
<p>Gherkin and Cucumber are integral components of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), each playing a distinct role in the testing ecosystem. While Cucumber is a testing tool, Gherkin serves as a language for writing acceptance criteria. Understanding their fundamental differences is essential for teams adopting BDD methodologies.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Gherkin_VS_Cucumber_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Gherkin VS Cucumber &#8211; Overview </a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Cucumber"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is Cucumber?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Gherkin_Language"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is Gherkin Language?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Basics_of_Cucumber_and_Gherkin"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Basics of Cucumber and Gherkin</a></li><li><a href="#Behaviour-Driven_Development_BDD_With_Cucumber_vs_Gherkin"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) With Cucumber vs Gherkin</a></li><li><a href="#Cucumber_and_Gherkin_in_the_Cloud"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Cucumber and Gherkin in the Cloud</a></li><li><a href="#Cucumber_vs_Gherkin_8211_Web_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Cucumber vs Gherkin &#8211; Web Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Gherkin_vs_Cucumber_8211_Key_Differences"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Gherkin vs Cucumber &#8211; Key Differences</a></li><li><a href="#Why_to_Use_Testsigma_as_an_Alternative_Tool_to_Cucumber_and_Gherkin"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Why to Use Testsigma as an Alternative Tool to Cucumber and Gherkin?</a></li><li><a href="#Gherkin_VS_Cucumber_VS_Testsigma_8211_Key_Differences_Which_is_Better"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">8</span> Gherkin VS Cucumber VS Testsigma &#8211; Key Differences: Which is Better?</a><ul><li><a href="#1_Nature_and_Role"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.1</span> 1. Nature and Role:</a></li><li><a href="#2_Functionality_and_Automation"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.2</span> 2. Functionality and Automation:</a></li><li><a href="#3_Collaboration_and_Readability"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.3</span> 3. Collaboration and Readability:</a></li><li><a href="#4_Versatility_and_Application"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.4</span> 4. Versatility and Application:</a></li><li><a href="#5_Execution_and_Reporting"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.5</span> 5. Execution and Reporting:</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">9</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">10</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Gherkin_and_Cucumber_automation"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">10.1</span> What is the difference between Gherkin and Cucumber automation?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Cucumber_BDD_and_Selenium"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">10.2</span> What is the difference between Cucumber BDD and Selenium?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="gherkin-vs-cucumber-overview"><span id="Gherkin_VS_Cucumber_8211_Overview"><strong>Gherkin VS Cucumber &#8211; Overview </strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-cucumber"><span id="What_is_Cucumber"><strong>What is Cucumber?</strong></span></h3>



<p>Cucumber is an open-source testing tool that allows you to execute automated tests written in the Gherkin language. For example, let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re developing a website, and you want to ensure that users can create an account successfully. You could write a Gherkin scenario that describes the steps the user takes, and Cucumber will execute those steps and report any issues it finds.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-gherkin-language"><span id="What_is_Gherkin_Language"><strong>What is Gherkin Language?</strong></span></h3>



<p>Gherkin is a language that uses a structured format to define application behavior. For example, let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re developing a feature that allows users to reset their passwords. You could write a Gherkin scenario that describes the steps the user takes to reset their password, such as entering their email address and clicking a &#8220;reset password&#8221; button. The scenario could also include expected outcomes, such as the user receiving an email with instructions on how to reset their password. This format makes it easy for non-technical stakeholders to understand and collaborate on test cases with developers.</p>



<h2 id="basics-of-cucumber-and-gherkin"><span id="Basics_of_Cucumber_and_Gherkin"><strong>Basics of Cucumber and Gherkin</strong></span></h2>



<p>Cucumber and Gherkin are integral components of BDD that streamline testing efforts and enhance collaboration among stakeholders.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Gherkin’s structured syntax enables testers to describe application behavior in a human-readable format. Cucumber interprets Gherkin scenarios and executes them as automated tests. This synergy between Gherkin and Cucumber bridges the gap between business requirements and technical implementation that promotes effective communication and early defect detection.For testers, it is necessary to also know the difference between Cucumber and Gherkin. They should grasp Gherkin’s Given-When-Then format, write clear and concise scenarios, and learn to implement step definitions in programming languages supported by Cucumber.</p>



