Top 15 Saucelabs Alternatives List to Look For

Sauce Labs is a tool for automated testing of web and mobile applications across different browsers, OS, and devices. It provides a lot of benefits for software quality assurance. However, it also has several issues that discourage testing teams. So they tend to find Saucelabs alternatives that go along with the new technologies as well. 

In this article, we are going to discuss the pros and cons of Sauce Labs, fifteen alternatives, and how to choose a proper Sauce Labs alternative.

What is Sauce Labs?

Sauce Labs is a cloud-based testing tool that supports both desktop, web, and mobile application testing. It is one of the most popular testing tools among QA engineers because of its parallel testing capabilities, cross-device and cross-browser testing functionalities, and proper error reporting and analysis features.

Saucelabs Alternatives Comparison Table

Tool	Platform Supported	Scriptless/Script-based	Environment Support	API Monitoring	CLI	Collaboration	API Development	Pricing
Sauce Labs	Web-based, Mobile	Scriptless	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Testsigma	Web-based	Scriptless	Web,Desktop, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
BrowserStack	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
TestComplete	Windows, Web, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Desktop, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Perfecto	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
LambdaTest	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Ranorex Studio	Windows	Scriptless, Script-based	Desktop, Web, Mobile	No	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Kobiton	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
TestGrid.io	Web-based, Mobile	Scriptless, Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
AWS Device Farm	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Paid
Selenium	Web-based	Scriptless, Script-based	Web	No	Yes	Yes	No	Free
Applause	Web-based, Mobile	Scriptless	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Paid
CrossBrowserTesting	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
HeadSpin	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Paid
pCloudy	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Experitest	Web-based, Mobile	Script-based	Web, Mobile	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Subscription
Testim	Web-based, Mobile	Scriptless,	Web, Mobile	yes	Yes	Yes	No	Free, Subscription

Top 15 Saucelabs Alternatives

Here, we are going to discuss fifteen Saucelabs alternatives with their special features, benefits, and disadvantages. Other than that, we will be comparing those tools with Testsigma as well.

Testsigma

Testsigma is a scriptless tool that can be used for web, mobile, and API testing. It can be easily used by new testers because you do not need to have much coding experience to work with. Other than that, it uses AI to detect changes in the testing applications making testers’ lives easier. Testsigma can be easily integrated with CI/CD pipelines and it has features like real-time test analysis. In Testsigma you can select a subscription plan based on your needs. Therefore it makes Testsigma a cost-effective option for test automation.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack supports over 2000 devices and various browsers, and it provides real-time logs for debugging purposes. It is very easy to integrate the tool with existing CI/CD pipelines. However, BrowserStack’s scriptless test capabilities are very limited, and complex testing can become quite expensive. BrowserStack is based on test scripts and it mostly supports real-device testing.

TestComplete

TestComplete is a script-based testing tool that supports web, mobile, and desktop testing. It is easier for the testers to integrate this tool with CI/CD pipelines and other test management platforms. It has a special AI-based object recognition which supports object capturing. However, the desktop version of the application uses more resources and when it is compared to most other testing tools this tool has a larger learning curve. When it comes to pricing, some pricing models in the TestComplete are quite expensive. Therefore if you are a non-developer, Testsigma gives you better options than TestComplete.

Perfecto

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing tool that can be used on real devices and browsers. It supports both manual and automated testing while delivering AI-based test analysis and real-time debugging features. Strong CI/CD integration features and great test reporting skills are its most valuable benefits. However, Perfecto has limited support when testers perform scriptless testing. Also, its cost can be high depending on the complexity of the testing tasks. 

LambdaTest

LambdaTest is a manual and automation testing tool that became popular recently among testers because of its cross-browser testing capabilities. It has better CI/CD pipeline integration capabilities compared to most other testing tools. Its prices are very affordable for smaller software development teams. However, it doesn’t support real-device testing and it has certain performance issues when it comes to test scenarios with high complexity. Compared to LambdaTest, Testsigma offers smoother support with different testing environments. Testsigma’s API monitoring features are also considerably better.

Ranorex Studio

Ranorex Studio supports web, mobile, and even desktop application testing with the help of its test automation capabilities. It offers a special feature with its drag-and-drop user interface which allows testers to avoid writing a huge code base. Additionally, the tool captures UI elements more easily compared to other testing tools. However, the Ranorex Studio desktop application uses more resources which can lead to frequent system crashes. Testsigma is more user-friendly for non-developers than Ranorex Studio. However, it is more expensive because it supports multiple platforms.

Kobiton

Kobiton is an AI-based no-code automation tool that helps with cloud-based mobile device testing. It has features such as real-time logs, video recording, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. However, it does not have many capabilities when it comes to web application testing since it is more focused on mobile application testing. Kobiton can become quite costly when testing more complex scenarios. While both Kobiton and Testsigma are scriptless testing tools, Testsigma offers more support for different platforms. Testsigma has more collaboration features too.

TestGrid.io

TestGrid.io is a web and mobile testing tool that offers both no-code and automation script-based testing features. Its main advantages include AI-based test reporting features and having an affordable price range. As it continues to expand its support for devices and browsers, it may have performance issues, especially with large test suites. Tools like Testsigma may outperform TestGrid but are far more expensive.

AWS Device Farm

AWS Device Farm helps you conduct cloud-based testing with access to real mobile devices and can be easily integrated with other AWS services. One of the major benefits of this tool is its real-time logs, screenshots, and video recording facilities. Since this mainly focuses on mobile testing, its web testing support is very limited. One disadvantage of the tool is that its cost can be increased with the complexity of the testing tasks. Unlike Testsigma, the AWS Device Farm tool is script-based and it only supports mobile testing. But Testsigma supports both mobile and web application testing.

