How to Write Test Cases for Registration Page

How to Write Test Cases for Registration Page?

Salesforce Test Cases Template with Best Practices

Test Reporting Tools A Comprehensive List

Test Reporting Tools: A Comprehensive List

How Motherhood Shaped Me As Better Tester

What is Monkey Testing? | Types, Top Advantages & Tools

This month, our team has introduced to Testsigma a range of innovative features that will revolutionize the way you approach testing.&nbsp;



Let&#8217;s dive right in:&nbsp;



1. Embrace targeted testing by using For Loop to filter Test Data Profiles: With the new Test Data Profile Filtering in <a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/test-cases/step-types/for-loop/">For Loop</a> feature, you can effortlessly run repetitive actions on a selected subset of your Test Data profile. Say goodbye to the unnecessary hassle of testing through the entire test data profile and embrace targeted testing like never before.



2. Develop deterministic tests with Mobile Debugger [Beta]: With <a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/debugging/results-on-local-devices/">Testsigma&#8217;s Mobile Debugger</a>, you can now debug issues on your local mobile devices step-by-step. Run your tests in Debug mode, and you&#8217;ll be able to execute them live, closely analyze each step, locate issues, and fix them in real-time—all in a single session. Gain 100% confidence in the accuracy of your test authoring and eliminate flakiness from your automated testing.



3. Execute Mobile Test Suites in Parallel: With<a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/test-plans/run-tests-in-parallel/"> parallel testing</a>, you can run tests on multiple OS and device combinations simultaneously, multiplying your test execution capacity and significantly reducing the time needed to complete your testing cycles.



4. Jira-Xray Integration: If your team relies on Jira Xray for release reporting and planning, Testsigma&#8217;s <a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/integrations/test-management/xray/">Jira-Xray Integration </a>will make it a breeze to push execution information to Xray with just a flip of a switch. This lets you seamlessly bridge the gap between testing and release management, and experience a smoother and more streamlined testing process.<gwmw style="display:none;">



With these new features, we&#8217;re continuing to empower you to achieve optimal testing efficiency and accuracy. If you&#8217;re not already a Testsigma user,&nbsp;



<button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Sign up for a free trial</a></button>



And embrace effortless automated testing with Testsigma.&nbsp;

June '23 Product roundup - latest on Testsigma

June ’23 Product roundup – latest on Testsigma

SaaS Testing Top Challenges, Tools and Testing Approach

SaaS Testing: Top Challenges, Tools and Testing Approach

We&#8217;re excited to announce the addition of visual test automation capabilities to Testsigma’s low-code platform. With this newest addition, quality teams are empowered to test the accuracy of visual elements with precision and deliver great user experiences at an unmatched scale and speed.



Empowering QA teams and democratizing software testing is at the core of what we do at Testsigma. Over time, we have realized that in QA, many teams hyperfocus on functionality—how the elements interact with the user—and often overlook how the elements render across various browsers and devices. The result &#8211; a poor customer experience and lost revenue.



Adding to it, the complexities of modern web design make it difficult to automate visual verifications with traditional tools and frameworks. They struggle to handle dynamic elements and responsive designs, often leading to false negatives and false positives in testing results. Manually verifying the UI is also error-prone and unscalable, leading to longer test cycles and eating into your release pace and quality.&nbsp;



To address these quality concerns and make visual testing as seamless as testing functionality and APIs, we are introducing low-code automated visual testing in Testsigma. Here are some of the highlights the new feature brings to the table:



<ul><li>Create visual tests effortlessly, without any code: Author automated tests using plain English statements with Testsigma. Or record user actions that are automatically converted into plain English test steps. Add visual validations for the required test steps with a click of a button.</li><li>View and debug visual errors in a user-friendly interface: With clear visualization of the base image, reference image, and highlighted differences, you can easily analyze and rectify any design-related problems to maintain a consistent visual experience.</li><li>Run visual regression tests across 3000+ platforms and browsers: Automate visual testing for mobile and web apps and ensure visual uniformity across 3000+ platforms, devices, and browsers with Testsigma&#8217;s cloud test lab.&nbsp;</li><li>Run functional and visual tests simultaneously: Run functional and visual tests in parallel without any additional effort. Cover both end-to-end scenarios and visual regressions to maximize coverage and save time covering the tests.&nbsp;&nbsp;</li></ul>



Automated visual testing is available to all Testsigma users across all plans. To learn more, <a href="https://hubs.ly/Q01VLkkX0">click here</a>.