<p></p>



<h2 id="h-behaviour-driven-development-bdd-with-cucumber-vs-gherkin"><span id="Behaviour-Driven_Development_BDD_With_Cucumber_vs_Gherkin"><strong>Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) With Cucumber vs Gherkin</strong></span></h2>



<p>In the dynamic landscape of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), the collaboration between Cucumber and Gherkin unfolds a narrative of effective communication. With its human-readable syntax, Gherkin becomes the language of choice for articulating behavior in plain text. It is a collaborative tool that fosters understanding between non-technical stakeholders and developers. On the execution side, Cucumber steps in, interpreting and running the scenarios penned in Gherkin. This collaboration between Gherkin&#8217;s expressive language and Cucumber&#8217;s execution prowess ensures that end-users expectations are understood and translated into robust, executable tests. To delve deeper into this symbiotic relationship, explore our comprehensive <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/behavior-driven-development-bdd-with-gherkin/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog here</a>, providing insights into how these tools synergize to elevate BDD practices to new heights.</p>



<h2 id="h-cucumber-and-gherkin-in-the-cloud"><span id="Cucumber_and_Gherkin_in_the_Cloud"><strong>Cucumber and Gherkin in the Cloud</strong></span></h2>



<p>Cucumber and Gherkin have proven their adaptability in the era of cloud computing, where testing environments are becoming more agile and scalable. They seamlessly integrate with <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/cloud-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cloud-based testing</a> infrastructure, ensuring teams can adhere to Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) practices regardless of their chosen infrastructure. This flexibility allows for efficient collaboration and communication among team members, enabling them to create and execute tests in a cloud environment. The combination of Cucumber and Gherkin transcends traditional testing boundaries. It embraces the possibilities and advantages of the cloud, making <a href="https://scaledagileframework.com/behavior-driven-development/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BDD practices</a> more accessible and influential in the modern testing landscape.</p>



<h2 id="h-cucumber-vs-gherkin-web-testing"><span id="Cucumber_vs_Gherkin_8211_Web_Testing"><strong>Cucumber vs Gherkin &#8211; Web Testing</strong></span></h2>



<p>In web testing, the collaboration between Cucumber and Gherkin brings a powerful synergy. Cucumber acts as the executor, interpreting and executing test scripts written in Gherkin. With its human-readable syntax, Gherkin provides a clear and expressive language for articulating behavior, making it an ideal choice for collaboration between non-technical and technical stakeholders. This collaboration ensures that the testing process remains effective, transparent, and easy to understand. While Cucumber excels in the execution of Gherkin scripts, Gherkin remains focused on providing a language that is not only readable but also collaborative. Together, they empower teams to conduct web testing efficiently, balancing technical precision and human-centric communication.</p>



<h2 id="h-gherkin-vs-cucumber-key-differences"><span id="Gherkin_vs_Cucumber_8211_Key_Differences"><strong>Gherkin vs Cucumber &#8211; Key Differences</strong></span></h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Aspect</strong></td><td><strong>Gherkin</strong></td><td><strong>Cucumber</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Nature</strong></td><td>Language: Describes behavior in plain text.</td><td>Tool: Executes BDD scenarios in various languages.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Usage</strong></td><td>Writing: Primarily for creating strategies.</td><td>Execution: Executes Gherkin scripts.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Focus</strong></td><td>Readability: Focus on human-readable syntax.</td><td>Automation: Focus on automated <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-execution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test execution.</a></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Role</strong></td><td>Collaboration: Facilitates communication between stakeholders.</td><td>Implementation: Translates Gherkin into executable code.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Formality</strong></td><td>Informal: Designed to be easy for non-developers.</td><td>Formal: Requires coding for automation.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Flexibility</strong></td><td>Agile: Suited for agile and collaborative environments.</td><td>Versatility: Adaptable to various testing scenarios.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Output</strong></td><td>Scenarios: Output scenarios for multiple tests.</td><td>Results: Generates test results and reports.<br></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>Understanding these key differences clarifies the distinct roles of Gherkin and Cucumber in BDD, fostering effective collaboration and streamlined testing processes.</p>



