During the multiple phases of the software development life cycle(SDLC), multiple types of testing are performed depending on the stage of development. Each <a href="https://www.elluminatiinc.com/software-development-life-cycle/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">stage of the SDLC</a> has different requirements and objectives for the testing to fulfill. The testing phase starts with unit testing, followed by integration testing, system testing, system integration testing, acceptance testing, and regression testing.&nbsp;



During each testing phase, if something does not work as per the requirements, the defects detected by the testers are raised and assigned to the developers to fix. Once defects are fixed, they are retested by testers to ensure it works as desired. This is called retesting. But isn’t it the same as regression testing? They are not. Let us discuss regression testing vs retesting in detail in this article and understand all about regression testing vs retesting.



Regression Testing:



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regression testing</a> checks if code changes affect existing features. It confirms that the application still functions correctly after updates. It includes functional and non-functional tests and is not done on new modules.



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center">Read all about <a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regression Testing</a></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



Retesting:



Retesting, also called <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/confirmation-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">confirmation testing</a>, ensures that previously identified defects are fixed correctly. It involves re-running failed test cases to verify they now pass.



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center">Read all about <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/retesting/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Retesting</a></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>







<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Regression_Testing_vs_Retesting_Differences">1 Regression Testing vs Retesting Differences</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion">2 Conclusion:</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">3 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Is_Retest_done_after_Regression_test_What_comes_first_Retesting_or_Regression_Testing">3.1 Is Retest done after Regression test, What comes first Retesting or Regression Testing?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_difference_between_Retesting_and_Sanity_Testing">3.2 What is the difference between Retesting and Sanity Testing?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="regression-testing-vs-retesting-differences">Regression Testing vs Retesting Differences</h2>



Let&#8217;s explore the key differences between Regression Testing and Retesting in software testing:



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/slH2WelOaROSYHXoze7fX8A.png" alt="regression testing vs retesting differences" class="wp-image-8564" width="576" height="499" /></figure></div>







<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td></td><td>Regression Testing</td><td>Retesting</td></tr><tr><td>Purpose</td><td>The primary purpose of regression testing is to ensure that recent code changes have not adversely affected existing functionalities. It involves running previously executed test cases to verify that new code modifications haven&#8217;t introduced new defects.</td><td>Retesting is focused on verifying that a specific bug or issue reported earlier has been fixed correctly. It involves running test cases related to the particular issue to confirm that it no longer exists.</td></tr><tr><td>Scope</td><td>It encompasses many test cases, not just those related to recent changes. The goal is to check the overall integrity of the software after any modifications.</td><td>It is narrowly focused on a specific defect or issue and involves re-executing only the test cases directly related to it.</td></tr><tr><td>Automation</td><td>Automation is commonly used for regression testing because it involves running many test cases. Automated test suites help efficiently execute these tests whenever there are code changes.</td><td>Automation can be used for retesting, but it&#8217;s only sometimes necessary, especially for one-time verifications of specific issues. Manual testing is often sufficient for retesting.</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-plan/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Plan</a></td><td>It is typically part of the overall test plan and is executed at various stages of the development cycle, such as during integration testing, system testing, and even post-release maintenance.</td><td>Retesting is usually planned and executed when a specific defect is reported. It may only be explicitly mentioned in the test plan if necessary to verify the fix.</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/what-is-test-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Test Cases</a></td><td>Test cases for regression testing cover a wide range of functionalities and scenarios to ensure the overall stability of the software. They are not limited to specific defects.</td><td>Test cases for retesting are specific to the reported defect. They are designed to replicate the conditions that triggered the issue initially.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



In summary, while regression testing and retesting are important aspects of <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/software-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">software testing</a>, they serve different purposes and have distinct scopes. Regression testing is a broader practice aimed at ensuring overall software stability, often automated while retesting is a focused verification of specific bug fixes, typically done manually or with fewer test cases.



<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion:</h2>



In conclusion, &#8220;Regression Testing vs Retesting&#8221; illustrates two vital yet distinct facets of the software testing process.



