Start automating your tests 10X Faster in Simple English with Testsigma
Try for freeThe scope of test automation is expanding. Modern test automation tools are also providing features as per customer demands and industry requirements. Advanced test automation tools like AccelQ, Testsigma, and Leapwork are becoming popular due to their unique features. These tools focus on no-code test automation where anyone who is aware of basic testing can automate the test cases without requiring any coding skills. Additionally, these tools can accelerate the test automation coverage.
Accelq supports both UI and API automation for mobile and web applications. Leapwork is a flow-based test automation platform that incorporates many AI capabilities. Testsigma is a unified test automation platform that supports many testing types and platforms. It supports both web and mobile automation. Testsigma can be enhanced to support desktop applications well. It supports API testing, visual testing, data-driven testing, etc.
Let’s compare Leapwork and AccelQ in detail and explore Testsigma as an alternative.
Table Of Contents
What is Leapwork?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50697/5069743803f7297061220ff5f18c1f00fe8de13e" alt="leapwork"
Leapwork is a flow-based test automation platform that supports end-to-end automation using no-code approach. It is an AI-powered visual test automation platform. It provides many capabilities such as a visual recorder, reusable components, easy debugging, and cross-browser/device testing. Leapwork is mainly focused on automating enterprise applications like Salesforce, Citrix, SAP, Oracle apps, Microsoft Apps, and IBM apps.
What is AccelQ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42b1/f42b1929807331dab198cea4093b5efd17fdcbbf" alt="accelq"
AccelQ is a no-code automation platform that supports mobile, web, API, and desktop test automation. It also offers manual testing with traceability with integration of AzureDevOps or Jira. AccelQ supports business process application automation for platforms like Salesforce, nCino, Oracle, MS Dynamics, SAP, Workday, ServiceNow, and more. Additionally, it integrates with many tools such as Jira, AWS, Selenium, and BrowserStack.
What is Testsigma?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/779a0/779a0b322af05514f23e59feaba5784d47bb6132" alt="Testsigma"
Testsigma is a unified testing platform. It incorporates modern features like no-code automation, advanced AI, in-built cloud execution, visual testing, etc. It provides various testing capabilities, including test automation support for Desktop, Web, and Mobile applications. Furthermore, it supports different testing types such as Data-driven, cross-browser, cross-platform, responsive testing, etc. Testsigma’s built-in cloud functionality eliminates the need for external cloud tool integration and saves cost and effort. It also supports business process automation, like Salesforce. Recently, Testsigma introduced its test management platform, which allows easy management of manual test cases with AI-based test creation.
Pros and Cons of Leapwork
Leapwork follows a different approach than traditional software test automation tools. It uses flow-based no-code automation with AI capabilities. Additionally, Leapwork supports integration with many third-party tools. However, Leapwork might be confusing for traditional application users. Let’s understand the pros and cons of Leapwork.
Pros of Leapwork
- Flowchart-based test automation: Leapwork uses flowchart-based visual test automation where writing the logic and creating test cases happens using flowcharts and visual forms, helping anyone automate faster without any technical knowledge.
- No-code test automation: It is a no-code automation tool; testers can simply record the test cases, and Leapwork builds the flows, eliminating technical barriers.
- AI capabilities: It has built-in AI capabilities, simplifying data extraction, data creation, etc.
- Parallel testing: It allows parallel testing, where users can run multiple flows on different machines.
- Reusable components: Users can build reusable sub-flows, enhancing reusability and reducing maintenance.
- Integration with third-party tools: It supports integration with many third-party tools such as Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Jira, Bamboo, TeamCity, etc., enhancing the framework’s capability.
- Role-based access and audit logs: Leapwork focuses on enterprise security, providing role-based access and audit logs.
- Full encryption (AES-256): Assets and data are stored using local AES-256 encrypted databases or enterprise-grade MS SQL Servers in the organization’s on-premise infrastructure.
- Easy debugging: It provides various levels of information with video recording, data-level insights, and activity logs, helping with easy debugging.
Cons of Leapwork
- Complex installation and configuration: Leapwork installation and configuration are difficult. Since Leapwork needs to be deployed on-premise, it might require technical expertise.
- Limited customization of reporting: Though Leapwork offers good reporting, it restricts customization.
- Pricing: Leapwork pricing may not be budget-friendly for smaller teams and organizations on tight budgets.
- Complex scenario automation can be challenging: Handling complex scenarios can be challenging. Many users opined that it often doesn’t identify elements if components are customized.
- No mobile automation built-in: Though Leapwork supports mobile automation, it requires additional integration and configuration. Desktop and mobile automation can be challenging.
- Limited support for data-driven testing: Data-driven testing features are AI-enabled, but it supports limited features for data-driven testing.
- May not fully be cloud-based: Though Leapwork supports cloud-based deployment, it might still require a complex setup to configure agents or configure in Amazon EC2 and Microsoft Azure.