<h2 id="why-to-use-testsigma-as-an-alternative-tool-to-cucumber-and-gherkin"><span id="Why_to_Use_Testsigma_as_an_Alternative_Tool_to_Cucumber_and_Gherkin"><strong>Why to Use Testsigma as an Alternative Tool to Cucumber and Gherkin?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Testsigma is a test automation tool that allows test creation in natural language. It enables non-technical team members to create and execute automated tests without the need for coding expertise.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Testsigma offers a range of features such as scriptless test creation, AI-powered <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/self-healing-tests-maintenance-testsigma/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">self-healing tests</a>, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-maintenance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test maintenance</a> that make it a popular choice among teams looking to implement <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automated testing</a> in their SDLC.&nbsp;</p>



<p><br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Start Automating your tests with Testsigma</a></button></p><br></p>



<p>In this context, we&#8217;ll compare Gherkin and cucumber with Testsigma to understand their differences and similarities.</p>



<h2 id="h-gherkin-vs-cucumber-vs-testsigma-key-differences-which-is-better"><span id="Gherkin_VS_Cucumber_VS_Testsigma_8211_Key_Differences_Which_is_Better"><strong>Gherkin VS Cucumber VS Testsigma &#8211; Key Differences: Which is Better?</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="1-nature-and-role"><span id="1_Nature_and_Role">1. Nature and Role:</span></h3>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Gherkin: Primarily a language for describing behavior in plain text, focusing on readability and collaboration.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Cucumber: An execution tool that interprets and runs BDD scenarios written in Gherkin.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Testsigma: An <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/end-to-end-testing-frameworks/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">end-to-end test automation platform</a> that employs natural language processing, but also provides the platform for execution and reporting eliminating the need for explicit coding in Gherkin.</p>



<h3 id="2-functionality-and-automation"><span id="2_Functionality_and_Automation">2. Functionality and Automation:</span></h3>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Gherkin: Emphasizes human-readable syntax, mainly for articulating behavior.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Cucumber: Focuses on automating test scenarios written in Gherkin, requiring coding for execution.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Testsigma: Leverages a no-code approach, allowing users to create and execute automated tests without scripting.</p>



<h3 id="3-collaboration-and-readability"><span id="3_Collaboration_and_Readability">3. Collaboration and Readability:</span></h3>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Gherkin Aims for informal, easy-to-understand language, promoting collaboration among non-developers.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Cucumber: Integrates Gherkin scenarios into code, ensuring clear communication between technical and non-technical stakeholders.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Testsigma: Enhances collaboration by providing a user-friendly, collaborative platform accessible to technical and non-technical users.</p>



<h3 id="4-versatility-and-application"><span id="4_Versatility_and_Application">4. Versatility and Application:</span></h3>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Gherkin: Suited for creating scenarios, emphasizing agile and collaborative environments.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Cucumber: Adaptable to various <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/test-scenario/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing scenarios</a>, offering versatility in automated testing.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Testsigma: Designed for <a href="https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">end-to-end test automation</a>, accommodating testing needs without coding.</p>



<h3 id="5-execution-and-reporting"><span id="5_Execution_and_Reporting">5. Execution and Reporting:</span></h3>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Gherkin: Outputs scenarios for manual or <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automated tests</a> without execution capabilities.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Cucumber: Executes Gherkin scenarios and generates test results, aiding in comprehensive testing.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8211; Testsigma: Executes automated tests seamlessly, providing real-time reporting for efficient <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test analysis</a>.</p>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>In summary, Gherkin, Cucumber, and Testsigma each play distinctive roles in <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/behavior-driven-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Behavior-Driven Development</a> (BDD) and test automation. While Gherkin acts as a human-readable language, Cucumber translates it into executable code. Testsigma, on the other hand, stands out with its no-code approach, offering a collaborative platform accessible to both technical and non-technical users.</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-gherkin-and-cucumber-automation"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_Gherkin_and_Cucumber_automation">What is the difference between Gherkin and Cucumber automation?</span></h3>



