ1icmE1zlcXkoN2HROUzmHIJfZCjKuDqiq_4YEbt7m37BgpKMhX6XU5jmnwF2mFSJk2mElPTl-YYTQ2iJsZAu1aa2VDbHcBijJdz3xiSO9ztTvZQwQr-B1RNHLuynHC" alt="Test Automation Benefits" /><figcaption>Test Automation Benefits</figcaption></figure></div>







In contrast with RPA, test automation understands specific commands only. For example, for a particular action, there would be a particular syntax that will have to be followed. This syntax might be achieved by writing code or by codeless methods. Codeless methods will be interpreting commands but will be easier to understand and automate. 



One such <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">codeless test automation tool is Testsigma</a>. Testsigma uses plain English to construct test cases which is an easier and simpler method than resolving a language and writing codes in it. To simplify the process, even more, artificial intelligence always watches your actions and heals the automation tests automatically.&nbsp; 



To understand the perfect time to initiate automation in your process, refer to <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/5-signs-you-need-to-implement-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">article that talks about&nbsp; the 5 signs when you need to implement test automation</a> 



<div class="bg-primary cta">

Try a simplified codeless test automation experience for free
<div class="d-flex mb-1" style="justify-content:space-evenly">
 <button class="btn cta-btn bg-white"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Signup Now</a></button></div>
</div>



Benefits of Test Automation



The test automation process boasts the following benefits:



<ul class="list_style_disc"><li>Time Saver: Test automation runs the repetitive tests whenever required on the application under test. Since tests can be hundreds, using <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/manual-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">manual testing</a> wastes a lot of time for something that can be automated. Test automation can run these tests quickly, anytime and generate reports at the end.</li><li>Cost Saver: Test automation can run the tests all day long with the same accuracy. Automating these tests is not charged per hour and is, therefore, a huge cost saver for the business.</li><li>Faster Project Delivery: Test automation can facilitate the time required to deliver a project since repetitive tasks are done by automation and testers can focus on other tasks. With the work being distributed, a project can be tested quickly.</li><li>Larger <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Coverage</a>: Since the repetitive tests remain the same when required again with time, we can add more tests and run all the tests for better quality software. Hence, we increase our test coverage and there is no need to skip or delete any test case.</li></ul>



I hope you must have got the gist of RPA and Test automation and how both of these automation processes helps us grow businesses and improve the quality of the software. But still, even though we know both of these phenomena as individual processes, the differences and comparisons between them are a little cloudy. In the next section, let’s see how these two processes differ and on what grounds.



<h2 id="rpa-vs-test-automation">RPA vs Test Automation</h2>



The following table will help you compare RPA vs test automation with keywords. The gist of these keywords can be found in the above sections.







<figure class="wp-block-table"><table style="border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><tbody><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"> </td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">RPA</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Test Automation</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Goal</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Business Process Automation</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Test Case Automation</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">syntax</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Not Required, it is rule-based</td><td>Required(for code and codeless features)</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Used For</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Automating any kind of Business Process</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Automation of Testing Process</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Flexibility</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Highly Flexible</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Limitations with Tools (Ex. Selenium works only with Web applications)</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Automation Spectrum</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Very Wide</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Only tests can be automated.</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Working Process</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Adaptive due to AI and ML.</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Although AI and ML have made their foray here, still the scope is limited</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td>Objectives</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Validate business objectives.</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Validate software application functionality and performance.</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Applications</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Data Entry, Billing, Ticket Booking etc.</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Security Testing, Regression Testing etc.</td></tr><tr style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse"><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Tools (examples)</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Blueprism, UiPath, NICE</td><td style="padding:15px;border: 1px solid black;border-collapse: collapse">Selenium, Appium, JIRA</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



Automation is expanding its wings to every field from manufacturing to information technology services. It has become an important part of a tester’s and businesses’ daily life. Automation cuts our costs, saves a lot of time and works with very high accuracy. It deserves the attention it gets from everyone today. Two such segments branching from automation are RPA and test automation. 



RPA focuses on <a href="https://www.sweetprocess.com/business-process-automation-software/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automating business processes</a> such as mimicking the tasks and actions while keeping in mind various scenarios through artificial intelligence. <a aria-label="Test automation (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test automation</a> on the other hand requires strict rules and focuses on different scenarios related to the testing of software. They might sound a bit similar, but they are different from their foundation and working.



RPA and test automation are both important in building a high-quality product and improving the business. While they come with their own set of bane and boons, the team has to decide what suits their needs the best. RPA is important for improving the business processes and making them more efficient while test automation is for building a high-quality product. 



It is recommended to use them whenever they can be of help to save time. I hope this post helped declutter the confusion and doubts about RPA vs test automation. If this post served its purpose, we would love to hear it from you in the comment section below!! Keep testing and keep improving!



