Anyone in the test automation industry for quite a few years now would know how Cypress and Puppeteer have changed the game. The initial tough days of installing, creating, and debugging tests using Selenium are a thing of the past, thanks to Cypress and Puppeteer. Now, among these two tools, which one is better? The Cypress vs Puppeteer conversation will help you understand the topic in detail.



In case, you have an extensive list of points to consider, <a href="https://testsigma.com/compare-test-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">compare test automation tools</a> in a way to check which one among the many available in the market works for you.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_8211_Overview">1 Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Cypress">1.1 What is Cypress?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Puppeteer">1.2 What is Puppeteer?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Cypress_vs_Puppeteer_Core_Differences">2 Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</a><ul><li><a href="#Installing">2.1 Installing</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Use">2.2 When Should You Use</a></li><li><a href="#When_Should_You_Not_Use">2.3 When Should You Not Use</a></li><li><a href="#What_Companies_Use">2.4 What Companies Use</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Execution">2.5 Test Execution</a></li><li><a href="#Features">2.6 Features</a></li><li><a href="#Benefits">2.7 Benefits</a></li><li><a href="#Limitations">2.8 Limitations</a></li><li><a href="#Pricing">2.9 Pricing</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Which_is_Better_8211_Cypress_vs_Puppeteer">3 Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#Alternative_Tool_for_Cypress_and_Puppeteer">4 Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">5 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">6 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_Cypress_better_than_Puppeteer">6.1 Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Puppeteer_and_Cypress">6.2 What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="cypress-vs-puppeteer-overview">Cypress vs Puppeteer &#8211; Overview</h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-cypress">What is Cypress?</h3>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/3kM8XO9N9qoI3EIJVUrpVozrKHY256kcAzqM_OB5Fd_PcDvTqv9vlZQ4m5jh4ph2rtbLmBtFpqLq9_w_cQhjcBFZaver-JypfsFavJPqHn48MMzxZztzWba2dOE0cdpt7-2dHgQ_YP-vXwDXs6ODRjw" alt="cypress" /></figure></div>



Cypress is an open-source, end-to-end testing framework that allows third-party add-ons per your testing needs. It runs directly within the browser and comes equipped with distinctive features like real-time interactive testing, automatic waiting, and seamless debugging. Cypress simplifies the testing process by enabling developers and testers to observe test execution in real-time, leading to quick issue identification.



In terms of the brand history, Cypress was released in 2015 with the aim of empowering open-source testing communities.



<h3 id="h-what-is-puppeteer">What is Puppeteer?</h3>



Puppeteer is a powerful Node.js library developed by Google. It was originally designed for web scraping and generating screenshots but has now evolved into a robust tool for browser automation. Testers benefit from <a href="https://medium.com/gdplabs/how-to-use-puppeteer-faad9acafeab" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer’s headless mode</a>, which allows for script execution without a visible browser interface. Its versatility extends to performance monitoring, accessibility testing, and generating detailed reports.



<h2 id="h-cypress-vs-puppeteer-core-differences">Cypress vs Puppeteer: Core Differences</h2>



Although both of these <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-frameworks/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automation testing frameworks</a> bring distinctive advantages for the testers, there are a few differences that you should consider when choosing one tool that suits your needs the best.



<h3 id="h-installing">Installing</h3>



Cypress: Installing Cypress is straightforward. Use npm to install Cypress globally, and then initialize the project with a simple command. Use the below command:



npm install cypress &#8211;save-dev



Puppeteer: Puppeteer is installed via npm as well. After installing Puppeteer, it automatically downloads a compatible version of Chromium. Use the below command:



npm install puppeteer &#8211;save-dev



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-use">When Should You Use</h3>



Cypress: Choose Cypress when focusing on <a href="https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">end-to-end testing </a>for modern web applications. Cypress is ideal for projects where real-time interactive testing and quick issue identification are priorities.



Puppeteer: Opt for Puppeteer when browser automation, especially headless browsing, is the primary requirement. Puppeteer is suitable for scenarios involving web scraping, generating screenshots, or performing tasks without a visible browser interface.



<h3 id="h-when-should-you-not-use">When Should You Not Use</h3>



Cypress: Avoid Cypress if your project involves extensive <a href="https://testsigma.com/cross-browser-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cross-browser testing</a>, as Cypress primarily supports Chromium-based browsers.



Puppeteer: Do not use Puppeteer if your focus is on interactive testing or if you require a testing tool that operates directly within the browser.



<h3 id="h-what-companies-use">What Companies Use</h3>



Cypress: Companies like GitLab, Shopify, and Trivago leverage Cypress for their testing needs.



Puppeteer: Google, Netflix, and Alibaba are among the companies utilizing Puppeteer for web automation.



<h3 id="h-test-execution">Test Execution</h3>



Cypress: Cypress runs directly in the browser, enabling real-time interactive testing. It provides an easy-to-understand interface and quick feedback on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-execution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test execution</a>.



Puppeteer: Puppeteer excels in headless mode, allowing for script execution without a visible browser interface. It&#8217;s suitable for automated tasks and scenarios where a visible browser is not required.



<h3 id="h-features">Features</h3>



Cypress: It offers features like automatic waiting, real-time reloading, and seamless debugging. It supports JavaScript-based testing and has an extensive set of commands for robust test scripts.



Puppeteer: It provides capabilities for web scraping, taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and interacting with pages in headless mode.



<h3 id="h-benefits">Benefits</h3>



Cypress: Fast test execution, real-time observation, user-friendly interface, and interactive testing capabilities to promote collaboration between developers and testers.



Puppeteer: Beneficial for headless browser automation, supporting web scrapping and performance reporting.



<h3 id="h-limitations">Limitations</h3>



Cypress: Limited cross-browser support and challenges in handling multiple tabs or windows. It may experience slower execution times in large test suites.



