
<p>Testing is the most critical part of the Software Development Life Cycle(SDLC). Testing is performed at different levels such as Unit Testing, Integration Testing, and Functional Testing. Testing can be performed either manually or through automation. The tools or libraries which are used for test automation vary with the framework that you are using. For example, if you are using a JavaScript framework, you might have to use Jasmine, Jest, etc. The JUnit and TestNG are the most popular Java testing frameworks, so let’s explore JUnit vs TestNG in detail here.</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#JUnit_vs_TestNG_8211_Overview"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> JUnit vs TestNG &#8211; Overview</a><ul><li><a href="#What_is_JUnit"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.1</span> What is JUnit?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">1.2</span> What is TestNG?</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Similarities_Between_JUnit_and_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Similarities Between JUnit and TestNG</a></li><li><a href="#Top_20_Core_Differences_between_JUnit_and_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Top 20 Core Differences between JUnit and TestNG</a></li><li><a href="#Why_is_JUnit_More_Popular_than_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> Why is JUnit More Popular than TestNG?</a></li><li><a href="#Can_We_Use_JUnit_and_TestNG_Together"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Can We Use JUnit and TestNG Together?</a></li><li><a href="#Summary"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Summary</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#JUnit_vs_TestNG_which_is_better"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.1</span> JUnit vs TestNG, which is better?</a></li><li><a href="#What_is_the_main_difference_between_JUnit_and_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.2</span> What is the main difference between JUnit and TestNG?</a></li><li><a href="#Does_TestNG_use_JUnit"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.3</span> Does TestNG use JUnit?</a></li><li><a href="#JUnit_vs_TestNG_What_are_the_advantages_of_TestNG"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">7.4</span> JUnit vs TestNG? What are the advantages of TestNG?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="junit-vs-testng-overview"><span id="JUnit_vs_TestNG_8211_Overview"><strong>JUnit vs TestNG &#8211; Overview</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-what-is-junit"><span id="What_is_JUnit">What is JUnit?</span></h3>



<p>JUnit happens to be among the most popular unit testing frameworks for Java. It offers a simple and effective solution when it comes to writing and running unit tests for Java code. In JUnit, test cases are generally written as Java classes that have methods to test particular units of code—<strong>methods</strong>, for example, or <strong>classes</strong>.</p>



<p id="h-features-of-junit"><strong>Features of JUnit</strong></p>



<p><strong>Annotations</strong>: JUnit uses annotations to define test cases, test suites, and expected exceptions.</p>



<p><strong>Assertions</strong>: JUnit provides several different assertion methods, such as assertEquals, assertTrue, and assertFalse, to check the correctness of the results being tested.</p>



<p><strong>Test Runners</strong>: JUnit comes with built-in test runners for running tests and reporting results.</p>



<p><strong>Fixtures</strong>: JUnit has built-in support for the creation and cleanup of fixture objects.</p>



<p><strong>Test Suites</strong>: JUnit enables the creation of test suites so that related tests can be executed together. This is a cleaner and simpler approach.</p>



<p>Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/cucumber-vs-junit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cucumber vs JUnit</a></p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-testng"><span id="What_is_TestNG">What is TestNG?</span></h3>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="798" height="134" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13142510/TestNG.jpg" alt="TestNG" class="wp-image-47228" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13142510/TestNG.jpg 798w, https://s3.amazonaws.com/blog-assets-production.testsigma.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13142510/TestNG-768x129.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 798px) 100vw, 798px" /></figure>



<p>TestNG is a unit testing framework for Java classes developed to fill in the gaps left by JUnit and NUnit. It introduces some new concepts that were not available in JUnit or NUnit at the time, like groups, flexible configurations for running test cases, and data-driven testing at the test suite level.</p>



<p>Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/testng-vs-cucumber/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TestNG vs Cucumber</a></p>



<p id="h-features-of-testng"><strong>Features of TestNG</strong></p>



<p><strong>Annotations</strong>: TestNG uses annotations to define test cases, test suites, and test configurations.</p>



<p><strong>Data-Driven Testing</strong>: TestNG supports data-driven testing. It allows running the same test with different data sets.</p>



<p><strong>Parallel Testing</strong>: TestNG has the capability to execute tests in parallel, which is advantageous for improving performance for large test suites.</p>



<p><strong>Listeners</strong>: TestNG equips listeners to customize the way tests are run and how results are reported.</p>



<p><strong>Dependencies</strong>: TestNG allows the specification of dependencies between test methods so that they are executed in the right order.</p>



<p>Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/parameterization-in-testng/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Parameterization in TestNG</a></p>



<h2 id="h-similarities-between-junit-and-testng"><span id="Similarities_Between_JUnit_and_TestNG"><strong>Similarities Between JUnit and TestNG</strong></span></h2>



