Accelq vs Cypress – Which One to Choose?

Test automation tools are evolving with the adoption new technologies such as AI and ML, easy interface for coding, etc. No code automation tools are getting popular day by day as they reduce the time to automate the scenarios. Accelq is one such no-code test automation tool that provides a lot of features to automate the scenarios without any coding knowledge. Similarly, code-based automation tools such as Cypress, Playwright, etc. provide more features to cover edge case scenarios and a high degree of customization. It is always a challenging job to pick the right tool. No-code tools are mostly commercial and it comes with a license cost. Whereas code-based tools are open source and free, but they require technical resources to design and develop the automation script. In this blog, we compare of Accelq vs Cypress to help understand the pros and cons and other features in detail.

Accelq vs Cypress – Overview

What is Accelq?

Accelq is a modern test automation tool designed to make the end-to-end testing process smoother and easier. 

• It mainly focuses on automating UI and API scenarios.
•  It supports both web and mobile platforms. 
• Accelq provides many other features such as test case design, maintenance, and execution.
• Unlike other tools, it automatically provides reporting and dashboards without any additional configurations. 
• Accelq supports business workflow based use cases such as Salesforce Automation, Oracle, MS Dynamics, SAP, and Service Now test automation under its platform. 
• Accelq is a commercial tool which means, it involves purchasing costs.

What is Cypress?

Cypress is a modern open-source test automation framework. It is popular because of its unique architecture. Cypress is faster and more reliable due to its design. Cypress follows a unique architecture where the browser simulation commands are directly executed within the browser, without any middleware.  Cypress provides a UI screen for test execution where one can choose the browser, and specific tests to execute. 

• Cypress automatically captures videos and screenshots which makes debugging easier. 
• It supports Chromium, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Electron browsers by default. 
• As Cypress is an open-source framework there are many third-party libraries available to integrate which reduces the framework setup effort and time.

Accelq Vs Cypress – Comparing with Testsigma

Both Cypress and Accelq are good in terms of their features. However, Accelq provides a no-code automation feature, that accelerates automation as non-technical members can contribute to the automation testing. On the other hand, Cypress is a more developer-friendly and highly customizable tool. Because of that, any edge-case scenarios can be covered with workarounds.  Below is the key comparison of Accelq Vs Cypress.

• Pricing: 

Accelq is a commercial test automation tool by ACCELQ Inc. It offers different types of pricing such as Web, API, Mobile, and Manual Testing. Which gives flexibility to the organization to choose the required features. 

Cypress is an open-source test automation tool and free to use (Cypress is also available with a commercial version, however, they are not as popular as the open-source version). It doesn’t offer any support under the open-source version. 

Testsigma is a commercial tool and the best alternative to Cypress and Accelq. It is known for budget-friendliness. Testsigma can rightly fit into any type of organization as it offers many different plans to choose from. Additionally, Testsigma provides a lot more features to make automation testing easier.

• Framework Setup: 

Accelq is a cloud-based solution, it’s easy to sign up and start testing. It is a framework-ready tool, any specific configuration can be achieved using UI-based flows without requiring coding knowledge. 

Cypress is a more developer-friendly tool, it’s known for its technical capabilities. Installation and setup might demand more technical knowledge. Additionally, automation scripts in Cypress demand coding knowledge. 

In comparison with these, Testsigma offers an easy way to start automation just by signing up. It doesn’t require any setup and configuration to start automation. It supports no-code automation scripts, that don’t require any coding knowledge to automate.

• Debugging: 

Accelq offers a debugging feature however sometimes it may not be sufficient because of organization requirements. It offers debug mode to debug the tests, to identify the element issues, browser-specific issues, etc. 

Cypress has a very good debugging feature, which includes console logs, screenshots, and videos and it also supports browser console debugging. 

Testsigma provides very good debugging features by providing different levels of logs. It provides useful logs with user-friendly error messages and it also provides specific documentation to fix them.

• No-code vs Code-based:

Accelq is no-code automation. Anyone who has basic knowledge of test automation can contribute to the Test automation. It helps manual testers to learn and grow in test automation. Organizations can easily share the resources across the projects as it demands less skill. Additionally, it saves a lot of cost in the design and development phase as the no-code tool can accelerate the automation. One of the drawbacks that an organization may face is that, if there are any complex and organization-specific scenarios no-code tool may not be able to support them. 