Regression Testing is a method that ensures the stability and functionality of a software system during modifications. It involves passed and failed test cases and can be performed manually or with automation tools. While it ensures business continuity and detects potential side effects, optimizing can be time-consuming and challenging. Retesting, on the other hand, is a specific practice that re-executes failed test cases to verify defects, enhancing product quality and reducing verification time.



Understanding the disparities and advantages of these two testing approaches is essential for maintaining software integrity and delivering high-quality products to users. The choice between regression testing and retesting hinges on the goals and priorities of the testing phase within the software development lifecycle.



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="is-retest-done-after-regression-test-what-comes-first-retesting-or-regression-testing">Is Retest done after Regression test, What comes first Retesting or Regression Testing?</h3>



Yes, retesting is done after regression testing. Retesting is done after a software release to ensure that the new features function properly, but regression testing is done before the software is released to ensure that the new features work properly, while regression tests are conducted to determine if there are any earlier issues in the software.



<h3 id="what-is-the-difference-between-retesting-and-sanity-testing">What is the difference between Retesting and Sanity Testing?</h3>



Retesting entails testing a specific software functionality. It is not good for automation because the test case varies every time. If a defect or problem is discovered in the code, it is merely a portion of the testing process.



Sanity testing is performed to ensure that each function performs as intended. Only one component of the entire system is subjected to sanity testing. The primary goal of the testing is to ensure the system’s stability.

Regression Testing vs Retesting-Differences and Examples

Overcome common Regression Testing challenges and ensure that any change does not impact the quality of the software deliverable. Agile development is acclaimed for delivering working software frequently. Each time it adds or enhances a minor feature that is of value to the customer.



We need to plan our <a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regression Testing</a> effectively to cater to the changing demands in Agile. Let us start with one of the major Regression Testing challenges.<gwmw style="display:none;">



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Top_8_Regression_Testing_Challenges">1 Top 8 Regression Testing Challenges</a><ul><li><a href="#1Optimizing_and_selecting_the_right_test_cases">1.1 1.Optimizing and selecting the right test cases</a></li><li><a href="#2Test_Authoring_time">1.2 2.Test Authoring time</a></li><li><a href="#3Close_the_Communication_gap">1.3 3.Close the Communication gap</a></li><li><a href="#4Examine_and_choose_the_right_automation_testing_tools">1.4 4.Examine and choose the right automation testing tools</a></li><li><a href="#5Reduce_the_DevTest_Complete_Gap">1.5 5.Reduce the Dev/Test Complete Gap</a></li><li><a href="#6Build_Automation_In-sprint">1.6 6.Build Automation In-sprint</a></li><li><a href="#7Deal_with_changing_Requirements">1.7 7.Deal with changing Requirements</a></li><li><a href="#8Perform_some_Exploratory_Testing">1.8 8.Perform some Exploratory Testing</a><ul><li><a href="#Sign_up_for_a_free_trial">1.8.1 Sign up for a free trial</a></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions">2 Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#What_are_the_disadvantages_of_regression_testing">2.1 What are the disadvantages of regression testing?</a></li><li><a href="#How_do_you_overcome_regression_testing_challenges">2.2 How do you overcome regression testing challenges?</a></li><li><a href="#What_are_the_pros_and_cons_of_regression_testing">2.3 What are the pros and cons of regression testing?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Suggested_Readings">3 Suggested Readings</a></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="top-8-regression-testing-challenges">Top 8 Regression Testing Challenges</h2>



Regression testing ensures that modifications or upgrades to a program or system do not affect previously tested functionality. However, various issues can influence the quality of the testing process, such as the following.<gwmw style="display:none;">



<h3 id="1-optimizing-and-selecting-the-right-test-cases">1.Optimizing and selecting the right test cases</h3>



The test cases affected due to a change may not be the same reason for another. Identifying the relevant affected test cases is a major problem in Regression Testing.



Prioritize test cases affected by a new function addition, update, or edit. Only run these instead of a complete test suite with irrelevant test cases and overloading. Identify the affected regions and analyze how changes, new features, or bug fixes might have impacted existing features and functionalities.