<p>The table below shows the similarities between JUnit and TestNG:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feature</strong></td><td><strong>JUnit</strong></td><td><strong>TestNG</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Core Purpose</td><td>Unit testing for Java</td><td>Unit testing for Java</td></tr><tr><td>Annotation-based Testing</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Assertion Mechanisms</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Test Suites</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Test Reporting</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Parameterized Testing</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Dependent Tests</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Data-Driven Testing</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Parallel Test Execution</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Grouping of Tests</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Test Listeners</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-top-20-core-differences-between-junit-and-testng"><span id="Top_20_Core_Differences_between_JUnit_and_TestNG"><strong>Top 20 Core Differences between JUnit and TestNG</strong></span></h2>



<p>Check out the core differences in the table below:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feature</strong></td><td><strong>JUnit</strong></td><td><strong>TestNG</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Open Source</strong></td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Setup</strong></td><td>Straightforward, minimal configuration</td><td>Easy, and to add dependencies</td></tr><tr><td><strong>User-Friendliness</strong></td><td>May require additional integrations (e.g., JUnit Jupiter) for some features</td><td>More features out of the box, user-friendly</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Listener Implementation</strong><strong><br></strong>Read here – <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/listeners-in-selenium/"><strong>Listeners in Selenium</strong></a><strong>&nbsp;</strong></td><td>Less intuitive (Listeners API)</td><td>More intuitive (annotations)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reporting</strong></td><td>No built-in HTML reporting integrates with Maven or other tools</td><td>Built-in HTML reporting integrates with Maven</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parallel Test Execution</strong></td><td>Not supported directly (workarounds possible)</td><td>Natively supported (improves efficiency)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Dependency Testing</strong></td><td>Not supported, tests run independently</td><td>Supported, allows tests to depend on others</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Data-Driven Testing</strong></td><td>Supported, but requires more effort</td><td>Straightforward, special annotations (@DataProvider)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Grouping</strong></td><td>Supported using tags (may require additional setup)</td><td>Seamless, allows organized execution by groups</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Priority/Order</strong></td><td>Controllable, but less flexible</td><td>Explicit priorities for precise control over execution order</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Assumptions Support</strong></td><td>Yes, tests can be skipped based on conditions</td><td>No built-in support focuses on strict execution</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Parameterized Tests</strong></td><td>Supported, but requires additional annotations (e.g., @ParameterizedTest)</td><td>Supported, but uses different annotations (@Test(dataProvider = &#8220;dataProvider&#8221;))</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Timeout Support</strong></td><td>Supported, allows tests to be terminated after a specified time</td><td>Supported, but provides more flexibility with timeout configurations</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Fixed Suite</strong></td><td>Yes, a fixed set of tests is defined in a suite class</td><td>No, tests can be dynamically discovered and added</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Configuration</strong></td><td>Less flexible, uses @BeforeClass and @AfterClass</td><td>More flexible, uses @BeforeMethod, @AfterMethod, @BeforeTest, @AfterTest, etc.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Annotations</strong></td><td>@Test, @BeforeClass, @AfterClass, @Before, @After</td><td>@Test, @BeforeMethod, @AfterMethod, @BeforeTest, @AfterTest, @BeforeClass, @AfterClass, and more</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Configuration Files</strong></td><td>Less flexible, uses testng.xml</td><td>More flexible, and uses testng.xml and other configuration options.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Error Handling</strong></td><td>Less granular error handling</td><td>More granular error handling with features like soft assertions.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Retry</strong></td><td>Not supported directly</td><td>Supported, allows failed tests to be retried a specified number of times.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Test Execution Listeners</strong></td><td>Supported, but less flexible</td><td>Supported, with more granular control over test execution events.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 id="h-why-is-junit-more-popular-than-testng"><span id="Why_is_JUnit_More_Popular_than_TestNG"><strong>Why is JUnit More Popular than TestNG?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Junit is most often more popular than TestNG because of its history as one of the first Java testing frameworks. It is simple and easy to use and very highly integrable with widely used IDEs like <a href="https://www.javatpoint.com/intellij-vs-eclipse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA</a>. </p>



<p>There are many tutorials available for this, and there is a very large community that supports an ecosystem of plugins and extensions.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The introduction of JUnit 5 has made it more interesting due to new features and flexibility. Besides JUnit 5 close association with the test-driven development (TDD) pattern enforces it as the de facto standard for <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/unit-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">unit testing</a> in Java.</p>



<h2 id="h-can-we-use-junit-and-testng-together"><span id="Can_We_Use_JUnit_and_TestNG_Together"><strong>Can We Use JUnit and TestNG Together?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Even though it is not a common practice, you can use JUnit and TestNG together.</p>



<p>But they are chosen to be used together due to their complementary strengths and widespread adoption within the testing community. While JUnit is renowned for its simplicity and ease of use, TestNG offers advanced features like parameterized testing and parallel execution. Combining both frameworks allows developers to capitalize on the best of both worlds.</p>