Don&#8217;t miss our upcoming webinar with Testsigma’s product engineering team on 29 June 2023, where you will get an exclusive walkthrough of the latest visual testing functionality.<gwmw style="display:none;">



<gwmw style="display:none;">



<button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="display: block;
 margin: auto;"><a href="http://hubs.ly/Q01VVdv90" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Register now</a></button><gwmw style="display:none;">

Introducing Automated Visual Testing: Run Visual and Functional Tests Parallelly

Test Environment Management What, Why, and Best Practices

Test Environment Management | What, Why, and Best Practices

When it comes to software delivery, automation is directly proportional to efficiency. With its ability to automate building, testing, and software delivery, Jenkins is the go-to choice for CI/CD pipeline automation for many teams. With low-code end-to-end test automation with Testsigma and our native Testsigma-Jenkins integration, you can incorporate your simple English tests—for web, mobile apps, and APIs—into your build automation workflows—to test continuously and at scale.



Here&#8217;s how you can get started:



<ol><li>Installation and Setup: To get started, you&#8217;ll need to install the Testsigma Test Plan Run plugin in your Jenkins instance. You can find the plugin on the <a href="https://plugins.jenkins.io/testsigma/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jenkins Plugins page </a>or download it directly from the Testsigma website.&nbsp;</li></ol>



Once installed, you&#8217;re ready to integrate Testsigma tests with Jenkins.



<ol start="2"><li>Configuring the Jenkins Pipeline: Add the <a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/test-plans/schedule-plans/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma Test Plan Run</a> plugin as a stage to trigger your Testsigma test plans:<ol><li>Click on the &#8220;Build&#8221; tab within your pipeline configuration.</li><li>Click on &#8220;Add Build Step&#8221; and select &#8220;Testsigma Test Plan run.&#8221;</li><li>Configure the plugin by providing your Testsigma API Key, Test Plan ID, maximum wait time for task completion, and the file path for the JUnit report XML file.</li><li>Save the changes to complete the configuration.</li></ol></li></ol>



<ol start="3"><li>Testing and Execution: Once your pipeline is set up, trigger a build to see the build verification in action. Check the console log for the execution details, and for more comprehensive results, log into your Testsigma account and deep dive into the test plan status.&nbsp;</li></ol>



With Jenkins&#8217; automation capabilities and Testsigma&#8217;s simplified testing, you automate your testing pipeline to maximize efficiency and deliver high-quality software with confidence. Automate your testing pipeline today and experience the benefits of a smoother, more efficient release workflow with Testsigma.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Build and run tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs under one platform with Testsigma.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>

Embrace Effortless Pipeline Automation with Testsigma-Jenkins Integration

Effortless Pipeline Automation with Testsigma-Jenkins Integration

Unit testing, followed by integration testing validates software quality. But when building a robust enterprise application, your integration testing approach needs some more push. For software connected to other sub-projects, quality validation requires <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/back-to-back-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">back-to-back</a>, reverse-forward testing of all layers of your application from the onset. This is where sandwich testing comes in.