Puppeteer: Not suitable for interactive testing scenarios, and the focus on headless browsing limit its applicability for certain use cases.



<h3 id="h-pricing">Pricing</h3>



Cypress: Both free and paid versions are available.



Puppeteer: Free of cost.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup required.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-which-is-better-cypress-vs-puppeteer">Which is Better &#8211; Cypress vs Puppeteer?</h2>



The answer truly depends upon the requirements your testing team carries. Cypress brings a few advantages to the shore, whereas Puppeteer provides other benefits. If you are looking for faster test execution, interactive test capabilities, and a tool that runs directly within the browser, Cypress should be your ideal choice. Alternatively, Puppeteer is the right choice if your test focus lies in web scrapping, headlines test automation, and capturing test screenshots.



Ultimately, the decision depends on your specific testing goals, team expertise, and the features that align best with your project requirements. Consider evaluating both tools in a small-scale test scenario to see which one better meets your needs.



The comparison of these two tools in the form of a table below can help you clarify doubts regarding, which tool is right for you.



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Cypress</td><td>Puppeteer</td></tr><tr><td>End-to-end testing of web apps</td><td>Headless browser automation</td></tr><tr><td>Chromiun-based browsers</td><td>Chromium (can be extended to Chrome)</td></tr><tr><td>Real-time extensive testing</td><td>Limited real-time testing; primarily, headless operation</td></tr><tr><td>Visible browser interaction</td><td>Optional: Headless Mode Available&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Uses JavaScript</td><td>Uses JavaScript (Node.js)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>It is User-Friendly, but steeper for Beginners</td><td>Moderate learning curve, requires JavaScript Skills</td></tr><tr><td>Limited support for cross-browser testing</td><td>Requires additional configuration for cross-browser testing</td></tr><tr><td>Supports real-time debugging</td><td>Offers comprehensive debugging with screenshots</td></tr><tr><td>Open-source and paid options present</td><td>Open-source</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-alternative-tool-for-cypress-and-puppeteer">Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1600" height="804" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png" alt="Alternative Tool for Cypress and Puppeteer" class="wp-image-46715" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28.png 1600w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-768x386.png 768w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/23165645/unnamed-28-1536x772.png 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" /></figure>



In case you wish not to limit the testing benefits by choosing either Cypress or the Puppeteer, an alternative that brings features of both the tools together should be on your list. Testsigma comes equipped with a myriad of attributes that overcome the challenges faced due to Cypress and Puppeteer. Unlike Cypress, Testsigma offers creation of browser-agnostic tests in simple english and provides access to over 3000+ devices and browsers for testing.&nbsp;



As a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/puppeteer-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Puppeteer alternative</a> , Testsigma brings headless testing that supports a wide range of testing types, including web, mobile, and API testing. Not to mention that Testsigma aims to reduce the learning curve by providing a scriptless, no-code interface for test creation.



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Determining which tool works best for you in the long run is more than just checking the price of those test automation tools. Rather it takes into account various factors, such as ease of use, integration capabilities, benefits and limitations, and use cases. Cypress vs Puppeteer comparison takes all these differences into consideration to guide you through the selection process. And if nothing else works, Testsigma is available to fill the gap of test automation tools in the present market.



Consider this blog a detailed guide to making the right decision when it comes to selecting either Cypress or Puppeteer.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-is-cypress-better-than-puppeteer">Is Cypress better than Puppeteer?</h3>



Cypress is only better than Puppeteer if it meets your testing project needs better than latter. The choice between Cypress and Puppeteer depends on the testing requirements. Cypress excels in end-to-end testing with real-time interactive capabilities, making it ideal for modern web applications. Puppeteer, developed by Google, focuses on headless browser automation, making it versatile for tasks like web scraping and generating screenshots.



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-puppeteer-and-cypress">What is the difference between Puppeteer and Cypress?</h3>



Again, the difference lies in the use case. Cypress is designed for end-to-end testing of modern web applications with real-time interactivity. Puppeteer, on the other hand, is more focused on headless browser automation, suitable for web scraping and tasks without a visible browser interface.

Cypress vs Puppeteer: Which One is Better?

What are the Test Scenarios for Flipkart Application?

How Do You Write Test Cases for Game Testing

How Do You Write Test Cases for Game Testing?

How Do You Write Test Cases for a Text Box

How Do You Write Test Cases for a Text Box?

Every online website has multiple digital assets. The main menu, search bar, images, and breadcrumbs make up a few of the fundamental components of the website design. They add to the overall design and operations of the site. One such component is pagination. Predominantly used by e-commerce sites, blogs, catalogs, and data tables, pagination comes into action when there is a large amount of digital content to deal with. Alongside this comes pagination test cases to qualify the component as bug-free and in proper working condition.



We show you how.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Pagination">1 What is Pagination?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_Perform_Pagination_Testing">2 Why Perform Pagination Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Cases_for_Pagination">3 Test Cases for Pagination</a><ul><li><a href="#Positive_Test_Cases_for_Pagination">3.1 Positive Test Cases for Pagination</a></li><li><a href="#Negative_Test_Cases_for_Pagination">3.2 Negative Test Cases for Pagination</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Pagination_Testing_Best_Practices">4 Pagination Testing Best Practices</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Automate_Test_Cases_for_Pagination">5 How to Automate Test Cases for Pagination?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">6 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">7 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_are_the_use_cases_for_pagination">7.1 What are the use cases for pagination?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_REST_API_pagination">7.2 What is REST API pagination?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-pagination">What is Pagination?</h2>



Pagination is a design pattern for online websites that comes into play when there is a need to organize large amounts of data in a specific order. It divides and displays the content into separate pages, which plays a critical role in simplifying navigation and access to the information.&nbsp;



The goal of pagination is to offer a clear pathway for users to discover crucial content on the website to prevent them from going off-track. On the plus side, pagination improves customer satisfaction and retention.



