UFT vs Tosca: Which is better?

Test automation is a crucial part of application testing. Unlike in the older days, modern organizations are developing diverse applications such as desktop, web, and mobile-type applications. 

As organizations have different types of applications, they might be interested in the test automation tool that supports all of their requirements. However, finding such a tool is difficult. Especially, many web application automation tools do not support desktop and mobile applications. 

UFT and Tosca are some of the enterprise-level applications that support all different types of applications. Testsigma is another modern test automation tool that supports desktop, web, and mobile application automation on the cloud without requiring complex integrations and scripting. 

Let’s compare UFT and Tosca in detail and also explore the features of Testsigma, as Testsigma serves as an alternative to both of these.

What is UFT?

UFT (Unified Functional Testing) was originally launched as QTP (QuickTest Professional) by Mercury Interactive in 2000. It is built for functional and regression testing. Later, HP acquired Mercury Interactive, rebranding QTP as HP QTP. As the years passed, Micro Focus acquired HP’s software business, continuing UFT’s development as part of its test automation offerings. Now UFT is offered as OpenText UFT One. UFT supports many features including AI-powered test automation, broad technology support, and parallel testing. It also offers different add-ons for mobile and web testing.

What is Tosca?

Tosca was initially developed by Tricentis in 2008, with a focus on model-based testing and automation. The tool was designed to simplify test automation for both technical and non-technical users. Today, Tosca supports both desktop, mobile, and web automation. It also supports Performance Testing. Tosca also offers many unique features like Copilot integration, API Simulation, test data management, record and playback, mobile testing, automation testing, etc.

What is Testsigma?

Testsigma is a relatively newer tool to the market. However, it has rapidly gained popularity due to its unique features and is now considered a mature product. Testsigma is built with simplicity and a no-code approach, and it unifies the testing activity. It is quickly adopting newer technologies like AI and ML. Testsigma supports auto-healing, automatic test case generation, and many other AI-driven tasks. 

Additionally, it makes integration simple by providing visual-based forms. Testsigma also supports cloud execution natively without requiring third-party cloud execution integration. Testsigma is a simple yet powerful tool.

Pros and Cons of UFT

UFT is also known as the unified function testing tool; it supports many types of testing with advanced AI-driven technologies. It also supports SAP testing, API testing, and integration of many third-party tools. However, it lacks the inbuilt cloud execution support, and pricing is another concern for many organizations. Let’s understand the pros and cons of UFT.

Pros of UFT

• Integrates AI into its product suite, improves productivity and eases test case creation.
• Comes with an IDE that helps beginners start testing easily.
• It supports different types of applications such as mobile, desktop, and web applications.
• UFT’s advanced object recognition capabilities allow it to interact with complex UIs, ensuring reliable test execution.
• UFT integrates seamlessly with Micro Focus ALM (Application Lifecycle Management), providing a centralized testing environment and streamlined test management.
• Supports VBScript for UI-based test automation.
• UFT offers debugging and rich reporting features.
• UFT supports integration with many tools, including CI/CD tools.

Cons of UFT

• UFT can be installed only on Windows; it does not support MacOS and Linux.
• No support for in-built cloud execution.
• It supports only VBScript; other scripting languages are supported only with UFT Developer tool integration.
• UFT can be expensive, especially for small to mid-sized companies, as it requires licenses and additional add-ons for full functionality.
• UFT does not support any platform other than Windows and cross-browser testing support is limited.
• It has limited support for no-code test automation and it only supports scripting language VBScript, so it has a steep learning curve.
• Integration with other third-party tools can be challenging as it requires specialized knowledge.
• Many users reported that the tool lags if they do not have a good configuration machine.

Pros and Cons of Tosca

Tosca offers many distinct features like model-based test automation, dynamic object identification, reusable libraries, Vision AI, etc. However, it has limited support other than Windows. Additionally, its licensing cost is expensive, so smaller organizations may not be able to afford it. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of Tosca.

Pros of Tosca

• Tosca is a model-based test automation platform, which reduces the coding requirement and makes it easy for beginners.
• It has advanced features like dynamic object identification, reusable libraries, etc, which help to create efficient test libraries.
• It has an IDE with a rich interface, which also helps anyone to quickly learn and start automating.
• Tosca supports test management. From test case creation to execution and reporting, everything can be done on one platform.
• Tosca supports cross-browser and cross-platform testing across multiple environments, which helps to ensure applications deliver consistent performance across various browsers, operating systems, and devices.
• It has a Copilot-based generative AI assistant that helps to speed up test automation.
• It has Vision AI technology that allows the creation of test automation using mockups.
• Supports codeless API testing.
• It also supports parallel execution and real-time monitoring.
• Tosca supports a mobile module that can easily be integrated to enhance the framework for mobile automation support.
• Tosca also supports accessibility testing; you can run the tests with accessibility compliance for WCAG 2.0 and AA measures.

Cons of Tosca

• Tosca setup and configuration may not be easy, and it requires good technical knowledge. Additionally, it is time-consuming.
• Tosca is an expensive tool, and it may require purchasing many add-ons for full-fledged automation testing. Together, it makes the cost heavy for many organizations.
• Tosca requires a lot of resources like RAM, CPU, and disk space to run. Providing such high-end configurations for each tester or developer may incur a lot of costs for the organization.
• Tosca supports Windows; it has limited support for Mac and does not support Linux.
• Tosca does not support out-of-the-box cloud integration; it may require a subscription and integration to execute tests on the cloud.
• Though it has a model-based framework, it requires learning and training to understand the features.
• Debugging capabilities are limited, and finding the root cause can be challenging.
• As the test suite grows, you may experience performance issues.
• Test automation script maintenance can be time-consuming.