This blog will explain the sandwich testing concept, including its features and the steps to execute it.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_Is_Sandwich_Testing">1 What Is Sandwich Testing?</a><ul><li><a href="#The_Top-Down_Testing_Approach">1.1 The Top-Down Testing Approach</a></li><li><a href="#The_Bottom-Up_Approach">1.2 The Bottom-Up Approach</a></li><li><a href="#Sandwich_Testing_and_the_N-Tier_Software_Architecture">1.3 Sandwich Testing and the N-Tier Software Architecture</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Features_of_Sandwich_Testing">2 Features of Sandwich Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Why_is_sandwich_testing_necessary_in_software_testing">3 Why is sandwich testing necessary in software testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Sandwich_testing_and_test_automation">4 Sandwich testing and test automation</a><ul><li><a href="#Some_Tools_to_Automate_Sandwich_Testing">4.1 Some Tools to Automate Sandwich Testing</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Example_of_Sandwich_Testing">5 Example of Sandwich Testing</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_run_a_sandwich_test">6 How to run a sandwich test?</a></li><li><a href="#Summary">7 Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">8 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_hybrid_or_sandwich_integration_testing">8.1 What is hybrid or sandwich integration testing?</a></li><li><a href="#What_are_the_attributes_of_sandwich_testing">8.2 What are the attributes of sandwich testing?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-sandwich-testing">What Is Sandwich Testing?</h2>



Sandwich testing is an integration testing method that involves splitting an application into different layers and testing them separately and integrally to ensure each layer works perfectly to meet the software specifications. You can also refer to a sandwich test as hybrid integration testing since it combines the top-down and bottom-up testing approaches. Sandwich testing is an incremental testing process, and it assumes a three-layer testing pattern with the middle layer as the target layer.



<h3 id="h-the-top-down-testing-approach">The Top-Down Testing Approach</h3>



The top-down approach starts testing from the middle layer (target) to the lower modules. Here, you begin with the independent validation of individual units of the target layer, followed by a gradual integration of the lower modules, usually the database and other external services.&nbsp;



The lower modules are usually stubbed (simulated) to provide dummy data and objects to mimic them. This helps verify if the validated component of the target layer behaves as expected when mounted on lower subsystems.



<h3 id="h-the-bottom-up-approach">The Bottom-Up Approach</h3>



On the other hand, the bottom-up approach begins testing from the middle layer to the upper modules. This approach first evaluates the upper part in isolation and gradually tests it when integrated with the validated middle subsystem to catch bugs as the test proceeds. You can think of the upper layer in context as a simulated UI.



<h3 id="h-sandwich-testing-and-the-n-tier-software-architecture">Sandwich Testing and the N-Tier Software Architecture</h3>



An N-tier software architecture using a three-tier typically features the client side, business logic, and data access. You test each layer independently and further validate how they communicate after integration. That&#8217;s the sandwich testing concept. Ultimately, it helps mitigate bugs and save development time. Additionally, it makes your test suite more scalable since there are different test layers.



For instance, while ensuring that the submit button in the UI works, you also want to ensure that it calls the appropriate function, sends the expected queries to the database, and executes the associated algorithm expectedly on the returned data. Regardless of your application&#8217;s complexity, the sandwich testing method helps your test assess its entire architecture without complicating your test suite.



<h2 id="h-features-of-sandwich-testing">Features of Sandwich Testing</h2>



Here are the key features of sandwich testing.&nbsp;



<ul><li>Sandwich testing is granular: It’s specific to each component or feature of an application. Thus, it involves independently testing individual components and how they further communicate with the corresponding subsystems. Invariably, it ensures each application component satisfies its expected quality first and checks how it behaves when it works with its associated layers.</li><li>It assumes a three-layer testing pattern: Sandwich testing takes the bottom-up and top-bottom approach, with the target layer is typically in the middle.</li><li>It is complete: Sandwich testing has extended coverage, combining integration and unit testing to validate the target layer independently first. It then verifies how it works when integrated with the associated upper and lower layers.</li><li>It modularizes the test suite: Sandwich testing ensures that the test suit handles each part of an application under test independently, separating component concerns into modules that can run independently.&nbsp;</li><li>Sandwich testing is incremental: Sandwich testing typically starts with the target module and progresses to other components in a forward and reverse pattern (from middle to top and from middle to bottom).</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-why-is-sandwich-testing-necessary-in-software-testing">Why is sandwich testing necessary in software testing?</h2>



The ultimate goal of sandwich integration testing is to ensure that each subsystem of your application works together to achieve an overall quality. While it might be costly and complex, you want to use this testing method for the following reasons.