When it comes to Cypress, it’s a code-based tool, which means, it requires proficient skills in coding to automate. In turn, it demands technical resources. Setting up the framework and configuring it to organization-specific requirements may take a lot of time and effort.  

Testsigma is the most popular no-code test automation tool, which supports many features under its platform. Interestingly, all those features such as API testing, data-driven testing, visual regression testing, mobile testing, etc. can be performed without writing a single line of code. When it comes to no-code automation tools, Testsigma has become a first choice for many organizations.

• Integration with CI/CD pipelines: 

Accelq supports CI/CD integration with ease. However, the CI/CD tools lists may be limited. Most of the popular tools such as Jenkins, Azure DevOps, TeamCity, etc. supported natively. Some organizations may have customized tools for CI/CD pipelines in such cases it may be challenging to integrate them with the pipelines. 

Cypress supports almost all CI/CD tools however configuration needs to be done manually which requires technical knowledge. It can even support customized CI/CD tools as it is highly extensible. 

Testsigma has listed a lot of supported tools to integrate with CI/CD, customized CI/CD tools may require additional effort however Testsigma provides dedicated technical support to assist in this.

• Third-party tools integrations: 

Accelq has support for many third-party tools such as Jira, LamdaTest, SpiraTest, GitHub Actions, MS Teams, etc. As this is not an open-source framework the tools list may be limited. Additionally, Accelq may not support less-used tools or most recent tools, etc. 

Cypress supports a limited set of commercial tools integration. But when it comes to libraries or plugins it has hundreds of plugins listed. Because of its open-source nature, many community members developed different types of plugins to cater to different needs, which can be reused by integrating.

• Automation Platform Support: 

Accelq is a cloud-based solution and it supports both web and mobile platforms natively. It supports the automation of native, hybrid, or web-based mobile applications. It also supports web-based automation testing. 

Cypress supports only web-based application automation. This may be a concern, if an organization is developing both mobile and web solutions, in such cases organization needs to rely on the different frameworks for each use case. 

Testsigma is the one-stop solution for all your automation testing needs. It supports all the platforms such as web and mobile. It provides an option to choose Mac, Windows, and Linux for the execution environment. Testsigma also provides a scalable environment it can allocate resources based on the requirement.

• Browser Support: 

Accelq supports all major browsers such as Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge which will be helpful in cross-browser testing and compatibility testing. 

Cypress supports Chrome, Chromium, Firefox, Electron, and Edge browsers. 

Testsigma also doesn’t compromise on cross-browser testing it supports all major browsers such as Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge. 

• Learning Curve: 

Accelq is a no-code automation tool, because of this users need not have to learn programming knowledge, however learning about application-specific features and usage is required. Accelq documentation is not great compared to other tools, as a result, beginners may face challenges to start the automation. 

Cypress is a technical tool and it only supports JavaScript/Typescript. The user must have proficient knowledge of JavaScript to start automation. Because of this learning curve for Cypress is high. 

Testsigma is  user-friendly tool. It is also a no-code tool, users do not need to learn any programming language. However, the user needs to understand the application-specific features. Testsigma provides user-friendly interfaces that are self-explanatory. That further reduces the learning curve. In case of Testsigma, the learning curve is extremely low.

• Documentation: 

Accelq documentation is not great. Whenever user encounters issues, it’s difficult to find the relevant documentation and fix them. As this is a modern test automation the community support is limited.

Cypress has very good documentation and every corner of the feature is well documented with examples. The search option provided is more user-friendly and easy to use. 

Testsigma maintains consistent and good documentation even if the feature is new. All documentation is accessible to the public even if they do not have a Testsigma subscription. This helps in evaluating and comparing the tools and also helps in choosing the right tool.

• Reporting: 

Accelq Provides a good report after the execution of tests, however, users might feel the report is not comprehensive and may not be able to customize them. 

Cypress supports very basic reporting natively, however, with additional integration it supports other reports. 