- Limited AI capabilities: It provides AI capabilities for limited use cases, but many users opined that more use cases could be integrated with AI to make automation faster.
- Business process application-focused: Many users opined that the design may be business process application automation-focused (e.g., Salesforce, Oracle, SAP). Normal applications may face challenges adopting them.
Pros and Cons of AccelQ
AccelQ is a cloud-based test automation tool, it also integrates manual testing which allows managing many testing activities in one place. It has many unique capabilities like support for both mobile and web automation, and application automation like Salesforce, SAP, etc. However, it has many cons like, handling complex scenarios with no-code automation may be difficult, requiring coding knowledge to handle advanced scenarios, etc. Let’s understand the pros and cons of AccelQ
Pros of AccelQ
- No-code automation: No-code automation makes automation simpler and easier even if there is no technical background.
- Fully cloud-based: It is fully cloud-based, and no installation or deployment is required.
- Self-healing capabilities: It has an in-built AI capability to auto-heal frequently failing tests, which can reduce the maintenance effort considerably.
- Central object repository: AccelQ comes with all required features in-built, which accelerates the setup. Additionally, it provides a central object repository that can help in reusability.
- Logging: It provides comprehensive logging, which helps in easy debugging and identifying the root cause.
- Manual testing feature: It also has test management integration with Jira and Azure DevOps, which helps in the traceability of testing activities.
- Cross-browser testing: AccelQ offers cross-browser testing with many popular browsers like Chrome, Edge, Firefox, etc.
- Business flow-based application support: AccelQ offers business process application automation such as nCino, Oracle, MS Dynamics, SAP, Workday, ServiceNow, Pega, Coupa, etc.
- Integration with third-party tools: It supports integration with many third-party tools such as Jira, Azure DevOps, AWS, Selenium, BrowserStack, GitHub, Slack, Jenkins, Bamboo, etc.
- Supports Java programming for complex scenarios: AccelQ also supports writing custom code in Java for handling complex scenarios.
Cons of AccelQ
- Lack of documentation: AccelQ documentation can be improved; though it has documentation, many features are not listed or require additional examples.
- Technical knowledge for complex scenarios: Handling complex scenarios may be challenging. Additionally, if it is not supported, one needs to write custom code, which requires technical proficiency.
- Pricing: AccelQ pricing may not be budget-friendly. Especially for smaller teams and small-scale organizations.
- Learning curve: Though it offers no-code automation features, it may not be usable for all different scenarios. Handling complex scenarios might require technical knowledge, which can increase the learning curve.
- Limited customization: It lacks customization in many aspects, such as reporting, editors, etc., which can be improved.
- Script stability issues: Many users opined that scripts have stability issues; often, automation scripts are flakier.
- Limited support for desktop application testing: Desktop application automation is supported only for a limited set of apps and technologies.
- Debugging can be difficult: Debugging edge-case scenarios can be difficult. It can be improved.
Features of Testsigma
- No-Code Feature: Testsigma is a simple test automation tool that doesn’t need coding skills. You can create test cases without knowing any programming language. It has a record and playback feature that helps you quickly create tests without much effort. It also has a visual script editor that makes it easy to edit or adjust your test scripts as needed.
- Multiple Application Types Support: Testsigma supports different types of applications such as web, desktop, and mobile. This helps teams to automate any type of application using a single platform. This considerably reduces the cost and time.
- Supports Various Testing Types: Testsigma supports many types of testing such as functional, end-to-end, visual, API, data-driven testing, etc. All these testing types are supported for both mobile and web applications. This helps to increase the test automation coverage across the various application types and platforms.
- Environment Support: Testsigma has an inbuilt cloud execution feature that supports executing scripts on multiple operating systems such as Linux, macOS, and Windows and multiple browsers like Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge. Additionally, it supports mobile testing for both iOS and Android.
- AI-Driven Test Automation: Testsigma integrates AI into its platform which enhances test automation by generating test cases automatically from user stories, Figma designs, screenshots, and other inputs. It also features AI-driven API test case generation and auto-healing tests for greater productivity and test reliability.
- Parallel Execution Support: Testsigma supports running tests in parallell. Tests can be executed on multiple platforms parallelly, which reduces the test execution time. When Testsigma is integrated with CI/CD platforms, it quickly provides the results.
- Multi-Project Management: Using Testsigma you can manage multiple projects. It has users and roles options that helps to manage multiple projects easily.
- Schedule Test Execution: You can schedule test execution for specific times, such as daily, weekly, or monthly. That helps to execute the tests at the specified times without manual intervention.
- Customizable Reports and Dashboards: Testsigma provides dynamic and customizable dashboards and reports. It also allows teams to filter data and create reports based on test suites, environments, and other parameters.
- Easy to Sahre Report: Test results can be generated in various formats including PDFs and that can be easily shared with stakeholders. Which helps in communication and increased transparency.