<p>In essence, Gherkin is a language for articulating behavior, emphasizing human readability, while Cucumber is a tool that interprets and executes Gherkin scenarios for <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automated testing</a>. Gherkin serves as a collaborative, non-technical language, while Cucumber acts as the bridge between Gherkin and automation, requiring coding for implementation.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-cucumber-bdd-and-selenium"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_Cucumber_BDD_and_Selenium">What is the difference between Cucumber BDD and Selenium?</span></h3>



<p>While Cucumber is a tool that facilitates Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) by interpreting scenarios written in Gherkin, Selenium is a web automation framework. Cucumber focuses on collaboration and readable scenarios, whereas Selenium is designed to automate web applications. The former involves collaboration between non-technical and technical stakeholders, while the latter is a widely used automation tool for <a href="https://testsigma.com/website-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">web testing</a>.</p>


Gherkin vs Cucumber 10 Top Key Differences

Gherkin vs Cucumber | 10 Top Key Differences

Selenium VS Cucumber Top 10 Key Differences

Selenium VS Cucumber: Top 10 Key Differences

Specflow vs Cucumber 10 Top Key Differences

Specflow vs Cucumber | 10 Top Key Differences

Top 10 Opkey Alternatives and Competitors

Cypress vs Cucumber - Which One to Choose

Cypress vs Cucumber – Which One to Choose?

Playwright vs Cypress Which should you Choose in 2023

Playwright vs Cypress: Which One should you Choose?

Top 10 TestRigor Alternatives and Competitors


<p>Anyone in the test automation industry for quite a few years now would know how Cypress and Puppeteer have changed the game. The initial tough days of installing, creating, and debugging tests using Selenium are a thing of the past, thanks to Cypress and Puppeteer. Now, among these two tools, which one is better? The Cypress vs Puppeteer conversation will help you understand the topic in detail.</p>



<p>In case, you have an extensive list of points to consider, <a href="https://testsigma.com/compare-test-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">compare test automation tools</a> in a way to check which one among the many available in the market works for you.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Cypress"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is Cypress?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is Puppeteer?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_Core_Differences"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</a><ul><li><a href="#Installing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Installing</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> When Should You Use</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Not_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> When Should You Not Use</a></li><li><a href="#What_Companies_Use"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.4</span> What Companies Use</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Execution"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.5</span> Test Execution</a></li><li><a href="#Features"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.6</span> Features</a></li><li><a href="#Benefits"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.7</span> Benefits</a></li><li><a href="#Limitations"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.8</span> Limitations</a></li><li><a href="#Pricing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.9</span> Pricing</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Which_is_Better_8211_Cypress_vs_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#Alternative_Tool_for_Cypress_and_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_Cypress_better_than_Puppeteer"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.1</span> Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Puppeteer_and_Cypress"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.2</span> What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="cypress-vs-puppeteer-overview"><span id="Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_8211_Overview">Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-cypress"><span id="What_is_Cypress">What is Cypress?</span></h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/3kM8XO9N9qoI3EIJVUrpVozrKHY256kcAzqM_OB5Fd_PcDvTqv9vlZQ4m5jh4ph2rtbLmBtFpqLq9_w_cQhjcBFZaver-JypfsFavJPqHn48MMzxZztzWba2dOE0cdpt7-2dHgQ_YP-vXwDXs6ODRjw" alt="cypress" /></figure></div>



<p>Cypress is an open-source, end-to-end testing framework that allows third-party add-ons per your testing needs. It runs directly within the browser and comes equipped with distinctive features like real-time interactive testing, automatic waiting, and seamless debugging. Cypress simplifies the testing process by enabling developers and testers to observe test execution in real-time, leading to quick issue identification.</p>