An example of pagination is Testsigma blogs, which provide readers with quick access to all the posts in an organized manner.



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/_HmTNi6rHiqZm8T0X0R7Xq9G0aJ3DYMzWXRcrPvNTR9RimqbOwn27j1WgoVHzjh-I0gTdb_P95Q-3c2HtlriyprvA4C5g4FLq4HuliJ0GbwPBViSnp3FPqTAk_PLaiYQLx3P04hHC56Vz64rCntea54" alt="Pagination Example" /></figure></div>



To test the pages on the website, you can either do manual testing or automated testing using tools such as Testsigma.



<h2 id="h-why-perform-pagination-testing">Why Perform Pagination Testing?</h2>



For the same reason, you execute any other testing: to ensure that a basic yet fundamental section of your website is behaving as intended. Issues in the pagination functionality can lead to the loss of potential customers for e-commerce sites and a decline in interested readers for blog sites. Subsequently, providing easy and quick entrance to any part of your website (through pagination) is only going to enhance the customer satisfaction quotient for the business.



<h2 id="h-test-cases-for-pagination">Test Cases for Pagination</h2>



Similar to every other element and functionality, pagination also has a list of <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases</a> for testers to run. It encompasses both positive and negative test cases with the same goal to validate the authenticity and quality of the component. Let’s look at some of the essential pagination test cases for e-commerce, blog, and data-based websites:



<h3 id="h-positive-test-cases-for-pagination">Positive Test Cases for Pagination</h3>



<ul><li>Verify that the pagination controls (Next, Previous, Page Numbers) are present and functional.</li><li>Ensure that the specified number of items per page is displayed consistently.</li><li>Confirm that clicking on the Next and Previous buttons correctly navigates to the next and previous pages.</li><li>Test selecting a specific page number and confirm that the correct page is displayed.</li><li>Verify that navigation to the first and last pages works as expected.</li><li>Test the pagination behavior when there is a large dataset to ensure it handles a maximum page limit properly.</li><li>Check that pagination adjusts appropriately on different screen sizes, ensuring a positive user experience.</li><li>Validate the UI aspects of pagination, i.e., font size, font style, display, and clickability, as expected.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-negative-test-cases-for-pagination">Negative Test Cases for Pagination</h3>



<ul><li>Test pagination behavior when there are no items to display, ensuring it provides appropriate feedback.</li><li>Check if an attempt to go to a page that does not exist shows a 404 error page or an appropriate error message.</li><li>Check the response when attempting to navigate to a page with a negative page number.</li><li>Test scenarios where the specified items per page exceed the total number of items, ensuring it handles such cases appropriately.</li><li>Verify that pagination controls are not displayed when the dataset is within a single page.</li><li>Check the system&#8217;s behavior when data is removed during pagination to ensure consistency and accuracy.</li></ul>



We also have a comprehensive blog on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-cases-for-search-functionality/">test cases for search functionality</a> that users rely on to find specific website information.



<h2 id="h-pagination-testing-best-practices">Pagination Testing Best Practices</h2>



Any testing is successful when testers follow the best approach to create and execute test cases. Adopting such practices prevents missing out on critical tests and helps to get results that are useful in debugging the issues. These best practices for test cases for pagination are tried and tested for your business:



<ul><li>Gain a clear understanding of the pagination requirements, including the number of items per page, expected behavior, and any specific business rules.</li><li>Verify that the frontend pagination controls align with the backend logic, ensuring consistency in data retrieval and display.</li><li>If pagination is coupled with sorting, test the combined functionality to ensure proper sorting across pages.</li><li>Follow a certain <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-template/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test case template</a> to create tests that align with the requirements of pagination functionality.</li><li>Make sure to add negative test cases as well.</li><li>Validate if the UI of pagination is consistent throughout the different browsers and devices.</li><li>Clearly document test cases, including expected results and any specific configurations or conditions.</li><li>Perform a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-review/">test case review</a> before finalizing the number of test cases, including the count of passed, failed, and blocked tests.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-how-to-automate-test-cases-for-pagination">How to Automate Test Cases for Pagination?</h2>



Once you know the best approach to conduct pagination testing, the next step is to put it into practice. With a couple of examples, you can see how Testsigma is an excellent companion for creating and executing pagination test cases.



Consider the blogs page on Testsigma website. We will test if the Previous and Next buttons are working correctly. Here are the steps to follow. Read on how to create test cases in Testsigma using NLPs.



<ul><li>Navigate to the blog URL on Testsigma.</li><li>Identify the pagination element at the end of the page.</li><li>Click on the Next button available. The previous button will only become active when you move from the first page.</li><li>Verify that clicking on Next takes you to the subsequent webpage. If you are on the 1st page, next should take you to the 2nd page. If you are on the 7th page, next should take you to the 8th page.</li><li>Repeat the same steps to check the Previous button from the 2nd page or any page thereafter.</li><li>Verify that clicking on the Previous button takes you to the preceding webpage.</li></ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/x0WTmA7xT7b1MWAZOjrF0dLWUpW2dvJ2jHm09h79KNo4tQuKcubOCfvPKMqq0OsrgUvYeAOHrgBJN_c2tJMtzqMYhT54MdOo0h8LI8TOMnkZyYEuUvSNFRP7PcKcQsPZO4mupoVdzSOE2GqIWKHpp4I" alt="Verifying pagination function" /></figure>



Similarly, you can validate the UI and pagination functionality using Testsigma. The tool works best for <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing">web automated testing</a>, mobile app testing, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-api-testing">automated API testing</a> to offer exceptional automation testing.