<ul><li>Earlier bug detection: It helps catch potential bugs earlier, saving development time and mitigating financial loss from production bugs.</li><li>Improved test coverage: It helps you perform both unit and integration testing simultaneously to discover the effect of integrating other subsystems on the target layer. So, it improves the<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-coverage/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> test coverage</a> and software quality.</li><li>Test scalability and reusability: Since each test module handles the application’s components individually, sandwich testing makes it easy to add more tests and reuse existing ones as your application scales. Thus, it’s robust and ideal for testing applications with complex architecture.</li><li>Reduced test suite complexity: Sandwich testing adopts a descriptive naming convention, making locating the module that handles a specific test easier. It also makes your tests more comprehensive when shared with your team.</li><li>Support for parallel testing: You can test modules in parallel since many modules are under test. This saves time significantly.</li><li>Support for test automation: Like conventional end-to-end testing, sandwich testing is also subject to automation testing tools like Testsigma, Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and many more.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-sandwich-testing-and-test-automation">Sandwich testing and test automation</h2>



Automating your sandwich testing is helpful when:



<ul><li>Considering the complexity of sandwich testing, automation simplifies the process</li><li>Test automation improves the test feedback cycle, allowing the development team to evaluate test results more efficiently.&nbsp;</li><li>Automation testing is saving costs, some avenues where costs can be saved are:<ul><li>It simulates different testing environments, including browsers and operating systems.</li><li>It helps you track the test step that fails during testing. This is handy for quick bug fixing.</li><li>It helps keep track of the test for continuity and scalability.</li><li>Automating your sandwich test provides an avenue for parallel multi-platform and multi-browser testing.</li></ul></li></ul>



<h3 id="h-some-tools-to-automate-sandwich-testing">Some Tools to Automate Sandwich Testing</h3>



<ul><li>Testsigma: Testsigma is an automation testing platform that allows you to automate UI tests locally or in the cloud without coding, in simple English. With support for multi-browser and multi-device testing, you can run tests in parallel using Testsigma’s Test Lab. In addition to browser extensions for recording tests, it features a user-friendly interface for creating test scenarios and writing test steps for each. It supports web, mobile, and API testing with little maintenance overhead, as tests are in plain English script.&nbsp;</li></ul> 



<button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop and APIs from the same place, 10x faster, with Testsigma</a></button>



 <ul><li>Selenium: Selenium is an open-source framework for automating user interactions on the web. Selenium provides web drivers for modern browsers, including Chromium-based browsers, Firefox, and Safari, and it&#8217;s the most-used testing framework. As of writing, Selenium has approximately 206,000 users, according to its <a href="https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GitHub stat</a>. The framework also features an IDE for playback test automation and supports the Selenium Grid for orchestrating tests in multiple environments. Selenium test automation requires coding experience in its supported languages, including Python, Kotlin, Ruby, Java, JavaScript, and C#.</li></ul> 



<ul><li>Playwright: Playwright is Microsoft&#8217;s end-to-end testing framework for automating web actions. In contrast to Selenium, <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/playwright" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">GitHub</a> puts its users&#8217; stat at 26,000. Compared to Selenium, Playwright is more recent and supports fewer programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, TypeScript, .NET, and Java. It also supports many modern browsers and allows parallel testing. Unlike Selenium, which requires an implicit wait for DOM loading, Playwright features auto-wait and web-first assertions. The framework also has a code generator. In addition to helping set up tests quickly, this can be handy for generating relevant web element selectors during testing to save element inspection time.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-example-of-sandwich-testing">Example of Sandwich Testing</h2>



Every application has different components performing different functions. Each part typically communicates with the lower subsystems. These include the business logic and data layers.&nbsp;



In sandwich testing, the application validation is typically incremental. It ensures you verify one module after another when integrated with the top layers.&nbsp;



While performing sandwich testing, you typically start by testing the UI using stubs to simulate test data. Here, you might want to use UI testing tools like Testsigma to simulate a UI to validate the target component.