<p>In terms of the brand history, Cypress was released in 2015 with the aim of empowering open-source testing communities.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-puppeteer"><span id="What_is_Puppeteer">What is Puppeteer?</span></h3>



<p>Puppeteer is a powerful Node.js library developed by Google. It was originally designed for web scraping and generating screenshots but has now evolved into a robust tool for browser automation. Testers benefit from <a href="https://medium.com/gdplabs/how-to-use-puppeteer-faad9acafeab" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer’s headless mode</a>, which allows for script execution without a visible browser interface. Its versatility extends to performance monitoring, accessibility testing, and generating detailed reports.</p>



<h2 id="h-cypress-vs-puppeteer-core-differences"><span id="Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_Core_Differences">Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</span></h2>



<p>Although both of these <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-frameworks/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automation testing frameworks</a> bring distinctive advantages for the testers, there are a few differences that you should consider when choosing one tool that suits your needs the best.</p>



<h3 id="h-installing"><span id="Installing">Installing</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Installing Cypress is straightforward. Use npm to install Cypress globally, and then initialize the project with a simple command. Use the below command:</p>



<p><em>npm install cypress &#8211;save-dev</em></p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Puppeteer is installed via npm as well. After installing Puppeteer, it automatically downloads a compatible version of Chromium. Use the below command:</p>



<p><em>npm install puppeteer &#8211;save-dev</em></p>



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-use"><span id="When_Should_You_Use">When Should You Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Choose Cypress when focusing on <a href="https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">end-to-end testing </a>for modern web applications. Cypress is ideal for projects where real-time interactive testing and quick issue identification are priorities.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Opt for Puppeteer when browser automation, especially headless browsing, is the primary requirement. Puppeteer is suitable for scenarios involving web scraping, generating screenshots, or performing tasks without a visible browser interface.</p>



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-not-use"><span id="When_Should_You_Not_Use">When Should You Not Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Avoid Cypress if your project involves extensive <a href="https://testsigma.com/cross-browser-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cross-browser testing</a>, as Cypress primarily supports Chromium-based browsers.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Do not use Puppeteer if your focus is on interactive testing or if you require a testing tool that operates directly within the browser.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-companies-use"><span id="What_Companies_Use">What Companies Use</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Companies like GitLab, Shopify, and Trivago leverage Cypress for their testing needs.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Google, Netflix, and Alibaba are among the companies utilizing Puppeteer for web automation.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-execution"><span id="Test_Execution">Test Execution</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Cypress runs directly in the browser, enabling real-time interactive testing. It provides an easy-to-understand interface and quick feedback on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-execution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test execution</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Puppeteer excels in headless mode, allowing for script execution without a visible browser interface. It&#8217;s suitable for automated tasks and scenarios where a visible browser is not required.</p>



<h3 id="h-features"><span id="Features">Features</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> It offers features like automatic waiting, real-time reloading, and seamless debugging. It supports JavaScript-based testing and has an extensive set of commands for robust test scripts.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> It provides capabilities for web scraping, taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and interacting with pages in headless mode.</p>



<h3 id="h-benefits"><span id="Benefits">Benefits</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Fast test execution, real-time observation, user-friendly interface, and interactive testing capabilities to promote collaboration between developers and testers.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Beneficial for headless browser automation, supporting web scrapping and performance reporting.</p>



<h3 id="h-limitations"><span id="Limitations">Limitations</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Limited cross-browser support and challenges in handling multiple tabs or windows. It may experience slower execution times in large test suites.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Not suitable for interactive testing scenarios, and the focus on headless browsing limit its applicability for certain use cases.</p>



<h3 id="h-pricing"><span id="Pricing">Pricing</span></h3>



<p><strong>Cypress:</strong> Both free and paid versions are available.</p>



<p><strong>Puppeteer:</strong> Free of cost.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup required.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-which-is-better-cypress-vs-puppeteer"><span id="Which_is_Better_8211_Cypress_vs_Puppeteer">Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</span></h2>



