Defect Management in Software Testing What it is, Pros & Cons

Defect Management in Software Testing | What it is, Pros & Cons


<p id="h-imagine-your-application-is-like-a-bustling-metropolis-with-vast-numbers-of-users-navigating-its-virtual-streets-and-alleys-how-do-you-ensure-that-your-digital-city-can-withstand-the-ever-growing-traffic-and-unexpected-surges-that-is-where-load-testing-and-stress-testing-come-into-play-are-they-different-yes-let-s-talk-about-load-testing-vs-stress-testing">Imagine your application is like a bustling metropolis, with vast numbers of users navigating its virtual streets and alleys. How do you ensure that your digital city can withstand the ever-growing traffic and unexpected surges? That is where load testing and stress testing come into play. Are they different? Yes! Let&#8217;s talk about load testing vs stress testing.</p>



<p>Often, these terms intertwine, creating a sense of confusion in the testing realm. Fret not. In this blog, we will unravel the key differences between load and stress testing and how they are crucial for the performance testing of software applications.</p>



<p>Load testing and stress testing are two indispensable facets of performance testing, both pivotal in ensuring that applications can withstand real-world demands. While they may seem similar, they serve distinct purposes in ensuring the reliability and performance of applications.&nbsp;</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Difference_between_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Difference between Load Testing and Stress Testing</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_Load_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is Load Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_Stress_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is Stress Testing?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Load_Testing_Vs_Stress_Testingnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Load Testing Vs Stress Testing&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#What_are_the_Best_Practices_for_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> What are the Best Practices for Load Testing and Stress Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Top_10_Key_Differences_Between_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Top 10 Key Differences Between Load Testing and Stress Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Tools_for_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Tools for Load Testing and Stress Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#1_What_is_the_difference_between_load_testing_and_reliability_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.1</span> 1. What is the difference between load testing and reliability testing?</a></li><li><a href="#2_What_is_a_stress_test_in_load_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.2</span> 2. What is a stress test in load testing?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="difference-between-load-testing-and-stress-testing"><span id="Difference_between_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><strong>Difference between Load Testing and Stress Testing</strong></span></h2>



<p>In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of load testing and stress testing, uncovering their fundamental differences and shedding light on how they contribute uniquely to refining software performance.</p>



<h3 id="what-is-load-testing"><span id="What_is_Load_Testing"><strong><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/load-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What is Load Testing?</a></strong></span></h3>



<p>Load testing is a type of <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/performance-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>performance testing</strong></a> that focuses on the behaviour and responsiveness of an application under normal load conditions. It simulates the expected workload on the application, such as the number of concurrent users or transactions, to evaluate its performance metrics. </p>



<p>Load Testing helps you gauge the breaking point where performance remains optimal, and user experience doesn&#8217;t take a hit. It helps identify performance bottlenecks, uncover any inefficiencies, and ensure that the application can handle the projected load without compromising its speed, stability, or user experience.</p>



<h3 id="what-is-stress-testing"><span id="What_is_Stress_Testing"><strong><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/software-stress-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What is Stress Testing?</a></strong></span></h3>



<p>Stress testing is another fundamental performance testing technique aimed at assessing an application&#8217;s robustness and reliability under extreme and challenging conditions.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Unlike load testing, stress testing pushes an application beyond its normal load conditions.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The primary objective of stress testing is to identify the breaking point of the system, understand how it behaves under extreme stress, and evaluate its ability to recover gracefully from any failures or crashes.&nbsp;</p>



<p>This type of testing helps uncover vulnerabilities, bottlenecks, and weaknesses in the application&#8217;s architecture, enabling developers to fortify the system and enhance its overall performance and stability.</p>



<h2 id="load-testing-vs-stress-testing"><span id="Load_Testing_Vs_Stress_Testingnbsp"><strong>Load Testing Vs Stress Testing&nbsp;</strong></span></h2>



<p>Load testing is primarily focused on assessing the performance of a system under anticipated or typical user loads. The primary objective is to ensure that the system functions smoothly and efficiently under regular, expected conditions. Think of it as evaluating how well your car runs during everyday city driving or highway cruising.&nbsp; Load testing helps answer questions like:</p>



<ul><li>Can the application handle the expected number of users without slowing down?</li><li>Is the system responsive under typical user interactions?</li><li>Are the response times within acceptable limits under normal usage?</li></ul>



<p>In essence, load testing assures that your application will perform adequately when it encounters the expected traffic load, ensuring a good user experience under usual circumstances.</p>



<p>On the flip side, stress testing is all about pushing the system to its limits and beyond. The main aim here is to evaluate how well the system copes with extreme and adverse conditions that exceed its standard operational boundaries. Imagine testing how your car handles the harshest off-road terrain or extreme weather conditions. Stress testing seeks answers to critical questions such as:</p>



<ul><li>What happens when the system faces an unexpected surge in user traffic?</li><li>How does the application behave when hardware components fail unexpectedly?</li><li>Can the system recover gracefully from sudden and intense stress?</li></ul>



<p>Stress testing goes beyond everyday scenarios to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses that could lead to system failures under exceptional circumstances. It&#8217;s like stress-testing a bridge to ensure it can withstand the most severe earthquakes or storms.</p>



<h2 id="what-are-the-best-practices-for-load-testing-and-stress-testing"><span id="What_are_the_Best_Practices_for_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><strong>What are the Best Practices for Load Testing and Stress Testing?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Some of the best practices for load and stress testing, or any type of performance testing, are as follows,</p>



<ul><li>Always begin with a performance baseline. A solid baseline is crucial to identify and measure performance bottlenecks for improvements or declines over time.</li><li>Prioritize your performance tests since covering every user workflow is impractical, given the various types available. Focus on the most essential workflows initially.</li><li>Integrate performance testing into your CI/CD pipeline. Run performance tests as part of continuous integration and deployment to ensure continuous testing. Ad hoc approaches are rarely effective in practice.</li><li>Allocate time for addressing any performance issues. Performing performance tests in the early stages of development allows much time for fixing issues before the product goes to production. Implementing a shift left approach has a remarkable impact on testing.</li></ul>



<h2 id="top-10-key-differences-between-load-testing-and-stress-testing"><span id="Top_10_Key_Differences_Between_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><strong>Top 10 Key Differences Between Load Testing and Stress Testing</strong></span></h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Difference</strong></td><td><strong>Load Testing</strong></td><td><strong>Stress Testing</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Definition</td><td>Evaluates system behavior under expected normal load.</td><td>Tests the system&#8217;s robustness under extreme conditions.</td></tr><tr><td>Purpose</td><td>Identify performance bottlenecks and optimize resources.</td><td>Discover the system&#8217;s breaking point and assess recovery.</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/the-different-software-testing-types-explained/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Type of Testing</a></td><td>Sub-category of <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/performance-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">performance testing</a></td><td>Sub-category of performance testing</td></tr><tr><td>Testing Attributes</td><td>Focuses on response times, throughput, and resource use.</td><td>Emphasizes system stability, scalability, and recovery.</td></tr><tr><td>Limit</td><td>Operates within expected operational parameters.</td><td>Pushes the system beyond its normal operational limits.</td></tr><tr><td>Advantages</td><td>&#8211; Helps identify performance bottlenecks and allows for optimization of system resources, resulting in better application performance.<br>&#8211; It enables the early detection of performance-related issues, allowing for preemptive fixes before they impact users.<br>&#8211;  Load testing helps assess how well an application can scale with increased user loads, aiding in capacity planning.<br>&#8211; It confirms that the application can handle expected user loads without crashing or experiencing excessive delays.<br>&#8211; By ensuring efficient response times, load testing enhances the overall user experience.</td><td>&#8211; Stress testing uncovers vulnerabilities that may not be apparent under normal conditions, helping to fortify the application against unexpected events.<br>&#8211; It assesses how well the system can recover from adverse situations, improving its overall robustness.<br>&#8211; Stress tests can validate the effectiveness of failover mechanisms, ensuring minimal downtime during critical events.<br>&#8211; It evaluates the system&#8217;s ability to recover and maintain data integrity after sudden interruptions or failures.<br>&#8211; Stress testing often reveals critical issues that could lead to system failures or data corruption.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="tools-for-load-testing-and-stress-testing"><span id="Tools_for_Load_Testing_and_Stress_Testing"><strong>Tools for Load Testing and Stress Testing</strong></span></h2>



<p>Load testing and stress testing are critical activities in software testing that help ensure the performance and stability of applications under different conditions. To conduct these tests effectively, you&#8217;ll need the right tools. Here are some popular tools for load testing and stress testing: </p>