- Third-Party Tool Integrations: It supports 30+ tool integrations such as JIRA, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitHub, and Bamboo; Testsigma allows seamless CI/CD workflows, bug tracking, notifications, etc. This helps to enhance the collaboration and streamline the test automation process.
- Low Learning Curve: It has an intuitive user interface, and it doesn’t require expertise level technical knowledge as it has no-code test automation. This also reduces the costs of training and upskilling resources.
- Business Process Application Test Automation: Testsigma provides dedicated libraries to automate business process applications. It supports Salesforce automation with enhanced support that helps to easily identify the objects and perform action on them.
- No Local Installation Required: Since Testsigma is a cloud-based test automation tool, it does not require any local installation or setup. One can sign up and start test automation.
- Budget-friendly tool: Testsigma is a budget-friendly tool and it provides flexible pricing options. It reduces costs by combining the capabilities of multiple testing tools into one platform. Additionally, it also reduces the subscription costs for third-party tools.
- Flexible Adoption Options: Testsigma has an on-premise hosting option this is helpful for the organization who requires to maintain security and compliance as per regulation. It also provides public cloud based version that helps to quickly adopt Testigma and start testing.
- Customer Support: Testsigma provides good customer support via chat, email, phone, and community forums. Additionally, each and every feature is documented in detail that helps to resolve any blockers easily.
- Comprehensive Documentation: Testsigma has detailed documentation, including video tutorials, screenshots, and step-by-step guides. This helps users to resolve their blockers easily and continue testing. It is also helpful for beginners to understand the features.
Table Comparison Leapwork vs AccelQ vs Testsigma
Features | Leapwork | AccelQ | Testsigma |
What is? | Leapwork is a flowchart-based AI-powered no-code test automation tool. | AccelQ is an AI-powered No-code test automation tool | Testsigma is a unified test automation platform that offers many features including both automation and manual test management |
Supported Platform | Web, Desktop, and Mobile. Desktop and Mobile require additional integration and configurations. | Web, Desktop, and Mobile | Web, Desktop, and Mobile |
Is fully cloud-based? | No | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Testing support | Yes, with additional integration | Yes | Yes |
Manual Testing | No | Yes with Jira and AzureDevOps integration | Yes |
Reporting and Dashboard | Yes, but with limited customization | Yes, but with limited customization | Yes, customizable dashboards and reports |
Pricing | May not be budge-friendly for smaller organizations | May be expensive | Flexible and budget-friendly tool |
Third-party tools integration | Yes, supports many applications including Jira, Jenkins, etc | Yes, supports many applications including Jira, Jenkins, Bamboo, etc. | Yes, offers a wide range of tools that belong to CI/CD, Bug tracking, Collaboration, and Test Lab Category. |
Debugging | Debugging is easier and offers video, logs, and other information | Debugging may be difficult | Easy to debug, provides good amount of information including a guide to fix the issue. |
Testing type support | UI, functional, and limited support for API testing | Functional, UI, and API testing | Functional, UI, Visual Testing, and API testing |
AI Capability | Yes, For data soucing | Yes, for auto-healing and test case creation | Yes, for Test case creation, auto-healing, and maintenance |
Learning Curve | High | Moderate | Low |
Documentation | Good documentation | Lacks documentation | Excellent documentation with detailed videos and images |
Leapwork vs AccelQ vs Testsigma: Which is better?
Leapwork is a flow-based AI-powered test automation tool. It uses a different approach from traditional test automation, such as not following the test cases or test plans, but instead using a flowchart-based approach. Leapwork requires a complex setup and configuration, which needs technical expertise and is not fully cloud-based. Many users reported that its pricing is not budget-friendly.
Leapwork is best for enterprise applications like Salesforce, SAP, etc. Mobile application automation requires additional setup.
AccelQ offers many features and it is cloud-based, but handling complex scenarios may require Java coding.
Testsigma is a unified platform for all of your testing requirements. It provides many features in a single platfom such as 3000+ real devices for testing both web and mobile, support for cross-browser, cross-platform testing, Functional testing, API Testing, Visual Testing etc. The advanced AI features help to accelerate the test automation and improve the productivity. It has cloud execution capability in built that eliminates the need for third-party cloud testing providers. Though it has many features and advanced integrations it comes with budget-friendly cost.
Considering AccelQ and Leapwork, Testsigma provides many benefits. However, the choice of automation tools may vary based on the organization and its requirements
Conclusion
No-code test automation tools are becoming popular nowadays. Testsigma, AccelQ, and Leapwork are popular no-code test automation tools. All of these tools are adopting many advanced features including AI features.
Testsigma aims to provide the simplest and easiest approach to automate an application’s end-to-end UI tests and APIs. It supports many features out-of-the box and it supports integration with various tools. It makes complex tasks easier by providing no-code automation feature. As it is a cloud based tool that does not require any local installation or setup. Because of many unique features Testsigma is preferred by many popular companies and it can serve as a good alternative for both Accelq and Leapwork.