<p>The answer truly depends upon the requirements your testing team carries. Cypress brings a few advantages to the shore, whereas Puppeteer provides other benefits. If you are looking for faster test execution, interactive test capabilities, and a tool that runs directly within the browser, Cypress should be your ideal choice. Alternatively, Puppeteer is the right choice if your test focus lies in web scrapping, headlines test automation, and capturing test screenshots.</p>



<p>Ultimately, the decision depends on your specific testing goals, team expertise, and the features that align best with your project requirements. Consider evaluating both tools in a small-scale test scenario to see which one better meets your needs.</p>



<p>The comparison of these two tools in the form of a table below can help you clarify doubts regarding, which tool is right for you.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Cypress</strong></td><td><strong>Puppeteer</strong></td></tr><tr><td>End-to-end testing of web apps</td><td>Headless browser automation</td></tr><tr><td>Chromiun-based browsers</td><td>Chromium (can be extended to Chrome)</td></tr><tr><td>Real-time extensive testing</td><td>Limited real-time testing; primarily, headless operation</td></tr><tr><td>Visible browser interaction</td><td>Optional: Headless Mode Available&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Uses JavaScript</td><td>Uses JavaScript (Node.js)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>It is User-Friendly, but steeper for Beginners</td><td>Moderate learning curve, requires JavaScript Skills</td></tr><tr><td>Limited support for cross-browser testing</td><td>Requires additional configuration for cross-browser testing</td></tr><tr><td>Supports real-time debugging</td><td>Offers comprehensive debugging with screenshots</td></tr><tr><td>Open-source and paid options present</td><td>Open-source</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-alternative-tool-for-cypress-and-puppeteer"><span id="Alternative_Tool_for_Cypress_and_Puppeteer">Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</span></h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1600" height="804" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png" alt="Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer" class="wp-image-46715" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png 1600w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-768x386.png 768w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-1536x772.png 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" /></figure>



<p>In case you wish not to limit the testing benefits by choosing either Cypress or the Puppeteer, an alternative that brings features of both the tools together should be on your list. Testsigma comes equipped with a myriad of attributes that overcome the challenges faced due to Cypress and Puppeteer. Unlike Cypress, Testsigma offers creation of browser-agnostic tests in simple english and provides access to over 3000+ devices and browsers for testing.&nbsp;</p>



<p>As a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/puppeteer-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer alternative</a> , Testsigma brings headless testing that supports a wide range of testing types, including web, mobile, and API testing. Not to mention that Testsigma aims to reduce the learning curve by providing a scriptless, no-code interface for test creation.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>Determining which tool works best for you in the long run is more than just checking the price of those test automation tools. Rather it takes into account various factors, such as ease of use, integration capabilities, benefits and limitations, and use cases. Cypress vs Puppeteer comparison takes all these differences into consideration to guide you through the selection process. And if nothing else works, Testsigma is available to fill the gap of test automation tools in the present market.</p>



<p>Consider this blog a detailed guide to making the right decision when it comes to selecting either Cypress or Puppeteer.</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions">Frequently Asked Questions</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-is-cypress-better-than-puppeteer"><span id="Is_Cypress_better_than_Puppeteer">Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</span></h3>



<p>Cypress is only better than Puppeteer if it meets your testing project needs better than latter. The choice between Cypress and Puppeteer depends on the testing requirements. Cypress excels in end-to-end testing with real-time interactive capabilities, making it ideal for modern web applications. Puppeteer, developed by Google, focuses on headless browser automation, making it versatile for tasks like web scraping and generating screenshots.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-puppeteer-and-cypress"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_Puppeteer_and_Cypress">What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</span></h3>



<p>Again, the difference lies in the use case. Cypress is designed for end-to-end testing of modern web applications with real-time interactivity. Puppeteer, on the other hand, is more focused on headless browser automation, suitable for web scraping and tasks without a visible browser interface.</p>