<h2 id="h-summary"><span id="Summary"><strong>Summary</strong></span></h2>



<p>In the comparison of JUnit and TestNG, JUnit is simple, old, and works greatly integrated with IDEs; hence, it is more commonly used for unit testing. On the other hand, TestNG offers advanced features like execution of tests in parallel and dependency testing that are oriented to a more complex test environment.&nbsp;</p>



<p>In the end, however, the choice between the two is an individual thing based on the project and its specific needs as well as the taste of the developer.</p>



<h2 id="h-frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="h-junit-vs-testng-which-is-better"><span id="JUnit_vs_TestNG_which_is_better">JUnit vs TestNG, which is better?</span></h3>



<p>This question has no definitive solution because both TestNG and JUnit have advantages and disadvantages. Other additions include flexible <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-design/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>test design</strong></a>, data-driven test support, and improved reporting capabilities. On the other hand, JUnit is extensively used and has a large ecosystem of plugins and integrations.</p>



<h3 id="h-what-is-the-main-difference-between-junit-and-testng"><span id="What_is_the_main_difference_between_JUnit_and_TestNG">What is the main difference between JUnit and TestNG?</span></h3>



<p>The primary distinction between JUnit and TestNG is their features and capabilities. Other additions include flexible test design, data-driven test support, and improved reporting capabilities. JUnit is extensively used and supported by a large ecosystem of plugins and integrations.</p>



<h3 id="h-does-testng-use-junit"><span id="Does_TestNG_use_JUnit">Does TestNG use JUnit?</span></h3>



<p>No, TestNG is a different testing framework that does not use JUnit.</p>



<h3 id="h-junit-vs-testng-what-are-the-advantages-of-testng"><span id="JUnit_vs_TestNG_What_are_the_advantages_of_TestNG">JUnit vs TestNG? What are the advantages of TestNG?</span></h3>



<p>Support for <a href="https://testsigma.com/data-driven-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>data-driven tests</strong></a>, flexible test setup, richer reporting, and the ability to create dependencies between test methods and groups are all advantages of TestNG over JUnit. Talking about parallel test execution with JUnit Vs TestNG, TestNG also supports <a href="https://testsigma.com/parallel-test-runs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>parallel tests</strong></a>, which can drastically reduce total test execution time.</p>


JUnit vs TestNG: Comparing Two Popular Testing Frameworks

JUnit vs TestNG – Top 20 Core Differences

4 Best TestRail Alternatives List to Look for

Top 5 Tricentis Tosca Alternatives List to Look For

Top 5 Mabl Alternatives [In-depth Comparison]

15 Best Postman Alternatives For Automated API Testing

15 Best Postman Alternatives You Should Know

Puppeteer vs Selenium | Which One Should You Choose?


<p>Software testing tools have become a necessity when it comes to scaling software delivery. qTest is the first option that comes to mind when you’re starting off.&nbsp;It’s an affordable and easy-to-use cloud-based automation solution. But what if it&#8217;s not the right fit for you? Not to worry – there are plenty of great options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses.</p>



<p>Here we&#8217;ll look at some of the best qTest alternatives available today. So, read on to find the right one for you!</p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#Why_Do_People_Choose_qTest"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> Why Do People Choose qTest?</a></li><li><a href="#The_Top_qTest_Alternatives"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> The Top qTest Alternatives</a><ul><li><a href="#Testsigma"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#Kualitee"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> Kualitee</a></li><li><a href="#Test_Rail"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> Test Rail</a></li><li><a href="#Zephyr_E"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.4</span> Zephyr E</a></li><li><a href="#GitHub"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.5</span> GitHub</a></li><li><a href="#Final_Words"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.6</span> Final Words</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-why-do-people-choose-qtest"><span id="Why_Do_People_Choose_qTest"><strong>Why Do People Choose qTest?</strong></span></h2>



<p>Tricentis qTest is a modern automated testing software that lets you put your business processes to the test. This powerful solution gives in-depth reports to help you pinpoint bugs and make quick fixes to your test case.&nbsp;</p>



<p>When it comes to testing speeds, it’s one of the fastest cloud-based automation testing tools out there. The UI is designed to help you navigate the planning and execution of tests.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The tool is so flexible that it can scale alongside your enterprise. It supports almost every browser, enabling your business to take full advantage of its utilities.</p>



<h2 id="h-the-top-qtest-alternatives"><span id="The_Top_qTest_Alternatives"><strong>The Top qTest Alternatives</strong></span></h2>



<p>We have taken the time to review some of the best options to give you a list of our top 5 picks.</p>



<h3 id="testsigma"><span id="Testsigma"><strong><a href="https://testsigma.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Testsigma</a></strong></span></h3>