Testsigma provides easy and customizable reports and dashboards. The reports provided are comprehensive. As it provides reports at different levels, that helps to target the different reports to different audiences.

• App-specific automation support: 

Accelq supports many app-specific automation features such as Salesforce automation, SAP, Workday, ServiceNow, etc. 

Cypress is a general-purpose automation tool and it doesn’t have any feature to support specifically for Salesforce, SAP, etc. However, it doesn’t restrict the user to customize as per needs. 

Testsigma supports Salesforce automation. Starting from configuring Salesforce to automate the application it follows a no-code approach. All use cases are well documented which help even beginners to automate complex applications.

Key Features of ACCELQ and Cypress?

Accelq and Cypress support many features to cater to different testing needs. There are many unique features in both of these automation tools. Understanding key features of Accelq vs Cypress – helps to evaluate against the business requirement and also helps to find the right tool.

Features of Accelq

• Easy to install and set up, requires less effort to start the automation
• The no-code tool helps to accelerate the automation coverage
• Supports many browsers for cross-browser testing such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari
• It supports both mobile and desktop web
• Accelq can be used for API automation and UI automation
• Provides dedicated technical support to resolve complex blockers
• Accelq has features to support application-specific use cases such as Salesforce, SAP, Workday, etc.
• Automatic generation of reports, Integration to CI/CD tools, and integration to the development and communication tools are a few other key features of Accelq.

Features of Cypress

• Open-source and free-to-use
• Guided installation feature
• The developer-friendly tool provides many options to debug
• Highly customizable tool and can be configured as per the organization’s needs
• Very good debugging feature, debugging can be done at different levels
• Supports cross-browser testing with Chrome, Edge, and Firefox. It also supports Beta versions
• Cypress can perform both API and UI automation with ease.
• It can be configured for component testing which is its unique feature
• Hundreds of libraries to integrate.  A lot of libraries are in the market developed by community members. One can reuse them to minimize the effort.
• Supports all major CI/CD platforms, many software development tools, and bug-tracking tools.
• Good community support

Features of Testsigma

• Testsigma is the most user-friendly tool. 
• It is truly a no-code tool packed with many AI capabilities
• Cloud-based tool; very minimal configuration required even to automate complex use cases
• Customizable reports and dashboards
• Cross-browser testing can be performed easily. It supports Chrome, Edge, Safari, and Firefox.
• Dedicated technical support to assist and resolve complex use cases
• Salesforce Testing helps to automate complex Salesforce-based scenarios with ease
• CI/CD integration, huge list of supported tools for third-party integration
• Native cloud test execution and configurable to any third-party tools
• API and UI testing, Mobile and Desktop Web testing, data-driven testing, and visual regression testing are a few key features.

Accelq VS Cypress – Which is the Better?

Both Accelq and Cypress are good automation tools. 

Accelq is a commercial tool, which doesn’t demand technical skills. It offers a no-code test automation platform. 

Cypress is a more technical tool, that requires good knowledge of coding to automate. In comparison, Cypress is highly customizable and can cover edge-case scenarios. 

The better option depends on the organization’s requirements. So before adopting any automation tool, one needs to carefully evaluate the organization’s requirements and future roadmap. One can also consider exploring other popular tools like Testsigma.

Summary

Accelq and Cypress both are good automation tools. Cypress is an open-source tool that can reduce the cost initially but it may demand more technical resources to set up and automate. Accelq is a commercial tool, that involves license costs, but it can save a lot of cost to the organization in the design and execution phase because of its no-code nature. 

Testsigma is a budget-friendly tool. It is the good alternative to Cypress and Accelq. It can fit into any type of organization. Additionally, organizations can save a lot budget by sharing the resources and accelerating the automation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Accelq vs Cypress – cater to which types of businesses?

Both Testsigma and Cypress focus on businesses and organizations that are having web-based solutions to fulfill their customer needs. Additionally, Accelq also focuses on organizations that have both mobile and web applications.

Do ACCELQ and Cypress offer a free trial?

Accelq offers a free trial and Cypress is free to use as it is open source.

Accelq vs Cypress – What level of customer support can I expect?

ACCELQ provides support over various channels including email and web platforms. Cypress provides community-based support.