Ranorex vs Testcomplete

Many modern test automation tools do not even require coding skills. Testsigma is one such tool that has advanced AI features, no-code automation, built-in cloud execution features, etc. Ranorex and TestComplete support enterprise–grade test automation with many unique features. Let’s understand them in detail by comparing Ranorex vs TestComplete. Let us also explore Testsigma as an alternative.

Ranorex vs Testcomplete – Overview

What is Ranorex?

Ranorex is an enterprise test automation tool that allows the automation of desktop, web, and mobile applications.

• It provides unique features like DesignWise, which intelligently suggests the test cases and helps to identify the gaps. 
• It also offers no-code test automation and comes with its own rich IDE which helps to create test cases easily for beginners. 
• It has a powerful object recognition engine that helps in reducing test maintenance. 
• Additionally, Ranorex supports integration with many third-party tools like DevOps, project management tools, bug tracking tools, etc.

Check here – Ranorex Alternatives

What is TestComplete?

TestComplete is a software test automation tool that allows automating functional and regression tests. 

• It is owned by SmartBear. 
• It supports the automation of desktop, mobile, and web applications. 
• Additionally, it provides integration with tools like Git, Jira, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, etc. 
• TestComplete also comes with its own IDE which allows recording and playback and writing automation scripts using JavaScript, Python, and VBScript. 
• Recently, TestComplete has integrated modern AI capabilities, including AI-based test-data generation, automated visual testing, self-healing tests, and OCR. 

Check here – Smartbear Alternatives

What is Testsigma?

Testsigma is a unified cloud test automation platform. 

• It does not require any local installation; hence, it can be used on any device. 
• It offers many features for test automation, such as cross-browser testing, responsive testing, visual testing, data-driven testing, etc. 
• Testsigma can be used for Windows desktop, mobile, and web application automation. 
• Testsigma offers the most stable no-code automation capability. 
• Tests can be run on the cloud platform without requiring any complex configuration. 
• Additionally, you can integrate the tests with CI/CD platforms, other bug-tracking tools, and project management tools to streamline the testing process. 
• AI-based capabilities reduce the test creation and maintenance time considerably. 
• Testsigma is an all-in-one platform that provides almost every required feature for software testing.

Ranorex vs TestComplete – Pros,Cons & Features

Pros and Cons of Ranorex

Ranorex is a popular test automation tool. It provides many unique features, including support for desktop, web, and mobile automation. However, it lacks cross-platform capability and requires high computing devices, local installation, etc. Let’s understand the pros and cons of Ranorex in detail.

Pros of Ranorex

• Supports different types of applications such as desktop, web, and mobile.
• Provides a unique test design capability where auto-suggestion of test cases helps identify gaps in testing.
• Unique object recognition engine to reduce flaky tests.
• Rich IDE provides intelligent suggestions and makes it easy for beginners.
• Supports data-driven testing and keyword-driven testing.
• Supports integration with many third-party tools such as Bamboo, JIRA, Bugzilla, Git, SVN, etc.
• Provides comprehensive reporting features like PDF and automatic email capability.
• Supports both code-based and no-code automation support.
• Supports C# or VB.NET scripting for script-based test automation.
• Flexible test suite structure.
• Remote testing allows simultaneous running of remote desktop tests in different environments.

Check here – Ranorex vs Katalon

Cons of Ranorex

• Ranorex requires local installation and is supported only on Windows-based machines. Installation of Ranorex on macOS can be challenging.
• License is costly and may not be suitable for many organizations that are on a tight budget.
• It supports only limited languages such as C# and VB.NET.
• It lacks community support, and documentation can be improved.
• Ranorex provides an IDE, though it is rich and has a good UI, its many features can be complex. It might require good learning to understand and use Ranorex.
• Releases are unstable and often contain a lot of bugs.
• Ranorex lacks advanced AI capabilities; there is a lot of room for improvement in advanced technologies.
• No in-built cloud execution support.
• Though it supports integration with many tools, integrating less-known tools can be challenging.
• Ranorex requires a good configuration machine to install and work smoothly. This might add a cost overhead to the company, especially in large-scale projects.

Check here – Ranorex vs Selenium

Pros and Cons of TestComplete

TestComplete is a popular test automation framework; it provides many advanced features in its platform, including AI-based object recognition, data-driven testing, rich IDE support, keyword-driven testing, integration with many third-party tools, parallel testing, etc. Though it supports many features, it lacks macOS support and in-built cloud execution support. Additionally, TestComplete may be resource-heavy and require a good configuration machine. Let’s understand the key features and limitations of TestComplete.