Regularly monitor and perform periodic cleanup to remove obsolete and duplicate test cases from the regression test suites.



If the Automated regression testing is done consistently, it will be easier to optimize and maintain the right test cases.



 <div class="bg-primary cta">
 Testsigma helps you create regression suites automatically using Artificial Intelligence.
 
<a class="btn cta-btn" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing-tool" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sign up for a free trial</a>
</div> 



<h3 id="2-test-authoring-time">2.Test Authoring time</h3>



It could be challenging to keep up with the pace of delivery in Agile with the huge scripting necessary time to test a simple functionality and rewrite every affected test. Updating and maintaining huge scripts at any time requires understanding the existing code. But one major disadvantage of Selenium is the huge test authoring time required.<gwmw style="display:none;">



Cutting down on the test authoring time allows us to use the full benefits of automating the regression testing process. This is now possible with the advent of Scriptless Automation Testing tools! Now, the tests can be <a href="https://testsigma.com/test-development" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">written using natural language</a>; This makes it easy for anyone to refer to the tests and make changes easily at any time.



Upcoming, you may refer to a more detailed discussion of the features ideal for a scriptless automation testing tool. You might also want to know how Testsigma can be the <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/scriptless-test-automation-tool-why-testsigma/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">best Scriptless Automation Testing Tool</a> and save you time and cost.



 <div class="bg-primary cta">Start automating your tests in plain English! 
<a class="btn cta-btn" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing-tool" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sign up for a free trial</a>
</div> 



<h3 id="3-close-the-communication-gap">3.Close the Communication gap</h3>



Effective communication forms the basis of the success of Agile. Continuous engagement with the team ensures that the client expectations are met, testers find quick solutions to issues and the deliverables meet customer expectations. Quite often, major issues or bugs are not identified early because the process was not followed and the team failed to communicate with each other.



A useful communication tool that will help understand the status of the project and broadcast changes.



<h3 id="4-examine-and-choose-the-right-automation-testing-tools">4.Examine and choose the right automation testing tools</h3>



We need to choose Automated Regression Testing tools that make the re-editing or rework of Regression Testing easier. You may want to refer this guide to help you <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/how-select-right-automated-regression-testing-tool/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="We need to choose Automated Regression Testing tools that make the re-editing or rework of Regression Testing easier. You may want to refer this guide to help you choose an Automated Regression Testing Tool effectively. (opens in a new tab)">choose an Automated Regression Testing Tool</a> effectively.



Intelligent automated regression testing tools like Testsigma help you create Regression test plans automatically and suggest all affected automated tests and areas so you can spend less time identifying affected areas and advice fixes.



The main challenges with conventional test automation are building a robust and maintainable automation framework and managing the “likely to change” objects and ui-identifiers. The automation testing tool must ensure that the automated tests are reusable and maintainable and non-resistant to changes in the application UI and also ensure that the automated tests remain stable(automatically).



What you can do is get the vendors to demonstrate how implementing their tool will minimize risk and improve the release quality.



Ensuring that a website functions as expected in all major browsers and mobile devices or tablets across different screen resolutions and sizes is challenging for testers in agile projects to manage and run them in parallel. It is particularly daunting to perform Regression Testing across browsers and devices. Managing environment specific datasets and variables that are likely to change in multiple execution environments at each stage like Development, Testing, Staging, Production is also crucial. Check if the automated regression testing tool offer real devices for testing to speed up your run times.



Also, choose an automated regression testing tool that can integrate with tools such as Jenkins, so you can run your regression tests continuously right from the first build incrementally and collate the results on a consistent loop integrated with the testing server which helps in getting actionable feedback allowing dev teams to act on them immediately in contrast to late hitting bugs towards the end of the sprint.