But the benefits don’t stop here. Partner with Testsigma to:



<ul><li>Save time and resources by automating cross-browser testing</li><li>Quickly present the best and easy-to-understand analytics and reporting to your stakeholders</li><li>Harness the power of AI and NLP-based no-coding test case creation</li><li>Integrate your existing tool set with Testsigma</li></ul>



 <button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Sign up to explore the 5x automation testing benefits Testsigma brings for the QA teams</a></button> 



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Similar to writing test cases for other functions, pagination test cases are also done in the same manner. Since pagination takes care of organizing data or information in a specific sequence, it is essential to validate this functionality. It is easy to do, and we have outlined the tests you can focus on for checking pagination on your website.



Either <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/test-cases-for-manual-testing/">write test cases for a manual testing</a> approach or go for automation using tools like Testsigma with all the information presented to you in this blog.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-what-are-the-use-cases-for-pagination">What are the use cases for pagination?</h3>



Pagination is crucial for displaying large sets of data in manageable portions. Common use cases include search results, product listings, and data tables. It enhances user experience by presenting information in digestible chunks, reducing page load times, and facilitating efficient navigation through content.



<h3 id="h-what-is-rest-api-pagination">What is REST API pagination?</h3>



REST API pagination involves breaking large sets of data into smaller, manageable chunks to improve performance and reduce the amount of data transferred in each request. It utilizes query parameters like page and per_page to specify the requested page and the number of items per page.

How to Write Pagination Test Cases with Samples

Jira started out as an issue-tracking and project-management tool in 2002. Companies initially used Jira for bug tracking. But over the years, it has become a ubiquitous platform for businesses to manage projects and ensure collaboration. Yet one issue has remained constant since the beginning: Jira does not have an in-built testing infrastructure. So, you can feed the defect information but cannot reuse it for further testing processes in the tool. But the good part is Jira allows integrations with some of the top-rated test automation tools, including Testsigma, for complete test case management.



Let’s look at how you can write and manage <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases</a> for Jira.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Jira">1 What is Jira?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Setup_Jira_for_Case_Testing">2 How to Setup Jira for Case Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Create_Test_Cases_in_Jira">3 How to Create Test Cases in Jira?</a></li><li><a href="#Steps_for_Writing_Test_Cases_in_Jira">4 Steps for Writing Test Cases in Jira</a><ul><li><a href="#Step_1_Create_a_Test_Case_Issue_and_Keep_It_Active">4.1 Step 1. Create a Test Case Issue and Keep It Active</a></li><li><a href="#Step_2_Change_a_User_Story_to_Be_a_Test_Case">4.2 Step 2. Change a User Story to Be a Test Case</a></li><li><a href="#Step_3_Add_a_Testing_as_a_Status_in_Jira_Workflow">4.3 Step 3. Add a Testing as a Status in Jira Workflow</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Report_on_Test_Cases_in_Jira">5 Report on Test Cases in Jira</a><ul><li><ul><li><a href="#Dedicated_Test_Case_Management_Tool_with_Jira_Integration">5.0.1 Dedicated Test Case Management Tool with Jira Integration</a></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Problems_with_Writing_Test_Cases_in_Jira">6 Problems with Writing Test Cases in Jira</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages_of_using_Jira_for_Test_Case_Management">7 Advantages of using Jira for Test Case Management</a></li><li><a href="#Disadvantages_of_using_Jira_for_Test_Case_Management">8 Disadvantages of using Jira for Test Case Management</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">9 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">10 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Does_Jira_work_for_test_case_management">10.1 Does Jira work for test case management?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_test_case_template_in_Jira">10.2 What is the test case template in Jira?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-jira">What is Jira?</h2>



Jira is a widely used project management and issue-tracking tool by Atlassian. It provides a versatile platform for teams to plan, track, and manage their work efficiently. Multiple in-built features, such as customizable dashboards, real-time collaboration, and detailed reporting, make Jira a fan-favorite of many top companies.



But what stands out in the tool is its integration capabilities, extensive plugin marketplace, and compatibility with agile methodologies. For instance, businesses can easily combine their test automation platforms with Jira for easy and quick test case management and bug reporting. Our focus will be on this particular feature of the tool throughout the blog.



<h2 id="h-how-to-setup-jira-for-case-testing">How to Setup Jira for Case Testing?</h2>



Jira does not have an inherent test case feature, but it has innumerable customization options. For case testing setup, we will use the Issue Type feature by creating a new custom issue that is specifically for case testing. Additionally, you will need to set up custom subtasks that testers can use to feed the test case results directly into Jira.



It is ideal to have your custom ‘Test Case’ issue type to have a summary, test case steps, and the expected results.



Once you have the vital information in place, let’s start with creating our custom issue type for case testing:



<ul><li>Go to Jira Settings by clicking on the gear icon in the top-right corner and selecting Issues. You will require admin access for this.</li><li>Under the Issues section, select Issue Types and click on the Add Issue Type button to create a Test Case issue.</li><li>Provide details for the new issue type, including description and icon.</li><li>Associate the new issue type with an issue type scheme. This determines which projects will use the new issue type. Go to Issue type schemes settings and click Edit on the Jira project you want to associate the issue type with.</li><li>Assign a field configuration to the issue type, specifying which fields will be available and required. Don’t forget to add a summary, test case steps, and the expected results. You will find it under Screen Settings to Add Screens.</li><li>After adding screens, go to Screen Schemes to add a screen scheme. This step is to add the screen scheme to the custom screen you created in the previous step.</li><li>Next, go to Issue type screen schemes. Look for the Jira project in which you want to use the new Issue type. Then, select Associate an issue type with a screen scheme, and select the new issue type (e.g. Test Case) and its Screen scheme. Lastly, click on Add.</li><li>And voila! You have successfully created a custom issue type for case testing with the necessary fields within the choice of your Jira project.</li><li>Verify by creating a test issue of the new type to check if it behaves as expected.</li></ul>



Next up, you have to create a custom subtask, Test Case Results, that QAs can use to log the test results directly.