Once you test the UI, you can start testing the lower modules independently using drivers to simulate unavailable modules. Once done, you&#8217;ll integrate each validated lower module with the UI and rerun the test. This is the <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/integration-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">integration testing</a> phase. It verifies if the application works expectedly after mounting each module.



For example, while testing a complex application using the sandwich approach, you want to validate each lower module in isolation before integrating it with the target (the UI). Next, you&#8217;ll rerun the test after integrating the UI with the previously validated module. This is to validate that each module works as expected when mounted on the UI.&nbsp;



You then repeat the process for each lower module until your test satisfies the required quality. However, modules that are unavailable for testing are usually stubbed.



<h2 id="h-how-to-run-a-sandwich-test">How to run a sandwich test?</h2>



Sandwich testing requires close attention to the detail of your application. The following steps are a guide for executing a sandwich test.



Step 1: Create your test scenarios: Planning a test scenario helps you imagine a user story. Your test scenario must be complete, comprehensive, and realistic and should include concise test steps.



Step 2: Prioritize the essential modules: Identifying the target components makes your tests more specific and consistent. Ensure you collaborate with the development team to understand underlying functions and modules. This helps you to verify which modules are available for testing and efficiently create test stubs and drivers for them. At this stage, you also want to identify and prioritize the modules in the order of their effect on your application&#8217;s functionalities.



Step 3: Choose a testing environment: This is where you decide whether to run manual or automation testing. While automating your test, you should also determine whether to use a local web driver or spin it up using a cloud grid.



Step 4: Run your UI test in isolation: Start your sandwich testing by running the UI test in isolation with stubs.



Step 5: Test each module independently: Here, you’ll test each lower subsystem in isolation to ensure they meet the software quality requirements. You might want to run subsystem <a href="https://testsigma.com/parallel-test-runs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tests in parallel</a> to save time and cost.



Step 6: Perform integration testing on mounted modules: After testing each module and the UI independently, integrate the UI with each module and rerun the test.&nbsp;&nbsp;



Step 7: Evaluate test results: Use various test coverage and analytic tools to estimate how well your test performed. A critical evaluation of the test coverage helps you identify further test requirements. You can also generate shareable HTML coverage reports to view the missing tests.



<h2 id="h-summary">Summary</h2>



Despite the independence of each layer during development, they intertwine and work together when shipped to the end user. Bugs in one of the layers can break the whole. Thus, a layered architecture requires unsullied testing to ensure all parts meet software quality standards and user experience expectations.&nbsp;



Unlike integration testing, that only tests the software when systems are mounted, sandwich testing is more comprehensive, as it checks each layer separately before integrating them incrementally with the target layer.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-hybrid-or-sandwich-integration-testing">What is hybrid or sandwich integration testing?</h3>



Hybrid or sandwich integration testing is an incremental software testing method for validating if an independently tested lower module works as it should when integrated with higher systems you&#8217;ve also tested in isolation.&nbsp;



<h3 id="h-what-are-the-attributes-of-sandwich-testing">What are the attributes of sandwich testing?</h3>



Sandwich testing has many attributes. But for the most part, it’s complete, stepwise, incremental, unassuming, modular, and pays strict attention to the application details. Overall, it makes your test suite reusable and more scalable.

What is Sandwich Testing- Features and Example

When it comes to software testing types, they can be broadly divided into Functional and Non Functional Testing. In this article, we will briefly introduce both testing types and try to understand the difference between functional and non functional testing!