Read here <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/low-code-vs-rpa/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RPA VS Low Code</a>

RPA Vs Test Automation

8 Challenges of mobile app testing and how to solve them

8 Major Mobile Testing Challenges & Solution

<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/cross-browser-compatibility-testing-what-browsers-you-should-test/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cross-browser compatibility testing</a> is the most important testing for someone whose business is completely dependent on a website. Take for example an online service provider company. It may have gone through rough testing phases but is there a point in exhausting all your energy when the end-user is not able to communicate with the website properly?



Cross-browser compatibility testing is extremely important for a successful running website where you have one less thing to worry about. Since cross-browser compatibility testing is so important, it should be done with caution and care. 



Similar to any other testing paradigm, developing the software with due consideration to the feedback from testing will always prove to be fruitful in the end. Hence, we have crafted this post in the same direction to provide you with tips on cross-browser compatibility testing. Working your way by keeping these tips in mind will help you design a website that is partially compatible even before testing. <gwmw style="display: none; background-color: transparent;"><gwmw style="display: none; background-color: transparent;"><gwmw style="display: none; background-color: transparent;"><gwmw style="display:none;"><gwmw style="display:none;"></gwmw>Similar to any other testing paradigm, developing the software with due consideration to the feedback from testing will always prove to be fruitful in the end. Hence, we have crafted this post in the same direction to provide you with tips on cross-browser compatibility testing. Working your way by keeping these tips in mind will help you design a website that is partially compatible even before testing.</gwmw></gwmw></gwmw><gwmw style="display:none;">



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Perform_Code_Validation">1 Perform Code Validation</a></li><li><a href="#Build_Browser_Matrix">2 Build Browser Matrix</a></li><li><a href="#Always_Verify_Feature_Support">3 Always Verify Feature Support</a></li><li><a href="#Skip_Unnecessary_Components">4 Skip Unnecessary Components</a></li><li><a href="#Choose_The_Right_Way_To_Test">5 Choose The Right Way To Test</a></li><li><a href="#Encapsulate_Code_In_Framework">6 Encapsulate Code In Framework</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Develop_Test">7 Test Develop Test</a></li><li><a href="#Any_More_Tips">8 Any More Tips?</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="perform-code-validation">Perform Code Validation</h2>



Code validation is a process of determining whether the code written by us is in accordance with the W3C standards or not. This is extremely important as a website developer. Remember how Internet Explorer sank just because they were not following the guidelines? 



Having a validated and well-formatted website will not only make it browser compatible but bring a lot more freebies along with it. Some of them are like improved search engine optimization for better traffic on the website, easy maintenance etc.&nbsp;



To make the website cross-browser compatible, you can check your code using validator tools that can be found on the internet. The text editors also have such functionalities that can highlight the code not compatible with the standards. One such editor that I encountered was Adobe Dreamweaver and it helped me learn best practices in web development too. 



<h2 id="build-browser-matrix">Build Browser Matrix</h2>



A browser matrix is a process of listing down the browsers and their versions for which you are developing the website. It is nearly impossible to satisfy every browser and every version of them even if they are in use. 



A simple reason for this is that browsers reject and accept various CSS and JS properties over time with their new versions. Although this process is gradual in nature, it does happen regularly. For this, you need to decide which browsers are you targeting and the range of their versions.&nbsp;



The best way to finalize a browser matrix is to think about your target audience. If you have a confined audience such as a particular bank whose employees use Firefox 78, then develop accordingly. The general audience gets their browsers updated regularly in the background and hence your browser matrix should also be updated in such cases.



 A browser matrix will help you make a plan about what components to use in your website. This will help you in the end since you will dodge common mistakes of using one deprecated feature of Chrome 70 and one new feature of Chrome 83 etc. 



You can also take help from online cloud-based cross browser compatibility testing tools such as Testsigma that keeps their <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/platforms-browsers-mobile-devices" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">browser configurations</a> updated as they are launched. This will be further discussed later in detail.<gwmw style="display:none;">



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate Tests for Browser compatibility, UI, Visual and Functional in Parallel with Testsigma. No coding required.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="always-verify-feature-support">Always Verify Feature Support</h2>



Now that we have enlightened ourselves with the validator and building a browser matrix, we need to take care of the components we use on our website. As a developer, we may know a lot of things in development but what we may not know is that the feature is now deprecated or is about to. 



Our habit and practice in the past give birth to our ignorance and we never try to check whether the feature is still in use or not. The result is mind-boggling and leaves us wondering for hours why the feature is not working on the web page.