<p><strong>1. Apache JMeter: </strong>Apache JMeter is an open-source tool that can perform load testing on a variety of applications, servers, and protocols. It allows software testers to simulate a heavy load on a server, network, or object to analyze overall performance under different conditions. Apache JMeter supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>2. LoadRunner: </strong>&nbsp;LoadRunner, developed by Micro Focus, is a powerful tool for performance testing. It supports a wide range of protocols and can simulate thousands of virtual users to test your application&#8217;s scalability and performance. LoadRunner supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>3. Gatling: </strong>Gatling is an open-source, highly customizable load testing tool. It is particularly well-suited for testing asynchronous scenarios and can generate detailed reports to help you analyze performance bottlenecks. Gatling supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>4. BlazeMeter: </strong>BlazeMeter is a cloud-based load-testing platform that allows users to create and execute tests easily. It integrates with various <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/ci-cd-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CI/CD tools </a>and provides real-time reporting and analytics. BlazeMeter supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>5. Neoload: </strong>Neoload is a user-friendly tool for performance testing. It supports a wide range of technologies, including mobile and IoT, and offers features like <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-design/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test design</a>, <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-maintenance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test maintenance</a>, and performance analysis. Neoload supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>6. Locust:&nbsp; </strong>Locust is an open-source load testing tool that allows you to write test scenarios in Python. It&#8217;s easy to set up and can simulate thousands of users. It focuses on simplicity and scalability. Locust supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>7. WebLOAD: </strong>WebLOAD is a load testing tool designed for web and mobile applications. It offers a wide range of testing capabilities, including peak load testing and <a href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">continuous testing</a>. WebLOAD supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>8. Artillery: </strong>Artillery is an open-source, modern, and flexible load testing toolkit. It&#8217;s suitable for testing both HTTP and WebSocket applications and is scriptable using JavaScript. Artillery supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>9. LoadUI:</strong><strong> </strong>LoadUI is a load testing tool by SmartBear that focuses on ease of use. It allows you to create complex load tests through a graphical interface. LoadUI supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p><strong>10. Tsung: </strong>Tsung is an open-source, distributed load testing tool. It&#8217;s suitable for testing various protocols and is known for its scalability. Tsung supports both load testing and stress testing.</p>



<p>Read more here about <a href="https://testsigma.com/tools/load-testing-tools/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Load Testing Tools.</a></p>



<h2 id="conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>In conclusion, load testing and stress testing are both essential components of performance testing, but they serve different purposes and involve distinct testing approaches. Load testing ensures that a system can handle its expected user load efficiently, while stress testing pushes the system beyond its limits to uncover vulnerabilities. Choosing the right <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_strategy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing strategy</a>, tools, and techniques depends on the specific goals of your testing process and the characteristics of your application.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="1-what-is-the-difference-between-load-testing-and-reliability-testing"><span id="1_What_is_the_difference_between_load_testing_and_reliability_testing"><strong>1. What is the difference between load testing and <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/reliability-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reliability testing</a>?</strong></span></h3>



<p>Load testing focuses on evaluating the system&#8217;s performance under expected user loads to ensure efficiency and responsiveness. Reliability testing, on the other hand, evaluates a system&#8217;s capacity to sustain its functionality and availability over an extended period of time, generally by putting it through continuous or long-duration tests. They both attempt to increase system quality, but their scopes and goals are distinct.</p>



<h3 id="2-what-is-a-stress-test-in-load-testing"><span id="2_What_is_a_stress_test_in_load_testing"><strong>2. What is a stress test in load testing?</strong></span></h3>



<p>A stress test, as used in the context of load testing, is a particular scenario in which the system is put under an intense and unexpected demand, pushing it beyond its typical operating conditions. In load testing, a stress test is used to determine how the system responds to challenging situations and whether it can gracefully recover from traffic or resource spikes that are unexpected or unanticipated. In load testing, stress tests are used to evaluate a system&#8217;s robustness and capacity for unforeseen difficulties.</p>


Load Testing vs Stress Testing | Key Differences


<p>When a Tester embarks on the journey of Isolation Testing, they enter a world full of mysteries and surprises. It&#8217;s like exploring a jungle of bugs, glitches, and defects. Here, we&#8217;re talking about the thrilling adventure of a Tester working on isolating the causes of bugs and failures.</p>



<p>So sit back, relax, and enjoy the hilariously suspenseful tale of a Tester on a mission to find bugs and conquer the unknown!</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="607" height="657" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/image-145.png" alt="Perform isolation testing" class="wp-image-34429"/></figure></div>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_an_Isolation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is an Isolation Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Characteristics"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Characteristics</a></li><li><a href="#The_Need_for_Isolation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> The Need for Isolation Testing</a></li><li><a href="#Isolation_testing_in_performance_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Isolation testing in performance testing</a></li><li><a href="#Isolation_testing_in_unit_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Isolation testing in unit testing</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Isolation_in_End-to-End_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Test Isolation in End-to-End Testing​</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Isolation_in_Component_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Test Isolation in Component Testing​</a></li><li><a href="#Advantages"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">8</span> Advantages</a></li><li><a href="#Disadvantages"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">9</span> Disadvantages</a></li><li><a href="#When_to_Perform_Isolation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">10</span> When to Perform Isolation Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_do_Isolation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">11</span> How to do Isolation Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#How_can_test_automation_help_in_Isolation_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">12</span> How can test automation help in Isolation Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Isolation_testing_and_Testsigma"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">13</span> Isolation testing and Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">14</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">15</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_unit_testing_the_same_as_isolation_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">15.1</span> Is unit testing the same as isolation testing?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_isolation_in_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">15.2</span> What is isolation in testing?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-an-isolation-testing"><span id="What_is_an_Isolation_Testing">What is an Isolation Testing?</span></h2>



<p>Isolation testing is a <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a> technique that isolates individual components or units of code from each other to test them independently. This helps to identify and fix defects early in the development process before they can cause problems in other parts of the system.</p>



<p>As Kent Beck, a software engineer and agile advocate, said, &#8220;The best way to find bugs is to isolate them.&#8221; This is because isolation testing can help to narrow down the scope of a defect, making it easier to find and fix.</p>



<p>Testing is a never-ending journey, essential for the quality of any software. By developing our knowledge of testing techniques like isolation testing, we can ensure that our software is free of defects and meets the needs of our users.</p>



<h2 id="h-characteristics"><span id="Characteristics">Characteristics</span></h2>



<p>The characteristics of isolation testing in more detail.</p>



<p><strong>Time-consuming:</strong> Isolation testing is time-consuming because each unit or component must be tested individually. This can be especially time-consuming for large or complex systems.</p>



<p><strong>Stubs and drivers:</strong> Stubs and drivers are software components used to simulate the behavior of external dependencies. This allows the unit or component being tested to be isolated from the rest of the system. Stubs provide the expected input to the unit or component, while drivers collect the output from the unit or component.</p>



<p><strong>Expensive:</strong> Isolation testing can be expensive because it requires the creation of stubs and drivers. Additionally, the cost of isolation testing can increase as the size and complexity of the system increases.</p>



<p><strong>Atomic in nature:</strong> Isolation testing is atomic, meaning that each unit or component is tested independently. This ensures that interactions with other code do not cause defects.</p>



<p><strong>Verifies the output of each one of those interfaces/subsystems precisely:</strong> Isolation testing verifies the output of each unit or component precisely. This ensures that the unit or component is producing the expected results.</p>



<p>Overall, isolation testing is a valuable method to help identify defects early and improve software quality. Yet, knowing the time, cost, and other challenges associated with isolation testing is essential.</p>



<p>Here are some additional tips for conducting isolation testing:</p>



<ul><li>Use a test framework to automate the testing process. This can help to save time and improve efficiency.</li><li>Use a mocking framework to create stubs and drivers. This helps simplify the testing process and improve accuracy.</li><li>Focus on testing the most critical units or components first. This will help ensure the system&#8217;s most essential parts are thoroughly tested.</li><li>Integrate isolation testing into your continuous integration (CI) pipeline. This will help ensure that tests are run frequently, and defects are detected early.</li></ul>



<p>By following these tips, you can conduct isolation testing effectively and efficiently.</p>



<h2 id="h-the-need-for-isolation-testing"><span id="The_Need_for_Isolation_Testing">The Need for Isolation Testing</span></h2>



<p>Isolation testing is essential because it can help identify bugs more quickly, prevent bugs from being introduced into other codes, and improve software performance.&nbsp;</p>



<ol><li><strong>Identifying bugs more easily:</strong> When a specific application unit is tested in isolation, there are fewer variables to consider, making it easier to determine the cause of a bug. This can save time and effort in debugging.</li></ol>



<ol start="2"><li><strong>Preventing bugs from being introduced:</strong> When a particular application unit is tested in isolation, it is less likely to interact with each other unexpectedly, which can lead to bugs. This can improve the overall quality of the software.</li></ol>



<ol start="3"><li><strong>Improving performance:</strong> When a certain application unit is tested in isolation, it can be optimized for efficiency without worrying about how it interacts with other codes. This can improve the performance of the software.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-isolation-testing-in-performance-testing"><span id="Isolation_testing_in_performance_testing">Isolation testing in performance testing</span></h2>



<p>In performance testing, isolation testing is a technique that isolates individual system components or functionalities to evaluate their performance separately. This helps to identify performance bottlenecks, resource utilization problems, or scalability issues within specific components of a complex software system.</p>



<p>By isolating and testing individual elements, performance testers can optimize and fine-tune them for better overall system performance. It also helps to simulate different load conditions and stress testing on specific components to ensure they can handle their designated tasks efficiently.</p>



<p><strong><em>For example</em></strong>, a performance tester might isolate the database server to test its performance under different load conditions. They might also isolate the webserver to test its performance under traffic conditions. By isolating these components, the performance tester can identify any performance bottlenecks and make necessary adjustments to improve performance.</p>



<h2 id="h-isolation-testing-in-unit-testing"><span id="Isolation_testing_in_unit_testing">Isolation testing in unit testing</span></h2>