Functional testing is a type of testing that focuses on evaluating the software&#8217;s functionality. This testing ensures that the software performs per the specifications and requirements outlined during the design phase. On the other hand, non functional testing evaluates the software&#8217;s non-functional aspects, such as performance, scalability, security, and usability.



Both types are important, and in this blog post, we&#8217;ll closely examine what makes each unique.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Functional_Testing_VS_Non_Functional_Testing_8211_Overview">1 Functional Testing VS Non Functional Testing &#8211; Overview</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Functional_and_Non-Functional_Testing">2 What is Functional and Non-Functional Testing?</a><ul><li><a href="#Functional_Testing">2.1 Functional Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Non-Functional_Testing">2.2 Non-Functional Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Example_of_Non-Functional_Testing">2.3 Example of Non-Functional Testing:</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Functional_Testing_Vs_Non_Functional_Testing_8211_Advantages">3 Functional Testing Vs Non Functional Testing &#8211; Advantages</a></li><li><a href="#Key_Difference_Between_Functional_Testing_and_Non_Functional_Testing">4 Key Difference Between Functional Testing and Non Functional Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Functional_Testing_vs_Non_Functional_Testing_Examples">5 Functional Testing vs Non Functional Testing Examples</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">6 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">7 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_API_testing_functional_or_nonfunctional">7.1 Is API testing functional or nonfunctional?</a></li><li><a href="#Is_UI_testing_functional_or_nonfunctional">7.2 Is UI testing functional or nonfunctional?</a></li><li><a href="#Key_difference_between_functional_testing_and_non-functional_testing">7.3 Key difference between functional testing and non-functional testing</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-functional-testing-vs-non-functional-testing-overview">Functional Testing VS Non Functional Testing &#8211; Overview</h2>



Here are simple explanations for both testing types.



<h2 id="what-is-functional-and-non-functional-testing">What is Functional and Non-Functional Testing?</h2>



Software tests are largely categorized into functional and non-functional tests, both of which are essential for the application’s real-world quality and performance.


<h3 id="functional-testing"><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/functional-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Functional Testing</a><gwmw style="display:none;"></h3>


Functional tests focus on verifying that an application behaves in accordance with predetermined requirements. They focus on the application’s specific functions, to verify that each of them work exactly as operated.



Key attributes



<ul><li>Tests the app’s business logic and user interactions.</li><li>Validates the system’s input, output, and data processing flows.</li><li>Checks that the application meets all functional requirements</li></ul>



Types of Functional Tests



<ul><li>Unit Testing – Tests individual components or modules.</li><li>Integration Testing – Checks the quality interactions between integrated modules.</li><li>System Testing – Evaluates the system functionality as a whole.</li><li>Acceptance Testing – Verifies that the system meets all business and end-user needs.</li><li>Regression Testing – Checks if any code changes break existing functionalities.</li><li>Smoke Testing – Quick checks to verify major functionalities after pushing new code.</li></ul>



Example of Functional Testing



Testing the payment feature of an e-commerce app by entering accurate and inaccurate information (amount, bank login credentials, etc.). This is done to evaluate system responses, and whether they serve customer and business needs.



<h3 id="non-functional-testing">Non-Functional Testing</h3>



Non-functional tests evaluate attributes of an application that do not relate to functionalities. Rather it focuses on verifying performance, security and usability.