As a web developer, to build a cross-browser compatible website, you should always check the features on each of the browsers you are targeting. For example, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Grid_Layout/Subgrid" target="_blank">CSS Subgrids </a>is supported in Firefox but is not supported in Chrome. There are tons of such features that can hinder your user experience and it is always better to be prepared than to repeat everything again.



<h2 id="skip-unnecessary-components">Skip Unnecessary Components</h2>



A lot of times, developers increase complexities of their website without any end-goal. A good example of the same is designing a lot of functionalities together creating congestion on the landing page. These are unnecessary components in terms of landing page and an enemy of cross-browser compatibility scenarios. 



The problem is simple in such cases. The more the components on a page, the more issues they will create and the more time they would need fixing.&nbsp;



Since components will live in a synchronised environment, a small misalignment of a single element could create chaos on the landing page.To simplify this, take the help of <a href="https://www.emailvendorselection.com/best-landing-page-builders/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">free landing page creators</a>, that lets you build customized landing pages effortlessly. Now you are required to adjust all the elements or maybe while adjusting some more elements gets misaligned and the process repeats. Hence, always code only the necessary components to reduce<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/9-tips-to-avoid-cross-browser-compatibility-issues-from-the-start/"> cross-browser compatibility issues.</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<h2 id="choose-the-right-way-to-test">Choose The Right Way To Test</h2>



The step of choosing the correct way is always a tricky business. A wrong judgement on this part can lead to wastage of time and efforts. Take for example you are developing a ticket reservation website for citizens of your country. Now you want to test it across browsers to satisfy every user’s requirement. 



Can you take time and guess the correct way to go? Since the browser matrix is huge and the audience is very wide, the best way is to choose an online cross-browser testing tool.&nbsp;



An online cross-browser testing tool is like Amazon. In Amazon, you can just order the items sitting at your home. You do not need to go to the shop manually and purchase from the shop. Similarly, online cross-browser tools provide you with the platform which is already set up and connected with the physical infrastructure. 



You do not need to worry about setting up the infrastructure manually. Now you just type the URL, hit enter and the website is launched within seconds. One such tool is Testsigma that has 2000+ browsers and a lot of features to smoothen your testing. There are integrations available which are regularly updated and a matrix of powerful CPUs that can run your website within seconds.



Another way to go is by developing a device lab (which is extremely expensive) or taking the device lab service on rent. In terms of device labs and online tool, I personally believe <a href="https://testsigma.com/tools/responsive-design-testing-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="online tools (opens in a new tab)">online tools</a> are more robust, faster and are lag-free. Although it ultimately boils down to the developers and testers’ preference and personal choice.



<h2 id="encapsulate-code-in-framework">Encapsulate Code In Framework</h2>



A good way to start the development of the website is to select a good framework and build your website in it. Frameworks bring a lot of advantages with them and most of them are free to use. A framework is already optimized for cross-browser issues and will automatically create responsive elements without any hardcode from the developer’s side. 



Frameworks are developed to let the developer worry just about the functionalities and not thinking much about the cross-browser compatibility issues that would arise in other browsers. <gwmw style="display:none;">



<h2 id="test-develop-test">Test Develop Test</h2>



This is the last step in our development process and our struggles to make a cross-browser compatible website. A lot of the time developers and the teams think that once they are completely satisfied and have developed the functionalities, only then you should test. This is the wrong approach as the issues are piled up when we delay them for later stages. The result is delayed-release and more efforts for improvements.



Similar to unit testing, if the website is tested regularly at frequent intervals, it will be very easy for the developers to get faster feedback from the user. With such feedback, there are lesser issues and lesser work to be done on the elements. 



You can save a lot of time and effort with such an approach and plan your future development processes easily. Consider a situation where you are using some CSS property that has been deprecated. It would be better to get the notification earlier into the process rather than changing the complete website. Therefore, test-build-test and keep iterating your plans as the development process moves on.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup time needed.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="any-more-tips">Any More Tips?</h2>



Cross-browser testing is a necessary job when it comes to website development. At first, it may seem that this is an end process i.e. you develop the website first and then move ahead with testing. It might look logical but creates a huge pile of issues. 



A website is not like the mark sheets that you can check even if piled up. You might notice that some element does not work which has been used exhaustively while development. This comes under bad planning in design and development. We can dodge such scenarios by learning through our experience and keep the above tips in mind.&nbsp;



The tips provided in this post have proved effective with the test of time and it is recommended to follow these. But, these are not the only ones and personal experiences will give birth to a few more that can help other fellow developers/testers. 



Hence, we welcome you to comment on your own experiences and any tips you would want to share with us. We would be more than happy to incorporate those in our post.&nbsp;

7 tips for successful cross browser testing

Wait a second...Did you try Testsigma?

Wait a second...
Did you try Testsigma?