Here are the steps to follow:



<ul><li>Follow the same first step to add the issue type. But this time, select Sub-Task Issue Type.</li><li>Re-trace the same steps. Add screens, select the fields for the subtask, add screen schemes, and select the previously created screen as default.</li><li>In the last step, when you are in the Issue type screen scheme, there is no need to create a new screen scheme. Look for the test case screen scheme set up prior and select Configure under Actions to Associate an issue type with a screen scheme.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-how-to-create-test-cases-in-jira">How to Create Test Cases in Jira?</h2>



Creating test cases in Jira is easy now that you have an issue type and the necessary fields to describe and log your tests. It is similar to creating a new task.



Go to your Jira account and click on Create. Pick the issue type as Test Case and enter the details in the available fields. Remember to provide the steps to recreate the defect and the expected results for the developers to fully understand the issue.



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/YSoH3CpAx6SpwHXygWcP0zgUMWtqPB7sAoDmzn9nWvGCAIRzznECwOhpt_JkCiKGxB7Lyw8k0kudNTdJO5EMYReqOzo_ZwCbL-jd6YQfT0CmyURD_p4zLaoQkxVv6npIUbgys4VihABaXP1kSXI3MpU" alt="Create Issue" /></figure></div>



Image source: <a href="https://marker.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">maker.io</a>



<h2 id="h-steps-for-writing-test-cases-in-jira">Steps for Writing Test Cases in Jira</h2>



All the essential elements are in place for you to start creating and managing test cases in Jira. The only thing left to do is start logging the issues.



<h3 id="h-step-1-create-a-test-case-issue-and-keep-it-active">Step 1. Create a Test Case Issue and Keep It Active</h3>



You can begin by creating a Jira task with the Issue Type Test Case that we made earlier. It will allow you to feed all the critical and important information about the issue in the task. However, there is a downside to this step. Jira tasks are not flexible. Once you create and publish it for everyone to see, it cannot be reused, which is a common practice in regression testing.



One way to tackle this is to keep the task open and update its description regularly with new tests that everyone in the project can follow.



<h3 id="h-step-2-change-a-user-story-to-be-a-test-case">Step 2. Change a User Story to Be a Test Case</h3>



Jira also enables users to create user stories, which you can use to serve as test cases. But again, these stories have the same problem as the tasks. Once they are pushed, you cannot use them to re-run the test cases.



<h3 id="h-step-3-add-a-testing-as-a-status-in-jira-workflow">Step 3. Add a Testing as a Status in Jira Workflow</h3>



Another way to handle tests in Jira is to add an extra status in the workflow, i.e., testing. When you add a Test Case issue type, which is still in the testing stage, keep the status as Testing. Once the process is over, mark it as Done or Closed.



But there might be cases where the tests are over, but the testing is still not done. So, you will have to find a workaround in that situation.



<h2 id="h-report-on-test-cases-in-jira">Report on Test Cases in Jira</h2>



The final round of testing is to prepare a comprehensive report that aids in analyzing and understanding the bugs. In Jira, you can rely on two ways for test reporting:



<ul><li>Writing it manually with all the necessary screenshots and steps</li></ul>



For this approach, you need to make a child issue to the parent issue, i.e., the test case.&nbsp;



Click on Add a Child Issue and choose Test Case Results, which we created in the earlier section. Next, enter all your findings along with relevant screenshots and steps to help everyone relate the results with the right test case. This way of reporting simple but comes with a few disadvantages: it is manual, requires developers to keep switching between Jira and their application, and demands technical skills to log issues. Opting for an automated approach is the alternative here.



<ul><li>Integrating a third-party tool with the host to do all the reporting work automatically</li></ul>



Since Jira does not offer support for test case reporting automatically, a bug reporting tool takes the lead here. A well-thought integration with the right tool for case testing and bug reporting for Jira will assist both testers and developers in easily doing their work.



<h4 id="h-dedicated-test-case-management-tool-with-jira-integration">Dedicated Test Case Management Tool with Jira Integration</h4>



Testsigma is a dedicated <a href="https://testsigma.com/test-management-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test case management tool</a> and comes equipped with features to aid bug reporting in Jira. Our test automation tool enables QAs to:



<ul><li>Push bugs directly to Jira&#8217;s project</li><li>Capture screenshots, annotate bugs, and share them with your team</li><li>Follow your choice of test case template and re-produced bugs with the right steps to feed in Jira</li></ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/9gOvrpM1OFoD6M6Azp4bMUhuIiDu65ioAYFANLeEnk14xAC1YdRZ25hL1XEa2ORfdw737mqcP554RVAiWww4eFoL_dsDcwwceXrH39hw75x7UDp43erRaZ7BX_c8NHXjUGHLiI_8wMXfEUETWo5Wp5Y" alt="Bug reporting" /></figure>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/docs/integrations/bug-reporting/jira/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Integrate Testsigma with Jira</a> in a few easy steps to simplify your bug-reporting process.



But wait! That’s not all. Testsigma is a full-fledged web automated testing tool that provides end-to-end testing capabilities for mobile and API without coding.



 <button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Sign up to experience the best of no-code automation testing with Testsigma</a></button> 



<h2 id="h-problems-with-writing-test-cases-in-jira">Problems with Writing Test Cases in Jira</h2>



Every step we discussed that pertains to writing test cases in Jira has encountered a problem. It is a highly manual process, does not support re-running of test cases, and requires time and skill to create a single test case.



Jira is a dedicated project management tool, and even though there are ways you can make writing test cases possible within Jira, it is not good practice to do so.



<h2 id="h-advantages-of-using-jira-for-test-case-management">Advantages of using Jira for Test Case Management</h2>



Despite all the backlogs Jira has when it comes to test case management, there exist a few advantages that must not be overlooked.