Key attributes



<ul><li>Examines system performance under different real-world conditions — performance, security, scalability, latency.</li><li>Verifies that the system meets predetermined quality standards for security, scalability and performance.</li><li>Seeks to uncover and eliminate bugs to optimize user experience.</li></ul>



Types of Non-Functional Testing:



<ul><li>Performance Testing – Evaluates system speed, responsiveness, and stability.</li><li>Load Testing – Gauges how the system handles a sudden spike in user activity.</li><li>Stress Testing – Verifies system behavior under unpredictable end-user conditions.</li><li>Security Testing – Checks the system’s ability to guard and defend against cyber threats and security threats.</li><li>Usability Testing – Gauges how easy it is for end-users to actually use the application.</li><li>Compatibility Testing – Checks if the system works equally well across different devices, browsers, and OSes.</li><li>Recovery Testing – Verifies how the system recovers from crashes or failures.</li></ul>



<h3 id="example-of-non-functional-testing">Example of Non-Functional Testing:</h3>



Testing how a website responds to sudden increase in high user traffic, at expected and unexpected times.<gwmw style="display:none;"><gwmw style="display:none;">



<h2 id="h-functional-testing-vs-non-functional-testing-advantages">Functional Testing Vs Non Functional Testing &#8211; Advantages</h2>



Let us look into the advantages .



Functional Testing Advantages



Functional testing offers a range of advantages that make it one of the most effective methods for ensuring software quality. Some of the key benefits include:



<ol><li>Complete coverage: Functional testing allows testers to evaluate whether an application meets all its stated requirements, giving developers and QA teams a detailed understanding of how well the software works.</li><li>Improved accuracy: By carrying out functional tests in a controlled environment, errors can be isolated and addressed before they cause major issues. This helps reduce debugging time and ensures that bugs are caught during the development process rather than after release.</li><li>Improved user experience: As functional testing focuses on ensuring that applications work as planned, it helps ensure users have positive experiences when using them. This includes ease of use, speed, responsiveness, and stability.</li></ol>



Functional testing thoroughly evaluates software performance across many areas and helps organizations build more reliable, high-quality products.



Non Functional Testing Advantages



<ol><li>The primary benefit of this testing is that it ensures the application&#8217;s reliability, scalability, and performance under different workloads and stress conditions.</li><li>It also identifies user experience issues such as compatibility, accessibility, usability, and security.</li><li>Performing this tests helps to identify weaknesses or areas for improvement in system components before they break down or become a bottleneck.</li><li>Conducting this tests lowers the risk of financial loss due to system failure or downtime caused by inadequate network connectivity or hardware dependencies.</li><li>Also, this results in better quality software with quicker releases and fewer post-release bugs, leading to happier customers and business owners.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-key-difference-between-functional-testing-and-non-functional-testing">Key Difference Between Functional Testing and Non Functional Testing</h2>



The below-given table will explain in detail a few criteria of the key differences.



