Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma
Try for freeAccelq and Mabl both are good players in the no-code automation space. Both offer unique and smart features to automate the business use cases.
Accelq focuses on end-to-end test automation and API test automation with a no-code-based approach. Mabl focuses on UI, API, Accessibility, and Performance Testing.
Both of these tools have AI capabilities to reduce maintenance and flakiness. When it comes to choosing the right tools, it may be difficult to decide without analysing them carefully.
Comparing Accelq vs Mabl helps to understand their competing capabilities, unique features, and disadvantages.
Table Of Contents
Accelq vs Mabl – Overview
Accelq and Mabl both are modern test automation tools. They have a lot of advanced features backed by AI and ML. These tools are getting popular because of their user-friendliness and ease. Additionally, these are enterprise and commercial tools that offer easy setup and configuration.
What is Accelq?
Accelq is a commercial no-code automation tool developed by ACCELQ Inc. Accelq primarily focuses on end-to-end test automation and API automation of desktop web and mobile platforms.
Additionally, it also supports business workflow test automation such as Salesforce, SAP, and Workday-based applications.
Some of the Key features are no-code automation, test case management, CI/CD integration, In-sprint automation capabilities, advanced reporting and logging, debugging, etc.
What is Mabl?
Mabl is a modern and advanced test automation tool known for its autonomous testing features. Test automation scenarios can be created based on AI and ML capabilities. It supports Functional, Accessibility, and Performance testing under a single platform.
Mabl can rightly fit into the Agile framework as it supports many features such as CI/CD integration, Sprint-based testing, etc. It offers robust reporting and analytics capabilities. Mabl can be the best fit for an organization looking for modern and advanced features.
ACCELQ vs Mabl – Detailed Comparison
Accelq and Mabl both are modern test automation tools with advanced capabilities. They are designed to streamline the automation and testing process. As this is a modern test automation tool, they rightly fit into the Agile and DevOps eco-system. Below is a detailed comparison of Accelq vs Mabl.
Testsigma, is also an alternative to ACCELQ and MABL, here we have also listed its features.
Technologies Used
Accelq enhances the capabilities of Selenium. It uses Selenium in the backend. To provide seamless integration of all the browsers and platforms, it uses cloud infrastructure. Additionally, it uses Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to provide advanced features. Mabl also uses many tech stacks to support modern test automation such as the Selenium-Like Automation tool, Cloud infrastructure, artificial intelligence, Machine learning, etc.
Testsigma is another popular tool in the no-code tool segment. It also uses cloud infrastructure to provide a scalable environment to its end user and it has also incorporated AI and ML into its platform.
Setup Complexity
Accelq follows the simple natural UI flow for faster adoption. It has an intuitive user experience design that makes it user friendly.
Compared to Accelq, Mabl follows a slightly complex approach with the legacy interface. One user has opinionated that, it takes considerable time to set up end-to-end flows with Mabl. When it comes to Testsigma, it’s most user-friendly. Most of the UI components are self-explanatory and easy to use. Setting up Testsigma takes only a few minutes. Configurations are provided as UI flows which reduces the complexity.
Automation Platform support
Accelq supports Desktop web and Mobile test automation. It supports both iOS and Android platforms native and hybrid applications. When it comes to web applications, users can test across the popular browsers. Mabl supports both web and mobile automation. However, features might be limited. When it comes to cross-browser testing Mabl supports Firefox, Chrome, and Edge. The Safari browser is not supported, rather it allows Webkit integration. Testsigma offers support for many different platforms such as Linux, Windows, and Mac. This also covers all major browsers in the market including Safari.
Mabl and Accelq Customer Base
Mabl started its business in the year 2017, and Accelq started much earlier than Mabl. However, when it comes to customer base Accelq is having less customer base compared to Mabl. As per 6sense.com data Mabl has 232 customers and Accelq has only 178 customers. Accelq ranks at 23rd place and Mabl ranks at 20th Place.
As Mabl has a good customer base, it is also having a good market share. The 6sense.com data shows that Mabl has a 0.69% market share in the Test automation category, and Accelq has a 0.53% market share.
Mabl vs Accelq customers by geography
As per the 6sense.com data the Mabl customers are spread across the United States, Japan, and France, but the Accelq customers are limited to the United States. As Accelq is releasing many new features, Accelq is expected to soon be able to succeed in grabbing other country customers
Mabl vs Accelq rating
As per g2.com data, Mabl has 4.5-star reviews and Accelq has got 4.8 stars. Testsigma has a maximum review with an average of 4.5 stars.
Learning Curve
Both Mabl and Accelq are easy to use however considering the user experience and documentation, the Mabl learning curve is moderate. Accelq has got a better UI which reduces the learning curve. Accelq’s learning curve is comparatively low. Testsigma’s rich user experience and its true no-code feature reduces the learning curve further. If anyone has a basic background of automation testing the Testsigma’s learning curve will be very minimal.
Version Control
Accelq has incorporated an in-built version control system. Which eliminates the third-party version control mechanism. Mabl might require a third-party version control system to function to fulfill organization requirements. Testsigma supports both native and third-party version control mechanisms. As always Testsigma provides more options to users.
Integration Capabilities
Accelq supports many third-party tools which include CI/CD tools, Agile development tools, etc. Mabl supports CI/CD integration tools, Software Development tools, application lifecycle tools, etc. Both of them have a limited set of tools to support. Testsigma has a good number of tool lists to support third-party integration. It can support tools from all different categories, version control, CI/CD, defect tracking, enterprise communication, etc.