 <div class="bg-primary cta">
Try Testsigma, best suited for automated regression testing in Agile and DevOps
 
<a class="btn cta-btn" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing-tool" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sign up for a free trial</a>
</div> 



<h3 id="5-reduce-the-dev-test-complete-gap">5.Reduce the Dev/Test Complete Gap</h3>



Regression tests must be run after every development iteration and after changes are made. The delivery pipeline should trigger regression tests automatically whenever a successful build is made. This results in a shorter feedback loop between developers and testers, leading to faster error identification and fixing. This saves time compared to testing postponed towards the end of the cycle.



<h3 id="6-build-automation-in-sprint">6.Build Automation In-sprint</h3>



Automation usually lags by at least one sprint. Teams take the risk of ignoring regression testing of the new feature at the end of the cycle due to the amount of manual effort and time required to achieve complete test coverage. Instead, the tester can begin building the skeleton of an automated test and fill in the objects/element ui identifiers later when the application UI is available.



Once the UI is close to done, all the participants should be working more closely to complete the UI mapping. This ensures the tests are completely automated along with the development and ready to run through continuous integration.



By the time the code is complete and ready to be committed, there are unit tests, API tests, and a handful of automated UI tests. The feature is all set for automated regression testing and then to move to the production.



Regression testing is now faster and the development flow will be smooth.



<h3 id="7-deal-with-changing-requirements">7.Deal with changing Requirements</h3>



The Agile methodology allows for change in requirements even late in the development. The scrum teams need to be prepared to accept the late change in requirements. When the requirements change, especially towards the end of the sprint and a particular functionality hasn’t been tested well, the team should make informed decisions whether to release the feature or push it to the next sprint based on the criticality of that function/feature. If this is the case, you could do a heads off by performing basic Sanity testing of the changes and not go into deeper levels of testing.



It can also be the case that the user stories/requirements are not recorded appropriately and, the team missed out on critical functionalities. This can also happen as a result of not involving testers in the early planning/designing phases or due to improper documentation.



Many a time, product requirement documents are too often read once and left which isn’t ideal for an Agile process. This creates a challenge for testers because there is a lack of understanding and requirements, so proper test cases can’t be constructed.



<h3 id="8-perform-some-exploratory-testing">8.Perform some Exploratory Testing</h3>



When everything goes fine, you could do some free unrestricted or “not bound by rules” testing with less or no documentation. You can see if you missed out on anything or an unused feature.



It would be wise to set a dedicated time for some exploratory testing complementary to Regression Testing to explore other areas of the software like a real user would.



The purpose of regression testing is to unmask abnormalities, unexpected behavior as a result of change, updates, or re-releases. For this, it is required that every relevant test case that has direct or indirect impact is run within the limited span of time in the sprint.



It is mandatory that a consistent test management and requirement management approach is followed right from the early stages within the automated regression testing tool you choose.



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing">Automated Regression Testing Tool bui</a><a aria-label="Automated Regression Testing Tool built for Agile and Continuous Delivery, Testsigma’s smart AI can identify the changes made to an application and analyze its impact on relevant affected test cases. (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing-tool" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lt for Agile and Continuous Delivery</a>, Testsigma’s smart AI can identify the changes made to an application and analyze its impact on relevant affected test cases.<gwmw style="display:none;">



You may have to run regression tests in parallel to be able to run it more often. With Testsigma, you can schedule your test executions to run periodically without manual intervention sequentially or in parallel any time.



You get detailed reports of your automated regression test executions on multiple device configurations with detailed error logs as to what failed, what tests are affected and why.



Take a look at Testsigma’s approach to Automated Regression Testing with an organized and well managed repository of regression test suites, reusable objects and identifiers.



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code><h4><a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sign up for a free trial</a></h4></code></pre>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>



<h3 id="what-are-the-disadvantages-of-regression-testing">What are the disadvantages of regression testing?</h3>



One of the major disadvantages is the time and effort necessary to run regression tests, which may be particularly significant in big, sophisticated applications. Additionally, regression testing may not always capture all faults, and it may be impossible to test every scenario fully in some cases.