Features of Testsigma

• Testsigma is a cloud-based test automation tool that does not require any installation on the local machine; hence, it follows an easy setup.
• It has AI integration, which auto-heals failed tests and makes test maintenance easier.
• Testsigma can be used for mobile, web, and desktop applications. It also supports enterprise application automation like Salesforce.
• A rich and easy-to-use interface is one of the major advantages for its stakeholders, as it reduces the learning curve and provides a smoother user experience.
• No-code automation allows building the automation test cases without writing code. This also eliminates upskilling resources and time.
• Supports cross-browser testing with many modern browsers, including Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Edge.
• Testsigma has out-of-the-box cloud execution support, and users can choose the required configuration like Windows, Linux, MacOS, and browsers. Additionally, mobile application testing is supported for both iOS and Android.
• Testsigma has AI integration that allows for maximum automation coverage, accelerated test cycles, and early bug detection by supporting advanced features like automated test case generation using Figma, user stories, screenshots, and different types of inputs, AI-based API test case generation, and auto-healing tests.
• Testsigma supports parallel testing, so you can execute your tests across different platforms simultaneously. This helps reduce the execution duration.
• Testsigma supports more than 30+ tool integrations with ease. These tools include CI/CD tools, defect tracking tools, corporate messaging tools, etc.
• It is a more cost-effective tool as it supports various pricing plans, and it also has dedicated technical support to answer all your queries.
• Testsigma documents its  features with detailed videos, screenshots, and steps, which not only makes testers’ lives easier but also reduce the time spent on scripting.

UFT vs Tosca vs Testsigma Table comaparison

Features	UFT	Tosca	Testsigma
Definition	UFT is a functional test automation tool primarily focused on regression and functional testing	A model-based test automation platform that supports functional and API test automation with ease	A unified test automation platform that supports Mobile, API, and Web testing out of the box. It also supports Desktop test automation.
Supported operating systems	Windows	Windows and Limited support for MacOS	Doesn’t require any installation as it is cloud-based
Supported application types	Desktop and Web. Mobile automation supported with Add-on support	Supports Desktop and Web. Mobile automation supported with Tosca Mobile	Supports Mobile and Web. Desktop automation supported with minimal configuration
Browser support	Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Edge	Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Edge. Safari is supported with additional configuration.	Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge out of the box
Integration support	Supports integration with many tools including CI/CD tools. However, integration can be challenging.	Supports integration with many tools including CI/CD tools. However, integration might require technical expertise.	Supports integration with more than 30 tools with ease
AI-Based features	Supports AI-based features for Object recognition and interaction, Intelligent automation, etc.	Supports AI features for test creation, auto-healing, and writing automation scripts from mock-up	Supports AI features test creation, test data generation, auto-healing, automatic maintenance, etc.
Cost	Expensive. Based on the use case organization, might be required to subscribe to paid add-ons as well.	Expensive. Additional paid add-on subscriptions might be required.	Budget-friendly and various pricing plans.
Setup and configuration	Requires local setup and configuration which is complex and  requires technical expertise.	Requires complex setup and installation process.	Easy to set up and in some use cases does not even require local installation.
Cloud testing support	Requires additional integration.	Requires additional integration	Supported out-of-the-box
Scripting language	VBScript	Model-based automation requires minimal scripting	No code automation no scripting is required
Parallel Execution	Limited support for parallel testing	Requires additional configuration for parallel testing	Supported
Testing Type	Functional testing, regression testing, data-driven testing, etc.	Functional testing, API Testing, Accessibility Testing, etc.	Functional testing, visual testing, data-driven testing, API Testing, etc.

UFT vs Tosca vs Testsigma – which is better?

UFT is a good test automation tool, If you are looking for extensive support for desktop applications and basic support for web and mobile applications. One of the main challenges with UFT is that it does not support any other operating system other than Windows, and it requires a very good configuration system to work. Tosca, with its model-based, no-code automation tool – It provides an intuitive interface and experience, especially for non-technical users. It supports a wide range of testing types and platforms. However, it can be expensive, resource-intensive, and complex to set up. Testigma can serve as a good alternative to both Tosca and UFT. Testsigma is a cloud-based, no-code automation tool that supports many unique features. It does not require local installation and no coding knowledge is required to write the automation scripts. 

Testsigma provides many distinct features such as AI-driven features, native cloud testing, cross-browser testing, cross-platform testing, budget-friendly subscription plans, etc.

 As Testsgima supports Desktop, Mobile, and Web applications it can be used as a unified platform to manage all testing requirements. As Testsigma has many unique capabilities and reduces costs, it has become a preferred choice for many organizations. 

However, the right tool can be chosen only after evaluating the tool against your requirements.

Conclusion

UFT and Tosca are both good tools that offer many distinct features for organizations. However, they have a few limitations and restrictions. These restrictions include cost, support for operating systems, cross-browser testing, cloud execution, etc. 

Testsigma is a modern test automation tool with advanced features and can serve as a good alternative to both of these. It also provides budget-friendly subscription plans with dedicated technical support. Testsigma is revolutionizing the automation industry by providing AI-driven features, the most stable no-code automation platform, and integration with many tools. For organizations seeking a unified solution for testing with advanced capabilities, Testsigma can be the best fit. However, the choice might vary based on requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Testsigma support desktop test automation?

Yes, Testsigma supports desktop application test automation. You can refer to the desktop application documentation for more.

Is Testsigma better than Tosca?

Both Testsigma and Tosca offer many distinct features. However, considering setup, complexity, learning curve, and support for advanced capabilities, Testsigma is much easier, especially when it comes to mobile and web application automation. However, based on the requirement, the choice might change.