<p>The first best qTest alternative on our list is Testsigma, a testing extension that enables teams to collaborate on projects seamlessly. The testing automation tool has unique reporting feature that lets you create customized reports, take screenshots, and record videos of test execution, which can be viewed by all project participants in real time.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/M-1z4P4a3EoMark2bwmH7D2AsmUbw8bDB5aDqNrhdWVKVBHY-wrFq8qshMaw-jSGJE60qy_jLhEVGJlVJ8-JxEg2NQJjYNi21db7O5fNTky5KCErPDPvkexjJAbT6zxbxZ6lJqB19ZE" alt="testsigma onboarding dashboard" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p id="h-testsigma-vs-tricentis-qtest"><strong>Testsigma vs Tricentis qTest</strong></p>



<p>Though Tricentics qTest allows project participants to collaborate on each test suite, Testsigma can be the more efficient software. As a result, even with slow internet speeds, Testsigma could deliver reports and test results faster.</p>



<p>While both these testing automation tools offer built-in JIRA sync, Testsigma does a lot more in terms of integration with other software and systems. Its complete REST-API allows effortless integration with third-party systems, DevOps, and test automation.&nbsp;</p>



<p id="h-key-features"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>



<ul><li>Efficient testing suite that delivers fast results</li><li>Unique reporting method allows participants to use screenshots and video clips</li><li>Real-time collaboration keeps all members aligned with the latest bugs and reports</li></ul>



<div class="custom-cta">
<p class="title">
Automate your Integration, UI, Visual and Functional tests 10X Faster with Testsigma. No coding required.
</p>
<div class="cta-with-ratings">
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="cta-btn hover:!no-underline">Try for free</a>
<div class="images">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/capterra.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/g2-crowd.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/ratings.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
</div>
</div>
</div>



<h3 id="kualitee"><span id="Kualitee"><strong>Kualitee</strong></span></h3>



<p>When it comes to alternatives, a close second is the Kualitee test management tool. The tool offers both manual and automated testing controls, giving you more flexibility over each test case.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The tool lets you get to the bottom of your defect logs and traces back to the errors you might have made. This allows quick bug fixes to get your test up and running again. You can also choose to export the reports in a range of selected formats. This is one of the top competitors in mobile app testing.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/cWdiSqIb7lOfWixdpSGswkUJSzDSETeCU_jseSvYBZXADUsiFLYFYBX1FIfdE1kew9S3AAoek6pJ2vQDpNYXgCNDl_ypKdxkEZYuQpc_RN76FudZ_5OYP2xo4pj3Nl3aEdBytZIKO7U" alt="Kualitee" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p id="h-kualitee-vs-tricentis-qtest"><strong>Kualitee vs Tricentis qTest</strong></p>



<p>When comparing the two, Kualitee seems to be the perfect alternative for small teams to hop on a project. They have a set community plan which is accessible for free to users.&nbsp;</p>



<p>This community plan helps you understand how it works during the initial test case input stages. On the other hand, qTest is free to use for 14 days, after which you need to purchase pay per year to use the tool.</p>



<p>Furthermore, we loved the Kualitee app that lets you set manual tests and edit them on the go. Since all your logs are saved to the cloud instantly, you can practically test out your cases from anywhere in the world. qTest does have an offline testing app, but it isn’t as user-friendly and detailed.&nbsp;</p>



<p>check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/kualitee-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kualitee Alternatives</a></p>



<p id="h-key-features-1"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>



<ul><li>Free community plan for small groups</li><li>Mobile app allows testing activities on-the-go</li><li>In-app bug reporting system optimizes mobile app testing</li><li>Easy transition of testing assets from previous tools</li></ul>



<h3 id="test-rail"><span id="Test_Rail"><strong>Test Rail</strong></span></h3>



<p>Another top test automation solution that competes well with Tricentis qTest is TestRail. It is a test case and management tool that helps bring all your automated and manual testing needs into an organized format.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Using the easy-to-use web UI, QA teams can create test cases, manage them and coordinate all your plans in one place.</p>



<p>The tool solely focuses on test management and provides an efficient workflow. It also integrates well with JIRA and Jenkins, so you should have no trouble creating complicated test cases.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/2go3klGk3p86aqVYatcF9dCsOis4XlR3FuZrK7TTss_WquXErrzjQuqBBJY6B8dEOQ44eGdpufeeRBKMqJgCxObsduivVQ76A54cl1ti4ovY_pl9mno-RKbARcSHMaRpcHbWby_lpEE" alt="qTest Alternatives- Test Rail " /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p id="h-testrail-vs-tricentis-qtest"><strong>TestRail vs Tricentis qTest</strong></p>



<p>The web interface is simple and ergonomic, allowing easy navigation and quick test runs. The categorized menu and in-depth reports will give you a clear view of your test results.&nbsp;</p>