<ul><li>Jira provides a centralized repository for storing and organizing test cases. This centralization ensures easy access, version control, and efficient management of test artifacts.</li><li>Seamless integration between Jira and development tools streamlines communication between testing and development teams.</li><li>Jira offers robust traceability features, linking test cases to requirements, user stories, and defects.</li><li>Jira supports agile and Scrum methodologies, allowing testing teams to align with iterative development cycles.</li><li>Teams can design custom workflows in Jira to reflect their specific testing processes, incorporating stages for planning, execution, <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-review/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test case review</a>, and closure.</li><li>Jira provides real-time visibility into testing progress through customizable dashboards and reports.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-disadvantages-of-using-jira-for-test-case-management">Disadvantages of using Jira for Test Case Management</h2>



Let’s look at some of the disadvantages as well.



<ul><li>Jira&#8217;s extensive customization options can lead to complexity during initial setup. Teams may face challenges in configuring workflows, screens, and issue types.</li><li>Jira can be resource-intensive, especially in instances with a large number of projects, issues, or concurrent users.</li><li>While customization is a strength, excessive customization can lead to maintenance challenges. Constantly changing configurations may create dependencies and impact the stability of the testing environment.</li><li>Jira&#8217;s native test management features are basic compared to specialized test management tools. Advanced test case management functionalities, such as test case design, traceability matrices, and test execution analytics, may require additional plugins or integration with dedicated test management tools.</li><li>The feature-rich interface of Jira can overwhelm users, especially those focused primarily on test case management.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



The Jira project management tool can serve as a test case management and bug-tracking tool. But when the stakes are high, it is not always the right way to go. There are multiple ways you can use Jira for your testing purposes, and the majority of them include improving collaboration and focusing on getting the right information across to the developers.



If you wish to use Jira as a case management tool, this blog can help you get a hold of the tool’s capability in every way. Alternatively, multiple integration possibilities exist as well. But no matter your choice, remember to focus on creating a clear and concise test case report that captures as much information as possible.



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-does-jira-work-for-test-case-management">Does Jira work for test case management?</h3>



Yes, Jira can be used for test case management. It provides a flexible and customizable platform that supports various testing methodologies, including manual and automated testing. The latter is done using third-party integrations.



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-test-case-template-in-jira">What is the test case template in Jira?</h3>



In Jira, a test case template serves as a predefined structure or blueprint for creating test cases with consistent formatting and information. This template includes standard sections, fields, and steps that testers can use as a starting point when designing test cases.Particularly, a <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-template/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test case template</a> in Jira would be a new issue type that we created in this blog in one of the sections.

How to Write and Manage Test Cases for Jira

How to Write and Manage Test Cases for Jira?

How to Write Test Cases for WhatsApp with Examples

How to Write Test Cases For Email Field and Email Validation

Gmail, a popular email service by Google, has nearly 2 billion users worldwide. The application allows all its users to communicate with each other over emails; they can log into the system, compose fresh emails, keep track of the received emails in the box, and do so much more. Thus, when approximately 22% of the world’s population uses a diverse set of features every day, any malfunction or crash would be catastrophic for all of them. Testing is necessary in this case.



&nbsp;In this comprehensive guide, we&#8217;ll explore test cases for Gmail, covering login, sign-up, inbox, and compose functionalities.



Statistics source: <a href="https://www.demandsage.com/gmail-statistics/#:~:text=Gmail%20has%20over%201.8%20billion%20active%20users%20as%20of%202023,population%20uses%20Google's%20mail%20service." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Demand Sage</a>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_are_Test_Cases_for_Gmail">1 What are Test Cases for Gmail?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Test_Gmail_8211_Explained_with_Examples">2 How to Test Gmail &#8211; Explained with Examples</a><ul><li><a href="#Manual">2.1 Manual</a></li><li><a href="#Automation">2.2 Automation</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Test_Scenarios_For_Gmail_Login_Page">3 Test Scenarios For Gmail Login Page</a></li><li><a href="#Gmail_Sign-Up_Test_Cases">4 Gmail Sign-Up Test Cases</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Case_for_Gmail_Inbox_Functionality">5 Test Case for Gmail – Inbox Functionality</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Cases_for_Gmail_Compose_Mail_Functionality">6 Test Cases for Gmail – Compose Mail Functionality</a></li><li><a href="#Negative_Test_Cases_For_Gmail">7 Negative Test Cases For Gmail</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">8 Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">9 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#How_to_write_a_Gmail_test_case_manually">9.1 How to write a Gmail test case manually?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_write_test_cases_for_the_Gmail_login_page">9.2 How to write test cases for the Gmail login page?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-are-test-cases-for-gmail">What are Test Cases for Gmail?</h2>



Before we delve into the specifics, let&#8217;s clarify what test cases are and why they are crucial for Gmail.



Test cases are a set of conditions, requirements, or steps that testers follow to evaluate the functionality of a software application. Testers can create and run <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/test-cases-for-manual-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">manual test cases</a> or take the help of automation tools to execute automated scripts.



In the context of Gmail, test cases help ensure that the platform is bug-free, user-friendly, and capable of performing its intended tasks effectively. This blog will cover four major features of Gmail and list the <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases</a> pertaining to them.



<h2 id="h-how-to-test-gmail-explained-with-examples">How to Test Gmail &#8211; Explained with Examples</h2>



As mentioned above, testing involves a variety of approaches, including manual and automated testing. The same is true for Gmail as well. Let&#8217;s break down each approach.



<h3 id="h-manual">Manual</h3>



Manual testing is the process of executing test cases by a human tester without the use of automation tools. It is valuable for assessing the user-friendliness and real-life performance of Gmail. The process involves identifying the possible areas to test and creating test cases accordingly. Let’s look at an example:



Test Scenario: Email Reception



Objective: To validate the correct reception of emails in the Gmail inbox.



Test Steps:



<ul><li>Open the Gmail login page and enter valid credentials.</li><li>Access the inbox.</li><li>Send an email to the Gmail address from another email account.</li><li>Return to the Gmail inbox and check for the received email.</li></ul>



Expected Result: The email sent from the alternate account should appear in the Gmail inbox without delays or issues. This test verifies that Gmail correctly receives and displays incoming emails as expected.