<h3 id="how-do-you-overcome-regression-testing-challenges">How do you overcome regression testing challenges?</h3>



A well-defined testing strategy and relevant tools and methodologies are necessary to address the obstacles of regression testing. This includes prioritizing test cases based on criticality, maintaining appropriate test data management standards, and employing automated testing technologies to boost productivity and decrease the risk of human mistakes. Testing should be carried out throughout the development lifecycle.



<h3 id="what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-regression-testing">What are the pros and cons of regression testing?</h3>



Regression testing helps verify that previously tested functionality is not impacted by modifications or upgrades. It can detect errors early in the development process and evaluate the program&#8217;s overall quality. The time and effort necessary to run regression tests, the expenses involved with maintaining and upgrading test cases and data, and the chance that it may not identify all flaws are all disadvantages are also a few of the regression testing challenges. The choice to do regression testing should be based on a detailed examination of each project&#8217;s possible advantages and drawbacks.



<h2 id="suggested-readings">Suggested Readings</h2>



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regression Testing Guide for Modern Agile Teams</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing">Automated Regression Testing | Low Code</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/automated-regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regression Test Automation: A Quickstart Guide</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Functional vs Regression Testing: What&#8217;s the difference?</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/selenium-regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Automating Regression Testing with Selenium: All you need to know</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing/regression-testing-framework" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A Detailed Guide to Frameworks for Regression Testing</a><gwmw style="display:none;">



<a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Agile Team&#8217;s Guide to Regression Testing</a><gwmw style="display:none;">

Overcoming-Automated-Regression-Testing-Challenges

Top 8 Automated Regression Testing Challenges in Agile | How to Overcome it?

Why Regression Testing is Important in Agile?

Selenium alternative for Automated Regression Testing

Top Limitations and Challenges in Selenium &  Solution

Test automation goes beyond regression testing new features. In-sprint test automation aims in developing a faster and reliable test automation in parallel to development.



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets">Table Of Contents<ul class="toc_list"><ul><li><a href="#Challenges_in_implementing_In-Sprint_Test_Automation_to_perform_Regression_Testing">0.1 Challenges in implementing In-Sprint Test Automation to perform Regression Testing</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Finding_the_right_tooltest_automation_framework">1 Finding the right tool/test automation framework</a></li><li><a href="#Lack_of_time_to_automate_in_short_sprints">2 Lack of time to automate in short sprints</a></li><li><a href="#Lack_of_a_unified_continuous_testing_platform">3 Lack of a unified continuous testing platform</a></li><li><a href="#Flexibility_to_enhance_the_toolframework">4 Flexibility to enhance the tool/framework</a></li><li><a href="#Demanding_technical_expertise">5 Demanding technical expertise</a></li><li><a href="#Availability_of_the_right_set_of_tools">6 Availability of the right set of tools</a></li><li><a href="#Teams_approach_within_the_sprint">7 Teams’ approach within the sprint </a><ul><li><a href="#Here_is_how_Testsigma_addresses_all_the_above_challenges">7.1 Here is how Testsigma addresses all the above challenges:</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h3 id="challenges-in-implementing-in-sprint-test-automation-to-perform-regression-testing">Challenges in implementing In-Sprint Test Automation to perform Regression Testing</h3>



The Agile and DevOps approach allows no time between code complete and release. In-sprint test automation ensures maximum coverage within short release cycles. However, there are a few challenges in implementing In-sprint test automation.



For an in-depth study about regression testing and its aspects, check out the <a href="https://testsigma.com/regression-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="regression testing (opens in a new tab)">regression testing</a> guide.



<h2 id="finding-the-right-tool-test-automation-framework">Finding the right tool/test automation framework</h2>



The tool/ test automation framework should allow for writing automated tests even without access to the application UI so as to start the automation process with no time to waste and help create tests right from the design phase.



As we know, the UI undergoes many changes up until the last minute so it is always recommended to automate the API tests and perform unit tests first so that the bugs can be identified early on in the cycle.



Hence the tools must support different types of tests including unit and API tests along with UI automation.