<p>However, it does not come with document management and defect tools, so you will need to purchase them separately from other vendors.</p>



<p>Nowadays, most test management suites come with a lot of additional tools such as defects, requirements, and document management. TestRail is perfect for organizations solely focused on a test management tool minus all the extra stuff. It is also more budget-friendly than qTest.&nbsp;</p>



<p id="h-key-features-2"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>



<ul><li>Detailed test case execution, control, and monitoring</li><li>Modern, easy-to-use web user-interface&nbsp;</li><li>Seamlessly integrates with JIRA and Jenkins</li><li>Offers real-time test case progress tracking</li></ul>



<p>Check here &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/testrail-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TestRail Alternatives</a></p>



<h3 id="zephyr-e"><span id="Zephyr_E"><strong>Zephyr E</strong></span></h3>



<p>Among testing tools, Zephyr has been making quite the name for itself. Their software testing and management solutions are used in over 100 countries by millions of users.</p>



<p>The company offers robust end-to-end solutions that help organizations make proper use of DevOps, automation, and analytics tools. Zephyr’s model is highly scalable and provides long-term support for companies and teams globally.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/bGgspg9dmlioXAVKd-H74HAurgyqw2INhEsbAl7_cJ6oWO1W5ndW5gEOPVZRXB90ImGbyK3Uc6P6GXQCEOWDIGuZgkQCVm1hQcNbD7K1Q5tBHVHDjj2v4Ck_2GjgH8TX7_YSCfJViys" alt="qTest Alternatives - Zephyr E" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p id="h-zephyr-e-vs-tricentis-qtest"><strong>Zephyr E vs Tricentis qTest</strong></p>



<p>Zephyr offers similar testing automation, analytics, and DevOps tools as Tricentis qTest. However, its ability to link bugs to an execution process along with detailed traceability reports is what sets it apart.&nbsp;</p>



<p>qTest also offers in-depth bug testing and traceability, but Zephyr&#8217;s UI is easier to go around, saving QA engineers time and effort.</p>



<p>Moreover, they tend to respond quickly to their hardworking support team. While the tool features a JIRA dashboard that should be fairly easy to use, certain bugs can pop up. Their team works quickly to analyze and solve any problems you report, which in turn makes the software better for the next person.</p>



<p id="h-key-features-3"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>



<ul><li>In-depth traceability reports to link bugs from test cases</li><li>Integrates with other software easily due to extensive API and plugins support</li><li>Features a sleek and user-friendly JIRA dashboard</li><li>Makes collaboration between team members easy with document sharing capabilities</li></ul>



<p>Check Out &#8211; <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/zephyr-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Zephyr alternatives</a></p>



<h3 id="github"><span id="GitHub"><strong>GitHub</strong></span></h3>



<p>One of the top alternatives to the qTest testing platform is GitHub. On Capterra, they managed to secure the top performer award for <a href="https://www.capterra.com/issue-tracking-software/">Issue Tracking Software</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<p>They are the perfect option not only for small teams but also for large companies who don&#8217;t want to spend thousands on a testing tool. GitHub offers testing and collaboration tools, monitoring test cases, reporting and analytics, and third-party software integrations.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/5QiaP1ZltGSZ4_lBsHF-Koz-Qu-RJnTAdi9YMyQiNxjbgvN9DOUd9gFI_8nebB8Pcof52UJkwGe53C4pM3_OzhUNUDbDr29yzWWFHEAhebJQFfFuFC0natBPBiviuJpwkVrX4dZmZ2w" alt="qTest Alternatives - GitHub" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p id="h-github-vs-tricentis-qtest"><strong>GitHub vs Tricentis qTest</strong></p>



<p>Compared to Tricentis qTest, GitHub&#8217;s testing platform is simpler to use and quite handy when it comes to collaborating with teams. The detailed reporting system helps set deadlines and monitor and track individual testing progress while keeping everybody in line with the bigger picture.</p>



<p>In addition, GitHub offers deployment of their services on the cloud, SaaS, or any web-based devices. Besides, they offer Windows and Mac support like qTest with additional assistance for browsers on Android, iPhone, and iPad.</p>



<p id="h-key-features-4"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>



<ul><li>Offers real-time progress checking for separate projects</li><li>Provides training videos for beginners</li><li>Features in-depth analytics reports and project management</li><li>Integrates well with other third-party software</li></ul>



<div class="custom-cta">
<p class="title">
Build and run tests 10x faster for web, mobile, desktop and APIs under Testsigma&#8217;s unified platform.
</p>
<div class="cta-with-ratings">
<a href="https://testsigma.com/signup" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="cta-btn hover:!no-underline">Try for free</a>
<div class="images">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/capterra.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/g2-crowd.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
<img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/ratings.png" alt="image" class="rating-image">
</div>
</div>
</div>