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Criteria</td><td>Functional Testing</td><td>Non-Functional Testing</td></tr><tr><td>Purpose</td><td>To test the functionality of the software application and ensure that it meets the specified requirements.</td><td>To test the non-functional aspects of the software application, such as performance, usability, security, and reliability.</td></tr><tr><td>Testing Techniques</td><td>Black box testing, White box testing, Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing, and Acceptance testing.</td><td>Load testing, Stress testing, Usability testing, and Security testing.</td></tr><tr><td>Automated Execution</td><td>Automate the tests using tools like Testsigma, Selenium, Appium etc</td><td>Automate the test using&nbsp; tools like Apache JMeter, LoadRunner, LoadUI, SoapUI, WebLoad</td></tr><tr><td>Metrics</td><td>Number of features tested, Pass/Fail rate</td><td>Transaction success rate, Response time, Resource utilization rate</td></tr><tr><td>Execution</td><td>Tests are executed after the system is developed and is ready for testing.</td><td>Tests are executed throughout the development lifecycle, from early requirements gathering to the final stages of deployment and testing.</td></tr><tr><td>Focus area</td><td>Focuses on the system’s functionality, i.e., whether the system is meeting the requirements.</td><td>Focuses on the non-functional aspects of the system, such as performance, scalability, usability, security, and reliability.</td></tr><tr><td>Requirement</td><td>Based on functional requirements, which describe what the system should do.</td><td>Based on non-functional requirements, which describe how the system should perform.</td></tr><tr><td>Usage</td><td>Used to ensure that the system meets the functional requirements and is working as expected.</td><td>Used to ensure that the system meets the non-functional requirements and performs well in performance, scalability, usability, security, and reliability.</td></tr><tr><td>Objective</td><td>To find and fix defects in the system’s functionality.</td><td>To find and fix bottlenecks and performance issues in the system, improve the system’s usability, and ensure that the system is secure and reliable.</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/manual-testing/">Manual testing</a></td><td>It can be executed manually, but automation is becoming more common.</td><td>For some <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/the-different-software-testing-types-explained/">types of testing</a>, like performance and load testing, automated scripts are generally used.</td></tr><tr><td>Functionality</td><td>Tests the functional aspects of the system, such as adding a new customer, placing an order, or generating a report.</td><td>Tests the non-functional aspects of the system, such as the system’s response time under load, the number of concurrent users that the system can support, and the ease of use of the system’s user interface.</td></tr><tr><td>Example Test Case</td><td>Functional: Verify that a user can successfully add a new customer to the system.</td><td>Non-functional: Verify that the system can handle 100 concurrent users without crashing.</td></tr><tr><td>Testing Types</td><td>Unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing.</td><td>Performance testing, scalability testing, usability testing, security testing, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/reliability-testing/">reliability testing</a>.</td></tr><tr><td>How to perform</td><td>Steps for manual and automated functional tests are outlined<a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/functional-testing/"> here</a>.</td><td>More details about performing non functional tests to be found<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/non-functional-testing/"> here</a>.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-functional-testing-vs-non-functional-testing-examples">Functional Testing vs Non Functional Testing Examples<gwmw style="display:none;"></h2>



Let us take an example application and look at the examples.



Application: Image Uploader Functional Testing Test Cases:



<ol><li>Verify the Upload button functionality</li><li>Check allowed file types</li><li>Validate image size limitation</li><li>Test the drag-and-drop feature</li><li>Verify File name with extensions</li></ol>



Non-Functional Testing Test Cases:



<ol><li>Test responsiveness on various screen sizes</li><li>Verify application performance</li><li>Check the compatibility across web browsers</li><li>Measure Upload time for large files</li><li>Test the load tolerance capability of the application</li></ol>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/migrated_images/functional-testing-2000_831982226e72041ae6a7c55b4127bbb4_2000.jpg_1748948434.webp" alt="An automated test case with Testsigma" width="600" height="300"/></figure></div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



So, whether you&#8217;re a developer, tester, or project manager, it&#8217;s important to remember the differences between functional and non functional testing to create high-quality software that meets the needs of your users.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Perform UI and functional tests in parallel across 3000+ web and mobile devices in a few clicks, with Testsigma.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-is-api-testing-functional-or-nonfunctional">Is <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/api-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">API testing</a> functional or nonfunctional?</h3>



API testing is functional testing, which tests how well the API performs its intended functions.



<h3 id="is-ui-testing-functional-or-nonfunctional">Is <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/ui-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">UI testing</a> functional or nonfunctional?</h3>



UI Testing, also called GUI Testing, is a process designed to test that the components of any software a user interacts with functions as expected. This is a functional testing.



<h3 id="h-key-difference-between-functional-testing-and-non-functional-testing-1">Key difference between functional testing and non-functional testing</h3>



The primary difference between functional testing and non-functional testing lies in the object being tested.



<ul><li>Functional Testing verifies what the system does by checking if it meets business and functional requirements.</li></ul>



Non-functional testing verifies how the system performs under different real-world conditions, focusing on performance, security, usability, and scalability.<gwmw style="display:none;"><gwmw style="display:none;">



<customlinks>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Functional Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/guides/functional-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Non Functional Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/non-functional-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Functional Test Cases</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/functional-test-cases/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Functional Testing Tools</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/tools/functional-testing-tools/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Automated Functional Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/blog/automated-functional-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
</customlinks>

Key Difference between Functional and Non-Functional Testing

Testsigma Blog