<p>In unit testing, isolation testing is the practice of testing a single unit or module of code in isolation from the rest of the application. This involves isolating the unit under test from external dependencies, such as databases, web services, or external libraries, using mock objects or stubs.</p>



<p>This approach ensures that any failures or issues detected during testing are specific to the unit being tested, allowing for easier debugging and more robust code development.&nbsp;</p>



<p><strong><em>For example,</em></strong> a unit tester might isolate a function to test its functionality. They might mock out the database dependency so that the function does not connect to the database. This allows the tester to focus on testing the function&#8217;s logic without worrying about the database.</p>



<h2 id="h-test-isolation-in-end-to-end-testing"><span id="Test_Isolation_in_End-to-End_Testing">Test Isolation in End-to-End Testing​</span></h2>



<p>In end-to-end testing, test isolation involves executing tests for individual user journeys or specific functionalities within a complete application workflow. By isolating these tests, testers can independently validate the behavior of specific features, user interactions, or scenarios.</p>



<p>This approach helps identify defects or discrepancies within specific application parts, ensuring they work correctly before testing the entire end-to-end flow. Test isolation in end-to-end testing enhances debugging efficiency and accelerates issues&#8217; identification and resolution.</p>



<p><strong><em>For example,</em></strong> an end-to-end tester might isolate the login functionality to test it independently. They could create a test case that logs in a user and then verifies that the user is logged in. This allows the tester to focus on testing the login functionality without worrying about the rest of the application.</p>



<h2 id="h-test-isolation-in-component-testing"><span id="Test_Isolation_in_Component_Testing">Test Isolation in Component Testing​</span></h2>



<p>In component testing, test isolation focuses on testing individual software components, such as modules, classes, or functions, in isolation from the broader system. This approach ensures that each component functions as intended and adheres to its specifications.</p>



<p>Test isolation in component testing is particularly valuable for verifying the correctness of the components&#8217; algorithms, logic, and data processing. It allows for comprehensive testing of each element&#8217;s functionality independently, contributing to the overall reliability and quality of the software components.</p>



<p><strong><em>For example,</em></strong> a component tester might isolate a class to test its functionality. They might do this by creating a test case that calls the class&#8217;s methods and verifies that they return the expected results. This allows the tester to focus on testing the class&#8217;s functionality without worrying about the rest of the application.</p>



<h2 id="h-advantages"><span id="Advantages">Advantages</span></h2>



<p>There are many advantages to isolation testing, including:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Early defect detection:</strong> Isolation testing can help to identify defects early in the development process before they can cause problems in other parts of the system.</li><li><strong>Improved quality:</strong> Isolation testing can improve the software&#8217;s quality by ensuring each component works correctly.</li><li><strong>Reduced debugging time:</strong> Isolation testing can help reduce debugging time and cost by identifying defects early on.</li><li><strong>Improved reliability:</strong> Isolation testing can help improve the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_reliability_testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software&#8217;s reliability</a> by making it less likely to fail.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-disadvantages"><span id="Disadvantages">Disadvantages</span></h2>



<p>There are also some disadvantages to isolation testing, including:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Can be time-consuming:</strong> Isolation testing can be time-consuming, especially if the software is complex.</li><li><strong>Can be difficult to automate:</strong> Isolation testing can be challenging, making it difficult to scale.</li><li><strong>Can give a false sense of security:</strong> Isolation testing does not test the interactions between components so it can give a false sense of security.</li></ul>



<h2 id="h-when-to-perform-isolation-testing"><span id="When_to_Perform_Isolation_Testing">When to Perform Isolation Testing?</span></h2>



<p>Here is an image that illustrates the concept of performing isolation testing.<br></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/image-146.png" alt="concept of performing isolation testing" class="wp-image-34431" width="669" height="484"/></figure></div>



<h2 id="h-how-to-do-isolation-testing"><span id="How_to_do_Isolation_Testing">How to do Isolation Testing?</span></h2>



<p>Let us look into the steps and know how it is done:</p>



<ol><li><strong>Identify the component to be tested.</strong> Look at the component details &#8211; structure, the dependencies, and the risk of introducing bugs.</li><li><strong>Create test cases.</strong> Design the test cases to test all possible scenarios for the component and all expected behaviors. This can be done using testing techniques such as unit testing, integration testing, and system testing.</li><li><strong>Isolate the units of code.</strong> Use stubs or mocks to simulate the behavior of other units of code or external dependencies. Stubs are dummy objects that provide canned responses, while mocks are objects that can be used to verify the behavior of other objects.</li><li><strong>Run the tests.</strong> Run the tests in a controlled environment to ensure accurate results. This can be done using a test automation framework or running the tests manually.</li><li><strong>Analyze the results.</strong> Interpret the results of the tests to identify any bugs. Fix any bugs found, and rerun the tests to verify that the bugs have been fixed.</li><li><strong>Repeat the process as needed.</strong> Repeat the process as needed. This may be necessary if new code is added to the system, changes to existing code, or new test cases are created.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-how-can-test-automation-help-in-isolation-testing"><span id="How_can_test_automation_help_in_Isolation_Testing">How can <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation</a> help in Isolation Testing?</span></h2>



<p>Test automation can help to isolate bugs by running tests in a controlled environment, separate from other units of code and external dependencies.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p  class="title">Learn more about automated testing</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Here</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-isolation-testing-and-testsigma"><span id="Isolation_testing_and_Testsigma">Isolation testing and Testsigma</span></h2>



<p>Let’s try to understand, with the help of a codeless test automation platform Testsigma &#8211; how it can help in isolation testing:</p>



<p>Testsigma provides related logs, screenshots, videos, and debugging options when a bug is found.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>This information can be used to isolate the bug and its cause further.</li><li>The logs can help to identify the steps that led up to the bug, the screenshots can show the state of the software at the time of the bug, and the videos can show the bug in action.&nbsp;</li><li>The debugging options can be used to step through the test and identify the line of test that is causing the bug.</li></ul>



<p>By providing this information, Testsigma can help testers quickly and easily isolate bugs, saving time and effort in debugging.&nbsp;</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p  class="title">Improve your automated isolation testing efforts with Testsigma</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Check out Testsigma</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>Testers doing Isolation testing should be armed with their trusty tools!&nbsp;</p>



<p>They must be determined to find those pesky bugs they venture into unknown boundaries.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Try <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma </a>and experience the magic of how simple it is to do testing when you have an automation tool.</p>



<p>Happy Testing!</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions">Frequently Asked Questions</span></h2>



<h3 id="h-is-unit-testing-the-same-as-isolation-testing"><span id="Is_unit_testing_the_same_as_isolation_testing">Is unit testing the same as isolation testing?</span></h3>



<p>Unit and isolation testing are both techniques that involve testing smaller system components. However, there are some key differences between the two techniques.</p>



<ul><li><strong>Unit testing:</strong> Unit testing is a type of white-box testing that tests individual units of code, such as functions or methods. Unit testing aims to ensure that each unit of code works as expected and does not contain any bugs.</li><li><strong>Isolation testing:</strong> Isolation testing is black-box testing that tests a unit of code or system component in isolation from other units or components. The goal of isolation testing is to identify and isolate bugs that different system parts may cause.</li></ul>



<h3 id="h-what-is-isolation-in-testing"><span id="What_is_isolation_in_testing">What is isolation in testing?</span></h3>



<p>Isolation in testing means testing a component or unit of an application or a system independently of other units or components.</p>


Isolation Testing | What it is, When & How to Do?


<p>According to Edward A. Strollo, a professor of software engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology, &#8220;The software requirements for a product like a plane or a train are so complex that it is impossible to test the system as a whole.&#8221; And this line throws a light on how important and complex integration testing and end-to-end testing can be.</p>



<p>This blog post will explore the core differences between integration testing and end-to-end testing and why understanding these differences is crucial for successful software development.</p>



<h2 id="h-what-is-end-to-end-testing">What is end-to-end testing?</h2>



<p><a href="https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">End-to-end</a> testing is a software testing technique that verifies the entire software system from start to finish. It tests all the integrated components of the system to ensure that they work together as intended. End-to-end testing aims to identify any potential defects or problems that may occur when real users use the system.</p>



<p>This testing technique is especially important for complex software systems, where integrating different components can be complex and error-prone. By testing the entire system, end-to-end testing can ensure that the system is reliable, efficient, and user-friendly.</p>



<p>Here are some of the benefits of end-to-end testing:</p>



<ul><li>It can help identify defects not found in unit or integration testing.</li><li>It helps ensure that the system meets the user&#8217;s requirements.</li><li>It can help to improve the reliability and performance of the system.</li><li>It can help to reduce the risk of system failures.</li></ul>



<p>End-to-end testing can be time-consuming and expensive, but it is often essential for ensuring the quality of complex software systems.</p>



<p><strong>Example:</strong></p>



<p>We can have a look at a real-time example to understand this End-to-end testing better:</p>



<p><strong>Scenario:</strong> A customer purchases a product from an e-commerce website.</p>



<p><strong>Steps for the end-to-end test:</strong></p>



<ol><li>The customer navigates to the e-commerce website.</li><li>The customer searches for the product they want to purchase.</li><li>The customer adds the product to their cart.</li><li>The customer proceeds to checkout.</li><li>The customer enters their shipping and billing information.</li><li>The customer selects a shipping method.</li><li>The customer reviews their order and clicks &#8220;Place order.&#8221;</li><li>The customer receives an order confirmation email.</li><li>The customer receives their order in the mail.</li></ol>



