Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma
Try for freeAs software development accelerates, Quality Assurance teams are facing unprecedented pressure to deliver both speed and quality. Despite exponential innovation in software development over the past couple of decades, QA teams still seem to be grappling with the fact that testing is not happening at the same speed as development happens. A recent Testsigma webinar surveying 300 QA professionals revealed that 57% consider time management—building, executing, and maintaining tests—their biggest challenge.
Table Of Contents
The Challenges Holding Us Back
Modern QA teams face several persistent challenges that slow down testing processes:
Slow Testing Cycles
Testing remains bottlenecked by manual-heavy processes and an overemphasis on building perfect automation frameworks. This traditional approach cannot match the speed of modern development cycles.
High Maintenance Overhead
Traditional test automation requires constant script updates, which create significant maintenance costs and technical debt and divert resources from actual testing activities.
Insufficient Test Coverage
Human-defined test cases often fail to anticipate all edge cases, leading to undetected defects. This limitation becomes more pronounced as software complexity increases.
Why Do These Challenges Exist?
A couple of key factors contribute to this misalignment:
- Manual testing—Don’t get me wrong—manual testing is not a bad word at all, as some vendors make it out to be. One can never hope to have 100% automation and anyone claiming that is a snake oil salesperson. But, having said that, automation is one of the best things that has happened to the software testing world. The idea is to use automation as a tool to solve everyday tasks at scale. However, majority of QA teams still grapple with manual-heavy testing cycles that significantly slow down software testing and release.
- Automation as the silver bullet – This is not too unrelated to the above point, that automation is being considered the one solution to all of software testing problems. The industry’s push toward automation has had unexpected consequences. Many skilled testers were forced to become programmers or rely heavily on development teams for test automation. This shift often came at the expense of core testing competencies: domain knowledge and user behavior understanding. This heavy focus on automation also slows down testing cycles as there is a heavy dependence on automation engineers to help build and write scripts.
The lure of code-driven testing
The world has come long since the first line of code was written. It has truly overhauled our world, and the possibilities it has brought about are endless. While code has revolutionized our world, the heavy focus on code-driven automation has overshadowed essential testing skills. The industry has drifted away from business-driven and user-behavior-driven testing approaches.
The shift to business-driven testing
A promising trend we are observing at Testsigma is the shift to business-driven testing and technology usage as a means to an end. With the advent of codeless technologies and GenAI, it is becoming increasingly easy for software testing teams to automate without having to build a test automation framework that takes months, and without writing code to actually script test cases. This allows testers to focus on their core strengths: domain expertise and user understanding.
GenAI-powered testing
Generative AI, combined with truly codeless test automation, offers new possibilities for rapid testing without coding requirements. Powerful tools like Testsigma Copilot allow testers to:
- Focus on core understanding of the business and user, and not necessarily on learning the technology used to build frameworks.
- Use prompt engineering to provide business context, to make the testing itself better
- Guide AI systems to think from a user’s perspective, and use AI to uncover edge cases that might otherwise get missed
While using GenAI to generate test cases and test scenarios seems to win half the battle, the magic lies in codelessly being able to automate them as well. And that’s where truly codeless test automation platforms like Testsigma help, as one can perform end-to-end test automation at scale without writing a single word of code. With agentic execution, the deal gets sweeter as AI optimizes for the right test cases to be executed, and across the right resources, while self-healing tests to account for any changes that might have been shipped.
There lies a huge opportunity for engineering organizations to utilize truly codeless test automation technologies to empower software testers of all skill sets to become true automation engineers.
Pitfalls in GenAI-driven test automation
It is crucial to remember that, just like any piece of technology, GenAI is a tool. And as the saying goes, a fool with a tool is still a fool. The ones that are able to get the tool to work for them are the ones that win. Mastering the tool itself is not the goal, but how to make it work for the business is.
The other risk in GenAI-driven test automation is that the quality completely relies on the inputs we provide. Again, this is a golden opportunity for software testers, as it forces us to think like users, which is the basic trait of any software tester anyway.
Looking ahead
The future of software testing lies not in writing more automation scripts, but in leveraging AI to handle complexity while humans focus on customer needs and business value. This shift represents an opportunity for software testing teams to:
- Return to business-centric and customer-centric testing approaches
- Reduce technical barriers to effectively democratize testing and make the industry inclusive
- Enable faster, smarter, and more comprehensive quality assurance, to empower software engineering teams to release quality software with confidence!
As software complexity continues to grow, the industry must embrace solutions that streamline testing while keeping quality control in the hands of those who best understand the product and its users.