Pros of TestComplete

• Supports desktop, web, and mobile test automation within the same platform.
• Provides advanced AI-based object recognition techniques, which help to produce stable tests.
• TestComplete can be used for data-driven testing and keyword-driven testing.
• Encourages reusability: Reuse project elements across all UI tests, write custom libraries, etc.
• The advanced AI assistant, like HaloAI integration, helps in test case creation and execution, low-code automation, API development, observability, etc.
• Supports integration with many third-party tools like Git, Jenkins, Zephyr, Jira, and Azure DevOps.
• Supports Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) testing, which allows understanding the test reports easily for non-technical members.
• You can get real-time information on the progress and status of your desktop, mobile, or web functional GUI tests from a single interface.
• With third-party tool integrations, it is possible to get rich reports with graphs and charts. Export your logs in multiple formats such as JUnit, HTML, or MHT, to easily share details with other team members.
• Provides execution videos and images, which allow you to quickly debug and fix the issues.
• Supports visual tests with SmartBear VisualTest add-ons.
• SmartBear provides many add-ons that are compatible with SmartBear, which help to extend the automation framework to support performance testing and many other features.

Check here – TestComplete vs Selenium

Cons of TestComplete

• macOS is not supported; it supports only Windows machines.
• Though it supports many features like visual tests, performance tests, AI capability, etc., they require subscribing to an additional add-on, which incurs a cost to the organization.
• License is costlier, and smaller organizations may not be able to afford the tool.
• It does not support an in-built cloud execution platform. It again requires a subscription to Bitbar or any other cloud execution tool.
• Understanding TestComplete commands and its IDE can be challenging, which results in a steep learning curve.
• TestComplete is resource-heavy; it requires a well-configured machine.
• As the project grows, the tool may face performance issues.
• TestComplete tests with record and playback may be flakier.
• It requires regular maintenance to keep the test cases running without breaking.

Features of Testsigma

Testsigma is a unified test automation platform. Unlike other automation tools, it does not require any local installation. Test creation, execution, and reporting—all features—are available on the cloud. It is a no-code tool, which doesn’t require any coding language expertise. Interestingly, even integration with many tools can be performed without coding, and just with form-based configurations. Many advanced capabilities, like the AI-based assistant and intelligent element identifier, help to boost productivity. Let’s understand the features of Testsigma in detail.

• Cloud-Based Platform: Testsigma is a cloud-based platform that does not require local installation and setup, which eliminates a lot of complexity and makes the setup simple.
• Smoother Experience: Testsigma has an intuitive and modern UI, which makes the user experience smooth and feels rich while using. It also helps in reducing the learning curve.
• No-Code Test Automation: Testsigma is a no-code test automation platform, where testers do not need to write complex logic in programming languages. It offers record and playback options and a visual editor to write the automation scripts. This removes the skillset barrier and allows anyone to be part of automation testing.
• Supports Desktop, Web, and Mobile Applications: Testsigma can be used for any type of application, including desktop, web, and mobile applications. This helps automate and track different types of applications on one platform.
• Multiple Testing Type Support: It supports many testing types such as functional testing, end-to-end testing, visual testing, API testing, and data-driven testing across mobile and web applications. Furthermore, Testsigma’s capability can be enhanced with additional integrations.
• Supports Many Real Environments for Test Execution: Testsigma’s built-in cloud supports a large list of environments for both mobile and web applications. It supports Linux, macOS, and Windows operating systems and Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge browsers. It also supports iOS and Android devices to test mobile applications. Testsigma’s cloud is highly scalable and meets the requirements of organizations of any size.
• Support for Many Testing Needs: Testsigma can be used for cross-browser testing, cross-platform testing, cross-device testing, and visual testing. It has an inbuilt cloud platform with 3000+ web and real mobile devices, allowing tests to run in parallel, locally, or on the cloud.
• AI Features: Testsigma has AI integration that allows for maximum automation coverage, accelerated test cycles, and early bug detection by supporting advanced features like automated test case generation using Figma, user stories, screenshots, and different types of inputs, AI-based API test case generation, and auto-healing tests.
• Parallel Testing: Testsigma supports parallel testing, so you can execute your tests across different platforms simultaneously. This helps reduce the execution duration of tests and provides faster feedback.
• Multiple Project Management: You can use Testsigma for multiple projects. It has the capability to support multiple projects. Using role management and user management, multiple projects can be managed easily.
• Schedule Test Execution: It allows you to schedule execution for the future, such as daily, weekly, monthly, etc.
• Reports and Dashboards: Testsigma provides customizable dashboards and reports. Dynamic and context-driven reports allow you to filter out the results and create custom reports like summary reports, environment-based reports, test suite-based reports, etc.
• Sharable Reports: Test reports can be generated in various formats, including PDF, and can be shared easily with stakeholders both within and outside the organization.
• Access-Based User Management: You can manage and customize your Testsigma account easily with user role management, user management, and custom field options.
• Integration with Third-Party Tools: Testsigma supports integration with more than 30 tools, including JIRA, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub, and Bamboo. This allows you to enable CI/CD integration, instant bug reporting, notifications, etc.
• Low Learning Curve: As Testsigma is a no-code-based tool, it does not require technical knowledge. Additionally, most of the features in Testsigma are self-explanatory, which reduces the learning curve and also reduces upskilling costs for the organization.
• Advanced Salesforce Test Automation: Salesforce automation is exclusively supported with many advanced features. It eliminates the complexity involved in Salesforce automation. One can leverage out-of-the-box automation with Salesforce metadata and APIs.
• Budget-Friendly: It is a budget-friendly tool that offers flexible pricing. Additionally, organizations can reduce costs in various ways by integrating Testsigma. Low learning costs save money on resource upskilling and training, in-built cloud execution eliminates third-party cloud provider integration, and supporting various platforms like mobile, desktop, and web eliminates the need for maintaining and subscribing to multiple tools.
• Options for Adoption: Testsigma offers an open-source variant, providing flexibility for organizations looking to customize or self-host their test automation platform. It also has an enterprise variant that provides advanced security and on-prem options. Testsigma Cloud is a fully managed platform for a faster and easier way to start automation.
• Customer Support: Testsigma provides 24×5 extended customer support via chat, email, call, and community.
• Documentation: Testsigma documents each and every possible feature with detailed videos, screenshots, and steps, which not only makes testers’ lives easier but also reduces the time spent on scripting.