<h3 id="h-final-words"><span id="Final_Words"><strong>Final Words</strong></span></h3>



<p>After thoroughly testing our options, it is safe to conclude that Testsigma is the best qTest alternative. The tool is super easy to use and allows importing previous test assets from other software.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Picking the right test automation tool will depend on your budget and priorities. Nonetheless, all the alternatives listed above are efficient and should provide satisfactory service.</p>





Software Testing with Generative AI
https://testsigma.com/ebook/software-testing-with-generative-ai


Testsigma Copilot GenAI Assistant
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="VQnDBHcY0c"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/introducing-testsigma-copilot-genai-assistant/">Introducing Testsigma Copilot: The AI Assistant for QA Teams</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;Introducing Testsigma Copilot: The AI Assistant for QA Teams&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/introducing-testsigma-copilot-genai-assistant/embed/#?secret=3xTg6WoREt#?secret=VQnDBHcY0c" data-secret="VQnDBHcY0c" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>


End of Life for Testproject
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="LJxxiR3AM5"><a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/end-of-life-for-testproject-what-next-for-the-community/">End of life for TestProject &#8211; what next for the community?</a></blockquote><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" title="&#8220;End of life for TestProject &#8211; what next for the community?&#8221; &#8212; Testsigma Blog" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/end-of-life-for-testproject-what-next-for-the-community/embed/#?secret=PkaYRB6nZE#?secret=LJxxiR3AM5" data-secret="LJxxiR3AM5" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>




5 Best qTest Alternatives [In-Depth Comparison]

Top 8 Perfecto Mobile Alternatives For Test Automation

10 Best Testlio Alternatives That You Should Try Out


<p>The platform for a centralized solution for all testing efforts, PractiTest, is well known amongst many agile teams. Although nowadays, several features within this tool, which was once well reputed for testing effectively, have been claimed to be absent or contain various issues.</p>



<p>For such reasons, QA engineers are looking ceaseless for the top <strong>PractiTest alternatives</strong>, and this article will mention some of the best ones!</p>



<p></p>



<div id="toc_container" class="no_bullets"><p class="toc_title">Table Of Contents</p><ul class="toc_list"><li><a href="#What_is_a_PractiTest_Tool"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">1</span> What is a PractiTest Tool?</a></li><li><a href="#Cons_of_PractiTest"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">2</span> Cons of PractiTest</a><ul><li><a href="#Duration_of_Free_trial"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.1</span> Duration of Free trial</a></li><li><a href="#Cloud-Based_Access_Only"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.2</span> Cloud-Based Access Only</a></li><li><a href="#Performance_and_Missing_Features"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">2.3</span> Performance and Missing Features</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Why_to_consider_PractiTest_Alternatives"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">3</span> Why to consider PractiTest Alternatives?</a></li><li><a href="#PractiTest_Alternatives_and_Competitors"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">4</span> PractiTest Alternatives and Competitors</a></li><li><a href="#Best_PractiTest_Alternatives_Free_and_Paid_for_2024"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">5</span> Best PractiTest Alternatives (Free and Paid) for 2024</a><ul><li><a href="#Testsigma"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">5.1</span> Testsigma</a></li><li><a href="#TestRail"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">5.2</span> TestRail</a></li><li><a href="#TestLink"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">5.3</span> TestLink</a></li><li><a href="#Zephyr"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">5.4</span> Zephyr</a></li><li><a href="#SpiraTest"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">5.5</span> SpiraTest</a></li></ul></li><li><a href="#Which_is_the_Best_PractiTest_Alternative"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">6</span> Which is the Best PractiTest Alternative?</a></li><li><a href="#Conclusion"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">7</span> Conclusion</a></li><li><a href="#Frequently_Asked_Questions"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_1">8</span> Frequently Asked Questions</a><ul><li><a href="#Why_Choose_PractiTest"><span class="toc_number toc_depth_2">8.1</span> Why Choose PractiTest?</a></li></ul></li></ul></div>
<h2 id="h-what-is-a-practitest-tool"><span id="What_is_a_PractiTest_Tool"><strong>What is a PractiTest Tool</strong>?</span></h2>



<p>PractiTest is a test management tool. In a nutshell, it allows you to organize any testing operations with the help of managed fields and filters, which can also be linked to other entities.</p>



<p>These test management features contain manual testing and the newly added attribute to carry out automated tests with the help of test automation tools. Using this management tool, you can also create test cases to review them.</p>



<h2 id="h-cons-of-practitest"><span id="Cons_of_PractiTest"><strong>Cons of PractiTest</strong></span></h2>



<p>PractiTest lacks in several aspects of requirements, including improper review of high-quality software and several bugs within their test management tool. A few of their cons are listed below.</p>