<p>The end-to-end test would involve testing all the steps above to ensure that the entire process works as expected.&nbsp;</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_Integration_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is Integration testing?</a></li><li><a href="#Integration_testing_vs_end-to-end_testing_Key_differences"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Integration testing vs end-to-end testing: Key differences</a></li><li><a href="#Which_test_do_you_need"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Which test do you need?</a></li><li><a href="#Testsigma_for_end-to-end_and_integration_testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Testsigma for end-to-end and integration testing</a></li><li><a href="#Summary"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#How_do_Integration_Testing_and_E2E_Testing_Complement_Each_Other"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">6.1</span> How do Integration Testing and E2E Testing Complement Each Other?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-integration-testing"><span id="What_is_Integration_testing">What is Integration testing?</span></h2>



<p>Integration testing is the process of testing how different software modules or components interact. It is a critical part of the software development process because it helps to identify and fix integration issues early on before they cause problems in the final product.</p>



<p>Integration testing is typically performed after unit testing, the process of testing individual modules or components in isolation. Integration testing ensures that the modules or components work together as expected. This is done by combining the modules or components and testing them as a group.</p>



<p>Different approaches to integration testing exist, such as top-down integration testing, bottom-up integration testing, and sandwich integration testing. The best approach to use depends on the specific software project.</p>



<p>Integration testing is an essential part of ensuring the quality of software. By identifying and fixing integration issues early on, integration testing can help to prevent costly errors and delays down the line.</p>



<p>Here are some benefits of integration testing:&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>&nbsp;It helps identify integration issues early on.</li><li>It helps to improve the reliability and robustness of the software.</li><li>It helps to reduce the risk of costly errors and delays.</li><li>It helps to ensure that the software meets the user&#8217;s requirements.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Example:</strong></p>



<p>We can have a look at a real-time example to understand Integration testing better:</p>



<p><strong>Scenario: </strong>A customer is trying to book a flight and hotel using a travel website.</p>



<p><strong>Steps for the integration test:</strong></p>



<ol><li>The customer navigates to the travel website.</li><li>The customer enters their travel dates and destination.</li><li>The customer searches for hotels.</li><li>The customer selects the hotel.</li><li>The customer clicks on “Book Now”.</li><li>The customer moves to payment page.</li></ol>



<p>The integration test would test that integration between hotel search, select and payment works.</p>



<h2 id="h-integration-testing-vs-end-to-end-testing-key-differences"><span id="Integration_testing_vs_end-to-end_testing_Key_differences">Integration testing vs end-to-end testing: Key differences</span></h2>



<p>Here are the Key differences between Integraion and End-to-end testing, along with their characteristics explained in detail in the table below:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Characteristic features</strong></td><td><strong>Integration testing</strong></td><td><strong>End-to-end testing</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Scope</strong></td><td>Integration testing tests a single module or a group of related modules.&nbsp;</td><td>End-to-end testing tests the entire software system, from the user interface to the database.</td></tr><tr><td><br><br><strong>Focus</strong></td><td><br><br>Integration testing concentrates on the interaction between different software modules or components. It ensures that these modules or components can communicate with each other and exchange data correctly.&nbsp;</td><td><br><br>End-to-end testing, on the other hand, focuses on the whole software system from start to finish. It ensures the system performs all its intended functions and meets the user&#8217;s requirements.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Effort</strong></td><td>Integration testing is less effort-intensive than end-to-end testing because it tests a smaller subset of the software system.&nbsp;</td><td>End-to-end testing is more effort-intensive because it tests the entire software system.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Time</strong></td><td>Integration testing is executed after unit testing, which tests individual modules or components in isolation.&nbsp; This testing is done before end-to-end testing</td><td>End-to-end testing is generally performed after integration testing. Still, it can also be performed after system testing, which tests the entire software system in its final environment.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cost</strong></td><td>Integration testing is less expensive than end-to-end testing because it tests a smaller subset of the software system.&nbsp;</td><td>End-to-end testing is more expensive because it tests the entire software system.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Complexity</strong></td><td>Integration testing is less complex than end-to-end testing because it tests a smaller subset of the software system.</td><td>End-to-end testing is more complex because it tests the entire software system, which can be complex and interconnected.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Benefits</strong></td><td>Integration testing helps identify issues early on, preventing costly errors and delays.</td><td>End-to-end testing helps to identify defects that may not be found in unit or integration testing.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Drawbacks</strong></td><td>Integration testing may only identify some defects, especially if the software system is complex.</td><td>End-to-end testing can be time-consuming and expensive, especially for large and complex software systems.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-which-test-do-you-need"><span id="Which_test_do_you_need">Which test do you need?</span></h2>



<p>If anyone asks you this &#8216;<em>which&#8217; </em>question, you should know the type of testing you need depends on the specific requirements of your software project. In general, you must perform both integration and end-to-end testing.&nbsp;</p>



<p>However, the emphasis on each <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/the-different-software-testing-types-explained/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">type of testing</a> will vary depending on the project. When deciding which type of testing to use, here are some factors to consider:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Complexity of the software system:</strong> If the software system is complex, you may need to perform both integration testing and end-to-end testing. This is because complex software systems often have many different modules or components that need to interact with each other. By performing integration testing, you can identify and fix any problems with the interaction between these modules or components.</li></ul>



<ul><li><strong>Risk of defects:</strong> If the software system is high-risk, you should perform more extensive, end-to-end testing. This is because high-risk software systems are more likely to have defects that could cause user problems. By performing end-to-end testing, you can identify and fix any defects that could affect the entire system.</li></ul>



<ul><li><strong>Budget and time constraints:</strong> <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/integration-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Integration testing</a> is less expensive and time-consuming than end-to-end testing. This is because integration testing tests a smaller subset of the software system. If you are on a tight budget or time constraint, consider prioritizing integration testing over end-to-end testing.</li></ul>



<ul><li><strong>Availability of test data:</strong> You may need to create test data for end-to-end testing, which can be time-consuming and expensive. You must have access to the necessary test data if you need help performing end-to-end testing.</li></ul>



<p>Here are some examples of when you might use integration testing:</p>



<ul><li>When testing a new module being added to an existing system.</li><li>When testing the interaction between two or more modules in a system.</li><li>When testing a system that is being modified or upgraded.</li></ul>



<p>Here are some examples of when you might use end-to-end testing:</p>



<ul><li>When testing a new system from start to finish.</li><li>When testing a system that real users are using.</li><li>When testing a system that is critical to the business.</li></ul>



<p>Ultimately, the decision of which type of testing to use is up to the software development team. The team should consider the specific requirements of the project and the factors listed above to make the best decision.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-testsigma-for-end-to-end-and-integration-testing"><span id="Testsigma_for_end-to-end_and_integration_testing">Testsigma for end-to-end and integration testing</span></h2>



<p>Testsigma is a powerful and easy-to-use automation tool that can help you improve the quality of your software. <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma </a>has multiple features, making it an ideal tool for automating end-to-end and integration tests.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It is easy to use, even for non-technical users, and it offers a wide range of features that can help you save time and effort. With Testsigma, you can:</p>



<p><strong><em>End-to-End Testing-Testsigma:</em></strong></p>



<ol><li>It is a cloud-based platform to access anywhere. This makes it ideal for distributed teams or teams that need to test on multiple devices or environments.</li><li>It is easy to use, even for non-technical users. You can create test cases using predefined NLPs and automate these test cases.</li><li>It is scalable, so you can easily add more tests or users as your needs grow.</li><li>It offers a wide range of features, including <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data-driven_testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Data-driven testing</a>: You can use data sets to drive your tests, which can help you automate more complex tests.</li><li>Parallel execution: You can run your tests in parallel, which can help you reduce the time it takes to test your software.</li></ol>



<p><strong><em>Integration Testing-Testsigma:</em></strong></p>



<ol><li>It lets you automate your web, mobile, APIs, and desktop tests from the same place while using the same approach.</li><li>You can customize your tests if you want to extend them.</li><li>With Testsigma, you don&#8217;t need to be an expert in coding &#8211; you can author and edit your tests like you would write and edit simple English sentences.</li><li>Not only that, Testsigma lets you integrate into device cloud labs and lets you run your tests in parallel.</li><li>Testsigma is also built-in, with extensive support for parallel testing.</li><li>All of the above and more, with 24&#215;7 support.&nbsp;</li></ol>



<p>Testsigma is the perfect tool for teams of all sizes who want to improve the quality of their software.&nbsp;</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Automate your tests for Web, Mobile, Desktop and APIs on Cloud with Testsigma. No setup required.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Try for free</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-summary"><span id="Summary">Summary</span></h2>



<p>In conclusion, understanding the differences between integration testing and end-to-end testing is crucial for any software development project. While both types of testing are essential for ensuring a smooth and functional application, they serve different purposes and require different approaches. Choosing the right testing strategy for your project can save time, reduce costs, and ensure a successful launch.</p>



<p>Happy Testing!</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions">Frequently Asked Questions</span></h2>



<h3 id="how-do-integration-testing-and-e2e-testing-complement-each-other"><span id="How_do_Integration_Testing_and_E2E_Testing_Complement_Each_Other">How do Integration Testing and E2E Testing Complement Each Other?</span></h3>