Testsigma vs Ranorex vs TestComplete: Table comparison

Features	Testsigma	Ranorex	TestComplete
About	Testsigma is a unified test automation platform. Which is powered by AI technology and supports Mobile, Web, and Desktop application automation on cloud	Ranorex is a Windows-based test automation tool that supports Mobile, Web, and Desktop applications.	TestComplete is a test automation platform that supports Mobile, Web, and Desktop application automation.
Platform Type	Cloud-based, no local installation required	Desktop-based, requires local installation (Windows only)	Desktop-based, requires local installation (Windows only)
Application Support	Desktop, web, and mobile	Desktop, web, and mobile	Desktop, web, and mobile
No-Code Automation	Yes, with recording and playback, visual editor	Yes, supports no-code and code-based (C# and VB.NET)	Partial, with record and playback, scripting required for advanced automation
AI Features	Advanced AI-based auto-healing, test case generation, and intelligent element recognition	Lacks advanced AI capabilities	AI-based test-data generation, automated visual testing, and self-healing tests
Integration with Tools	Extensive integrations (JIRA, Jenkins, GitHub, Azure DevOps, etc.)	Many third-party integrations (e.g., JIRA, Bugzilla, Git, SVN)	Yes, supported (e.g. JIRA, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Git, etc.)
Cloud Execution	Built-in cloud execution platform with 3000+ environments	No built-in cloud execution	No built-in cloud execution (requires third-party tools like BitBar)
Cross-Platform Testing	Yes, supports cross-browser, cross-platform, and cross-device testing	Limited cross-platform capability	Limited cross-platform capability
Parallel Testing	Yes, supports parallel test execution	Yes, supports parallel test execution	Yes, supports parallel test execution
IDE Features	Intuitive, cloud-based UI with a minimal learning curve	Rich desktop IDE, but complex for beginners	Desktop IDE, requires training.
Custom Reporting	Advanced customizable dashboards and reports	Comprehensive reporting	Graphical reports, exportable in JUnit, HTML, and other formats
Performance and Resource Usage	Lightweight, works on any device with a browser	Requires high-spec Windows machines	Requires high-spec Windows machines
Pricing	Budget-friendly, flexible pricing	Expensive, suitable for larger budgets	Expensive, may require additional subscriptions for add-ons
Documentation and Learning Curve	Extensive, user-friendly documentation with videos and tutorials	Limited documentation, steep learning curve for IDE	Good documentation, but complex IDE requires time to learn

Testsigma vs Ranorex vs TestComplete: Which One to Choose

Ranorex has good technology for object recognition and desktop testing but lacks cloud execution and advanced AI features. It also requires the Windows-based machine to be set up locally. Ranorex might require heavy investment which may be difficult for many organizations. 

TestComplete provides rich AI-powered features, third-party tool integrations, and support for various automation testing types. But it requires high computing resources. Additionally, it might also require you to purchase add-ons that may incur a considerable cost to the company. 

Furthermore, Ranorex and TestComplete may require in-app purchases, and third-party tools subscriptions for enhanced and advanced features. 

Testsigma is a preferred choice for many organizations as Testsigma provides many features in-built, you do not need to purchase any additional add-ons for most of your requirements. It also has unique AI features to accelerate test automation. However, the choice may vary based on requirements.

Conclusion

Ranorex and TestComplete both offer unique features for testing desktop, mobile, and web applications. Ranorex and TestComplete require local installation on a Windows machine. Both of them cannot be installed on Mac OS.  The AI capabilities might be limited in both of these tools. Cloud execution requires additional integration or subscriptions which can incur considerable cost. 

Testsigma bundles everything in one platform which helps to accelerate the testing. Additionally, no-code testing helps to easily create test cases even for non-technical team members. Cloud integration is inbuilt no third-party tool support is required. As it has a scalable platform it is preferred by many organizations.

Mobile Testing Tools https://testsigma.com/mobile-testing-tools AI Testing Tools https://testsigma.com/tools/ai-testing-tools/ Cross Browser Testing Tools https://testsigma.com/cross-browser-testing-tools