Read More on <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-cases-for-email/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test cases for Email</a>



<h3 id="h-automation">Automation</h3>



Automation testing involves the use of testing tools and scripts to automate the execution of test cases. This approach is efficient for repetitive tasks and regression testing.



Test Scenario: Email Reception



Objective: To validate the correct reception of emails in the Gmail inbox using automated testing with Testsigma.



Test Steps:



<ul><li>Log in to Testsigma and create a test case for Gmail email reception.</li></ul> 



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/WxQRNjwSHwdm7csZ7xgDRMnZdoKoH4gAUdRbwaBurKzFLCJCdf5svMUlTYgaw4T3x1HGslpeXD9W0WNtgHM-1_VBkT0B4RWtJalkT8MQJ_dVvDHD4w51M7X7VlOJv-VOmu3QAqn7ledBQZyP86yY-qo" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" /></figure>



 <ul><li>Set up preconditions, such as launching the browser and navigating to the Gmail login page.</li><li>Use Testsigma&#8217;s scripting capabilities that consist of pre-defined NLPs to automate the login process with valid credentials.</li></ul> 



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/VxFJHQK4h6-xU8eDHMB88zkDi4IAXj8hE2bf-ANzFvk3ZzGu8AQSqoJ0dJh4tKvXJYFFxLgH98fwVV9PFDTvomdpKVP3vKSDx-KK7i5_Z3esZ63Fli8fr2x3pd-yCDIOmQsNzRgPVJhgRCqq2TkSFPM" alt="Testsigma - Test automation platform" /></figure>



 <ul><li>Access the Gmail inbox, compose an email, and hit send to another Gmail address.</li><li>Utilize Testsigma&#8217;s features to check for the received email in the Gmail inbox.</li><li>Verify that the email is received in the other Gmail account.</li></ul>



Expected Result: The Testsigma automation script should successfully execute the test steps, and the received email should be visible in the Gmail inbox without delays or issues. Automation with Testsigma ensures accurate and efficient testing of Gmail&#8217;s email reception functionality.



Further reading: Learn how to create <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-cases-for-registration-page/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases for the registration page</a>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, from the same place, 10x faster with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-test-scenarios-for-gmail-login-page">Test Scenarios For Gmail Login Page</h2>



The login page of Gmail consists of multiple test scenarios that you need to verify before moving on to testing the inbox and compose functionalities. Similar to any other login feature, the Gmail login function includes a username field, a password field, a forgot password option, and a Submit button. Here are some of the important test scenarios for Gmail login:



<ul><li>Test Scenario: Valid Login</li></ul>



Objective: To verify that valid user credentials grant access to the Gmail account.



Steps:



a. Open the Gmail login page.



b. Enter a valid email address.



c. Enter a valid password.



d. Click the &#8220;Sign In&#8221; button.



Expected Result: The user successfully logs into the Gmail account.



<ul><li>Test Scenario: Invalid Login</li></ul>



Objective: To ensure that entering invalid user credentials results in login failure.



Steps:



a. Open the Gmail login page.



b. Enter an invalid email address.



c. Enter an invalid password.



d. Click the &#8220;Sign In&#8221; button.



Expected Result: The user fails to log in, and an error message is displayed.



<ul><li>Test Scenario: Forgotten Password</li></ul>



Objective: To test the &#8220;Forgot Password&#8221; feature.



Steps:



a. Open the Gmail login page.



b. Click the &#8220;Forgot Password&#8221; link.



c. Enter the registered recovery email.



d. Follow the password reset process.



Expected Result: The user receives instructions to reset the password via the recovery email.



<h2 id="h-gmail-sign-up-test-cases">Gmail Sign-Up Test Cases</h2>



Let’s look at the common test cases for the Gmail sign-up functionality. All of these will have their own test steps and expected results:



<ul><li>Verify a user can successfully create a new Gmail account.</li><li>Ensure the system rejects duplicate email addresses during sign-up.</li><li>Validate that Gmail enforces password strength requirements.</li><li>Confirm that usernames are unique across the Gmail platform.</li><li>Verify a valid mobile number can be associated with a Gmail account.</li><li>Ensure users must pass a CAPTCHA test during the sign-up process.</li><li>Verify that a valid birthdate is required during sign-up.</li><li>Ensure users can upload a profile picture during sign-up.</li><li>Verify users must accept Gmail&#8217;s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy during sign-up.</li><li>Ensure users can customize their Gmail email address.</li><li>Verify users receive a verification code on their mobile number.</li><li>Confirm that two-factor authentication can be enabled during sign-up.</li><li>Ensure users can set up security questions for account recovery.</li><li>Verify users can provide optional profile information during sign-up.</li><li>Ensure users can select their preferred language during sign-up.</li><li>Verify the sign-up process complies with accessibility standards for users with disabilities.</li><li>Verify that the sign-up process provides clear error messages for incomplete or incorrect information.</li><li>Ensure the system enforces email address uniqueness even for variations like capitalization (e.g., &#8220;example@gmail.com&#8221; and &#8220;Example@gmail.com&#8221;).</li><li>Verify that the Gmail sign-up process supports multiple <a href="https://www.mycountrymobile.com/blog/international-phone-number-format/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">international phone number</a> formats, ensuring users can register with different country codes seamlessly.</li></ul>



Also, read the blog on creating <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-cases-for-mobile-application/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test cases for the mobile application</a>



<h2 id="h-test-case-for-gmail-inbox-functionality">Test Case for Gmail – Inbox Functionality</h2>



Now, let’s look at the test cases for Gmail’s Inbox functionality:



<ul><li>Confirm emails sent to the Gmail address appear in the inbox.</li> <li>Verify the Gmail inbox correctly organizes and displays received emails.</li><li>Ensure that unread emails are highlighted in the inbox.</li> <li>Verify that the Gmail inbox updates in real time to display new emails.</li> <li>Confirm the inbox allows the user to search for specific emails using keywords.</li> <li>Ensure that the inbox supports advanced search filters and operators.</li><li>Verify that the user can move emails to different folders or labels.</li> <li>Confirm that emails with attachments display attachment icons in the inbox.</li> <li>Verify that starred or flagged emails are visually marked in the inbox.</li> <li>Ensure that archived emails are moved out of the inbox.</li> <li>Verify the inbox&#8217;s functionality to mark emails as read or unread.</li> <li>Ensure the inbox supports bulk actions like deleting, archiving, or moving multiple emails.</li> <li>Verify the functionality of the &#8220;Primary,&#8221; &#8220;Social,&#8221; &#8220;Promotions,&#8221; and other categorized tabs.</li> <li>Confirm that the inbox supports a conversation view for email threads.</li><li>Ensure that the &#8220;Important&#8221; label highlights critical emails in the inbox.</li> <li>Verify that users can customize inbox display settings.</li> <li>Confirm the functionality of the &#8220;Snooze&#8221; feature for emails.</li> <li>Ensure that the &#8220;Mark as Spam&#8221; option effectively moves unwanted emails to the spam folder.</li> <li>Verify the inbox&#8217;s responsiveness to various screen sizes and devices.</li> <li>Check if the user can delete the email from the inbox, which is then moved to the Spam folder.</li> <li>Verify that the correct pagination option exists.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-test-cases-for-gmail-compose-mail-functionality">Test Cases for Gmail – Compose Mail Functionality</h2>



Here are the test cases for composing email functionality for Gmail:



<ul><li>Check if the Compose button is available and clickable.</li> <li>Ensure users can create and send a new email successfully.</li> <li>Verify that the email&#8217;s subject, body, and recipient fields function as expected.</li> <li>Confirm that users can add multiple recipients to an email.</li> <li>Verify that Gmail supports CC (carbon copy) and BCC (blind carbon copy) functionality.</li> <li>Ensure that attachments can be added to an email and are received correctly.</li> <li>Confirm that Gmail provides a rich text editor for email formatting.</li> <li>Verify the functionality of inserting hyperlinks in the email&#8217;s body.</li> <li>Ensure that users can add and format bullet points and numbered lists in emails.</li> <li>Verify the email&#8217;s draft-saving functionality for unfinished emails.</li> <li>Confirm that users can schedule email delivery at a specific time.</li> <li>Ensure that the &#8220;Undo&#8221; feature works for recent email actions.</li> <li>Verify the ability to customize the sender&#8217;s email address and name.</li> <li>Confirm that Gmail accurately counts characters and words in the email.</li> <li>Ensure that the email&#8217;s &#8220;Send&#8221; button functions reliably.</li> <li>Verify the compatibility of the email composer across different web browsers.</li> <li>Confirm that Gmail&#8217;s &#8220;Formatting Options&#8221; provide various text formatting features.</li> <li>Ensure that the &#8220;Drafts&#8221; folder correctly stores unfinished email compositions.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-negative-test-cases-for-gmail">Negative Test Cases For Gmail</h2>



Individually, different functions of Gmail have their own test cases. And all of those functions also have a set of negative test cases. Here, we list some of the negative test cases for Gmail functions:



<ul><li>Attempt to log in with an empty email address field.</li> <li>Try logging in with an empty password field.</li> <li>Use an email address that does not have the &#8220;@&#8221; symbol.</li> <li>Enter a password with fewer than the required characters.</li> <li>Provide an incorrect email format, such as &#8220;username@domain.&#8221;</li> <li>Use an email address that does not exist.</li><li>Enter an incorrect password for a valid email address.</li> <li>Try to log in with a deactivated or suspended account.</li> <li>Use special characters in the email address or password.</li> <li>Exceed the maximum character limit for the email address or password.</li> <li>Enter spaces before or after the email address or password.</li> <li>Use different capitalization in the email address (e.g., &#8220;example@gmail.com&#8221; and &#8220;Example@gmail.com&#8221;).</li> <li>Attempt to send an email without any recipient.</li><li>Attach a file with an unsupported format for emails.</li> <li>Attempt to schedule an email for delivery in the past.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-conclusion">Conclusion</h2>



Gmail is a widely used email facility by billions of people around the world. Clearly, a proper testing process in place is a necessity; it is likely that even one defect can turn into a huge disaster when the client base is vast and spread worldwide. The many features of Gmail have multiple test scenarios and test cases, which we have tried to list in this blog. Take your reference from the mentioned test cases for Gmail before you begin verifying the functions for your corporate use.



Many automated test tools, such as Testsigma, support automating these test cases with ease. You can perform automated web testing along with mobile and API without writing any code.



 <button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/request-demo" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Elevate your testing efforts with Testsigma by 5x; Book a demo today!</a></button> 



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="h-how-to-write-a-gmail-test-case-manually">How to write a Gmail test case manually?</h3>



To write a Gmail test case manually, testers need to focus on understanding the requirements and identifying different test scenarios. Here are the sequential steps you can follow:



<ul><li>List Preconditions</li><li>Define Test Steps</li><li>Specify Expected Results</li><li>Provide Test Data</li><li>Mention Test Environment</li><li>Assign Test ID and Title</li><li>Set Priority and Severity</li><li>Final Review</li><li>Execution</li><li>Reporting</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-how-to-write-test-cases-for-the-gmail-login-page">How to write test cases for the Gmail login page?</h3>



To write test cases for the Login page of Gmail, you have to gather the information about the feature and list down all the possible test scenarios, both positive and negative. Once you have identified the test scenarios, either manually start writing the steps or create a script that does the testing for you using a tool.

Test Cases for Gmail - For Login, Sign Up, Inbox Functionalities