<p><strong>Integration testing</strong> ensures that different modules of a software system work together correctly.</p>



<p><strong>E2E testing</strong> ensures that the entire software system works correctly from start to finish.</p>



<p>By combining these two testing techniques, you can get a complete picture of the quality of your software system.</p>



<customlinks>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Integration Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/guides/integration-testing/</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>E2E Testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/end-to-end-testing</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
</customlinks>


Integration Testing vs. End-to-End Testing The Core Differences

Integration Testing vs. End-to-End Testing: The Core Differences

Software Testing Fundamentals Guide to Concepts and Processes

Software Testing Fundamentals: Guide to Concepts and Processes


<p><strong><em>&#8220;Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.&#8221; &#8211; John Ruskin</em></strong></p>



<p>In the world of software testing, ensuring quality is not a mere coincidence but a meticulously planned endeavor. As we embark on this voyage of software testing, we come across a set of invaluable companions known as &#8220;Test Deliverables.&#8221;</p>



<p>Just as a well-prepared meal requires the right ingredients and a skilled chef to bring out its flavors, successful software testing relies on these key documents, artifacts, and reports to achieve its goals.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In this blog, we will try to understand test deliverables and explore their significance, types, and the pivotal role they play in delivering high-quality software.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_are_test_deliverables"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What are test deliverables?</a></li><li><a href="#List_of_test_deliverables"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> List of test deliverables:</a><ul><li><a href="#Test_Strategy"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Test Strategy</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Plan"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> Test Plan</a></li><li><a href="#Test_CasesTest_Scripts"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> Test Cases/Test Scripts</a></li><li><a href="#Test_data"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.4</span> Test data</a></li><li><a href="#Test_summary_report"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.5</span> Test summary report</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Closure_Report"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.6</span> Test Closure Report</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Role_of_Test_Automation_in_Getting_the_Test_Deliverables"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Role of Test Automation in Getting the Test Deliverables</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-are-test-deliverables"><span id="What_are_test_deliverables">What are test deliverables?</span></h2>



<p>Test deliverables are the tangible artifacts and documents generated during the software testing process. These items serve various purposes, from planning and execution to reporting and analysis. They are essential for tracking progress, ensuring adherence to testing standards, and providing stakeholders with valuable insights into the quality of the software under test.</p>



<h2 id="h-list-of-test-deliverables"><span id="List_of_test_deliverables">List of test deliverables:</span></h2>



<p>Imagine you&#8217;re at a hospital for treatment/surgery, and a team of expert doctors is attending you. What would you expect from them? Thorough planning, meticulous execution, and detailed documentation of the entire process, right? Well, in software testing, we have our own set of &#8220;doctors&#8221; – testers – who ensure the &#8220;health&#8221; of our software. Just like in medicine, there&#8217;s a need for precision and care in software testing, and this begins with creating the right &#8220;test deliverables.&#8221;</p>



<p>Let&#8217;s take a closer look at these test deliverables by drawing parallels with the medical industry:</p>



<h3 id="h-test-strategy"><span id="Test_Strategy">Test Strategy</span></h3>



<p>In the medical world, a doctor begins by crafting a treatment plan, which outlines the overall approach to addressing a patient&#8217;s condition. Similarly, in software testing, the Test Strategy serves as the treatment plan.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It defines the scope, risks, quality criteria, testing techniques, resources, and timelines, providing a strategic view of how testing will be conducted throughout the project.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-plan"><span id="Test_Plan">Test Plan</span></h3>



<p>Much like a doctor starts with a thorough diagnosis to understand a patient&#8217;s ailments, the Test Plan in software testing is like the initial assessment. It defines what needs to be tested, how it will be tested, and what resources are required.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The <a href="https://testsigma.com/testplan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Plan</a> is a detailed document that describes the testing approach, objectives, and methodologies. It includes the scope of testing, roles, timelines and test schedule, resource allocation, and test environment requirements.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center"><img loading="lazy" width="485" height="341" src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/TzcOtWBIuCNCYUaxNIEzNNc4pJgG35oaHlHpMlpnVa5kUlEUi0hFnNTYZLYgiJavBcOHGk3mOJz2dHJK__rJeoEwVF-3U_q7-VAw-IGdykdt38j0mvbb8hwo08Dk8ZCGxzXdfYNbkKm_6qKhRUDy4_I"></p>



<h3 id="h-test-cases-test-scripts"><span id="Test_CasesTest_Scripts">Test Cases/Test Scripts</span></h3>



<p>Just as a doctor prescribes a specific treatment regimen with detailed instructions, software testers create <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Cases</a> or Test Scripts. These detailed instructions guide the testing process, specifying what to test, what data to use, and the expected outcomes. They are the treatment regimen for your software.</p>



<p>Test cases/scripts detail the step-by-step instructions for executing tests, including input data, and expected results.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-data"><span id="Test_data">Test data</span></h3>



<p>A patient&#8217;s medical history is vital for diagnosis and treatment decisions. Similarly, <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-data/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Data</a> in software testing provides the necessary input and configurations to execute tests. It&#8217;s like the patient&#8217;s medical history, helping testers understand the software&#8217;s behavior under various conditions.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Test Data encompasses the input values, configurations, and scenarios used during testing. Proper test data management is crucial to ensure thorough and accurate testing.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-summary-report"><span id="Test_summary_report">Test summary report</span></h3>



<p>After a doctor prescribes treatment, they regularly review the patient&#8217;s progress. Similarly, a Test Summary Report tracks the progress of testing. It provides an overview of the testing effort, including pass/fail results, coverage, and any issues encountered. This report keeps stakeholders informed, much like a progress report keeps the patient and their family updated on their condition.</p>



<p>The Test Summary Report provides a high-level overview of the testing activities and results. It includes key metrics, such as test coverage, pass/fail status, and any outstanding issues.</p>



<h3 id="h-test-closure-report"><span id="Test_Closure_Report">Test Closure Report</span></h3>



<p>When a patient&#8217;s treatment is complete, doctors prepare a discharge summary, highlighting the overall health status and future recommendations. In software testing, the<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-closure-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Test Closure Report</a> is akin to the discharge summary, signaling the readiness for deployment. It marks the end of the testing phase, summarizing the entire testing effort, lessons learned, and recommendations for future projects.</p>



<h2 id="h-role-of-test-automation-in-getting-the-test-deliverables"><span id="Role_of_Test_Automation_in_Getting_the_Test_Deliverables">Role of Test Automation in Getting the Test Deliverables</span></h2>



<p>Test automation acts as a powerful tool in the production of test deliverables by increasing efficiency, ensuring consistency, and providing detailed reporting. It allows software testing teams to meet tight deadlines, maintain high-quality standards, and deliver valuable insights into the quality of the software being tested.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/fbIVGHnleWwrM8El8NbBdKxAuWFl3JzIxvoBHr986wHv_I6tehK-XF_Eqcoe3UOAvn9sytbiMaWvu0CExi1m-BCB91ICNjRAFfEHxyH3PO2c164VJP9JbcmanS7OdvdrGIG2eEjxgO0QktedkBLKPcs" alt="Role of Test Automation" width="530" height="530"/></figure></div>



<p>Just like a highly efficient assistant to a doctor can help streamline patient care, test automation simplifies and enhances the process of producing test deliverables. Here&#8217;s how:</p>



<ul><li><strong>Efficiency &amp; Speed:</strong> Test automation tools can rapidly build and execute test cases and generate test results. This efficiency significantly reduces the time required to perform testing activities.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Data Management:</strong> Test automation tools often come with data management features. They can help generate and manage test data, ensuring that the right input data is used for each test case. This is like having an automated system to maintain and update patient records, making sure the correct data is associated with each patient.</li><li><strong>Continuous Integration:</strong> Test automation can seamlessly integrate with the software development process, enabling continuous testing. With each code change or build, automated tests can be triggered automatically. This integration ensures that test deliverables, such as test results and reports, are continuously generated and readily available.</li></ul>



<ul><li><strong>Parallel Execution:</strong> Automation tools can execute multiple test cases simultaneously, increasing testing throughput. This parallel execution capability expedites the <a href="https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/devops-tutorial/fundamentals-of-software-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing process</a> and accelerates the production of test deliverables.</li><li><strong>Reusability:</strong> Automated test scripts and artifact templates are reusable assets. Once created, they can be used across different testing phases, and projects, or even with minor adjustments for similar features. This reusability not only saves time but also promotes consistency across different testing efforts.</li><li><strong>Reporting:</strong> Automation tools typically provide detailed test execution reports. These reports include information such as pass/fail status, logs, and screenshots. Using these reports, generating test summary reports and test closure reports becomes more efficient and accurate, similar to how an assistant can compile and organize patient records for the doctor&#8217;s review.</li></ul>



<div class="cta-banner-v4">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Check more details about Test Automation in this Guide</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Check out</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>In software testing, test deliverables are not just documents; they are the tools, guides, and records that ensure a successful expedition into the software wilderness. They help testers navigate, document their findings, and ensure that the software landscape is thoroughly explored, just as explorers rely on their compass, maps, journals, supplies, logs, and debriefs to conquer uncharted territories.</p>