<h3 id="h-duration-of-free-trial"><span id="Duration_of_Free_trial"><strong>Duration of Free trial</strong></span></h3>



<p>PractiTest allows 14 days of a free trial. After that, using this software costs <strong>$15 per month</strong>. As several other test management tools are either completely free or offer a more significant trial period, the existing competitors seem the cost-effective choice.</p>



<h3 id="h-cloud-based-access-only"><span id="Cloud-Based_Access_Only"><strong>Cloud-Based Access Only</strong></span></h3>



<p>Unlike their competitors, this particular test management tool runs only on the cloud, and there are quite a few challenges in <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/cloud-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cloud testing</a>. Also, some of the modules in this software do not contain some particular features, such as reporting.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 id="h-performance-and-missing-features"><span id="Performance_and_Missing_Features"><strong>Performance and Missing Features</strong></span></h3>



<p>Although easy to use, the user interface often lags as the front-end is somewhat old-fashioned compared to several other test management tools.</p>



<p>In addition, people have faced several other problems with this tool and their test data. Although development teams have claimed to fix the bugs at the earliest, such reasons have caused customers to look for a better alternative to PractiTest.</p>



<h2 id="why-to-consider-practitest-alternatives"><span id="Why_to_consider_PractiTest_Alternatives"><strong><strong>Why to consider </strong>PractiTest Alternatives</strong>?</span></h2>



<p>Though PractiTest is user-friendly and intuitive, it may require some time for users to familiarize themselves with its numerous features. Teams with limited resources and budget constraints may find it difficult to train and onboard new users to become proficient with the tool.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It supports integration with other testing tools, but having an internal engine for test automation would be a great advantage. Also, the user interface of PractiTest, particularly with filters and tags, can make test management tasks tedious rather than streamlining.</p>



<h2 id="h-practitest-alternatives-and-competitors"><span id="PractiTest_Alternatives_and_Competitors"><strong>PractiTest Alternatives and Competitors</strong></span></h2>



<p>Several websites with similar yet better test management features are available today. We have curated a list of the best PractiTest alternatives below.</p>



<ul><li>Testsigma</li><li>TestRail</li><li>TestLin</li><li>Zephyr</li><li>Postman</li><li>SpiraTest</li><li>UserTesting</li></ul>



<p>These are some of the best<strong> test case management </strong>software that includes primary and secondary features for managing manual and automated testing, as well as traceability and coverage reports.</p>



<p></p>



<h2 id="h-best-practitest-alternatives-free-and-paid-for-2024"><span id="Best_PractiTest_Alternatives_Free_and_Paid_for_2024"><strong><strong>Best PractiTest Alternatives (Free and Paid) for 2024</strong></strong></span></h2>



<p>There are numerous alternatives to PractiTest in the market that offer unique features and capabilities for test management. Here, we will discuss in detail the top PractiTest alternatives,</p>



<h3 id="testsigma"><span id="Testsigma"><strong>Testsigma</strong></span></h3>



<p>Testsigma is a low-code, cloud-based, AI-driven test automation tool that allows you to automate web, mobile, desktop app, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/guides/api-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">API testing</a> in a single platform. Using Testsigma, you can easily create, update, and maintain test cases on the cloud without any hassle.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/Ogx3-WfrUoLDJsJ8aFFSXVq62QvtjWQnxPH6cR51Ca4q51egreBmbBkcpM_-h73-an_ry50lBZtOfEyOQK2yTOLVXrH7ShjBdiPlxKR7IsTrx1w2mLxaGCM89-yjgCrYuIfvfKb3KD55dxZ8v0WlvVI" alt="PractiTest Alternative" /></figure>



<p></p>



<p>You can perform different types of functional testing, like regression, integration, API, system, cross-browser testing, and more, in one place. It is the perfect tool for both technical and non-technical users.&nbsp;</p>



<p>That is, you can automate testing using both scriptless and <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/scripted-testing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">script-based testing</a>.</p>



<p>It supports scriptless test automation using NLPs and the Record-and-Playback feature, which you can use to automate even complex workflows easily and efficiently. For code-based testing, it supports Java. That is, you can create custom Java scripts to test specific complex scenarios that might require coding.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/V-FJRNSVtCIRQwKp6HKuwrAu4FY9QxlvDzqCTXLgKzvAcWL_9As4KrYhmSiQ9Q2w82Meia5BNAPu_YE5XcuchCcFgIGci7FHxB5XTIAtZOWX6D6izOzWzLu-yKu2vQBkUymxHszruyLBXEKVt-Ruc80" alt="Testsigma" /></figure>