Selenium

Selenium is the most popular open-source web application testing framework among testers. It is a script-based testing framework that has a large community support with proper documentation. Selenium is well-known for its flexibility and it has a huge learning curve for non-developers. Also, it requires additional tools such as Appium to support mobile and desktop application testing. Compared to Selenium, Testsigma offers several advantages such as being no-code, user-friendly, and having a short learning curve.

Read here – Saucelabs vs Selenium

Applause

Applause helps testers perform manual and automated testing on real-world devices and environments. It focuses more on functional, usability, and accessibility testing. The tool offers benefits such as customizable test cycles, detailed reporting facilities, human feedback on usability testing, etc. Even though this tool supports both manual and automation testing, it has limited automation capabilities. Its cost is relatively high since you can get feedback from professional testers. Unlike Testsigma, Applause can be used for exploratory testing in addition to other testing methods.

CrossBrowserTesting

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based tool that supports a wide range of browsers and devices in manual and automated testing. It includes local testing and debugging tools with screen-capturing features. However, users have frequently reported performance issues with this tool. Testsigma is more user-friendly than CrossBrowserTesting. However, CrossBrowserTesting supports more browsers and devices.

HeadSpin

HeadSpin supports mobile and IoT testing. It supports features such as video recording, detailed logs, and performance metrics. It is particularly well known for its AI-based analyses of test optimization and problem detection. However, this tool is quite complex for newcomers in the software testing industry. Compared to Testsigma, HeadSpin is more focused on real-device testing and performance testing.

pCloudy

pCloudy is an AI and cloud-based mobile application testing platform that has detailed reporting features. It includes video recordings and screenshots. Also, it can be integrated easily with CI/CD pipelines. Its support for web applications is quite limited. The cost of pCloudy increases with the size of the testing device pool.  Compared to this tool, Testsigma offers broader support, covering both web and mobile testing, rather than being limited to mobile testing alone.

Experitest

With Experitest, testers can perform mobile and web application testing on real devices. It supports features such as real-time logs, screenshots, and video recording capabilities. Its AI-based analysis helps to optimize test cases and detect bugs. But comparatively, its cost is higher when it comes to larger testing teams and the tool is a bit complex for non-developers. Although both tools use AI for testing, Testsigma focuses on automation and is also known for being budget-friendly.

Testim

Testim is an AI-driven test automation platform used to aid teams in building, running, and overseeing tests for web applications. It supports both script-based and codeless testing. This allows users to record tests and later insert JavaScript code. Testim minimizes maintenance efforts by using artificial intelligence to detect changes in the user interface. The tool integrates with CI/CD pipelines and allows parallel test execution and version control. Although Testim can be configured easily, it targets more advanced testers who require flexibility in creating complex test scenarios.

Why Sauce Labs?

Sauce labs is popular due to several reasons. It has device and browser testing capabilities, as well as parallel testing features that allow testers to complete their tests faster. Also, it provides better test execution reports and helps to identify bugs and issues effectively.

Why look for Saucelabs Alternatives?

Even though Sauce Labs is a very popular tool, software testing teams look for Saucelabs alternatives due to various factors. Most of the teams consider budget constraints, special project needs, performance needs, etc. They may also consider test management needs, bug reporting capabilities, and other additional features.

What are the Major Drawbacks of Sauce Labs?

One of the major drawbacks of Sauce Labs is its high cost. This discourages a lot of small and medium software testing teams. Additionally, some users report performance issues with the tool, and new users may face a steep learning curve. Test executions can also be affected by network issues due to it being a cloud-based solution.

How to Choose the Best Alternatives to Saucelabs?

When choosing the best alternatives to Saucelabs, you can consider factors such as your target testing platform, device and browser coverage, CI/CD integration capabilities, your project nature, and especially the budget. You will be able to find the most suitable Saucelabs alternatives that match your requirements.

Which is the Best Sauce Labs Alternative?

When looking for an alternative to Sauce Labs, there are several reliable options available that offer similar features. These alternatives can improve test coverage and provide support for cross-browser testing, accessibility testing, and test management. Your choice depends on specific testing needs, such as how hard it is to integrate, platform support, and user interface preferences. Many software testers consider these alternatives to be trustworthy for executing and managing tests effectively.

Conclusion

Sauce Labs can be considered one of the best software testing tools. However, even the best testing tool has its issues. This is why software testing teams search for Saucelabs alternatives. 

There are a lot of Saucelabs alternatives that have unique features and benefits. However, they also have several disadvantages as well. It is very important to choose the best Saucelabs alternatives considering your project’s nature, requirements, and testing needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sauce Labs Visual testing flaky?

Even though Sauce Labs has a lot of features, sometimes it has a flakiness especially when it comes to dynamic application content and layout changes. While these issues do not affect the core functionalities, they can still result in errors and bugs.

This can be simply prevented by excluding specific testing elements.

Is Sauce Labs Visual fast?

One of Sauce Labs Visual’s best features is its speed. However, its speed can be dependent on the complexity of the testing application. However, when it comes to applications with complex graphics, it may take much longer. So it is important to configure the testing tool with the application using the most suitable settings and configurations.

Can we migrate test data from Sauce Labs to Testsigma?

Migrating test data from Sauce Labs to Testsigma can be done but it requires custom scripts as both testing tools use different structures for their test cases.  During the migration, you may have to export test data from Sauce Labs, match it with Testsigma’s format, and import it. Other than that, you may have to reconfigure the testing tool as well.