<h2 id="lack-of-time-to-automate-in-short-sprints">Lack of time to automate in short sprints</h2>



In modern development practices like Agile and DevOps, the build is handed to the test team right after development(not at the same time in most cases)to find issues in the new feature and to fix them. All of this in one sprint cycle which may be a week or two long.



But as we all know, automation testing demands a significant amount of time not just the automation engineer&#8217;s but the developer’s and QA’s. During short development cycles, it is difficult to spare dedicated time for automation.



<h2 id="lack-of-a-unified-continuous-testing-platform">Lack of a unified continuous testing platform</h2>



Today, all modern businesses use not just web interface but Web, Mobile Web, Native Apps and APIs.



Every new feature needs to be tested in all these different application types to ensure a smooth user experience.



Hence, to automate different application types to avoid managing multiple tools to automate different application types, it is best to have a&nbsp;<a class="brand-color" style="box-shadow: unset;" href="https://testsigma.com/blog/why-unified-automated-testing-software-for-continuous-testing-in-agile-and-devops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">unified automated testing framework</a>.



<h2 id="flexibility-to-enhance-the-tool-framework">Flexibility to enhance the tool/framework</h2>



The modern business is very dynamic and the requirements change very often. There may be a new design and approach for the product at any time.



The tool/framework must be flexible enough to enhance and optimize new automation requirements at any time.



The tool and framework should not demand you to start from scratch to address the new requirements.



<h2 id="demanding-technical-expertise">Demanding technical expertise</h2>



Automation done with legacy tools demand high technical skills from all the stakeholders. Most of the times teams may not have all the skill sets to automate testing. Most tools demand a steep learning curve and a deep technical understanding.



This makes it difficult for the teams to automate testing within a sprint. In order to implement automation testing within short cycles, writing automated tests should be made as simple as possible.



Automation Testing should be easy enough for Functional Testers who are new to the concept or the underlying complexity.



<h2 id="availability-of-the-right-set-of-tools">Availability of the right set of tools</h2>



As the cycles are very short, the timely availability of different tools in the test automation ecosystem is very critical for in-sprint test automation.



Teams spend a lot of time setting up test environments to execute tests. Instead, dynamically scalable pre-configured environments will save a lot of time to focus on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://testsigma.com/test-development" target="_blank">test development</a> process.



Continuous integration will automatically update the changes in the test environments.&nbsp;With this, the feedback will be automatic and quick.



An ecosystem with the right set of tools (with important elements like test environments, continuous integration environment, automated build, servers etc.) is a must for In-sprint test automation.



<h2 id="teams-approach-within-the-sprint">Teams’ approach within the sprint </h2>



Often teams execute sprints in mini-waterfalls which is not the right approach and things cannot be done in parallel.&nbsp;This needs to change. It is a must to follow Agile and start automation right from the design phase



<div class="cta-banner-v2">
<div class="title-with-description ">
Get started with insprint test automation, the easy way, with Testsigma
</div>
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" class="cta-btn-v1" rel="noopener">Signup Now </a>
</div>



<h3 id="here-is-how-testsigma-addresses-all-the-above-challenges">Here is how <a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a> addresses all the above challenges:</h3>



<ol><li>Testsigma’s simple English based test script development approach doesn&#8217;t depend on the application availability. You can start writing automated tests right from the design phase. It also supports both UI and API testing.</li><li>Testsigma’s<a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/natural-language-processing-nlp-based-test-automation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)"> natural language based</a> approach requires very less time to automate your testing and automating your tests within the sprint now becomes a reality. Testsigma doesn’t demand programming skills to write automated tests but uses simple English to automate your tests. Writing automated tests is as simple as writing manual tests.</li><li>Testsigma is a unified <a href="https://testsigma.com/continuous-testing" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> continuous testing</a> platform to automate all your applications including Web, Mobile, Native apps and APIs. You don&#8217;t need to manage multiple tools to automate different types of applications.</li><li>Testsigma is simple and flexible and can be customized according to your testing requirements.&nbsp;</li><li>Testsigma is a complete ecosystem with all the essential components and integrations required for continuous testing.</li></ol>

In Sprint Test Automation Challenges for Regression Testing