<p>They provide a roadmap for testing activities, ensure accountability, and offer valuable insights into the quality of the software. Incorporating a robust set of test deliverables and leveraging test automation as a strategic ally, software development teams can navigate the complex landscape of testing with confidence, delivering software that meets user expectations and industry standards.</p>


Test Deliverables In Software Testing

Test optimization techniques in software testing


<p>Both DevOps and Agile frameworks focus on rapid development and delivery, and to enable this test automation becomes crucial. However, automation testing has its own challenges. Maintenance is one such challenge. If a test automation framework is not maintained correctly, automation testing starts to give False Positive and False Negative results.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#False_Positive_VS_False_Negative_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> False Positive VS False Negative &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_False_Positive_in_Software_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is False Positive in Software Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_a_False_Negative_in_Software_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is a False Negative in Software Testing?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#False_Positive_VS_False_Negative_How_to_Find"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> False Positive VS False Negative: How to Find?</a></li><li><a href="#Why_do_False_Positive_and_False_Negative_Occur"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Why do False Positive and False Negative Occur?</a></li><li><a href="#Examples_of_False_Negative_and_False_Negative"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Examples of False Negative and False Negative</a></li><li><a href="#False_Positive_and_False_Negative_8211_Importance_in_Testing"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> False Positive and False Negative &#8211; Importance in Testing</a></li><li><a href="#False_Positive_and_False_Negative_8211_Importance_in_test_automation"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> False Positive and False Negative &#8211; Importance in test automation</a></li><li><a href="#How_to_Choose_the_Right_Tool"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> How to Choose the Right Tool?</a></li><li><a href="#Best_Practices_for_Reducing_False_Positive_and_False_Negative"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">8</span> Best Practices for Reducing False Positive and False Negative</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">9</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#How_to_handle_false_positive_and_negative"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">9.1</span> How to handle false positive and negative?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="false-positive-vs-false-negative-overview"><span id="False_Positive_VS_False_Negative_8211_Overview"><strong>False Positive VS False Negative &#8211; Overview</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-false-positive-in-software-testing"><span id="What_is_False_Positive_in_Software_Testing"><strong>What is False Positive in Software Testing?</strong></span></h3>



<p>A false positive is an outcome where the model wrongly predicts the positive case.</p>



<p>if the test case is supposed to pass however due to script issues the test result is marked as fail. If you look at the application everything might be working as expected it&#8217;s just automation script marked them fail. The false positive might occur mostly due to tools, dependencies, middleware, or sometimes invalid DOM elements.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-a-false-negative-in-software-testing"><span id="What_is_a_False_Negative_in_Software_Testing"><strong>What is a False Negative in Software Testing?</strong></span></h3>



<p>A false negative is an outcome where the model wrongly predicts the negative case.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In testing, if the test case is supposed to fail due to functional issues or defects however test case ignores those defects and marks the test as pass. It can occur due to improper construction of test cases, false assumptions while writing the automation scripts, etc.</p>



<h2 id="h-false-positive-vs-false-negative-how-to-find"><span id="False_Positive_VS_False_Negative_How_to_Find"><strong>False Positive VS False Negative: How to Find?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Both false positives and false negatives are common in test automation. However, more than false positives, the false negatives have impact as it marks the defective application as pass.&nbsp;</p>



<p>If more of such issue start occurring in your application, the test automation test reports become unreliable. Thus, you should be very careful while writing the tests.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Let’s understand in detail how to find the false positives and false negatives.</p>



<p id="h-how-to-find-false-negatives"><strong>How to Find False Negatives?</strong></p>



<p>Finding a false negative is a lot more complicated than you think, as false negative results mark the test as passing inaccurately. False negatives can be caught only if you analyze them manually. You might not be able to validate a complete application manually if it is a complex application. However, you can put the strategy that whenever there are specific feature changes, you must ensure that all those test cases are validated manually and note down the expected result. The strategy needs to be improved based on its effectiveness.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Building a robust framework and having the right strategy are key to reducing false negatives.</p>



<p><strong>How to Find the False Positives?</strong></p>



<p>Unlike false negatives, finding false positives is easy. Standard practice in automation is to analyze the automation failures as and when the result/report appears.&nbsp; Before logging any issue as a defect, perform a double-check by reproducing the error manually.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In false positives scenarios, you can aim to go through the list of failure scenarios manually and analyze them before concluding.</p>



<h2 id="h-why-do-false-positive-and-false-negative-occur"><span id="Why_do_False_Positive_and_False_Negative_Occur"><strong>Why do False Positive and False Negative Occur?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Both False negatives and false positives can occur because of various reasons. However, the business impact of false negatives is more compared to false positives. As an automation team, you should always aim to have 0% false negatives. The false positive percentage can vary based on the application complexity and automation framework.</p>



<p id="h-reason-for-false-negatives"><strong>Reason for False Negatives</strong></p>



<ol><li>Poor Automation framework architecture</li><li>Skipping some of the conditions while designing the test case</li><li>Untrustworthy tools/packages are used for automation</li><li>Outdated packages, and libraries used in test automation</li><li>Unhandled pesticide paradox principle</li><li>Assumption of test coverage<br></li></ol>



<p id="h-reason-for-false-positives"><strong>Reason for False Positives</strong></p>



<ol><li>Automation scripts are not maintained regularly</li><li>Unstable <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-environment/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing environment</a></li><li>Standard locator strategies are not used</li><li>Outdated frameworks, libraries, and packages used</li><li>Underlying component issues such as Incompatible browsers, browser drivers, etc.</li></ol>



<h2 id="h-examples-of-false-negative-and-false-negative"><span id="Examples_of_False_Negative_and_False_Negative"><strong>Examples of False Negative and False Negative</strong></span></h2>



<p><br>When you hear about false positives and false negatives you may easily get confused, Let&#8217;s put it into analogy. When we compare with the medical test case, the medical test is done for the whether patient has some medical condition or not. Similarly, when it applies to software testing we can assume as below. <em>A positive test found a bug when there was a bug in the application</em>. This means that there was a bug in the application and automation testing found it, it is a true and ideal scenario.<br>Let&#8217;s take another example of COVID-19 test</p>



<p><strong>False Positive</strong></p>



<p>Suppose Person X doesn&#8217;t have COVID-19 and he provides the sample for testing. When the report arrived the test report was marked inaccurately COVID-19 positive though he doesn’t have an infection in his body.</p>



<p>When the same scenario is applied to testing, If you have a login scenario that is working as expected when you execute the automation test script it reports back Login functionality failed. In reality, there is no bug as such. This is a false positive.</p>



<p><strong>False Negative</strong></p>



<p>Suppose Person Y has covid infection and he provides the sample for testing. When the report arrived, report marked as “No Infections” which is COVID-19 negative. This is inaccurate, as in reality he had a COVID-19 infection.</p>



<p>Similarly, in software testing, you have a login scenario, which is failing to log in with a username and password. But, when you execute the automation script you get the report saying that the login test is passed. This is false negative.</p>



<p>If you are still confused, let&#8217;s put it in simple terms.</p>



<p>Automation test reporting failure without any valid failure in the application is called a false positive.</p>



<p>Automation test passing even if there is a valid failure in the application is called a false negative.</p>



<h2 id="h-false-positive-and-false-negative-importance-in-testing"><span id="False_Positive_and_False_Negative_8211_Importance_in_Testing"><strong>False Positive and False Negative &#8211; Importance in Testing</strong></span></h2>



<p>The <a href="https://www.javatpoint.com/software-engineering-software-development-life-cycle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Software Development Life Cycle</a>(SDLC) gives the same importance to testing as development, the reason is it aims to deliver quality products. Imagine a company has launched a car with model X, and after 6 months it finds a major issue with the car engine which can be life-critical. Now the company has to recall all the cars that are sold, and the company should provide compensation to the customer, additionally, the company might have to face lawsuits. These things might not have happened if there had been a proper check in place before releasing the car. The same thing applies to software. The quality of the application resides in the quality of the testing and testing framework. If testing itself does not report actual failures, that can incur loss and reputation damage to the organization.</p>



<p>The false negatives are scarier than the false positives. The false negatives leave the feature broken. If you are dealing with health care, defense, or automobile software the false negatives may take a toll on someone&#8217;s life. However, if the tool you choose, and the framework you build are robust and flawless then the organization gets great benefit.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In short, The good or bad quality lies in the automation framework and automation scripts.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Though the impact of false positives is lesser, if it occurs more frequently you end up with unreliable testing. The Team might have to spend a lot of time analyzing without any gain. The good news is that false positives are easy to fix especially with modern testing tools like <a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a>. It suggests the fixes for failures, and guidance and provides technical support if you are struggling to fix the critical issue.</p>



<p>Both false positives and false negatives are critical in testing. However when we compare, the false positives are tolerable to some extent, but there is zero tolerance for false negatives.</p>



<h2 id="h-false-positive-and-false-negative-importance-in-test-automation"><span id="False_Positive_and_False_Negative_8211_Importance_in_test_automation"><strong><strong>False Positive and False Negative &#8211; </strong>Importance in test automation</strong></span></h2>