<p></p>



<p>Testsigma makes your test automation 10x faster and accelerates the time-to-market by 8x faster. It supports built-in <a href="https://testsigma.com/blog/test-case-review/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test case review</a> management. That is, you can create test cases and assign them to your QA manager or test lead for peer review.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It easily integrates with product management, bug-tracking, collaboration, and CI/CD tools like Jira, Bamboo, CircleCI, Jenkins, etc, in just a click. You can integrate <a href="https://testsigma.com/automated-testing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">automated testing</a> in the CI/CD and DevOps pipeline for continuous testing.</p>



<p>Testsigma supports 3000+ real devices/tablets and 1000+OS/browser combos, so you can easily test your applications on the cloud without having to do it manually. It makes your cross-browser testing, portability, and compatibility testing so efficient with the use of a real device cloud.</p>



<h3 id="h-testrail"><span id="TestRail"><strong>TestRail</strong></span></h3>



<p>TestRail is a web-based test case management tool that provides a trial duration of one month. This test management software can be used for any website and desktop-based applications.</p>



<p>This test management software has one of the most easy-to-use and manageable test suite features. TestRail also helps keep track of testing history, making it easy to monitor the number of failed and successful tests. </p>



<p>Numerous helpful features such as these are why many QA engineers favor TestRail.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1897" height="922" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2022-07-08-112709.png" alt="TestRail - Practitest alternatives" class="wp-image-19764" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h3 id="h-testlink"><span id="TestLink"><strong>TestLink</strong></span></h3>



<p>TestLink provides you with test management facilities in the form of a website with simple test steps. This Practitest alternative is effortless to set up and is often used to review test cases and generate reports.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/1-1.jpg" alt="testlink dashboard" class="wp-image-19762" width="-115" height="-69" /></figure></div>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>It also has several features such as the ability to cover multiple test runs for numerous projects simultaneously. The best thing about TestLink is that it is free and can be integrated with many tools, including JIRA, Bugzilla, etc.</p>



<p></p>



<h3 id="h-zephyr"><span id="Zephyr"><strong>Zephyr</strong></span></h3>



<p></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="1896" height="930" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/zwp.png" alt="Zephyr - Practitest alternatives" class="wp-image-19759" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>It allows you to access its features and fields easily. This test-management tool can easily trace any particular story mapped to other tests.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The progress of any ongoing testing can be seen by using Zephyr. This feature provides scope for a team to keep track of all aspects of testing. For such reasons, Zephyr has received much positive feedback from users.</p>



<p></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="2646" height="1374" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/image-4.png" alt="Testsigma - Zephyr" class="wp-image-19772" /></figure>



<div style="height:19px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>Zephyr is a cloud-based test creation and management system. It is a plug-in for JIRA. Like PractiTest, this alternative also has a 14-day trial duration; but costs <strong>$10</strong>/month, which makes it a more cost-effective solution than Practitest.&nbsp;They also have 3 different hosting options to pick what&#8217;s best for you.</p>



<p></p>



<h3 id="h-spiratest"><span id="SpiraTest"><strong>SpiraTest</strong></span></h3>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" width="2640" height="1422" src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/image-2.png" alt="Bug management in spiratest" class="wp-image-19749" /></figure>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>SpiraTest is a test case management tool with a trial duration of 21 days. This alternative to PractiTest is better in several aspects, such as its management interface, data, and many other features like Test Management, Bug Tracking, and Requirements Management. Many recommend using SpiraTest to avoid failures in managing the priorities for your team&#8217;s testing, traceability, etc.</p>



<p>Depending on the number of users the price can be changed. Here is a quick overview of SpiraTest pricing.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img src="https://testsigma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/image-3.png" alt="pricing of SpiraTest" /></figure>



<h2 id="which-is-the-best-practitest-alternative"><span id="Which_is_the_Best_PractiTest_Alternative"><strong>Which is the Best PractiTest Alternative?</strong></span></h2>



<p>The best alternative to PractiTest is the one that suits your testing needs, budget, business requirements, and such. There are several <a href="https://testsigma.com/test-management-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test management tools</a> in the market that provide excellent test case management solutions and support test automation as well. Below, we will list the top PractiTest alternatives so you can easily find the best one that suits your needs.</p>



<h2 id="h-conclusion"><span id="Conclusion"><strong>Conclusion</strong></span></h2>



<p>This article has listed some of the best alternatives to PractiTest. By considering your essential integration, test environments, manual and automated test management requirements, and budget, choose the one best suited to your needs.</p>



<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions"><span id="Frequently_Asked_Questions"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></span></h2>



<h3 id="why-choose-practitest"><span id="Why_Choose_PractiTest"><strong>Why Choose PractiTest?</strong></span></h3>



<p>You can choose PractiTest for the various features it provides its users, including,</p>



<ul><li>Provide end-to-end test management solution</li><li>Supports AI-powered features</li><li>Supports integration with Jira, CI/CD, and <a href="https://testsigma.com/qa-automation-tools" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">test automation tools</a></li><li>Customizable dashboards</li><li>Detailed Reporting</li></ul>