Types of Testing Support
Accelq focuses on the UI and API testing that falls into web and mobile platforms. Whereas Mabl focuses on the UI, API, Performance, and Accessibility testing. It also supports Mobile and web platforms. Accelq has Business workflow tools testing support such as Salesforce automation, Workday, SAP, etc. Testsigma provides fully packed features by supporting visual regression, functional, UI, end-to-end, and API test automation. It also provides support for Salesforce test automation. Data-driven testing is another unique feature of Testsigma.
Accelq and Mabl Similarities
Accelq and Mabl both are targeting the test automation market space. Because of that, they offer many similar features. They both offer cloud cloud-based platforms to automate the UI and API use cases with no-code capabilities. They have integrated AI capabilities into the platform to provide the most efficient and robust test automation solutions. They support integration into many different tools that belong to CI/CD, defect tracking, software development life cycle, etc. These tools are designed to support multiple platforms such as web and mobile. Both of these tools have user-friendly interfaces and scalable and flexible execution environments.
ACCELQ vs. Mabl – Which is Better?
Accelq and Mabl both are modern test automation tools, and though both have many distinct features they share many similarities. When it comes to choosing the right automation tool, it’s difficult to generalize them. As it depends on many requirements that are specific to the organization. The budget of the organization also plays a key role.
Additionally, some of the features like platform support, mobile test automation support, cross-browser testing support, etc. need to be considered. Some organizations may even look beyond test automation like accessibility testing, visual regression testing, etc.
Considering the above fact, there is no better or worse tool. However, the right tool can be chosen after careful evaluation of the organization’s needs and future roadmaps. Remember, the migration of automation tools costs a lot, so make the right choice before initiating test automation. If Mabl and Accelq don’t fulfil organization requirements consider alternative tools like Testsigma.
Best Alternative to Accelq and Mabl
Accelq and Mabl both of them offer many unique features and they also have many similarities. When it comes to choosing the right automation tool, organizations look for a tool that fulfills their requirement. In some cases, Accelq and Mabl may not be able to satisfy all of the organization’s requirements.
Testsigma is a good alternative to Mabl and Accelq. It supports almost all the features that Mabl and Accelq support, additionally it supports many other features that other automation tool lacks. The table comparison below helps to gain good insights into all of these tools.
| Feature | Accelq | Mabl | Testsigma |
| License/Pricing Model | Commercial License with Free trial Subscription-based pricing | Commercial License with Free trial Subscription-based pricing | Commercial License with Free trial Subscription-based pricing |
| Testing approach | Natural language-based codeless testing | ML-powered Autonomous testing | No-code test automation with AI capability |
| Supported Testing types | API and UI | API, UI, Accessibility, and Performance | API, UI, and Visual Regression Testing |
| Supported platforms | Mobile and web | Mobile and web | Mobile and web |
| Cloud Technologies | Cloud-based technology for test execution | Uses the Cloud infrastructure | Cloud-based scalable infrastructure for execution environment |
| Cross-browser testing support | Supports cross-browser testing with Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari | Supports cross-browser testing with Chrome, Edge, Firefox | Supports cross-browser testing with Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari |
| Learning Curve | Low | Moderate | Extremely Low |
| Version Control | Inbuilt and Third-party | Third-party | Inbuilt and Third-party |
| AI Capabilities | AI capabilities for test optimization | AI capabilities for autonomous testing | AI capabilities for reduced test maintenance |
| Support | Email and Ticket system | Email and Ticket system | Dedicated technical support with Email, Tickets and Chat |
| Documentation | Documentation could be improved. Difficult to find the solution for specific use cases | Documentation needs improvement. Difficult to find the solution for specific use cases | Very good documentation. Easy to find the solution for specific use cases and issues |
| Integration to third-party tools | Provides limited integration to third-party tools | Provides many third-party tools integration, however, the list may be limited | Wide range of tools to integrate. Which includes categories like CI/CD, Defect tracking, communication, etc |
| Business App application testing support | Supports many business applications such as SAP, Salesforce, Workday, etc. | N/A | Supports Salesforce integration with advanced features. |
Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop and APIs, 5x faster, from the same place with Testsigma
Conclusion
No-code automation accelerates the test automation coverage. There are many no-code tools in the market. It’s always difficult to choose the right tool, the evaluation of the tool takes a considerable amount of time and it’s worth spending time on evaluating the tool before adoption as roadblocks in the middle can cost the organization a lot.
Accelq and Mabl are good and popular test automation tools but lack a few features that may restrict a few organizations from choosing them. Testsigma can be considered as the best alternative as it provides many similar features to Mabl and Accelq and it is also a budget-friendly tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ACCELQ and selenium?
Accelq enhances the Selenium test automation tool, by overcoming the challenges in Selenium. Some of the key pointers in comparison of Accelq to Selenium are scripless testing, ease of setup, easy-to-perform cloud-based test execution, support for mobile applications, etc.
Which language is used in ACCELQ?
Accelq is a no-code platform, so no need to worry about the programming language. However, as Accelq claims on its website, it doesn’t do a vendor lock rather it generates the readymade Java code.
Does ACCELQ support performance testing?
As per the Accelq documentation, it supports Mobile and Web automation of UI and API. JMeter is the most popular and open-source tool for performance testing. You can also consider modern tools like K6 for performance testing.