<p>False positives and false negatives are most common in <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation</a>, however, it is not limited to test automation. If the same occurs in manual testing it will be because of human error.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The automation framework design plays a critical role when dealing with false positives and negatives. As an organization makes huge investments to set up infra for automation, skills, and resources the unreliable results may disappoint the management and it may end with questioning Return on Investment(ROI). Thus, having a robust design to tackle the false positives and false negatives is a must.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Here is a blog on different test automation frameworks</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-automation-frameworks/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Read more</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-how-to-choose-the-right-tool"><span id="How_to_Choose_the_Right_Tool"><strong>How to Choose the Right Tool?</strong></span></h2>



<p>As mentioned earlier, the automation framework plays a very critical role in the success of test automation. The automation framework depends on the underlying tools used. The tool should be capable enough to handle all the edge cases and should be continuously updated as technology changes.</p>



<p>As technology has evolved, many legacy automation tools have disappeared. One of the reasons is they could not align with modern technology change. Importantly their architecture was not flexible.</p>



<p>The right tool for your organization will be based on many factors such as the development framework used, cost, infrastructure, required skillsets, requirement of upskills, nature of the application, application domain, etc. The below pointers are generic and irrespective of the project domain that you need to consider while choosing the right tool.</p>



<ul><li>Don&#8217;t be biased, evaluate all possible automation tools as per the requirement</li><li>The tool should be intelligent enough to choose the best stable locator</li><li>It should provide all critical functionalities natively, as it reduces the third-party library dependency. In turn, this reduces the false positives and false negatives</li><li>It should support the DevOps ecosystem</li><li>It should align with the modern Agile framework</li><li>The reporting should be comprehensive</li><li>Consider no code automation tools if your organization is short of skills or resources.</li></ul>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Automate your tests for better reliability and stability</p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Check out Testsigma</a>
</div>



<h2 id="h-best-practices-for-reducing-false-positive-and-false-negative"><span id="Best_Practices_for_Reducing_False_Positive_and_False_Negative"><strong>Best Practices for Reducing False Positive and False Negative</strong></span></h2>



<p>The best practices for reducing false positives and false negatives vary from project to project. To reduce them you need to prepare a concrete strategy while designing the test strategy document. Below is the list of the best practices that are independent of the project and application however, list is non-exhaustive.&nbsp;</p>



<ul><li>Build it right, from the beginning. Choose the right tool and build a robust framework.</li><li>Integrate the alerting and monitoring tools wherever possible</li><li>Prepare a code review checklist and make it a mandatory requirement to follow</li><li>Never write a test case based on the assumption</li><li>Use the right testing tool after careful evaluation of your requirements</li><li>Use dedicated environment for testing. Ensure it is as stable as the production environment</li><li>Cover all possible testing scenarios, and use assertion as much as possible in your test scripts.</li><li>Learn from failures, and update the checklists, and strategy documents as and when required.</li></ul>



<p>False positives and false negatives in test automation are common, however, you should always target to minimize them. Especially when it comes to false negatives you should aim for zero. False positives are unavoidable as UI testing relies on browsers and other testing components.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Choosing the right tool can help to reduce false positives. False positives mostly occur due to latency, locator, browser incompatibility, etc. If your test automation tool is smart enough to handle such issues the false positives can be easily reduced. <a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a> is one such tool it automatically chooses the best possible locators and your test will be executed on the most stable workspaces remotely. This helps in producing the most accurate, stable, and reliable reports.</p>



<p>On the other hand, false negatives occur if you don’t write the test cases as per the requirement. False negatives require manual analysis and in-depth investigation. Remember even if you have the right toolsets, good infrastructure, and a stable application environment &#8211; if you don’t write test cases properly as per requirement then test automation will become unreliable.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="how-to-handle-false-positive-and-negative"><span id="How_to_handle_false_positive_and_negative"><strong>How to handle false positive and negative?</strong></span></h3>



<p>False positives can be handled by implementing the correct design strategies while building the automation framework. If the framework is robust then there will be fewer false positives. False negatives can be reduced with code review, and test case review strategies. Additionally having the right process while developing the test cases can bring you great benefits.</p>


False Positives and False Negatives in Software Testing

False Positive and False Negative in Software Testing


<p>“When to stop testing” is a very interesting topic yet highly asked in many interviews these days. There are several answers to that question too such as: “you stop once you have completed an acceptance criteria”, some say “you never stop as testing is an ongoing task” and some day “it depends!”&nbsp;</p>



<p>Every company and every engineering team have their own criterias set in terms of when testing should be stopped for a particular product/feature. There are several things that impact this decision such as the entry and exit criterias too, however are these enough?&nbsp;</p>



<p>Let&#8217;s dive deeper and understand what is a good way to stop testing with enough confidence.&nbsp;</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#When_do_we_start_testingnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> When do we start testing?&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#When_to_Stop_Testingnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> When to Stop Testing?&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#Checklistnbsp"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Checklist&nbsp;</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-when-do-we-start-testing"><span id="When_do_we_start_testingnbsp">When do we start testing?&nbsp;</span></h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/CzPSbY-tiRvIEJ7KlE4Ukql-ZMJB5zS9ilOlkYHDma7Qa73w3RNXnHy1pPnG6BSywr_k6D8xbTUK6gnqhH3wPq4X5x1RdZTOc0ZA5vNHl_lD5GstFcZUGeRdCtlwb4IaZK-TWEdKVkHtCoV0fTdIhxk" alt="start testing"/></figure>



<p>Let&#8217;s start this blog by understanding when to really initiate your testing process. As we keep hearing a lot in communities, conferences, webinars, etc shift testing to the left and not to leave this major task later in the SDLC. The reason behind this is that it helps find defects earlier, clear any assumptions/ambiguities, reduces costs, time and effort to rework and retest on features. This then leads to a good quality product.&nbsp;</p>



<p>We can start testing as early as the requirements stage by understanding what is the ask from this feature:</p>



<ul><li>What do we already have in place?&nbsp;</li><li>How much testing will be required?</li><li>If we don&#8217;t have anything in place, then what would the system expect?</li><li>Pair with developers and Business analysts to get a clear picture and expectations</li><li>Understand if we need other teams too as this might be a feature that impacts other teams or not</li><li>Be involved with the design team to understand the design prior to testing it</li><li>If you are automating tests, you can follow a TDD process too and won&#8217;t have to wait till the feature is fully developed</li></ul>



<p>Once we are clear at this stage, deployment will become much smoother for the entire team.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 id="h-when-to-stop-testing"><span id="When_to_Stop_Testingnbsp">When to Stop Testing?&nbsp;<a href="https://qa.world/when-to-stop-testing/"></a></span></h2>



<p id="h-till-date-no-manager-director-has-ever-said-to-me-or-my-team-to-stop-testing-or-reduce-testing-all-i-hear-is-are-we-ready-to-proceed-are-we-confident-with-the-amount-that-has-been-tested-generally-testing-is-an-ongoing-task-we-do-tend-to-meet-acceptance-criterias-and-move-our-tasks-to-completion-however-sometimes-an-extension-or-enhancement-is-done-to-the-same-feature-that-means-you-have-to-test-it-again-therefore-having-an-open-mind-about-this-is-always-good-for-all-teams">Till date no manager/director has ever said to me or my team to stop testing or reduce testing. All I hear is are we ready to proceed, are we confident with the amount that has been tested? Generally testing is an ongoing task, we do tend to meet acceptance criterias and move our tasks to completion, however sometimes an extension or enhancement is done to the same feature, that means you have to test it again. Therefore having an open mind about this is always good for all teams.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The following points can be some guidelines to help you stop the testing tasks:</p>



<ul><li>Decisions from your product owners, line managers to stop the testing tasks<ul><li>a) Budget or/and resources were allocated to some other high priority project</li><li>&nbsp;b) The project was canceled (from the client’s side or the company’s side)&nbsp;</li><li>c) The allocated budget is over and no more budget is being allocated.</li></ul></li></ul>



<ul><li>Deadlines that need to be met</li><li>No high priority and severity bugs found/expected</li><li>Completion of test case execution</li><li>Completion of functional and code coverage to a certain point</li><li>Completion of the acceptance criteria and exit criteria. It is imperative that we consider multiple factors while designing exit criteria, some of which are mentioned below:<ul><li>1. Strong buy-in from the software development team. In the end, your job is to discover defects and theirs is to fix.</li><li>2. If there are clients who will further test the product, that should also be considered as to what will be an acceptable input quality.</li></ul></li><li>Good coverage of the functionality/code.</li><li>Number of bugs in the feature or too buggy to deep dive (valid criteria for exiting a testing process is the discovery of a forecasted number of bugs).</li><li>Release deadline has been met</li></ul>



<p>It is vital to pay attention to all finer details and errors in the product of the application. It is not possible to find all the bugs that may exist, but the team management will make decisions on when to release the product anyway. Also remember that if a bug is found in a live production environment that is not solely the testers responsibility, it&#8217;s the engineering team&#8217;s responsibility. Similarly, if you are retesting a vital bug and get asked “are we ready to release the testing?” it should not be the testers decision to say yes or no, it should always come from the management team. The release might go ahead with some unwanted bugs! See, we haven’t really stopped testing. The question is, can we find these bugs prior to the release, and what is their severity? And the best thing, how to stop the same bug from appearing?</p>



<p>Thereafter if you have met the exit criterias, ship it, but understand that it still has an unlimited amount of not yet discovered bugs.</p>



<h2 id="h-checklist"><span id="Checklistnbsp">Checklist&nbsp;</span></h2>



<p id="h-this-checklist-can-serve-as-a-guide-to-determine-whether-or-not-your-team-have-enough-confidence-for-completing-the-testing">This checklist can serve as a guide to determine whether or not your team have enough confidence for completing the testing:</p>



<ul><li>Stop the testing when deadlines like release deadlines or testing deadlines have reached.</li><li>Stop the testing when the test cases have been completed with some prescribed pass percentage.</li><li>Stop the testing when the testing budget comes to its end.</li><li>Stop the testing when the code coverage and functionality requirements come to the desired level.</li><li>Stop the testing when the bug rate drops below a prescribed level.</li><li>Stop the testing when the number of high severity Open Bugs is very low.</li><li>Stop the testing when the period of beta testing/alpha testing is over.</li></ul>



<p>Some useful metrics you could also use :</p>



<ul><li>Have a dashboard of the percentage of test cases that have passed.</li><li>Have a completion percentage based on the number of test cases executed.</li><li>Have a percentage of failed test cases.</li></ul>



<p>One way to speed up your testing is when you automate your tests. Automation, though, should only be taken up if you <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/roi-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">see an ROI</a> in the long run at least.</p>



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
<p class="title">Here is a guide with in-depth discussions on do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts of  automated testing. </p>
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Check out the guide</a>
</div>



<p><a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a> is one such tool that comes with features made specifically to help you speed up your testing. It is a codeless platform thus you don’t need to learn to code too. Learn more about it here: testsigma.com</p>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>Determining when to stop testing is subjective and a complex matter. I believe testing is a never-ending process in a positive way. I have yet to hear from someone that the software is 100% complete from testing. Criteria once designed are not meant to be carved in stone. It should be reviewed constantly in light of the adherence and the post-release issues which come after we meet a set criterion. Therefore, by exploring factors such as meeting release deadlines, the severity of bugs, management decisions, and establishing effective exit criteria, we have equipped you with the necessary thinking points to make informed choices. While the decision may still require careful consideration and evaluation of specific project circumstances, we are confident that the information shared in this blog will empower you to determine appropriate exit criteria and identify the right time to conclude testing. Remember, success lies in finding the right balance between thorough testing and project constraints.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Happy testing!</p>


When to STOP testing?


<p>When software is tested through several phases of software development, there are multiple issues that can occur. They can be functionality issues or a non-functionality one that the software engineers might need to debug. And, there could be some issues that may go unnoticed because of a lot of error clutter. This is what is the concept of defect masking. This phenomenon occurs when a significant software flaw could potentially lead to critical system failures. Therefore, effective testing strategies and thorough defect prioritization are crucial to mitigate this risk and ensure the identification of all critical defects during the testing phase.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_defect_masking"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is defect masking?</a></li><li><a href="#Masked_Defects_Example"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Masked Defects Example</a></li><li><a href="#Why_Masked_Defect"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Why Masked Defect?</a></li><li><a href="#Practical_description_of_masked_errors"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Practical description of masked errors</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_latent_and_masked_defects"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> What is the difference between latent and masked defects?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Conclusion</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-defect-masking"><span id="What_is_defect_masking">What is defect masking?</span></h2>



<p>Defect masking is a terminology in software testing that refers to a scenario where a critical defect goes undetected due to another defect or issue that attracts more attention during the testing process. Defect masking can be a serious concern as it may result in the release of faulty software, ultimately compromising system reliability and user satisfaction.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 id="h-masked-defects-example"><span id="Masked_Defects_Example">Masked Defects Example</span></h2>



<p>An example of a masked defect that is easily visible but unnoticed is a faulty user interface. Let’s say the UI that was built is extremely visually attractive but some of the most important functionalities according to the requirements of the application might not be easily visible which would impact the business revenue.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Another example would be when integrating multiple software components or third-party libraries, integration issues may arise. These issues can sometimes mask defects within individual components. For instance, a defect in one module may only become apparent when integrated with others, making it harder to trace the root cause.</p>



<p>One of the most common examples is that a software product may function flawlessly in one environment but exhibit critical defects in another, like a production environment versus a development or testing environment. Testers might not discover these defects if they primarily focus on one environment and assume that the software is functioning correctly elsewhere.</p>



<h2 id="h-why-masked-defect"><span id="Why_Masked_Defect">Why Masked Defect?</span></h2>



<p>Defects can become masked because of a combination of factors like limited resources, shifting priorities, and the complexity of software systems. When teams have constraints in resources and limited time, they often prioritize addressing more visible or urgent defects allowing less critical ones to remain hidden.&nbsp;</p>



<p>This results in a scenario where the presence of defects is masked by other issues, becoming an unintentional byproduct of the software. These interdependencies often involve complex relationships between various components or modules within the software, making it challenging to predict how a defect in one area might affect or be obscured by defects in another. This phenomenon underscores the importance of meticulous testing, rigorous defect tracking, and comprehensive quality assurance practices to uncover and rectify all <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/types-of-defects/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">types of defects</a>, especially those that could otherwise remain hidden and compromise the software&#8217;s integrity and functionality.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In essence, defect masking is a nuanced challenge that requires vigilant attention to detail and effective <a href="https://www.javatpoint.com/test-strategy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">testing strategies</a> to mitigate its impact.</p>



<h2 id="h-practical-description-of-masked-errors"><span id="Practical_description_of_masked_errors">Practical description of masked errors</span></h2>



<p>In practical terms, consider a scenario in which a software development team is working on an e-commerce platform. During testing, they discovered a minor formatting issue in the product description section that caused a huge misalignment in the text. This cosmetic issue is quickly identified and resolved because it&#8217;s readily available to testers.&nbsp;</p>



<p>However, buried within the same codebase, there&#8217;s a more critical defect related to payment processing that occasionally results in incorrect transactions, but it&#8217;s rare and doesn&#8217;t consistently trigger errors. This severe payment bug remains unnoticed because the team&#8217;s attention is predominantly focused on fixing the visual flaw.&nbsp;</p>



<p>So, the payment error remains masked by the less impactful formatting issue, posing a significant risk to the system&#8217;s financial integrity and user trust. This practical example illustrates how a less critical defect can mask a far more severe one when testing and development priorities are not effectively managed.</p>



<h2 id="h-what-is-the-difference-between-latent-and-masked-defects"><span id="What_is_the_difference_between_latent_and_masked_defects">What is the difference between latent and masked defects?</span></h2>



<p>There often is a misconception between masked and latent defects. So here are its differences.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Latent Defects</strong></td><td><strong>Masked Defects</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Latent defects are defects within the software that are present but dormant or inactive. They do not manifest themselves until specific conditions or scenarios arise.</td><td>Masked defects are defects that go unnoticed or undetected during testing due to the presence of other defects or because they are overshadowed by more visible issues.</td></tr><tr><td>Latent defects are triggered by specific and often uncommon usage patterns, data inputs, or environmental conditions that are not typically encountered during regular testing.</td><td>Masked defects are concealed by other defects and may only become apparent when the masking defects are resolved, or under specific, often uncommon, circumstances.</td></tr><tr><td>Latent defects may remain dormant for an extended period and can potentially go undetected for a long time if the triggering conditions do not occur.</td><td>Masked defects are usually detected only when the defects masking them are fixed or when the right set of conditions is met during testing or real-world usage.</td></tr><tr><td>A latent defect in a backup system might only become active and noticeable when a specific type of system failure occurs, triggering the backup process.</td><td>A masked defect might occur when a critical software bug is concealed by the presence of other, less impactful issues, leading testers and developers to overlook it during testing.</td></tr><tr><td>Latent defects can have severe consequences when they become active, potentially leading to system failures, data loss, or other critical issues.</td><td>Masked defects can impact software quality by allowing critical issues to go unnoticed, potentially leading to user dissatisfaction, financial losses, or compromised system reliability.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p><strong>How can test automation help?</strong></p>



<p>If you have test cases that need to be executed repeatedly, and you see test automation generating an ROI in the long run, it is always recommended to automate your tests.</p>



<p>Automating these tests ensures there is no masked defect in the areas where tests are automated.</p>



<p><br><p><button class="btn bg-primary cta-btn" style="margin: auto"><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color:#fff">Automate your tests for web, mobile, desktop applications and APIs, 10x faster, with Testsigma</a></button></p><br></p>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion">Conclusion</span></h2>



<p>In conclusion, defect masking is a significant concern in software testing that can lead to the release of faulty software. Addressing this issue requires a combination of robust testing practices, effective communication, defect prioritization, and a commitment to delivering high-quality software to end-users. </p>



<faq>
  <ts-list-item>
    <ts-title-value>What is defect leakage?</ts-title-value>
    <ts-content-value>Defect leakage occurs in a software application when issues that were previously identified and supposedly fixed reappear in later stages of development or even after the software has been released to users. This phenomenon indicates that defects have &#8220;leaked&#8221; from one phase of development or testing into another, often going unnoticed until they resurface in a more critical context.</ts-content-value>
  </ts-list-item>
</faq>



<customlinks>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Automated mobile app testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/automated-mobile-app-testing</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
<ts-link-item>
<ts-linktext-value>Automated web application testing</ts-linktext-value>
<ts-linkurl-value>https://testsigma.com/automated-web-application-testing</ts-linkurl-value>
</ts-link-item>
</customlinks>


Defect Masking in Software Testing What it is & Why it Matters